The Spike Protein and PIEZO1: Damaging the Endothelium, Inducing Fatal Arrhythmias, Demyelinating Axons and Starting Tumors

PIEXO1

Walter M Chesnut writes:

Here we have yet another example of how the Spike Protein alone can induce multiple fatal pathologies.

All it takes is one exposure to the Spike Protein. That is all that is needed to induce prolonged damage to the endothelium. I cannot stress enough that viewing COVID as “just a cold” is a grave mistake. Additionally, you have no idea how unbelievably mind-boggling it is that this viral protein has been gene therapied into billions of human beings – multiple times.

A recent preclinical study provides compelling evidence for the first time that a single exposure to the spike protein or receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 is sufficient to induce acute-to-prolonged damage to pulmonary vascular endothelium. This damage occurs through the upregulation and activation of Piezo1 and store-operated calcium channels, leading to increased intracellular calcium concentrations.

https://open.substack.com/pub/wmcresearch/p/the-spike-protein-and-piezo1-damaging

I have recently formulated two aids to people suffering from Covid caused health issues:

https://www.healthelicious.com.au/NutriBlast-Anti-Spike.html

https://www.healthelicious.com.au/NutriBlast_DNA_Heart_Mitochondria.html

Hope these help.

Breaking News! Just In! Spike Protein Test.

Spike Protein Antibody Test

For a long time now I have had my research radar scanning for an objective measure to tell how well a body is holding up against the assault of the Spike Protein. Last night I saw this video from Dr Peter McCullough which I commend to you.

Got Spike? Find Out With a LabCorp Roche Elecsys Spike Antibody Test
<0.8 = no spike protein exposure
<1,000 = likely cleared
>1,000 = high risk of spike protein disease

Click to view the video: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CfeCh3V99/

Empirical Data Proves Vaccinations Harm The Body Overall

Dr Paul Thomas

Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed Stats

He proved unvaccinated kids were healthier. They revoked his license.

Dr. Paul Thomas studied 3,324 children and found unvaccinated kids had FEWER doctor visits and BETTER health outcomes. Here’s what his data showed:

Fever – 9.1× higher in vaccinated
Ear Pain – 3.4× higher
Otitis Media (Ear Infections) – 2.9× higher
Conjunctivitis – 2.4× higher
Eye Disorders (Other) – 1.8× higher
Asthma – 5.2× higher
Allergic Rhinitis (Hay Fever) – 6.9× higher
Sinusitis – 4.3× higher
Breathing Issues – 2.9× higher
Anemia – 5.5× higher
Eczema – 4.5× higher
Urticaria (Hives) – 2.1× higher
Dermatitis – 1.4× higher
Behavioral Issues – 4.1× higher
Gastroenteritis – 4.7× higher
Weight/Eating Disorders – 2.5× higher
ADHD – 0 cases in unvaccinated group
*Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition*

Instead of investigating the findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas’s license—just days after the study was published. Months later, the study was retracted.

Dr. Paul Thomas isn’t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing inconvenient science. Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the same pattern. The question is: Why are doctors being punished simply for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids?

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc

For all the sources and details, read the full 20,000-word report at:

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-has-mass-vaccination