Deadly Cancer-Causing Chemical ‘BPL’ at Center of $500 Million Pandemic Bird Flu Vaccine Platform
The chemical used in the Trump administration’s new ‘Generation Gold Standard’ bird flu vaccine platform—beta-propiolactone (BPL)—is classified as a ‘Group 2B’ carcinogen by U.S. regulators (meaning the substance is possibly cancer-causing in humans) and as a ‘Group 1B’ carcinogen in Europe (meaning it’s presumed to cause cancer in humans).
A carcinogen is any substance or agent capable of causing cancer by damaging a cell’s DNA and leading to uncontrolled cell growth.
The revelation follows this website’s report that the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)—under Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger’s direction—has been funding the creation of chimeric, lab-engineered bird flu viruses in American and foreign laboratories, even as Taubenberger himself is named on a federal patent for the very BPL-utilizing bird flu vaccine platform those experiments are designed to justify.
A May 2025 government press release announced the multi-million dollar BPL platform will be used to generate bird flu pandemic vaccines:
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the National Institutes for Health (NIH) today announced the development of the next-generation, universal vaccine platform, Generation Gold Standard, using a beta-propiolactone (BPL)-inactivated, whole-virus platform.
This initiative represents a decisive shift toward transparency, effectiveness, and comprehensive preparedness, funding the NIH’s in-house development of universal influenza and coronavirus vaccines, including candidates BPL-1357 and BPL-24910. These vaccines aim to provide broad-spectrum protection against multiple strains of pandemic-prone viruses like H5N1 avian influenza and coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1, and MERS-CoV.
https://open.substack.com/pub/jonfleetwood/p/deadly-cancer-causing-chemical-bpl
Measles Causes
First Hand Experience Vaccinated vs UnVaccinated
Ivermection Reduces Tumours
Another ivermectin study is out, and like the long list of similar studies lately, it shows more cancer treatment potential. This one was published in July in ACS Biomaterials Science, titled, “Intranasal Delivery of Ivermectin Nanosystems as an Antitumor Agent: Focusing on Glioma Suppression.”
In short, the study found low-dose ivermectin shrank brain tumors by a whopping 70% in rats. The treated rodents also had less dead tissue, less swelling, and fewer new blood vessels forming, which means the remaining tumors were less invasive and less aggressive.
The ivermectin was delivered using a nasal spray in a very fine (nanoscale) form, since oral ivermectin can’t cross the blood-brain barrier. The rats that got the treatment showed no negative side effects.
The serendipitous discovery of ivermectin is one of the most remarkable stories in medical science. In the 1970s, Japanese microbiologist Satoshi Omura set out to find new microorganisms that might produce useful medicines. He collected hundreds of soil samples from around Japan, including one from a golf course in Kawana, south of Tokyo.
In one of his golf-course soil samples, Omura’s team isolated a previously unknown bacterium that produced compounds found to be extraordinarily effective at killing parasitic worms. He sent it to a U.S. lab at Merck, which developed ivermectin: a safer and even more potent chemical derivative of the bacterial compound.
As you know, in 2015, Omura and Merck researcher Bill Campbell jointly received the Nobel Prize in Medicine for a cheap dirt drug that has saved millions from disease and blindness. If ivermectin’s cancer-fighting abilities bear out —and the studies and anecdotes keep mounting up— it will become the single most beneficial accidental discovery in human history.
Here’s a question to ponder: would ivermectin have broken out of the pharma wilderness absent its high-profile role during the pandemic as a cultural and political flashpoint? Without this extraordinary exposure, efforts to study ivermectin as a cancer agent would almost certainly have remained niche— buried in the literature amid hundreds of other “drug repurposing” efforts, lacking funding, conference time, or media coverage.
Ivermectin may wind up being the greatest covid miracle of all.
https://open.substack.com/pub/coffeeandcovid/p/dizzying-dichotomies-saturday-october
Overview Of The Fertility Impacts Of COVID Vaccines
The jump in miscarriages/stillbirths with vaccine uptake.
The correlation of injection to fetal death showed very tight timing, with by far the most fetal deaths occurring the same day.
And for guys…
The likely mechanism of reduced sperm production is that both spermatogonia and spermatozoa, as well as their support cells, Leydig and Sertoli cells, all abundantly express the ACE2 receptor and various TMPRSS and furin proteases, all of which attach the spike protein, and this has been known since 2020. Those cells are all in the testicles, which the Pfizer-Acuitas study found to receive the mRNA vaccine content within minutes.
Sperm are dependent for their survival and function on the participation of ACE2 in the angiotensin system. When the spike protein attaches to the ACE2 receptor, which it specifically targets, it cleaves the latter, rendering the sperm non-viable.
Read more: https://open.substack.com/pub/colleenhuber/p/overview-of-fertility-impacts-of
On Poisoning: Lead vs. The Spike Protein: Both Parallel Each Other In How They Poison Us
We have heard it over and over: The COVID mRNA gene therapies are poison. Many have scoffed at this claim, most notably governing medical agencies. However, when you take the time to look at the mechanisms at work, the claim is not far-fetched – at all. Let’s dive into how lead and the spike protein poison the body in similar ways.
https://open.substack.com/pub/wmcresearch/p/on-poisoning-lead-vs-the-spike-protein
Lung Virus – A Remedy
This is an interesting datum that you might find useful.
Finish reading: https://lungvirus.com/
Dr Ardis On Nicotine
mRNA and Spike Protein In Blood
Deaths and injuries from people who received blood from vaccinated people.
Tom: Tainted blood is unsafe and potentially deadly. Please compile a list of those close to you who would be prepared to donate blood to you in an emergency.