Another new study – yes, a SECOND one – says the “Omicron-specific” mRNA Covid boosters are worthless

For the second time in a week, top scientists have reported that “Omicron specific” Covid mRNA boosters are a $5 billion taxpayer-financed marketing gimmick.

The new shots work no better than the original mRNA shots to produce antibodies specifically targeting the Omicron variant.

And the Omicron shots are even WORSE than the original boosters in producing T-cells that target Omicron, according to the researchers, part of a group led by Dr. Dan Barouch, a highly respected virologist. This finding is of particular concern because T-cells, the second line of the immune system, keep infections from becoming too severe.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/another-new-study-yes-a-second-one/comments?publication_id=363080&post_id=81234239

What we Know and Knew

Vax doesn’t stop transmission we knew this from (Kassam v Hazard) 2021. Again recently in European Parliament sitting with Pfizer conceding same point 2022. Despite politicians and others claiming it would protect (all on public record) and they still locked people down, police shot people and arrested them.

State run experts and media said get vaxed to protect grandma and grandpa. (We know this is and this was a Myth that was supported by institutions that should have put human life before conjecture)

Here is the risk stratification for the non believers. We said similar in Kassam v Hazard in the sense that our evidence which most Australians have “NOT” seen but potentially misunderstood in the judgement because no one called our experts for cross examination to explain what was really happening.

If anyone would like to read that evidence and compare to what you are all seeing now, you will see how right we were. Global experts with many years of experience and treatment records, were overlooked, for a “State run” expert who never treated a COVID patient.

We were right on the science and we will be right in the upcoming cases, as they start to roll out!

The question is, how much longer can the institutions once respected can last before they realise, not only their duty, but how they will be perceived in the future?

Confidence comes from the integrity of a system, right now that is eroding in many areas!

Absolute Versus Relative Protection

Absolute Versus Relative Protection
Below are some videos you want to pay attention to. The first thing to remember is that there is some very advanced material inside the shots, something called graphene oxide. Graphene oxide is extremely toxic. Graphene oxide is also believed to be causing this massive increase in heart attacks, strokes, cardiac problems and circulation issues….in only the injected populations. The people who took the shots are THE ONLY people experiencing the acceleration of this unnatural phenomenon.

I personally believe this poisonous ingredient can be detoxed from the body because what else would explain the never ending insistence for perpetual boosters. I’m not the only one who believes that this toxic ingredient can be removed from the body. The videos below will expand on this hypothesis.

WARNING – PAY ATTENTION. As I’ve been observing the sudden deaths of the injected for a long time, it’s obvious that a couple of factors are in play beyond just complying with the injection. Heat from sports seems to be a contributing factor and so does wifi. What this means is that “HEAT” and “WIFI” appear to activate the graphene oxide to clot and form hard structures in the circulatory system….causing the heart attacks and sudden deaths we’re seeing so much of today.

For graphene to “go live” or “go active’ and hurt/kill a person….it needs an energy source in most cases. Graphene oxide is the most conductive substance ever found on the planet for heat and wireless radiation. What this means is simple. If you are vaccinated and want to avoid being added to the growing list of folks who’ve “died suddenly” please understand that you may want to consider a) stop getting anymore injections of graphene b) conduct one of the many detoxes listed in the detox article below c) avoid intense exercise/sport that produces large increases in heat (until you fully detox) and d) avoid using wifi devices or going near large wireless complexes, especially when exercising. Avoid using the famous cancer causing ear buds, smart watches, fitbits or having your cell phone on your person. Beyond the cancer issues with the wireless radiation, it appears wifi can make the graphene go live and form clotting structures in the blood stream that can kill. More info is below, which could save the lives of many injected people who are only now starting to understand that they’ve been conned on a monumental scale.

https://courses.jchristoff.com/e/BAh7BjoWZW1haWxfZGVsaXZlcnlfaWRsKwjTSyg2AgA%3D–86a4628352b81192670e2001f153eed3df82a13f?skip_click_tracking=true

BOOM! It Is Unravelling!

SUMMARY: The infection fatality rate (IFR) of COVID-19… …analysis suggests global IFR of 0.03% for ages 0-59 and 0.07% for 0-69 years…

Less than a tenth of one percent!

ARTICLE: The infection fatality rate (IFR) of COVID-19 among non-elderly people in the absence of vaccination or prior infection is important to estimate accurately, since 94% of the global population is younger than 70 years and 86% is younger than 60 years. In systematic searches in SeroTracker and PubMed (protocol: https://osf.io/xvupr), we identified 40 eligible national seroprevalence studies covering 38 countries with pre-vaccination seroprevalence data. For 29 countries (24 high-income, 5 others), publicly available age-stratified COVID-19 death data and age-stratified seroprevalence information were available and were included in the primary analysis. The IFRs had a median of 0.035% (interquartile range (IQR) 0.013 – 0.056%) for the 0-59 years old population, and 0.095% (IQR 0.036 – 0.125%,) for the 0-69 years old. The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-39 years, 0.035% at 40-49 years, 0.129% at 50-59 years, and 0.501% at 60-69 years. Including data from another 9 countries with imputed age distribution of COVID-19 deaths yielded median IFR of 0.025-0.032% for 0-59 years and 0.063-0.082% for 0-69 years. Meta-regression analyses also suggested global IFR of 0.03% and 0.07%, respectively in these age groups. The current analysis suggests a much lower pre-vaccination IFR in non-elderly populations than previously suggested. Large differences did exist between countries and may reflect differences in comorbidities and other factors. These estimates provide a baseline from which to fathom further IFR declines with the widespread use of vaccination, prior infections, and evolution of new variants.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.11.22280963v1