Posts

Posted on

February 16th

In Australia, vaccine damage is mostly denied so the countless parents who have vaccinated in good faith do not get any acknowledgment whatsoever. They have done what society expects and pressures them into doing. However, when things go wrong they are treated with denials and often contempt. Most parents never read a product insert to even be aware of the side effects drug companies admit happen.

In the US.A. where vaccination is mandatory and damage is often (but not always) acknowledged, compensation is paid to the victims. In exchange for this, parents are not able to sue drug companies and doctors. The outcome is doctors are more likely to admit to the damage being done.

We have no such scheme in Australia and therefore damage is usually denied, due to the fear of being sued. These children are regarded as ‘collateral damage’, and ‘what happens for the good of the community’ – and parents are left with questions, anger and grief and often, no closure. Most are not after money as they realise money will not restore the life, health, vitality or brain of those damaged – they simply want acknowledgment and closure.

Two years ago, I proposed a Day of Remembrance for these children and families as a way to start to right this injustice. It also brings to light that many children are damaged every year. If a child is vaccinated and then has a reaction, of say, encephalitis (listed on the product insert), the baby is treated for encephalitis and not vaccine damage. If the child dies, encephalitis is listed as the cause of death on the death certificate. This is why most people are unaware of the incredible damage, including deaths, that are happening in this country and most others from vaccination.

The story of my own deceased son Jason, is on my website http://www.naturematters.info

Raggedy Ann has been used as a mascot for this day, as she was created by a father, Johnny Gruelle, whose daughter, Marcella was vaccinated at school and became very floppy and eventually died from her vaccinations.

Please pass this email far and wide to do your bit to spread the word about vaccine damage. You may just get a parent who is thinking about the issue to dig deeper and become fully informed.

Stephanie Messenger

Posted on

Anoox – Scam, Fraud, Thieves or…?

Just a bit of a heads up to those interested in internet marketing.
I put $50 down for pay per click advertising on a minor search engine, Anoox.
I entered 33 keywords and advertisements and logged the results each day.
After 12 days I observed that their reported clicks were significantly higher than the visits reported by Google Analytics.
I queried Anoox on it. I said,
“According to my Anoox results page all 30 ads that point to www.DefeatDegenerativeDisease.com have pulled a combined total of 98 clicks. For the same 12 day period Google reports the total number of visits as 31, 5 of them from Anoox.”
Their reply:
“We have no relationship or control over Google reporting.
So we have no idea why they would not be reporting clicks that our system says you have received. But we can tell you this that in fact we do not count to your account many clicks that our system considers to be dubious as to their pattern of clicking.
With that said, since we aggressively under cut the prices that google charges for pay-per-click Advertising, it could be, although we are not saying that it is, that they are under reporting our clicks. But again we have NO control or relationship with Google so we cannot definitely state as to why their software system is doing what.”
So I asked:
“Can you suggest an alternative tool to Google Analytics so I can audit or cross check their reported results?”
Their response:
“Really the best way to track clicks on your Ads to your Web site is to write the code by your company. This is the sort of accounting that cannot be trusted to a big (search engine) company that by definition cannot pay attention to details of your particular case.”
Now, they didn’t know it but I happen to be a programmer, so while that is, in my case, technically feasible, if totally impractical, what genius would ever suggest that to an end user?
So, on the million to one shot that their maligning of Google had some substance to it, I found another web site visit tracker, GetClicky, and installed the tracking code for it. I left the Google tracking code on the page so I could compare results from the two analytics tools.
I also checked my web site hosting control panel and looked at the site visits as reported by Awstats. Most web site hosting companies provide some basic statistical reporting. I am told the reason Awstats reports more visitors for the same time frame compared to Google or GetClicky as that the latter two filter out automated traffic like search engine bots and the like that Awstats doesn’t.
Anoox claim to have sent my site 97 visitors in the last 7 days.
Awstats only report on a calendar month. For the entire month of February Awstats reports only 89 unique visits.
That’s less visits for the two weeks than Anoox reports for the week.
Google reports 22 visits in last 7 days (Feb 7-13th), only _3_ coming from Anoox.
GetClicky reports 23 visits in last 7 days (Feb 7-13th). (They do not break the visits down by source.)
GetClicky returns a similar number of visits to Google but provides no source of visit breakdown, which I find useful. I used GetClicky purely as a cross check to investigate suggestions of impropriety on Google’s part. Turns out it blows them totally out of the water.
So three other site visit reporting tools offer a wildly different number of visits than those for which Anoox claims to have generated and for which I am charged.
Data from three other sources suggest Anoox to be charging for 10-20 times more clicks than for which they are responsible for visitors.