
A documentary worth watching.

Tom's Blog on Life and Livingness

An investigative report by Vanity Fair contributor Katherine Eban, based on more than 100,000 EcoHealth Alliance documents, shows a disturbing reality of “murky grant agreements, flimsy NIH oversight and pursuit of government grants by pitching increasingly risky global research”.
In 2014, EcoHealth received a $3.7 million NIAID grant to study the risk of bat coronavirus emergence and the potential for outbreaks in human populations. Nearly $600,000 of that went to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was a key collaborator.
The 2014 grant highlights the truth of what critics of gain-of-function (GOF) research have been saying for years, which is that this kind of research never achieves its aims. They say it needs to be done to prevent and/or get ahead of pandemics, but not a single pandemic has ever been averted and, instead, GOF research may actually be the cause of them.
EcoHealth president Peter Daszak’s behavior has added fuel to suspicions of a lab leak — potentially of a virus that he himself helped create. In 2015, he warned a global pandemic might occur from a laboratory incident, especially the sort of virus manipulation research being done in Wuhan. Despite this history, in February 2020, Daszak wrote a “scientific consensus statement” published in The Lancet that condemned the lab leak theory as a wild conspiracy theory.
It appears those who insist SARS-CoV-2 is of natural origin, despite all the evidence to the contrary, are doing so because they don’t want risky virological research to be blamed for the COVID pandemic.

Dr. Ryan Cole was recently interviewed by Maria Zeee where he stated that he is getting reports all across the world from doctors observing that cancer rates are “taking off like wild fire” following COVID-19 vaccinations. A recently published study in the Journal “Food and Chemical Toxicology,” also linked mRNA vaccines to an increase in cancers. I spent some time today searching through the U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) for data on cancer following vaccines. Cancer is not a common side effect associated with vaccine injuries, perhaps due to the time it takes for cancer cells to proliferate and be exposed through cancer screening, as by then most people would probably not even associate a diagnosis of cancer with a previous vaccine. Therefore, even though previous analyses on COVID-19 vaccine injuries have shown that the unreported factor is about 41x, it could be significantly higher for cases of cancer. To find trends of increased cancer rates following COVID-19 vaccines, we need to compare these rates with previous FDA approved vaccines in VAERS. Searching for various forms of cancer in VAERS, I found 739 cases resulting in 84 deaths following COVID-19 vaccinations for the past 16 months. Using the exact same search for all FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 30 years before the COVID-19 shots were issued emergency use authorizations, I found 220 cases resulting in 16 deaths over 360 months. That’s an average of .6 cases per month for the previous 30 years compared to an average of 46 cases of cancer per month following COVID-19 vaccines, an increase of 7,567%. The CDC and FDA have not issued any warnings regarding increased cancer rates following COVID-19 vaccines.
If a medical degree can explain the theatrics we’re seeing, then it’s not a degree worth trusting. Ordinary people are beginning to see that.

“Yeah, I think we have to recognize – I’ve always said that I think the Covid pandemic was a wakeup call. I don’t believe it’s the great pandemic. I believe the great pandemic is still in the future, and that’s going to be a bird flu pandemic for man. It’s gonna have significant mortality in the 10-50% range. It’s gonna be trouble.” – Robert Redfield — Former CDC Director, March 30th, 2022 interview with Doug McKelway on “Center Point”
The fact that these evil monsters are saying that this is going to happen, and not that there may be a possibility of new ‘viruses,’ is telling to say the very least. Even the framing of this so-called warning leaves only the indication that this is the definite next ‘threat’ to mankind, even though nothing of the sort has happened. How can they predict the exact future? Because they are perpetrating and purposely creating that future. This is what should be called the plan to commit criminal genocide.
(Tom: So, once again, a society with people in charge who are destructive threatens the survival of each and every one of us. The most constructive things I can conceive of have all been documented here https://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=36001 and here https://www.bringorder.info/English.html and boil down to you becoming as fit and healthy as you can, laying in stocks of spare foods and essential supplies, increasing your skills and abilities, widening your communication lines to encompass more people of like mind to you and supporting others, especially those doing good.)

For this treaty to have teeth, the organisation that governs it needs to have the power – either political or legal – to enforce compliance. In its current form, the WHO does not possess such powers. In order to enforce compliance, some commentators have recommended concluding the treaty at the United Nations level. However, we fear that it has been already decided with the INB (mandated by WHASS) that a treaty will be developed under the roof of WHO.
To move on with the treaty, WHO therefore needs to be empowered — financially, and politically. If international pandemic response is enhanced, compliance is enhanced. In case of a declared health emergency, resources need to flow to countries in which the emergency is occurring, triggering response elements such as financing and technical support. These are especially relevant for LMICs, and could be used to encourage and enhance the timely sharing of information by states, reassuring them that they will not be subject to arbitrary trade and travel sanctions for reporting, but instead be provided with the necessary financial and technical resources they require to effectively respond to the outbreak. High-income settings may not be motivated by financial resources in the same way as their low-income counterparts. An adaptable incentive regime is therefore needed, with sanctions such as public reprimands, economic sanctions, or denial of benefits.




And here’s something you won’t hear on the main stream news outlets…
“On April 9, 2022 American Airlines Captain Robert Snow experienced a severe post-vaccination cardiac arrest inside the cockpit of Airbus 321 carrying nearly two hundred souls,” Horowitz tweeted.
The event took place at the gate six minutes after landing. This near miss is a direct result of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) overlooking their own safety regulations for brazenly political purposes relating to the dangerous COVID-19 vaccine mandate policies.
A group of lawyers and doctors familiar with health care protocols in civilian and military aviation in December sent a letter to the FAA and CEOs of all major airlines with a dire warning about vaccinated pilots.
According to the team of legal and medical professionals, pilots are prohibited from flying after taking a non-FDA-approved treatment or one that was approved under 12 months ago.