In Vaccines We Trust:

In Vaccines We Trust:

There is an old propaganda line, Repeat a lie often enough and it will be believed.

Well, they are ramping up the lie factory to warp speed as more people are becoming more aware on the subject!

Let’s talk about trust for a moment. Trust requires honesty, transparency and integrity. Three ingredients sorely missing from Pfizer’s character and deeds.

How can you possibly trust a vaccine maker who is a convicted felon that has paid over $3 BILLION in fines in the last 20 years for illegal activities, lying about the efficacy of their products, off-label marketing and bribing doctors? You can’t!

How can you trust a vaccine maker who won’t tell you what is in their vaccine? You can’t!

How can you trust a vaccine that has been rushed to market and skipped animal trials? You can’t!

How can you trust a safety study where they only take really healthy people into the study, do not test the effect of the vaccine on sick or immunocompromised people? You can’t!

How can you trust a vaccine safety study where only the results from a selected 8,000 of the 40,000 participants were taken into account? You can’t!

How can you trust a vaccine safety study where any adverse reaction in less than 2% (800 people) of the 40,000 participants went unreported? You can’t!

How can you trust a vaccine maker that says they are studying the results of the safety study now and will release the results in TWO YEARS TIME? You can’t!

DO NOT BUY THEIR PROPAGANDA! THEY ARE BANKING (LITERALLY) ON YOU BEING UNINFORMED AND COMPLIANT.

If… …Works…

If__Works

A friend asked: “Can anyone answer this intelligently because I’m all ears.”

I replied…

Some people hold the view Craig that there is no actual pandemic, only a false one because the remedies (like HCQ and Ivermectin) that would prevent COVID deaths have been suppressed and the COVID deaths have been falsified and inflated and the media fear porn have blinded those who feel rather than look and think so do not observe the statistics that the total deaths in the US and OZ are actually down on last year. Influenza and pneumonia deaths are down, replaced with COVID deaths.

So why the lockdowns and other “pandemic” response measures that the statistics reveal are at best useless and more likely completely counter-productive and harmful?

The old adage, follow the money.

Who loses from the lockdowns?
Small businesses and the people they employ.

Who wins?
Big businesses.

Owners of Amazon and the other mega giants have seen their net worth grow by billions over the last 8 months whereas a great many small business will never reopen. This reduces mum and pop competition to the giants and we have seen and enormous transfer of wealth from the middle class to the wealthy elite due to this manipulation.

For the last ten+ years Bill Gates (through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) have contributed tens and hundreds of millions of dollars to the WHO and many other health institutions. Do these organisation bite the hand that feeds them? 10 points if you thought, “No.”

Bill Gates and others sponsored a Pandemic 201 conference late 2019 to get everyone (the WHO, governments and health departments) on the same page with regards to societal response to a pandemic.
Since then, the IMF have funded those governments that toed the line and imposed the restrictions on their people. (The president of a former Soviet republic exposed this.)

Hope this explanation of the sting helps make sense of what would otherwise look pretty insane.

CDC Quietly Updated COVID-19 Numbers – Only 9,210 Americans Died From COVID-19 Alone – Rest Had Different Other Serious Illnesses

CDC Sign

The CDC silently updated their numbers late August to show that only 6% of all coronavirus deaths were completely due to the coronavirus alone. The rest of the deaths pinned to the China coronavirus are attributed to individuals who had other serious issues going on.

The data from Europe shows that the number of cases has little correlation to the number of deaths. This is why the narrative is reporting cases and ignoring deaths.

Let’s face it – at this moment in time anyone who is pushing for more lockdowns and other abuses on our personal rights is either evil or terribly misinformed.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm

Blueberry Icecream Recipe

Blueberry Icecream

This delicious blueberry ice-cream recipe comes just in time for the Australian summer! Thanks for the recipe Panaceas pantry.

INGREDIENTS:
2 cups fresh Australian blueberries
1/2 cup pure maple syrup
2 tsp fresh lemon juice
1 cup raw cashews, soaked for 3 hours
2 x 400mL cans full-fat coconut cream
1 tbsp (15mL) Master blend Pure vanilla extract
1 tbsp vodka (optional)
1/4 tsp salt

METHOD:
1. The night before, prepare your ice-cream maker by placing in the freezer, and add the canned coconut cream to the fridge. Soak cashews in water, and put these into the fridge too.
2. The next day, drain cashews, and rinse well. Add cashews to a blender along with all the remaining ingredients, and blend until smooth and uniform. Transfer the mixture to a large bowl, and set in the freezer for 30 minutes.
3. Pour chilled ice-cream mixture into your ice-cream maker, and churn for 45 minutes (or follow the manufacturer instructions). At this stage, you will have what looks like soft serve ice-cream (and you can definitely serve it at this point).
4. Add unicorn confetti, and allow to churn for a further few minutes, until incorporated, then transfer the ice-cream to a 2L capacity metal ice-cream tin (or loaf tin). Cover the top of the ice cream firmly with baking paper or a repurposed, food-safe plastic bag, taking care to seal the ice-cream well to avoid ice crystals from forming. Freeze for 3 hours, then serve up in waffle cones or a bowl.

Panaceas pantry blog. Whole food recipes.

Safety Concern With COVID-19 Vaccine – No Possibility of Rollback

One of my Healthelicious clients sent me this regarding the new COVID vaccines that alter our DNA. I thought it well worth sharing with you…

Hi Tom, thanks for forwarding your newsletters, I hope you take a break from it every now and then.

We’ve met a couple of times at your market stall during various expos over the years and talked about issues relating to general practice of medical procedures on healthy people.

Here we are, 2020, with a little more transparency than usual but still along way from where we need to be for safety of said medical procedures on healthy people.

I have a background in design engineering of systems for a large financial institution. Over a 20 year period I gained a substantial understanding of IT systems and management of risk implementing those systems with Change Management infrastructure.

A Change as it is labelled usually has several departments to approve before implementation. If it does not have a roll back procedure (used if something breaks to restore back to original state) it is considered high risk and in practice is avoided if possible due to potential high impact.

In other words, if going forward with a Change that does not have a roll back procedure, be 100% sure as far as is practible by testing on a replica system. Testing is to establish that a Change does what is intended and will not break anything in the process.

The latest medical procedures still in experimental phase involve a Change to the human cell system that operate much like a factory with DNA the programming language.

I consider these latest medical procedures to be high risk and potentially high impact as I have yet to see to see any equivalent roll back procedure.

I suppose we could imagine a DNA software simulation run for each individual that might solve the problem of testing prior to administering one of these procedures. This doesn’t exist to my knowledge and I suppose there would need to be robust checking mechanisms to be able to trust such an AI system.

So without an individual testing regime, we’re back to engineering basics, consent provided only with a safe roll back procedure.

Best regards,
David

Frank Shallenberger, MD, HMD regarding the upcoming COVID vaccines:

Last week I must have been asked 20 times about the new COVID vaccines. Here are my thoughts. Please pass this informatiion onto many as you can. People need to have fully informed consent when it comes to injecting foreign genetic material into their bodies.

1. The COVID vaccines are mRNA vaccines. mRNA vaccines are a completely new type of vaccine. No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed for human use before. In essence, we have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine. We have no idea if it will be effective or safe.

2. Traditional vaccine simply introduce pieces of a virus to stimulate an immune reaction. The new mRNA vaccine is completely different. It actually injects (transfects) molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-humans sources into our cells. Once in the cells, the genetic material interacts with our transfer RNA (tRNA) to make a foreign protein that supposedly teaches the body to destroy the virus being coded for. Note that these newly created proteins are not regulated by our own DNA, and are thus completely foreign to our cells. What they are fully capable of doing is unknown.

3. The mRNA molecule is vulnerable to destruction. So, in order to protect the fragile mRNA strands while they are being inserted into our DNA they are coated with PEGylated lipid nanoparticles. This coating hides the mRNA from our immune system which ordinarily would kill any foreign material injected into the body. PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been used in several different drugs for years. Because of their effect on immune system balance, several studies have shown them to induce allergies and autoimmune diseases. Additionally, PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been shown to trigger their own immune reactions, and to cause damage to the liver.

4. These new vaccines are additionally contaminated with aluminum, mercury, and possibly formaldehyde. The manufacturers have not yet disclosed what other toxins they contain.

5. Since viruses mutate frequently, the chance of any vaccine working for more than a year is unlikely. That is why the flu vaccine changes every year. Last year’s vaccine is no more valuable than last year’s newspaper.

6. Absolutely no long term safety studies will have been done to ensure that any of these vaccines don’t cause the cancer, seizures, heart disease, allergies, and autoimmune diseases seen with other vaccines. If you ever wanted to be guinea pig for Big Pharma, now is your golden opportunity.

7. Many experts question whether the mRNA technology is ready for prime time. In November 2020, Dr. Peter Jay Hotez said of the new mRNA vaccines, “I worry about innovation at the expense of practicality because they [the mRNA vaccines] are weighted toward technology platforms that have never made it to licensure before.” Dr. Hotez is Professor of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology & Microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he is also Director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development.

8. Michal Linial, PhD is a Professor of Biochemistry. Because of her research and forecasts on COVID-19, Dr. Linial has been widely quoted in the media. She recently stated, “I won’t be taking it [the mRNA vaccine] immediately – probably not for at least the coming year. We have to wait and see whether it really works. We will have a safety profile for only a certain number of months, so if there is a long-term effect after two years, we cannot know.”

9. In November 2020, The Washington Post reported on hesitancy among healthcare professionals in the United States to the mRNA vaccines, citing surveys which reported that: “some did not want to be in the first round, so they could wait and see if there are potential side effects”, and that “doctors and nurses want more data before championing vaccines to end the pandemic”.

10. Since the death rate from COVID resumed to the normal flu death rate way back in early September, the pandemic has been over since then. Therefore, at this point in time no vaccine is needed. The current scare tactics regarding “escalating cases” is based on a PCR test that because it exceeds 34 amplifications has a 100% false positive rate unless it is performed between the 3rd and 5th day after the first day of symptoms. It is therefor 100% inaccurate in people with no symptoms. This is well established in the scientific literature. See the attachment (False Positive PCR testing is up to 100%!) for more information on this. If you go to the CDC site (file:///C:/Users/docto/AppData/Local/Temp/cdc_97230_DS1.pdf ), you can see that the weekly death rates in the US are now lower than they normally are during an average flu season.

11. The other reason you don’t need a vaccine for COVID-19 is that substantial herd immunity has already taken place in the United States. This is the primary reason for the end of the pandemic.

12. Unfortunately, you cannot completely trust what you hear from the media. They have consistently got it wrong for the past year. Since they are all supported by Big Pharma and the other entities selling the COVID vaccines, they are not going to be fully forthcoming when it comes to mRNA vaccines. Every statement I have made here is fully backed by published scientific references.

13. I would be very interested to see verification that Bill and Melinda Gates with their entire family including grandchildren, Joe Biden and President Trump and their entire families, and Anthony Fauci and his entire family all get the vaccine.

14. Anyone who after reading all this still wants to get injected with the mRNA vaccine, should at the very least have their blood checked for COVID-19 antibodies. There is no need for a vaccine in persons already naturally immunized.

Here’s my bottom line: I would much rather get a COVID infection than get a COVID vaccine. That would be safer and more effective. I have had a number of COVID positive flu cases this year. Some were old and had health concerns. Every single one has done really well with natural therapies including ozone therapy and IV vitamin C. Just because modern medicine has no effective treatment for viral infections, doesn’t mean that there isn’t one.

Yours Always,

Frank Shallenberger, MD, HMD