Psychiatry Is NOT Your Friend!

The current fake pandemic is a psychological warfare operation directed against the nation by its enemies and their collaborators.

Please note the following

“Various types of belief can be implanted in many people, after brain function has been sufficiently disturbed by accidentally or deliberately induced fear, anger or excitement. Of the results caused by such disturbances, the most common one is temporarily impaired judgement and heightened suggestibility. Its various group manifestations are sometimes classed under the heading of “herd instinct,” and appear most spectacularly in wartime, during severe epidemics, and in all similar periods of common danger, which increase anxiety and so individual and mass suggestibility.”- from Tavistock Institute psychiatrist Dr. William Sargant’s 1957 book, Battle for the Mind.

Please note, he says during wars and “severe epidemics”

The Tavistock was the UK’s psychological warfare HQ during WW2. It was run by psychiatrist JR Rees, the UK counterpart of Germany’s Goebbels.

Much was learned about psychological warfare. After the war it was put to use against the people.

Sargent (see quote above) was a colleague of Rees.

Another colleague and fellow psychological warrior was psychiatrist G Brock Chisholm.

In 1948 G Brock Chisholm founded the World Federation for Mental Health (WFMH).

In the previous year he became the first President of the newly founded W.H.O. which sponsored the formation of the WFMH.

The WHO and WFMH have been promoting one another’s agendas and working in concert ever since.

In WW2 the “philosophy” that drove the regime of Adolf Hitler was based on the psychiatry-led bogus science of “eugenics”. Eugenics’ purpose is to provide for psychopaths a “scientific” justification for humanitarian crimes and mass murder.

Bill Gates is a eugenicist from a family of eugenicists and primary donor to the psychiatric/pharmaceutical front group WHO.

Gates also donates heavily to “mental health” programs (see WFMH above).

Gates’ eugenics concerns centre on the notion the planet is over populated and the population must be reduced.

Gates heavily promotes vaccines which are claimed to prolong life and thus contribute the growth in world population.

These last two points are contradictory.

What are vaccines really intended to do?

I encourage you to do your own reading to find out for yourself. To that end I have compiled a lot of material the search engines bury in accordance with the narrative to which they subscribe. You can find it at https://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=3835

After that you are welcome to use the search tool on my blog or just select all articles tagged under Vaccines.

Happy learning!

Australian Government Put on Notice by Medical Professionals

Aust Govt Put On Notice

The introduction and worldwide use of Covid-19 gene-based ‘vaccines’ has been associated, in the short term, with far more deaths, illnesses, injuries, and disabilities than any other therapeutic agent in the history of medicine. Due to the total lack of any long-term safety data, the potential future iatrogenic effects (including neurological, immunological and carcinogenic effects) may be even more devasting.

Despite initial claims, the Covid-19 gene-based ‘vaccines’ have now been shown to possess disappointing clinical efficacy – they neither prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection nor do they prevent transmission of the virus; any immunological protection wanes rapidly and, coincident with the emergence of the Omicron variant, evidence of negative vaccine efficacy is being reported in many countries including Australia.

In light of widely reported emerging and compelling evidence, there appears to be little scientific or clinical justification to support vaccine mandates as a health policy.

The latest hospital admission statistics do not support the claim that unvaccinated individuals are more at risk of serious Covid-19 disease, hospitalisation or death. Excess non-Covid-19 related deaths coincident with the introduction of the gene-based ‘vaccines’ are now being reported by many countries, and suggest a surge in heart attack and stroke among both the young, adolescents and middle age individuals (especially males).

The knowledge that the synthetic mRNA in both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines can enter the nucleus of human liver cells in culture, raises the serious questions about genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, and adverse impact on future generations. Disturbing safety signals regarding fertility and miscarriages are emerging.

The Time of Covid, Dr. Phillip M. Altman, 9 August 2022, pg. 42

https://expose-news.com/2022/08/14/australian-gov-on-notice-by-medical-professionals/

 

Nurses Describe ‘Brutal’ COVID-19 Hospital Treatments

Staci Kay RN

Nurses who witnessed “brutal” hospital COVID-19 treatment protocols kill patients paint a bleak picture of what is taking place in state and federally funded health care systems.

(Tom: Yet another confirmation of what many before her have said. Kudos to this nurse for her awareness and courage.)

Nurses who witnessed “brutal” hospital COVID-19 treatment protocols kill patients paint a bleak picture of what is taking place in state and federally funded health care systems.

“They’re horrific, and they’re all in lockstep,” Staci Kay, a nurse practitioner with the North Carolina Physicians for Freedom who left the hospital system to start her own early treatment private practice, told The Epoch Times. “They will not consider protocols outside of what’s given to them by the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and the NIH (National Institute of Health). And nobody is asking why.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/nurses-describe-brutal-covid-19-treatment-protocols

“BIGGEST Disaster in Medical History!” ~ Dr Charles Hoffe Gives Riveting Speech In Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Dr Charles Hoffe

Dr. Charles Hoffe is a family doctor. He lives and works in Lytton, in Canada. He is a graduate of the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa, and moved to Canada. He has worked as a rural family physician and emergency room physician for 31 years.

https://rumble.com/v1fhy3v–biggest-disaster-in-medical-history-dr-charles-hoffe-gives-riveting-speech.html

New CDC Covid Guidelines

New CDC Covid Guidelines

If these guidelines were recommended from the start of the pandemic there would have been no lockdowns, no social distancing, no masks, no mandatory vaccination requirements. Suicides and business closures would not have skyrocketed, the social development and learning of children would not have been markedly delayed, bailouts would not have been required so governments would have been plunged deeper into debt.

No responsibility, no accountability and in many cases, the perpetrators are still in the same job as before.

This is just wrong!

NZ Medsafe is unable to define safe…

One of the NZDSOS team decided to ask Medsafe a fairly simple question. It’s quite brilliant in its simplicity. “What is the working definition of ‘safe’”? There was concern that Medsafe might have a different definition than that of the general public.

This request was sent on 30 July 2021 and when no reply was received, it was followed up with a further request for a definition on 17 Oct 2021. At this stage, 94 deaths following vaccination had been reported to Medsafe and were on their Safety Reports, many still under investigation or in limbo due to ‘insufficient information’, (there are now 171 deaths and 3,452 serious adverse events reported).

No reply ensued so the matter was referred to the Ombudsman as is often suggested if dissatisfied with OIA (Official Information Act) results.

In March 2022 a letter was received from the Ombudsman saying an investigator would be allocated when one became available. A further letter was written in July 2022 to the Ombudsman to ask whether it is likely the investigator will be allocated before the end of the year.

It is now nearly one year since a simple question “What is the definition of ‘safe’?” was asked of Medsafe and they have been unable to respond.

If Medsafe cannot define what ‘safe’ is, how can they determine when an intervention is not safe?