Chris Martz writes on X:

Here’s my story. I have been studying climate change for over six-years, and became so interested in it that I decided to pursue a meteorology degree which I complete next year.

When I first embarked on this journey, I started out as a casual believer in the mainstream narrative. I wouldn’t have called myself a “climate doomer” per se, but if not that, I was certainly an alarmist. I thought that climate change was a very serious problem. I was worried about the weather, thinking that it was more extreme than it has ever been in history. I thought that wickedly warm December in 2015 was unprecedented, living in blissful ignorance of the fact similarly mild Decembers occurred in 1889, 1932, 1964, 1965 and 1982. I thought Hurricane Harvey was also unprecedented, not knowing that we have had far more intense hurricane strikes in the past such as Camille (1969) and Labor Day (1935). I was a total dork blindly accepting whatever was spoon-fed to me.

Then one day, I came across my friend Tony Heller’s YouTube channel. Soon after, Joe Bastardi’s page. The two of them know our weather history better than anyone else and it’s not even close. And, I sat down, I listened to what they had to say, and they put things into some much-needed perspective. I then, and only then, began to question what I was taught about the weather becoming more extreme as a result of carbon dioxide emissions. Then I began to think for myself, I began to research. I didn’t divert my thinking to other people, I dove headfirst into the data. Bought books, read through the literature (not the Washington Post headlines) and I educated myself.

The weather we observe today is really no different than it was 30, 50 or 100-years ago and the coupled, non-linear ocean-atmosphere system is far more complex than many scientists make it out to be. The more I research, the less concerned I am. Sure, we impact the environment around us, and that includes the climate. But, this idea that we’re in a “climate crisis” just isn’t a scientifically supportable statement. The human condition has never been better than it is today, and that is largely thanks to fossil fuels. And, life without reliable and affordable energy such as oil and natural gas is cold, dark and short.

And, perhaps a more startling revelation is that most climate activists are Marxists masquerading as environmentalists. They advertise as being “green” on the outside, but in reality, they are red on the inside. Watermelons, if you will. It wasn’t apparent to me at first, but through my interactions with these green energy scammers on this platform and in real life, I’ve come to find that the entire movement is just smoke and mirrors for an authoritarian agenda that my values do not align with. I made the mistake of thinking that these people had a common goal of finding truth by means of the scientific method. I gave them an inch, they demand a mile. There’s no meeting in the middle with these people. They are champions of DEI until it comes to diversity of opinion. They’re disgusting, vile and dangerous.

Ever since becoming vocal about my position, I have faced threats from hundreds of climate activists. They write into my university emailing my professors trying to get me kicked out before I finish my undergraduate degree. They engage in extortion trying to get me to absorb back into the fold, or else they’ll make sure my career is ruined. They’ve been unsuccessful, and I’m not concerned. But, it just goes to show the lengths these people will go to in order to achieve the outcome they want. They see me, a 21-year-old college student, as a threat to their house of cards. They don’t like that someone so young can see through their buIIshit and is actively educating young people on these matters.

If there is anyone out there who is on the fence on the issue, I encourage you to keep an open mind. Get your information from a wide array of sources and follow people with differing perspectives, and form your own educated conclusion. But, remain open to new ideas. I am told that my judgement is clouded, but my views changed upon a second close examination of the data. I encourage others to do the same.

Sasha Latypova

Sasha Latypova, has 25 years of experience in pharmaceutical research and development, started a number of successful companies — primarily focused on creating and reviewing clinical trials. Sasha writes:

Overall characterization of what is going on: the federal and most of the state governments are gone and captured. Whatever is running the federal gov agencies (e.g. HHS) really intends to kill you, or at least substantially injure you, damage your reproductive capacity and repossess your assets in the process. The aim is to reduce the population and terrorize the survivors enough to establish a totalitarian control over much of the world’s territory. Nobody is coming to save you, your survival and that of your children is in your hands only. Do not comply.

Now for details:

Most of my writing on these topics should be understood in conjunction with legal history research by Katherine Watt. I am explaining what rules and regulations are being broken by the HHS/FDA/all public health actors, and Katherine has found how our laws have been subverted over time to enable this. Recently Katherine put together an excellent summary presentation for a conference in Ireland, and this provides a very good starting point: Public health emergencies are camouflaged power grabs.Orientation for new readers…Katherine Watt
We are at war in the US and globally. Public Health Emergencies have largely the same legal status as war declarations (National Emergency). PHE (PHEIC) declarations effectively suspend the Constitution, let the Executive branch (including DOD and HHS) usurp the power and neuter the Legislative and Judicial branches of the government. Once initiated, there are no stopping conditions. See also “Legal Walls, short version” by Katherine Watt.
PREP Act declarations by the HHS Secretary can be viewed as announcements of use of certain types of weapons as well as provision of liability coverage for those deploying them (largely through the healthcare system), just as military in combat zones are exempt from injury claims from those they kill and injure as enemy combatants.
Deployment of the bio-chemical poisons advertised as “vaccines” or any other medical countermeasures (for covid or another made-up “pandemic”) does not depend on federal or state pharmaceutical regulations and are not subject to any consumer or research subject protections, such as informed consent rules. I explain this here, in the presentation at Swedish Parliament conference. Thus, any activities advertised as “clinical trials” or regulatory actions in relation to these bio-chemical materials are theatrics to fool the public and especially the professional class into believing this is a health event, and that they are receiving (or administering) treatments. This is explained in more detail in this post – Intent to Harm.
Bio-chemical poisons advertised as “vaccines” were pushed on unsuspecting public and fooled professionals under a “bait and switch” scheme where FDA approval (BLA) was a sham and the actual delivered product always (with exception of tiny amount of 35K doses) substituted with the Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) version of the product. This is explained in detail in this post, as well as the allegations in this important legal complaint.
The role of DOD: All covid countermeasures were ordered by the US Department of Defense (DOD), typically as “demonstrations” and “prototypes” via Other Transactions Authority contracts. DOD partnered with HHS in order to over-ride the OTA restrictions of both, the DOD and HHS. DOD oversaw the development, manufacture, and distribution of the countermeasures. Hundreds of contracts for covid countermeasures became available via FOIA and SEC disclosures in partially-redacted form. The contracts include the removal of all liability for the manufacturers and any contractors along the supply and distribution chain under the 2005 PREP Act and related federal legislation except in case of willful misconduct. While the DOD/BARDA countermeasure contracts refer to safety and efficacy requirements for vaccines and mention current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) compliance, this language in contract is designed to fool the reader as it is in fact unenforceable. More information about vaccine contracts with the DOD is here, here, here, here and here. To date (2024) no legal case filed against vaccine makers citing contractual obligation to deliver safe and effective vaccine has succeeded. These compliance items are explicitly carved out as “not in scope” of the contract and not being paid for nor ordered by the US Government. Judge Truncale agreed with this interpretation when dismissing Brook Jackson’s case v Pfizer under False Claims Act. The case is now being appealed.
The Department of Justice filed a motion to intervene and dismiss Brook Jackson’s case stating that the FDA knew about deaths and injuries due to the vaccines, and knew that these products do not need to follow pharmaceutical law (given their EUA Countermeasures status). They asked to dismiss the case, nevertheless, because discussing this information in court would be contrary to the “United States public health policy”. This confirmed mine and Katherine Watt’s position that the deaths and injuries due to poisonous shots are intentional and that the US Government is behind this intent to harm the people.
Use of Emergency Use Authorized (EUA) covered countermeasures under a declared Public Health Emergency cannot constitute a clinical investigation (21 USC 360bbb-3(k)), therefore these countermeasures could not be tested for safety or efficacy in accordance with US law (21 CFR 312 and 21 CFR 601), nor could compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) or Good Distribution Practices (GxP in general) be enforced by the FDA. This legal fact was known to high-level FDA officials, to DOD and BARDA officials and to the pharmaceutical companies signing these contracts. This fact was not known to the public, clinical investigators, clinical trial subjects, or the lower-level employees of the pharmaceutical companies and the US Government. See short testimony with links.
EUA Countermeasures under Public Health Emergency are neither investigational nor experimental! The federal government found a way to break the FD&C Act by creating a separate section in it (chapter 564) and making up a new “regulatory” pathway that resides entirely outside of all pharmaceutical regulations: NO investigational review board, NO informed consent and NO cGMP compliance apply to things called “EUA countermeasures under Public Health Emergency”. No matter how adulterated or misbranded (filled with poison and wrapped in a false label) – US Code states that this is totally fine and allowed because HHS Secretary says so. The EUA law is explained in detail in this memo, which you can use to communicate with health care providers and others who are pushing these poisons on you and your children.
The implications of the above can not be overstated. Senior Executive Service officials within the U.S. Government authorized and funded the deployment of bio-chemical poisons on Americans and others without clarifying their “prototype” and “large scale demonstration” legal status, making the materials not subject to normal regulatory oversight, all while knowingly and willfully maintaining a fraudulent pseudo-“regulatory” presentation to the public. These poisons have harmed and killed and continue to harm and kill Americans and other people around the world.
The Covid countermeasures deployment program has been partially coordinated through the quasi-government Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE) and via several other public, private, hybrid and quasi-governmental entities, including but not limited to: the FDA’s Medical Countermeasures Initiative (MCMi); BARDA; and the Medical Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear [CBRN] Defense Consortium (MCDC).[1]
Pandemic Preparedness is a federal quasi-government racketeering enterprise (here, here and here), and a mass murder/mass injury campaign orchestrated by the CIA/DOD/HHS and several other federal agencies. The purpose is to establish a global government regime of control and enslavement that will allow to replace already fake currencies with even more fake digital tokens CBDCs. This objective goes hand-in-hand with other globalist objectives. These objectives include reduction of the population in the name of “saving the planet”, asset transfer to cronies away from independent private sector (whatever is left of it), looting of public money, creation of government-dependent and therefore highly compliant slave class (dependent on extremely expensive “health” care, dependent on welfare, mentally ill, having to care for vaccine-disabled children, brainwashed into depraved self-destructive ideologies, including but not limited to DEI, addicted to propaganda and fear, addicted to drugs, etc.)
Private pharma corporations are used by the PHEMCE cartel as front to launder the poison made by the CIA/DOD controlled bio-manufacturing assets such as Resilience, Moderna, Emergent Biosolutions, and many other “biodefense” contractors. Pharmas are co-conspirators in the mass murder, however they are corporate shells used to both fool the public with brand names, illusion of regulated, compliant manufacturing (not at all in reality, see above), and launder massive profits resulting from no-risk “investment” of $billions of public money. Prosecution of pharmas for fraud under the EUA Countermeasures laws and PREP Act is mostly a fool’s errand, designed to fail.
Pandemics do not exist naturally. It is not possible for a natural infectious disease to spread all over the world simultaneously. Any local communicable diseases self extinguish. The vast majority to what is presented to the public as historical pandemics are diseases related to lack of water sanitation from human and animal waste, crowding and infestation with rats, fleas, etc. These include diseases that are attributable to bacteria – e.g. cholera and the plague. Spanish Flu was severely misrepresented as a “pandemic”, decades after the fact. It wasn’t considered one by the International Sanitary Convention (predecessor to WHO, 1850 – 1949), also here.
Pandemics do not exist, they are faked by the governments with prohibited bio-chemical agents manufactured utilizing “infectious disease research” loophole of the International Bioweapons Convention, and massive amounts of engineered virus fear porn, fake PCR and hospital murder protocols. US Government has a long, well-documented history of deploying chemical, biological and psychological weapons on unsuspecting targets, and on human subjects without proper consent. “Pandemic preparedness” is a murderous government scam, from which a huge parasitic, militaristic industry is deriving profits and power. This Cartel is managed by DARPA/DTRA and DOD-affiliated “defense” consortia which include all federal agencies acting as “One Government” and biopharmaceutical companies, academia, healthcare providers and many other entities.
For legal frameworks utilized and their history, see Katherine Watt’s writing on Bailiwick News:Bailiwick NewsAmerican Domestic Bioterrorism ProgramResearch and organizing tool first posted April 28, 2022, subject to ongoing revision as new information comes to light. Last updated June 8, 2023. Other formats: Sept. 2022 small-print, footnoted PDF (67 pages); Sept. 2022 large-print, footnoted PDF…Read more2 years ago · 879 likes · 427 comments · Katherine WattSix primary enabling statutes include:Title 21 – Federal Food and Drugs Act, at §360bbb et seq, “Expanded access to unapproved therapies and diagnostics,” as established in 1997;Title 42 – Public Health Service Act, at §247d et seq, “Public health emergencies,” as established in 1983;Title 42 – Public Health Service Act, at §300hh et seq, “National All-Hazards Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies,” as established in 2002;Title 42 – Public Health Service Act, at §300aa-1 et seq, “Vaccines,” as established in 1986;Title 10 – Armed Forces Act, at §4021 et seq, “Research projects: transactions other than contracts and grants,” as established for DoD use for “prototype” contracting in 2015;Title 50, Chapter 32, §1511 et seq, “Chemical and Biological Warfare,” as established in 1969.For additional in-depth analysis, Patrick Delaney from Life Site News interviewed me and Katherine Watt and has written up 4 excellent articles on these topics here.[1] 42 USC 300hh-10a. PHEMCE membership shall include: (1) The Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response; (2) The Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; (3) The Director of the National Institutes of Health; (4) The Commissioner of Food and Drugs; (5) The Secretary of Defense; (6) The Secretary of Homeland Security; (7) The Secretary of Agriculture; (8) The Secretary of Veterans Affairs; (9) The Director of National Intelligence; (10) Representatives of any other Federal agency, which may include the Director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, the Director of the Strategic National Stockpile, the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the Director of the Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, as the [HHS] Secretary determines appropriate.

https://creativedestructionmedia.com/news/health-freedom/2024/04/30/latypova-do-not-comply-with-what-is-coming/

Category: Inspiration

Be Yourself

Understand You

You Kept Going

A Well Written Call To Climate Reason

A Sound Money Plan

Stopping CBDCs & Restoring Sound Money With Kevin Freeman

Fascism, Globalism, and the “Medical-Industrial Complex”

Fight for life, freedom, and sovereignty.

DO NOT COMPLY With What Is Coming

Sasha Latypova

Fighting Monsters

Censorship vs Freedom of Thought and Speech