Month: August 2021

This is not just scientific madness, it appears to be very intentional and purposeful.

The Moderna and Pfizer vaccine tests were conducted, as customary, with a control group; a group within the trial who were given a placebo and not the test vaccine. However, during the trial -and after the untested vaccines were given emergency use authorization- the vaccine companies conducting the trial decided to break protocol and notify the control group they were not vaccinated. Almost all the control group were then given the vaccine.

Purposefully dissolving the placebo group violates the scientific purpose to test whether the vaccine has any efficacy; any actual benefit and/or safety issues. Without a control group there is nothing to compare the vaccinated group against. According to NPR, the doctors lost the control group in the Johnson County Clinicial Trial (Lexena, Kansas) on purpose:

(Via NPR) […] “Dr. Carlos Fierro, who runs the study there, says every participant was called back after the Food and Drug Administration authorized the vaccine.

“During that visit we discussed the options, which included staying in the study without the vaccine,” he says, “and amazingly there were people — a couple of people — who chose that.”

He suspects those individuals got spooked by rumors about the vaccine. But everybody else who had the placebo shot went ahead and got the actual vaccine. So now Fierro has essentially no comparison group left for the ongoing study. “It’s a loss from a scientific standpoint, but given the circumstances I think it’s the right thing to do,” he says.

People signing up for these studies were not promised special treatment, but once the FDA authorized the vaccines, their developers decided to offer the shots.

Just so we are clear, the final FDA authorization and approval for the vaccines are based on the outcome of these trials. As noted in the example above, the control group was intentionally lost under the auspices of “the right thing to do”, so there is no way for the efficacy, effectiveness or safety of the vaccine itself to be measured.

There’s no one left within the control group, of a statistically valid value, to give an adequate comparison of outcomes for vaxxed versus non-vaxxed.

Whiskey – Tango – Foxtrot !!! This is nuts.

That NPR article is one to bookmark when people start claiming the vaccination is effective.

How can the vaccine not be considered effective when there is no group of non-vaccinated people to compare the results to?

Good grief, the entire healthcare system is operating on a massive hive mindset where science, and the scientific method, is thrown out the window in favor of ideological outcomes and self-fulfilling prophecies. The fact that the researchers and doctors, apparently under the payroll of the pharmaceutical companies that have a vested financial interest in the vaccine outcome, lost the control group on purpose is alarming.

Of course, Big Pharma will promote the vaccine as beneficial, and the controlled media will promote that message with a complete disconnect from the clinical trial details, and the FDA will grant approval on results that were intentionally constructed to produce only one outcome.

Madness. All of it.

This is Nuts, Moderna and Pfizer Intentionally Lost The Clinical Trial Control Group Testing Vaccine Efficacy and Safety

(Shared from another…)
And there you have it.
ME: CDC, should I get poke if I already had Covid?
CDC: “Yes, you should be poked regardless of whether you already had COVID-19. That’s because experts do not yet know how long you are protected from getting sick again after recovering from COVID-19.”
ME: Oh, okay, we don’t know how long natural immunity lasts. Got it. So, how long does poke-induced immunity last?
CDC: “There is still a lot we are learning about COVID-19 pokes and CDC is constantly reviewing evidence and updating guidance. We don’t know how long protection lasts for those who are poked.”
ME: Okay … but wait a second. I thought you said the reason I need the poke was because we don’t know how long my natural immunity lasts, but it seems like you’re saying we ALSO don’t know how long poke immunity lasts either. So, how exactly is the poke immunity better than my natural immunity?
CDC: …
ME: Uh … alright. But, haven’t there been a bunch of studies suggesting that natural immunity could last for years or decades?
CDC: Yes.
NEWYORKTIMES: “Years, maybe even decades, according to a new study.”
ME: Ah. So natural immunity might last longer than poke immunity?
CDC: Possibly. You never know.
ME: Okay. If I get the poke, does that mean I won’t get sick?
BRITAIN: Nope. We are just now entering a seasonal spike and about half of our infections and hospital admissions are poked people.
ME: CDC, is this true? Are there a lot of people in the U.S. catching Covid after getting the poke?
CDC: We stopped tracking breakthrough cases. We accept voluntary reports of breakthroughs but aren’t out there looking for them.
ME: Does that mean that if someone comes in the hospital with Covid, you don’t track them because they’ve been poked? You only track the UN-poked Covid cases?
CDC: That’s right.
ME: Oh, okay. Hmm. Well, if I can still get sick after I get the poke, how is it helping me?
CDC: We never said you wouldn’t get sick. We said it would reduce your chances of serious illness or death.
ME: Oh, sorry. Alright, exactly how much does it reduce my chance of serious illness or death.
CDC: We don’t know “exactly.”
ME: Oh. Then what’s your best estimate for how much risk reduction there is?
CDC: We don’t know, okay? Next question.
ME: Um, if I’m healthy and don’t want the poke, is there any reason I should get it?
CDC: Yes, for the collective.
ME: How does the collective benefit from me getting poked?
CDC: Because you could spread the virus to someone else who might get sick and die.
ME: Can a poked person spread the virus to someone else?
CDC: Yes.
ME: So if I get poked, I could still spread the virus to someone else?
CDC: Yes.
ME: But I thought you just said, the REASON I should get poked was to prevent me spreading the virus? How does that make sense if I can still catch Covid and spread it after getting the poke?
CDC: Never mind that. The other thing is, if you stay unpoked, there’s a chance the virus could possibly mutate into a strain that escapes the pokes protection, putting all poked people at risk.
ME: So the poke stops the virus from mutating?
CDC: No.
ME: So it can still mutate in poked people?
CDC: Yes.
ME: This seems confusing. If the poke doesn’t stop mutations, and it doesn’t stop infections, then how does me getting poked help prevent a more deadly strain from evolving to escape the poke?
CDC: You aren’t listening, okay? The bottom line is: as long as you are unpoked, you pose a threat to poked people.
ME: But what KIND of threat??
CDC: The threat that they could get a serious case of Covid and possibly die.
ME: My brain hurts. Didn’t you JUST say that the poke doesn’t keep people from catching Covid, but prevents a serious case or dying? Now it seems like you’re saying poked people can still easily die from Covid even after they got the poke just by running into an unpoked person! Which is it??
CDC: That’s it, we’re hanging up now.
ME: Wait! I just want to make sure I understand all this. So, even if I ALREADY had Covid, I should STILL get poked, because we don’t know how long natural immunity lasts, and we also don’t know how long poke immunity lasts. And I should get the poke to keep a poked person from catching Covid from me, but even if I get the poke, I can give it to the poked person anyways. And, the other poked person can still easily catch a serious case of Covid from me and die. Do I have all that right?
…
ME: Um, hello? Is anyone there?
Copied and pasted… ??

From Ross Walter Nutritionist & Naturopath

Australia’s medicines regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), holds 2 databases for the reporting of adverse events on medicines or vaccines. One is their internal database for the initial reports, then after 3 months to allow for their investigations into the reported cases, the data is de-identified and a summary of the data is made public in their Database of Adverse Event Notifications or DAENs database. The DAENs data is available online for public searching as needed.
I searched the DAENs database for all reported adverse events on all vaccines going back to the start of their data in 1971. I did not include the reported events for the CV-19 shots as I wanted to compare the number of reported adverse events and deaths of other vaccines to the current ones.

What I found was shocking… Especially when compared to the statistics of the current adverse events, and the fact that these results are only based on 3 months of CV-19 reports, with the data of the other 3 months of their use not being available yet.

My findings are here:
Adverse events for non-CV-19 vaccines reported to TGA (1971-2021) – 18,080
Reported deaths for non-CV-19 vaccines (1971-2021) – 57
Adverse events for CV-19 vaccines reported to TGA (2021) – 43,811
Reported deaths for CV-19 vaccines (2021) – 407

Or in short, the current CV-19 vaccines in approximately 6 months (but only 3 months of TGA data on the CV-19 shots) since being introduced have caused:
– Approx 2.5x times as many adverse events from the CV-19 shots compared to ALL other vaccines combined over the past 50 YEARS
– Over 7x times as many deaths from the CV-19 shots compared to ALL other vaccines combined over the past 50 YEARS. 7 TIMES MORE in just 3 months of TGA data.

On an annual basis, the CV-19 shots have caused a 2800% increase in deaths compared to all other shots combined over the last 50 years of vaccines.

Does this really seem safe to you?

And these statistics are just the reported ones. The TGA estimates that 90-95% of adverse events are not reported (TGA. 2021b), so the true numbers are likely to be MUCH higher.

These shots are causing a disproportionate and excessive number of adverse reactions and deaths compared to other vaxes, and even compared to all vaxes combined over the past 50 years.
Share these findings widely, especially to your doctor and state and federal politicians.

Be informed. Question everything. Stay healthy!

References:
Therapeutic Goods Administration. (2021a). Database of Adverse Event Notifications – medicines. Retrieved 4th August 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/media-release/new-web-service-helps-consumer-reporting-side-effects
Therapeutic Goods Administration. (2021b). New web service helps consumer reporting of ‘side effects’ . Retrieved 11th July 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/media-release/new-web-service-helps-consumer-reporting-side-effects

References:
Therapeutic Goods Administration. (2021a). Database of Adverse Event Notifications – medicines. Retrieved 4th August 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/media-release/new-web-service-helps-consumer-reporting-side-effects

Therapeutic Goods Administration. (2021b). New web service helps consumer reporting of ‘side effects’. Retrieved 11th July 2021 from https://www.tga.gov.au/media-release/new-web-service-helps-consumer-reporting-side-effects