Category: Health Tips

Why in the world would anyone want to ban a medicine that is listed as a WHO essential safe medicine, won the Nobel prize, and has turned around millions of people with COVID from death’s doorstep? The Australians have now let the cat out of the bag. The reason is because it works, and it will eradicate COVID, along with the agenda — from control to vaccination — that they have built upon its existence.

Last Friday, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) of Australia officially banned the prescribing of ivermectin for COVID-19 or any other use besides parasitic infections. One would think that a country that forged a policy of “zero COVID” would want to aggressively treat this virus with everything that has proven to work and actually achieve literal zero COVID, as the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh did with the use of ivermectin. But indeed, this is not about getting rid of COVID, but about perpetuating the control and cronyism harnessed through COVID.

The three reasons given for the TGA’s decision were as shocking as they were revealing. “Firstly, there are a number of significant public health risks associated with taking ivermectin,” begins the statement. If you stop reading at that point mid-sentence, you are likely wondering how a drug that was praised more than any other drug in recent decades and was used safely billions of times could suddenly cause such terrible problems. However, when you complete the sentence, you will understand what sort of “risk” they are referring to. Here is the full explanation:

“Firstly, there are a number of significant public health risks associated with taking ivermectin in an attempt to prevent COVID-19 infection rather than getting vaccinated. Individuals who believe that they are protected from infection by taking ivermectin may choose not to get tested or to seek medical care if they experience symptoms. Doing so has the potential to spread the risk of COVID-19 infection throughout the community.”

That’s it! That is the reason they not only oppose ivermectin here and in Australia, but oppose hydroxychloroquine, budesonide, fenofibrate, and any and all forms of preventive and outpatient treatment. Doctors have even told me they have had prescriptions blocked by pharmacists for antibiotics or prednisone, if they think they are being used for COVID. This is the most evident admission yet from the Australian government that it can’t afford to get rid of the virus with something so cheap because it will obviate the need for the vaccine … and the totalitarian agenda accompanying it.

The irony is supremely rich, given that they are falsely projecting on ivermectin a weakness that is doubly true of the vaccine. Unlike ivermectin, the vaccine absolutely does not work to stop community spread and its protection against critical illness even wears off after about five to six months, according to Israeli studies, which is why they are pushing third and even fourth shots. These people have been silently spreading the virus for months thinking they are enjoying the protection traditional vaccines have afforded.

http://www.yourdestinationnow.com/2021/09/horowitz-australia-admits-it-is-banning.html

Unsubstantiated but synchronous with other reports I have seen. And if you feel like dismissing it because it is anonymous, remember doctors are being disbarred for telling the truth!

http://key=ZWJ4TXN2RFpMUXpnTWV4bVVaWGhlclNZRjZsaDVB

BOMBSHELL REVELATION: From the court filings in the NSW Supreme Court case on mandatory vaccination.

The lead vaccine researchers driving all government policy in Australia received $65,330,038 in government grants covering 2020-2023. Grants of this size are unprecedented.

Remember when Clive Palmer said in a press conference two weeks ago that Gladys Berejiklian was being paid tens of millions of dollars by a lobbyist in Sydney?

Notice that the name “K Macartney” appears next to every single one of the grants. This is referring to Professor Kristine Macartney who is a paediatrician specialising in infectious diseases and vaccinology. She is also a director of the National Centre for Immunisation Research & Surveillance (NCIRS). Most revealingly, she is also a member of the Advisory Committee on Vaccines (ACV) of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). Yep, the same TGA that BANNED Ivermectin as an early treatment option for treating COVID despite its high efficacy in treating COVID in other countries. Prof Kristine Macartney has also acted as an expert consultant to the World Health Organisation (WHO).

She was also one of the contributing authors of a peer-reviewed paper entitled “Constructing an ethical framework for priority allocation of pandemic vaccines.” Read paper here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X20316339?via%3Dihub

Now you know why Ivermectin was banned.

All this is probably an indicator why Prof Kristine Macartney seemed very uncomfortable when she was questioned during yesterdays NSW Supreme Court hearings.

Another point of interest is that many of the grants were applied for and awarded before 2020. Draw your own conclusions from that. And I should add, a lot of the grants are covered until well into 2023. No wonder whenever a state gets near to zero and the end of the state of emergency is in sight, a mystery case pops up and an outbreak occurs.

Now you understand what’s driving lockdown policy and vaccine mandates in Australia. The love of money is the root of all evil.