Leading expert explain how aluminum in vaccines can cause brain damage.
Press Conference Alert: Eminent German Doctors, Professors, and 200+ Signatories Demand Immediate Ban on mRNA COVID Vaccines Amid Soaring Health Crisis and Plummeting Birth Rates
(Tom: From a newsletter I received from someone called Aussie17.)
“Today, we are issuing an urgent risk warning and calling for a moratorium on mRNA vaccines, an immediate halt, and an evidence-based reassessment.”
(Full Subtitled 2 hour Press Conference at the end of article)
In the same week that Japan held a press conference calling for a moratorium on mRNA vaccines, a group of nine eminent German health experts—including professors, doctors, and a pharmacist—held a press conference to warn about the risks of mRNA vaccines and demand their immediate suspension. Organized by the MWM-Proof Initiative and supported by over 200 signatories, including doctors, lawyers, and health professionals, they called for open discussions with policymakers. Their goal is to halt mRNA vaccines until their safety is thoroughly studied, citing associations with increased mortality, chronic illnesses, and declining birth rates. They urged the public to visit mwm-proof.com to sign the petition.
The two-hour press conference, available to watch in German here, features several presenters. Let me summarize what each of them said.
Dr. Dirk Volker Seeling, a psychologist and publisher, hosted the event. He focuses on health and societal issues, organizing expert discussions. Dr Seeling introduced the call for a moratorium on mRNA vaccines, pointing to data linking them to more deaths, diseases, and lower birth rates. He noted immune system issues like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, heart inflammation, and cancer risks from spike proteins, lipid nanoparticles, and DNA contaminants. The FDA calls mRNA vaccines gene therapy, which he says fits their genetic impacts.
Prof. Dr. Gerald Dyker, an organic chemistry professor at Ruhr University Bochum with over 160 papers, studies chemical safety and nanomaterials. Dr. Dyker questioned if mRNA vaccines are safely tested. He criticized the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut for political influence and weak checks, like only requiring 50% intact mRNA and doing visual inspections. Batches vary widely, with extra lipids or DNA impurities. A recent study found 75% of a key lipid (ALC-0315) is toxic due to ignored chemistry rules. With mRNA pushed for kids and animals, Dyker says approvals skip steps, risking health. The side effect list is massive compared to flu shots, demanding a rethink.
Dr. Andreas Sönnichsen, a professor of internal medicine and evidence-based medicine from the Medical University of Vienna, has training from Munich and leads rigorous health research. Dr Sönnichsen said vaccines for healthy people need strong proof. Approval studies focused on minor infections, not serious outcomes, showing just 0.7% effectiveness. They ignored early illnesses, and later data was flawed, hiding harms. Boosters? A study showed more shots meant more COVID cases. For kids, disease risk is near-zero, but side effects are 60x higher and deaths 20-25x worse than other vaccines. He called it a scandal, urging a stop and suggesting safer options for the elderly.
Dr. Kurt E. Müller, a dermatologist and environmental medicine expert, teaches at Dresden International University and has 28+ papers on immune health. Dr Müller linked mRNA vaccines to immune issues, based on 20 years of research. In 61 sick patients, high IL-10 and IL-4 levels showed weak defenses, causing autoimmune issues, allergies, and Mast Cell Activation Syndrome spikes. Low Interferon-Gamma and IL-2 raised tumor risks, worsened by SV40 in vaccines, a cancer-linked contaminant. Sudden deaths jumped 4x, nursing cases 7x. Spike proteins linger, causing harm. Müller, who warned against ventilators in 2020, demanded an immediate stop to this risky “gene therapy.”
Prof. Dr. Konstantin Beck, a Swiss economist and statistician at the University of Lucerne, has 80+ papers on health economics and insurance. Prof Dr. Beck asked if mRNA vaccines harm fertility. He showed Swiss and Czech birth rates rose until 2021, then dropped sharply in 2022—68% of 38 European countries followed. High-vax areas had bigger declines (96% link). Pro-vaccine studies used tiny samples or tricks, like counting early miscarriages as unvaccinated. Critical studies (e.g., Israeli data) showed 42-142% higher fetal deaths. Beck said it’s unlikely women worldwide suddenly chose fewer kids. No safe pregnancy data exists, so he called for a moratorium.
Dr. Michael Nehls, a molecular geneticist and MD with 50+ papers, advised Germany’s Bundestag on pandemics. Dr. Nehls said severe illness comes from cytokine storms, not viruses, and can be stopped with lithium (2020/2022 trials: halved hospital stays, no ICU/deaths) or vitamin D (77x winter risk; 100-150 nmol/L nearly eliminates deaths). 2020 studies were buried, and EU caps blocked vitamin D use. Calcifediol cut ICU visits 25x. At 6€/year, it’s cheaper than masks. Dr. Nehls accused leaders of pushing mRNA by hiding cheap, safe options like diet and sleep, calling it criminal neglect.
Dr. Erich Freisleben, an internal medicine doctor with 37 years in Berlin, founded a holistic medicine network. Freisleben treated 250+ vaccine-injured patients; 55% had post-COVID-like symptoms (vs. 5% true long COVID). Only 3.4% had prior infections; 79% got sick within 14 days. Tests showed low T-cells and lingering spike proteins (even in blood, placentas, brains). His early warnings were ignored; 2023 guidelines later confirmed his findings. Only 6-8% of cases are recognized—a scandal. He urged a moratorium and more research to stop this “catastrophe.”
Christina Delprete, a pharmacist from Switzerland, knows medicine production rules. Delprete criticized mRNA vaccine production for breaking quality rules. Batches had low intact mRNA, DNA contaminants, and SV40 (cancer-linked, per FDA limits). The EMA admitted issues. Tests skipped cancer risks and interactions, despite use in healthy or pregnant people. Production changes weren’t approved, and self-replicating RNA risks the environment. Delprete said emergencies don’t justify sloppy work—medicines must match labels and be safe. She demanded a full review to restore trust.
Prof. Dr. Dr. Christian Schubert, a medical psychology and psychoneuroimmunology expert at Innsbruck, has 100+ papers on stress and immunity. Dr. Schubert said medicine ignores mental health. Short-term fear helps immunity, but lockdowns and panic weakened key immune cells (NK, T-lymphocytes), per studies. No efforts supported hope, social bonds, or vitamin D—all proven to boost defenses. He called for future pandemics to focus on mental and immune strength, not just drugs. Chronic stress made COVID worse; a human-centered approach could have saved lives.
This week marks a huge turning point in the fight for truth about mRNA vaccines. From Japan’s bold press conference demanding a moratorium, to the ACIP’s explosive meetings finally acknowledging mRNA harms, and now this powerful German call for an immediate halt—backed by 200+ experts and hard data—the “safe and effective” narrative is crumbling. The evidence is undeniable and the truth is emerging like a tide that can no longer be held back.
Signing off for now
A17
Click the Read More button to view the video:
They Told Me I’d Never Have a Career. I Told the Truth Anyway
Standing alone at the University of Michigan to expose the deadly impact of mRNA shots was not easy.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
I sat down with Dr. Philip McMillan on Vejon Health, and our conversation wasn’t just about the latest evidence on vaccine harms—it was about survival in an academic world hostile to truth.
At the University of Michigan’s School of Public Health, I faced walls at every turn. Professors ignored internship requests and warned me that investigating vaccine harms would mean I’d “never have a career.”
When I presented our systematic review of autopsy findings at the school’s epidemiology poster session, some of my own professors walked past without even making eye contact. Those who did stop were shocked — as though serious adverse events after genetic injections simply didn’t exist.
I was an outlier—isolated, ridiculed, and told I was finished in public health if I continued this line of work. They were unequivocally wrong.
Despite immense pressure, I didn’t back down. Partnering with Dr. Peter McCullough, I helped publish the world’s first autopsy study linking COVID-19 mRNA shots to death.
From that moment forward, the attacks only intensified: hate campaigns online, cartel-funded “fact checker” defamation, censorship of preprints, and illegal retractions from the Journal Cartel:
The Fall of the Academic Publishing Cartel
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Most of the major publishers, including Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley, Sage Publications and Taylor & Francis, have formed a cartel under the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers. The Cartel controls two-thirds of global journal publications, enforces unpaid peer reviews, restricts manuscript submissions, and delays scientific progress—all to protect their multi-billion-dollar profits. This resulted in a recent class action lawsuit against the Cartel for “tremendous damage to science and the public interest.”
The Cartel’s corruption extends to censoring critical genetic injection safety data in accordance with the Biopharmaceutical Complex, likely costing lives. A prime example of this is when Cartel member Elsevier violated COPE guidelines and immediately censored the Hulscher et al autopsy study proving a casual link between COVID-19 vaccines and death after it became the #1 trending research paper worldwide across all subject areas:
Dr. McMillan asked whether it was worth it—whether exposing these harms justified the personal and professional cost. My answer was clear: yes. Because what’s at stake isn’t reputations—it’s human lives.
Despite years of hostility, I remain unshaken. Academic bullying forged resilience, and personal attacks now bounce off me like light off a mirror. It’s clear that telling the truth wasn’t just the right choice—it was the only choice.
Click to read the article:
https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/they-told-me-id-never-have-a-career
mRNA Vaccine Study Results
A deeply alarming set of statistics from an mRNA vaccine study in live animals is raising critical questions about food safety and livestock viability.
In a trial involving 525 hogs injected with a live mRNA vaccine, the 21-day outcomes were catastrophic:
• 25 Animals SUCCUMBED TO DEATH.
• 55 Animals became severely ANOREXIC, nearing death.
• 20 Animals suffered from debilitating LAMENESS.
• 12 Animals exhibited severe LOSS OF CONDITION.
• 25 Additional animals presented with NEAR-DEATH symptoms.
This equates to a staggering 30% morbidity and mortality rate.
Only 70% of the herd remained viable to any extent, presenting a dire threat to any farming operation.
Most disturbingly, post-mortem analysis revealed remnants of the live virus vaccine persisted within the tissue of the deceased animals. The implications are twofold and severe:
For the CONSUMER: This raises a monumental food safety question. The potential for a live virus vaccine to be present in the meat supply introduces a unknown variable into the food chain, a concern for every family prioritizing health and transparency.
For the PRODUCER: This is an existential threat. Adopting a pharmaceutical technology that could potentially decimate 30% of a herd is not merely a poor business decision—it is a fast track to financial ruin, destroying livelihoods and generational farms.
This isn’t just a study; it’s a warning. Share this information. Demand accountability and transparency. Support the farmers who prioritize the health of their animals and, by extension, the public.
COVID-19 vaccine recommendations dropped by panel
The new ACIP Committee has been delicately chipping away at the mRNA guidelines with archeological tools. Yesterday, they fired up the jackhammer. The Wall Street Journal ran the story under the intentionally confusing headline, “COVID-19 vaccine recommendations dropped by panel, shots won’t require a prescription.”
The news was that the CDC’s vaccine committee (called ACIP) met again yesterday for its second full day. They ultimately voted to further limit the covid mRNA shots, this time adding a requirement for “shared clinical decision-making” before anyone under 65 or not in a ‘high-risk’ group can get the shots. They nearly voted to require a prescription, it was so close, but that vote failed by a small margin.
Corporate media and its pet experts were alarmed, worried, fretful, and terrified, squawking things like this is the end, nobody’s following the science, and so forth and so on.
But, apart from that, the meeting was a bloodbath for the jabs. In the clip above, Pfizer and Moderna declined to respond to a direct question from a committee member. Even worse, they were forced to sit through a several lengthy presentations by the newly formed “Vaccine Working Group” about all the growing questions and problems over the jabs.
“Beyond antibody changes,” one presenter began, “the vaccinations have also been linked to long-lasting shifts in cytokine profiles, with elevated inflammatory cytokine persistence for months. These immune alterations may contribute to an increased risk of recurrent infection in some individuals.”
That was just the first bullet point.
The Workgroup continued through problem after problem, discussing biodistribution (it spreads all over the body, including into the brain), frameshifting (it creates random ‘nonsense’ proteins), and implausibly high levels of DNA contamination, including parts of a monkey virus (SV40), especially in the Pfizer shot.
💉 Even more astonishing, following the meeting, the CDC itself tweeted a very critical comment from Dr. Malone, questioning how the drugmakers can even tell the shots work.
What Dr. Malone meant is that there is no agreed-upon measurement —like a specific antibody level— that reliably predicts whether a person “is protected” from covid, either in terms of bare infection or severe disease.
Absent “consensus” on even what proves protection exists, how can the drugmakers claim the shots produce protection? Stop saying that.
Malone was pointing out that pharma’s claims of efficacy were only based on large-group statistical conclusions, rather than any hard-science-based —i.e. measurable— biological effect. Whereas, most other vaccines do have established correlates of protection— meaning that there are well-defined, measurable biological markers (often specific antibody levels) that can reliably predict immunity.
Anyway, Malone had a solid point, and he made it well. But the more important development was that his point was then re-published by the official US government Twitter account for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And that wasn’t all. The CDC also published a whole string of clips, the most recent including a clip of Dr. Retsef Levi stating that, “Sub-clinical myocarditis can cause death. It’s proven. It’s not questionable. Nevertheless, we are not talking about this with patients, and we are not stating that risk.”
They are prying the Overton Window open, inch by inch, one post at a time.
You should see the crazed hysteria in the comments by the medical fetishists, who are mad as hornets that their beloved CDC is now being used to push all this anti-vaxx propaganda. Don’t actually read the comments. There’s no logic; the pro-vaxxers never try to rebut the claims on the merits; it’s just name-calling and non-sequiters.
Some may wonder why, with all these evident problems, the Committee didn’t just withdraw authorization from the shots altogether? The short version is, this problem didn’t develop in a day, and it won’t be fixed in a day. The Committee appears to be carefully building an unassailable scientific record before pulling the plug. Still, every time they get a whack at the Pfizer piñata, they hit it a little harder.
The clock is ticking, louder and louder.
https://open.substack.com/pub/coffeeandcovid/p/unprescribed-saturday-september-20
Would Parents Agree?
Gardasil is probably the single worst mass vaccine that we’ve ever seen.
RFK Jr.: “Gardasil is probably the single worst mass vaccine that we’ve ever seen. This vaccine targets millions of preteens and teens for whom the risk of dying from cervical cancer is zero. Nobody in their right mind would ever take this vaccine if they actually read the clinical literature.”
“Death rates in the Gardasil trials were 37 times the death rates for cervical cancer. Children who take that vaccine, the Gardasil vaccine, are 37 times more likely to die from the vaccine than they are to die from cervical cancer. The problem with Gardasil, like most vaccines, is it was never tested against a true placebo, an inert placebo.”
“And the CDC and HHS say, if you don’t test it against a true placebo, it’s not science. You have no way of gauging whether the injuries you’re seeing from the product are being caused by that product, or whether they’re just bad, sad coincidences. The entity that is actually performing the study is, and paying for the study, is Merck.”
“Merck got to decide which injuries were being caused by Gardasil and which were just bad coincidences. And because it had that power, it just wrote them all off as bad coincidences.”
“You can do that when there’s no placebo, because the injuries they were seeing in the control group, where the girls were getting aluminum neurotoxins, were identical to the injuries they were getting in the Gardasil group.”
“So they said, well, we don’t have to report any of these as vaccine injuries. They were able to license something that is insanely dangerous.”
Major Study: Covid ‘Vaccines’ Were ‘Deliberately Engineered’ to Cause ‘Unprecedented Levels’ of Death
A bombshell new peer-reviewed study has dropped a hammer on the official Covid narrative, concluding that both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the mRNA “vaccines” share “deliberately engineered” features consistent with gain-of-function biological weapons research.
The researchers behind the study warn that the mRNA injections have caused “unprecedented levels of morbidity and mortality.”
The study’s paper was authored by 11 scientific and legal experts.
It was published in the prestigious Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.
The paper argues that the genetic signatures of SARS-CoV-2, and the dangerous spike protein it shares with the vaccines, “represent a violation of the Biological Weapons Convention.”
The study lays out what many have long suspected but few dared to say: COVID-19 was not a natural accident, and the vaccine rollout only deepened the harm.
“Far from benign, these vaccines have unleashed profound harm, disrupting nearly every system of the human body and contributing to unprecedented levels of morbidity and mortality,” the paper states.
Lead author Dr. Andrew Zywiec did not mince words:
“The systemic toxicity unleashed by these interventions, manifesting as autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular devastation, aggressive cancers, and catastrophic reproductive harms, represents not merely a public health failure but a profound betrayal of trust.”
The paper details a cascade of harms linked to the vaccines, from “autoimmune diseases and cardiovascular catastrophes to pregnancy complications and aggressive cancers.”
Joseph Sansone, Ph.D., who has filed suit to prohibit mRNA “vaccines” in Florida, called the study historic:
“This is the first peer-reviewed journal article stating that both Covid and the Covid injections violate the Biological Weapons Convention and that both COVID-19 and the Covid injections are biological weapons.”
The authors identify multiple red flags in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, including the notorious furin cleavage site, absent in nature but known to “enhance infectivity” in engineered viruses.
The paper cites military scientists who previously described SARS-CoV-2 as containing “evidence of manipulation” that makes it an “attractive pathogen.”
According to the authors, these manipulations were not just reckless science; they were illegal under the 1975 Biological Weapons Convention.
The study directly accuses former NIAID director Dr. Anthony Fauci and U.S. intelligence officials of concealing the engineered origins of the virus.
It points to Project DEFUSE, a 2018 EcoHealth Alliance proposal to DARPA that outlined creating coronaviruses with features eerily similar to SARS-CoV-2, including the furin cleavage site.
While DARPA rejected the proposal, EcoHealth and Wuhan collaborators allegedly pursued the experiments with other funding.
The paper highlights the now-infamous Feb. 1, 2020, Fauci call with top virologists.
Some of those virologists admitted that the virus looked engineered before co-authoring the widely cited “Proximal Origin” paper claiming the opposite.
That paper, the study notes, became one of the most cited publications of 2020 and was used worldwide to suppress the lab-leak theory.
“The deliberate concealment of critical genomic features delayed public awareness and pandemic mitigation efforts, potentially allowing wider spread and more deaths,” the authors state.
Perhaps the most disturbing claim is that the spike protein from the mRNA injections doesn’t just vanish after 48 hours, as promised.
The study cites evidence of spike protein and vaccine nucleic acids lingering in the body for months, even years, detected in heart tissue, blood plasma, placentas, breast milk, and now even tumors.
“Prolonged protein expression, exemplified by S1 spike protein detection more than 700 days post-Covid vaccination, underscores the potential for irreversible harm,” the authors warn.
Military data cited in the paper show alarming spikes in myocarditis (151%), pulmonary embolism (43%), ovarian dysfunction (35%), and multiple cancers following the “vaccine” rollout.
The paper lands just as HHS pulled broad authorization for Covid “vaccines” and canceled nearly $500 million in mRNA research contracts.
Its conclusion is blunt:
“The surge in autoimmune diseases, aggressive cancers, pregnancy losses, cardiovascular fatalities, societal fragmentation, and the looming risks of advanced mRNA platforms demand an immediate halt to mRNA vaccine and biologic use, comprehensive investigations into the motives behind this unprecedented violation of public trust, and robust measures to restore safe therapeutics and ethical public health practices.”
Co-author Dr. Irene Mavrakakis went further, demanding:
“Complete recall of all COVID-19 vaccines and biologics and a moratorium on all mRNA biologics,” along with the criminal prosecution of decision-makers who “were criminally negligent and failed in their duties.”
She added that vaccine manufacturers must lose the liability shields granted under federal law.
This study represents the most direct challenge yet to the official Covid narrative.
It doesn’t just question safety, it raises the possibility that both the virus and the “vaccines” were products of deliberate engineering, with catastrophic consequences.
And the authors are clear, warning the public that the damage is ongoing, and the truth can no longer be ignored.
5,000 Americans Killed by Covid ‘Vaccines’ Every Week, Insurance Data Shows
One of the world’s leading data analysts has sounded the alarm, revealing that the insurance industry is now tracking up to 5,000 deaths every single week linked to the Covid mRNA “vaccines.”
The revelation comes from Edward Dowd, a former Wall Street executive and respected data expert, who disclosed the findings in a recent interview with the Commodity Culture podcast.
Dowd, who has been monitoring life insurance and disability trends since the rollout of the shots, warned that the number of “healthy young adults dropping dead” has skyrocketed at an unprecedented rate.
Injuries 10–15 Times Higher Than Before
According to Dowd, it’s not only deaths spiking but also devastating injuries.
“Injuries are 10–15 times higher” than pre-2021 levels, he explained.
Dowd said the hardest-hit demographic is people in their 30s, 40s, and 50s, age groups that previously had low mortality risk but are now appearing in excess death data across the insurance industry.
“30–50-year-olds are dropping dead,” Dowd said bluntly.
Suppression by Media and Tech
Dowd argues the scale of the crisis is being hidden in plain sight:
“The media and tech giants actively suppress these stories,” he warned.
The suppression campaign has allowed officials and pharmaceutical companies to continue pushing the narrative of “safe and effective,” even as insurance companies quietly pay out billions in claims tied to sudden deaths, disabilities, and long-term illnesses.
A Crisis Too Big to Ignore
Dowd’s findings echo what independent researchers and frontline doctors have been warning for years.
Leading experts have been raising the alarm to warn the public that the mRNA injections have unleashed a wave of sudden deaths and catastrophic injuries.
However, pharmaceutical companies and their allies in Congress and the corporate media are refusing to acknowledge the devastation.
With up to 5,000 deaths a week now being tied to the shots in the U.S. alone, the question is no longer whether this is happening; it’s why those in power are covering it up.
Dowd, a former executive at the world’s largest investment firm, BlackRock, has been sounding the alarm about surging deaths among the Covid-vaxxed for some time.
He is considered one of America’s leading data experts.
Through his expert analysis of insurance industry data, Dowd has become a prominent figure in investigations into the impact of the global Covid “vaccination” campaign.
As Slay News previously reported, Dowd dropped a chilling warning in April after uncovering evidence showing that the number of excess deaths of working-age Americans is skyrocketing.
According to an alarming warning from Dowd, insurance industry data shows that excess deaths are soaring among people aged 18 to 64 years old.
These deaths started exploding after the Covid mRNA “vaccines” were rolled out for public use in early 2021.
However, the deaths appear to show no signs of slowing down, despite the pandemic being long over and “vaccination” rates dropping off.
In January 2022, Life Insurance CEO Scott Davidson reported that death rates among working-aged people aged 18 to 64 were “up 40 percent over what they were pre-pandemic.”
He explained that a 40 percent spike in deaths was completely unprecedented.
Davidson compared a 10 percent rise in deaths to a once-in-200-year flood.
According to Dowd, excess deaths are now “off the charts.”
Davidson also noted that excess deaths that started surging in 2021 were non-Covid deaths.
Meanwhile, those who are attempting to warn the public about the dangers of the “vaccines” are increasingly coming under fire.
As Slay News recently reported, a pharmaceutical industry whistleblower has spoken out to allege that a world-renowned professor, Dr. Francis Boyle, was murdered shortly before he was due to testify before a Dutch court that Covid mRNA “vaccines” were developed as deadly “bioweapons.”
Dr. Boyle, a bioweapons expert, wrote the 1989 Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, which was passed by Congress and signed into U.S. law in 1990 by President H. W. Bush.
Boyle, who was one of the most prominent law professors in the world, declared last year that “everyone involved” in pushing Covid mRNA shots onto the public committed “crimes against humanity.”
During an interview last summer, Dr. Boyle asserted that the “frankenshots” were part of a plan to conduct “medical experimentation” on humanity.
He warned the public that COVID-19 was developed in a lab as “an offensive biological weapon.”
Professor Boyle argued that those who pushed the mRNA injections “clearly violated the Nuremberg Code.”
Boyle died unexpectedly in Urbana, Illinois, on January 30, 2025, at the age of 74.
His cause of death was never disclosed.
https://slaynews.com/news/5000-americans-killed-covid-vaccines-every-week-insurance-data-shows/
ACIP Refuses to Warn Against COVID Shots Despite Injuries, Deaths, and DNA Contamination That Can Integrate Into Human Genome
Ages 6 Months to 64 Years: ’Individual Decision-Making’
All 12 members voted unanimously that for people ages 6 months through 64 years, COVID vaccination should be based on “individual-based decision making.”
The panel emphasized that the risk-benefit is “most favorable” for people at higher risk of severe COVID and “lowest” for healthy people.
In other words, COVID shots remain recommended as a legitimate option, with no statement advising against them.
Age 65 and Older: ’Shared Clinical Decision-Making’
For older adults (65 and up), ACIP moved away from its prior blanket recommendation that all seniors should get the vaccine.
Now, the board says decisions should be made through “shared clinical decision-making,” meaning patients are told to consult their healthcare providers on whether to take the shot.
But again—no warning, no reversal, no acknowledgment of the gene-contaminated injections.
COVID Shots Now Easier to Access—No Prescription Required
ACIP also considered whether states should require prescriptions for COVID shots.
That vote split 6–6, with Chair Martin Kulldorff breaking the tie against the measure.
The result?
No prescriptions required.
COVID shots remain open-access, widely available at pharmacies, and—thanks to ACIP’s recommendation—still covered by insurance.
A Hollow Pivot
By softening its language for seniors and shifting younger age groups into “individual choice” framing, ACIP creates the illusion of restraint.
In reality, the panel kept COVID shots on the table for all Americans while burying the growing evidence of risk.
Bottom Line
ACIP had the power to do what the evidence demands—recommend against COVID shots altogether.
Instead, the board doubled down on keeping them in circulation.
They ignored the 38,773 reported deaths and 1,666,646 adverse events in VAERS, sidestepped the Harvard Pilgrim HHS report proving that fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries are ever counted.
Their new recommendations ignored the reality that these injections are contaminated with plasmid DNA carrying human gene segments capable of integrating into the human genome.
Rather than warn the public, ACIP voted to keep the shots widely available, insurance-covered, and legitimized as “individual choice.”
It was a hollow pivot that preserved access, protected the pharmaceutical industry, and left Americans exposed to injections with no long-term safety testing for cancer, genetic damage, fertility harms, or immune collapse.
When given the chance to finally draw a line, ACIP refused—and in doing so, they chose silence over safety.
https://open.substack.com/pub/jonfleetwood/p/acip-refuses-to-warn-against-covid