Did The Polio Vaccine Reduce Polio?

So, let’s take a look at the data. Did the cases of polio decrease after the vaccine? Well, in fact, no. The chart to the left shows 5 states (MA, CT, NH, RI, VT) that were sampled show a whopping increase in polio after the vaccine ranging from 266% – 642%! –Neil Z Miller The Polio Vaccine: A Critical Assessment of its Arcane History, Efficacy, and Long-term Health-related Consequences, 2004 via US Government Statistics

In fact, according to CDC figures, every case of polio in U.S. since 1979 was caused by the polio vaccine or from foreigners bringing wild polio into the U.S. – CDC – Morbidity and Mortality Report, 1999

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N5ePF6XPR5LmLGTjiBMpD5JfFJAm6JYJ68OyV5GJySw/mobilebasic

Australian Data: Cancer Epidemic in Gardasil Girls

Australian Data: Cancer Epidemic in Gardasil Girls

The Australian government’s cancer data show the dramatic rise in cervical cancer in young girls vaccinated with Gardasil.

Government numbers show a 16% cancer increase in 25-year-olds, a 28% increase in 30-year-olds, several years post vaccination.

Merck markets Gardasil as a prophylactic against cervical cancers despite the company’s own pre-licensing studies that showed a 44.6% INCREASE in cervical cancers among girls exposed to HPV virus prior to vaccination (up to 30% may be exposed in the birth canal).

Coronavirus: Why everyone was wrong

Beda M Stadler

This is not an accusation, but a ruthless taking stock [of the current situation]. I could slap myself, because I looked at Sars-CoV2- way too long with panic. I am also somewhat annoyed with many of my immunology colleagues who so far have left the discussion about Covid-19 to virologist and epidemiologist. I feel it is time to criticise some of the main and completely wrong public statements about this virus.

https://medium.com/@vernunftundrichtigkeit/coronavirus-why-everyone-was-wrong-fce6db5ba809

Ebola and Colloidal Silver Coverup

During the Ebola crisis, it was claimed that certain organizations in the United States had rushed emergency supplies of colloidal silver to Ebola-stricken countries, only to have those supplies stopped at the border and turned back by international authorities acting at the behest of the World Health Organization (WHO), the CDC and the FDA.

This claim turned out to be true. And a public uproar ensued over the audacity of western medical bureaucrats stopping foreign countries suffering under a dire infectious disease crisis from trying a safe, natural remedy against the Ebola virus – especially since conventional western medicine was failing spectacularly against the virus.

As a result of the public uproar, almost overnight, a major news media campaign was launched labeling colloidal silver a “quack remedy with no proven efficacy.”

Immediately, newspapers from Britain to America picked up and spread the story that people were trying to “take advantage of poor Ebola victims” by selling them a “snake oil cure.” Over a period of several weeks an unprecedented scorched earth campaign was conducted by the world news media, vilifying and ridiculing anyone who advocated the use of colloidal silver for Ebola in West Africa, labeling them “unscrupulous profiteers.”

But the reality was that no one was trying to sell colloidal silver to Ebola victims. No one at all. In fact, the massive supply of colloidal silver that was sent to Ebola-stricken countries was donated at no cost by several charitable groups whose proprietors were knowledgeable in colloidal silver usage, and who were acting out of the goodness of their own hearts to help save people who were clearly dying in droves in spite of being treated by some of western medicine’s best infectious disease specialists.

The colloidal silver was sent free to doctors from Ebola-stricken countries who had specifically requested it for themselves and for their Ebola-stricken patients. But U.S. and global medical authorities did their best to block the delivery of the donated colloidal silver, and then use the corporate news media to ridicule the idea of even thinking about using colloidal silver against Ebola.

Fortunately, however, some of the colloidal silver actually made it through the blockade. And while western news sources continued to report on the supposed futility of trying to use colloidal silver to heal Ebola patients, newspapers from the Ebola-stricken countries were telling a completely different story – indeed, a quite amazing story. They claimed the colloidal silver was actually working against Ebola.

In fact, according to preliminary reports from the region, not only did the silver treatment work — with as many as 500 Ebola patients getting better after using the small amount of donated colloidal silver that made it through the blockade — but the government of Sierra Leone was so impressed with the results they actually approved the colloidal silver as an official Ebola treatment!

Texas Coronavirus Numbers Show COVID-19 Less Lethal than Last Two Flu Seasons

This is really STUNNING information!
The Texas Department of Health released numbers recently comparing the coronavirus to the last two seasonal flu viruses.

The coronavirus was actually less lethal than the flu!
The flu had a mortality rate of 0.03% and 0.04%.
The coronavirus has a mortality rate of 0.01% in Texas.

(Tom: Proof that when you don’t deliberately put COVID infected people in nursing homes and deliberately use non-working treatments (ventilators) from which you get more money from Medicare and Mdicaid and apply treatments that work, you don’t have a problem!)

BOMBSHELL: Covid-19 infection rate may be 440% higher among children who received FLU SHOT while health “authorities” madly push more shots for the coming flu season.

A new study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases finds that children who received inactivated influenza vaccines were 440% more likely (relative risk: 4.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.31-14.8) to acquire infections of respiratory viral pathogens which are not influenza. With the aggressive push for influenza immunizations now under way, the medical establishment may be setting up children to be extremely vulnerable to coronavirus infections.

Titled, “Increased Risk of Noninfluenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated With Receipt of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine,” the study is found at this link at the National Library of Medicine:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404712/

The study finds that flu shots quite literally inactivate parts of the human immune system, rendering the child more vulnerable to coronavirus infections. “Being protected against influenza, trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine recipients may lack temporary non-specific immunity that protected against other respiratory viruses,” the study authors write.

The study authors explain that the influenza vaccine works to prevent influenza virus infections, but at the same time it makes children more susceptible to other respiratory infections. Since the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) for seasonal influenza is so low (around 0.024%, which is not a typo), and the Infection Fatality Rate of covid-19 infections is at least one order of magnitude higher, it raises the obvious question:

Would it save more lives of children to avoid administering flu shots this year and therefore reduce their vulnerability to covid-19, which has a far higher fatality rate?

The study, which was conducted in 2009, observed the outcomes of 115 children aged 6 – 16 years. The study also used a placebo group and found that placebo made “no statistically significant difference” in the risk of acute respiratory infection risk.

But children who received influenza vaccines had a much higher risk of respiratory infections.
Even more shockingly, the study also found no difference in the risk of seasonal influenza infections between those children who were vaccinated vs. those who weren’t. In other words, the influenza vaccine offered no protection against the flu, but it created increased vulnerability to other respiratory infections. (No benefits, just increased risks.) “There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of confirmed seasonal influenza infection between recipients of TIV or placebo,” the study explains.

You can see the increased number of respiratory infections in this chart. Note the “TIV” column means those children who were vaccinated with an influenza vaccine:

The conclusion is that influenza vaccines make children more susceptible to other respiratory viral infections. From the study, which took place more than a decade before the arrival of the covid-19 pandemic:

We identified a statistically significant increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infection among TIV recipients (Table 3), including significant increases in the risk of rhinovirus and coxsackie/echovirus infection, which were most frequently detected in March 2009, immediately after the peak in seasonal influenza activity in February 2009.

The study authors point out that the influenza vaccine, “could increase influenza immunity at the expense of reduced immunity to noninfluenza respiratory viruses, by some unknown biological mechanism,” although they also state more research is needed because some of the self-reporting of symptoms may have introduced “artifacts” which could sway the numbers. Nevertheless, the study authors also state that this phenomenon of “viral interference” is well known:

Participants who received TIV would have been protected against influenza in February 2009 but then would not have had heightened nonspecific immunity in the following weeks… The phenomenon of virus interference has been well known in virology for >60 years [24–27]. Ecological studies have reported phenomena potentially explained by viral interference [3–11]… Interference in respiratory and gastrointestinal infections has been reported after receipt of live oral poliovirus vaccine [29–32].

Those who push flu shots may be worsening the coronavirus pandemic

The upshot of this research is that those who are pushing flu shots for children may in fact be worsening the coronavirus pandemic, creating “perfect storm” conditions for children to become carriers of the Wuhan coronavirus that causes covid-19.

This is consistent with the fact that we now know the medical establishment has acted to deliberately worsen covid-19 fatalities by, for example, conspiring the destroy the credibility of hydroxychloroquine, working to maximize fatalities in order to reap a windfall of profits from the coronavirus vaccine.

Yes, the medical and science establishment quite literally arranges for more people to die in order to keep the coronavirus fear alive, resulting in more demand for high-profit vaccines.

As always, it’s all about the money. As Gary Heavin recently wrote in a warning to America, Big Pharma operatives are “accessories to murder.”

The Great COVID-19 Deception … and What You Need to Know to SURVIVE

Today we feature a contributed article by Gary Heavin, who has been intimately involved in working with doctors …

How does Big Pharma have so much control over the dissemination of this information or should I say propaganda? Well, the same answer pops up again, money. Big Pharma gave $2 billion dollars during the last election cycle to US politicians. Big AG, the military/security complex and big oil each gave only a paltry $1.0 billion dollars to buy the votes of our political leadership.

The MSM counts Big Pharma’s advertising revenue at up to 80% of their income. The internet’s “masters of the universe” also kowtow to Big Pharma’s influence and advertising dollars by censoring anyone who tries to tell the American people the truth about Covid 19.

It certainly appears that anyone who is complicit in this Great Deception, a deception that is designed to kill and terrify enough people to ultimately beg for an experimental vaccine, well, these people would be accessories to murder.

Flu shots are being hyped to suppress immune systems and create an explosion in coronavirus infections
Flu shots, it seems, are one more way the medical establishment can literally murder children and adults, creating widespread vulnerability to the coronavirus pandemic which will no doubt surge back this Fall as flu shots work to suppress the immune systems of millions.

Recognize that the people pushing flu shots are medical murderers, and many are deliberately trying to kill as many people as possible to create demand for the high-profit coronavirus vaccines that are about to be unleashed on America, probably before the end of this year.

It’s the perfect crime: Manufacture vaccines that suppress the immune system right in the middle of a pandemic, causing more infections and deaths, leading to more calls for mandatory vaccines. The drug companies will cash in to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars while innocent children and adults all across America needlessly suffer and die.

As usual, it’s all about the money, and the vaccine / drug cartels are murderous, criminal regimes that twisted science (Dr. Fauci?) to maximize profits at any cost.

Studies Report Rapid Loss of COVID-19 Antibodies

The results, while preliminary, suggest that survivors of SARS-CoV-2 infection may be susceptible to reinfection within weeks or months.

(Tom: Now this is really interesting. It makes it a tough sell for the vaccine makers because the basic premise of a vaccine is that it stimulates the immune system to create antibodies that are supposed to prevent you from becoming ill or infected by the pathogen. [According to some researchers that theory has limited to no validity as they have found people who do not get sick but do not have the antibodies. How does that work?] So if the vaccine precipitated anitbodies wear out in mere months, what to do? Get a shot every three months? Or preserve and protect your health and build your immune system so it can defend against all pathogens? Me, I’m for option two thanks!)

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/studies-report-rapid-loss-of-covid-19-antibodies-67650