Category: Vaccines

In 2021 the New Zealand government enacted laws requiring citizens to take a novel vaccine based on mRNA technology.

Pfizer fraud news

Large sections of the population were not permitted to keep their jobs, or were segregated from normal civil life, unless they took this vaccine.

This vaccine was manufactured by Pfizer, a company with a long history of crime, fraud and corruption – a record which can only be described as disgraceful.

In late 2021 two widely-read articles about this history were published on Substack by KanekoaTheGreat and Jestre.

In the opening paragraph of his article, Jestre writes:

‘Imagine, if you will, an industry that is hated even more than government. Within that industry, there is a corporation that has a reputation so low that even among their peers, they were ranked as the worst in 2016, 2017, and 2018. Now imagine you are told if you do not let that company inject an experimental drug into you, using a never before tried delivery system, you will lose your livelihood, freedom, and possibly your life. You are not in the twilight zone. It is 2021 and that corporation is Pfizer.’

The following record combines Pfizer’s criminal history as outlined in each article.

Both authors insist their lists are by no means complete.

Advil
Pfizer’s Ibuprofen product Advil has been the subject of many lawsuits in the USA. The majority of these involve cases alleging severe adverse reactions. One such case related to a man who developed severe blistering over 35% of his body. Jestre believes a confidential out of court settlement was reached.

Aricept
This case invovling the Alzheimer’s drug Aricept though ultimately unsuccessful, ‘raised serious questions as to whether the FDA was colluding with the drug industry rather than protecting public health’, according to Jestre.

Bextra, Geodon, Zyvox and Lyrica
Pfizer was fined US$1.195 billion for promoting the off-label use of Bextra. Pfizer was ordered to pay a further US$1 billion in civil damages and penalties. US$102 million was given to six whistleblowers who had been fired by the company.

The company was charged with ‘misbranding’ the drug with intent to mislead.

Blackmail in Africa
Wikileaks blew the lid on Pfizer’s blackmailing practices in relation to a US$75 million payout in Nigeria as part of the ‘Trovan’ case.

Blue Cross Blue Shield
In this case it was revealed the Pfizer regularly organised large-scale luxury conferences for doctors, where they would give them gifts and a US$2,000 ‘stipend’ each. The litigation itself was a claim by Blue Cross Blue Shield to recover overpayments made to Pfizer for its Bextra drug.

Bribes in Europe
In 2020, Pfizer paid US$60.2 million dollars for violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Bribes were paid to government officials in Russia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Kazakhstan, Serbia, Czech Republic, China and Italy.

Celebrex, Bextra and Lyrica
Pfizer paid US$450 million to Brigham Young University (2012) after the university alleged that the company cheated them out of $9.7 billion in royalties for the creation of the drug.

Pfizer also paid out US$486 million (2016) to its own shareholders for hiding safety risks associated with Celebrex, Bextra and Lyrica.

Chantix
In 2013, Pfizer paid US$273 million to settle claims relating to Chantix, its ‘quit smoking’ drug, mainly for undisclosed serious side effects.

Delaware River Pollution
In 1991, Pfizer was fined US$3.1 million for illegally dumping untreated and treated industrial waste into the Delaware River.

Depo-Testosterone
Thousands of lawsuits have been filed over depo-testosterone, most of which are still ongoing without settlement, although those that have resolved have generally been in Pfizer’s favour.

Effexor
Multiple lawsuits alleging undisclosed serious adverse reactions over the anti-depressent Effexor were dismissed.

Eliquis
The Pfizer made blood-thinner Eliquis is currently the subject of multiple ongoing lawsuits alleging serious undisclosed adverse reactions.

Estring
Pfizer was accused of ‘fraudulent co-pay marketing’ in which they misled consumers over the final price they would have to pay for drugs. In the settlement Pfizer paid US$200,000 to each affected consumer.

Geodon
In 2009, Pfizer paid US$33 million for unfair and deceptive marketing practices for its anti-psychotic drug Geodon.

Heart Valves
Pfizer agreed to create a fund of between US$80-130 million for defective heart valves from use of its drugs, in particular those arising from the fracturing of its Bjork-Shiley Convexo-Concave heart valve product.

A separate court action claimed Pfizer lied to the US government in order to get approval for its heart valve product, which continues to fracture and has killed hundreds of patients worldwide.

Inlyta, Sutent and Tikosyn
In yet another case of deceptive marketing, Pfizer paid out US$23.85 million to settle a co-pay scheme and was required to undertake a 5 year period of ‘probation’ in relation to its marketing activities.

Lipitor
Thousands of cases alleging the Pfizer cholestrol medication Lipitor caused Type 2 diabetes were dismissed by a judge, although many legal experts have questioned the court judgment.

Lyrica and Zyvox
Pfizer reached a US$43 million settlement with authorities for illegally using incentives to promote these drugs to doctors. More litigation is expected for Lyrica for claims it has caused numerous birth defects.

Neurontin
In 2010 a jury found Pfizer guilty of ‘racketeering’ and was ordered to pay US$142 million to the claimants over its epilepsy drug Neurontin. Pfizer bribed doctors with luxury trips and planted its operatives in audiences at drug conferences.

Premarin
The Pfizer drug Prempro litigation follows thousands of cases filed by women who claimed the drug caused breast cancer. Pfizer paid US$330 million to settle more than 2,200 of these lawsuits, with many more thousands ongoing. Court records show there was, on the part of Pfizer, a “concerted effort to misdirect physicians” from the dangers of the drugs.

Pristiq
A case in which Pfizer settled with its own shareholders over claims it had misled them over the safety of the drug, to the tune of US$67.5 million.

Protonix
Pfizer paid US$55 million in fines for illegally promoting Protonix for off-label use, and a further fine of US$784.6 for underpaying drug rebates to Medicaid.

Rapamune
Pfizer was ordered to pay US$35 million to settle claims relating to the unauthorised use of transplant drug Rapamune. Allegations made in the claim said Pfizer bribed doctors to prescribe the drug, and provided ‘misleading presentations of data.’

Rezulin
Pfizer paid out US$750 million to settle 35,000 claims relating to its diabetes drug Rezulin.

Trovan
A case involving Nigerian children. According to Jestre:

‘Pfizer performed a clinical trial on 200 children without telling the parents that the treatment was experimental or obtaining informed consent. These children were paired off in groups of 100, with one group receiving Trovan, and the other group receiving the “gold standard” treatment at a reduced dosage in order to make their drug look better. Many of the children died or were permanently disabled. This led to a $75 million settlement, which Pfizer tried to stop by blackmailing government officials, as noted earlier.’

Viagra
Multiple lawsuits are in progress claiming Viagra to be responsible for a number of undisclosed health conditions, including cancer. All these actions were recently consolidated into a class action lawsuit.

Xalkori
New York University sued Pfizer alleging that the company failed to pay royalties on the drug.

Xeljanz
Xeljanz litigation is growing by the week as claimants allege Pfizer’s arthritis drug caused an array of serious adverse reactions, the risks of which were not disclosed by the company.

Zithromax
Pfizer reached a confidential settlement with various US state governments for deliberately failing to disclose some risks associated with use of this drug.

https://dailytelegraph.co.nz/news/bb-pfizers-long-list-of-crime-and-fraud-b/

Randomized controlled trials show all-cause mortality reduction from the Covid adenovirus-vector vaccines but not from the mRNA vaccines.

Have People Been Given the Wrong Vaccine?

“Scientist Stephanie Seneff PhD from MIT talks with Dr. Breggin about the latest research on the deadly effects of the spike protein in the pseudo-vaccines for COVID-19 and how they are more harmful than SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 itself with its less harmful version of the spike protein. No hocus pocus or exaggeration—the scientific research results are appalling in themselves, indicating that the vaccinated body sets up very small functioning DNA packets outside the nucleus that can exert harmful effects on the human body like dysfunctional nuclei. There is also a serious risk that the DNA within the nucleus can be changed as well, but this is still under investigation.” (Tom: Latest research from Sweden shows the jab does alter our DNA.)

“The reported total deaths from the vaccines in America quickly surpassed by many times the total deaths for all combined vaccines since data began to be collected. And the buildup of reported adverse effects including cardiac and neurological disorders is far beyond anything ever before allowed to occur in medicine. A shocking rise in the death rate for relatively young and healthy people in 2022 is almost certainly caused by these experiments. Overall, Dr. Seneff’s observations make clear that we must end the experimental jabs. We must work especially hard to make sure that children are no longer given these dangerous, damaging, experimental genetic experiments that are already doing a great deal of harm without doing any good for them”- Dr Peter Breggin

https://www.brighteon.com/f4ecfbc0-685c-4774-ac9e-6db6fe462e6c

This is quite a long interview with a talented researcher with some serious integrity and courage! Listen for a few minutes at the 1:35:00 mark if you have any doubts at all of the corruption level at the WHO, FDA and CDC.

From what I can see he has had several accounts suspended from Twitter for not following the narrative and recommending things that work rather than obsequiously following the mandated protocols (which often kill the patient).

I have known from other research I read years ago that Niacin has the power to dislodge and remove drug residuals, pesticides and other toxins from where they lodge in fat cells but Dmitry has taken my understanding of B3 to a whole new level.

It is a tough listen as he is a bit dispersed, obviously has not given this talk a thousand times so does not have his patter down pat and uses a lot of medical terminology.

So if you just want the super highlights, here are some snippets from the interview:

The maintenance of health is governed by a bioenergetic balance of energy in the cells.
Too much energy leads to inflammation.
Reduced exercise as we age couple with maintained caloric intake builds up in the cells unused energy whish is a causal condition of dementia.
Exercise has a profound anti-cancer and anti-Dementia effect.
Our body was engineered to be able to use large doses of Niacin as medicine.
Niacin, NAC and Tryptophan are used in the signaling mechanisms in the bioenergetics of cellular energy.
The same ACE-2 receptor that SARS Covid uses also uses Niacin in an anti inflammatory mechanism.
When you take a large enough dose of Niacin the liver communicates with every cell in the body.
The expression is a function of how much inflammation is in the cells, how many free radicals, how much kinetic energy pressure there is in the mitochondria and other organelles in the cells. The objective is to maintain thermodynamic equilibrium in cellular energy.
The Niacin flush is a very intricate mechanism that involves addressing cellular inflammation.
Regular consumption of Niacin limits the assumption of esterified cholesterol into your macrophages (specialized cells involved in the detection and destruction of bacteria and other harmful organisms) and stabilizes your lipids (fats). This severely reduces the ability of SARS-Covid-2 to invade cells and infect you.
NAC cleaves heavy metals from the brain, important for people with vaccine injuries.
NAC reverses the action of the spike protein.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/AiqaZ8ZO14nf/

An investigative report by Vanity Fair contributor Katherine Eban, based on more than 100,000 EcoHealth Alliance documents, shows a disturbing reality of “murky grant agreements, flimsy NIH oversight and pursuit of government grants by pitching increasingly risky global research”.

In 2014, EcoHealth received a $3.7 million NIAID grant to study the risk of bat coronavirus emergence and the potential for outbreaks in human populations. Nearly $600,000 of that went to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was a key collaborator.

The 2014 grant highlights the truth of what critics of gain-of-function (GOF) research have been saying for years, which is that this kind of research never achieves its aims. They say it needs to be done to prevent and/or get ahead of pandemics, but not a single pandemic has ever been averted and, instead, GOF research may actually be the cause of them.

EcoHealth president Peter Daszak’s behavior has added fuel to suspicions of a lab leak — potentially of a virus that he himself helped create. In 2015, he warned a global pandemic might occur from a laboratory incident, especially the sort of virus manipulation research being done in Wuhan. Despite this history, in February 2020, Daszak wrote a “scientific consensus statement” published in The Lancet that condemned the lab leak theory as a wild conspiracy theory.

It appears those who insist SARS-CoV-2 is of natural origin, despite all the evidence to the contrary, are doing so because they don’t want risky virological research to be blamed for the COVID pandemic.

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/geopolitics/over-100-000-released-documents-expose-covid-origin-fraud/

Dr. Ryan Cole was recently interviewed by Maria Zeee where he stated that he is getting reports all across the world from doctors observing that cancer rates are “taking off like wild fire” following COVID-19 vaccinations. A recently published study in the Journal “Food and Chemical Toxicology,” also linked mRNA vaccines to an increase in cancers. I spent some time today searching through the U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) for data on cancer following vaccines. Cancer is not a common side effect associated with vaccine injuries, perhaps due to the time it takes for cancer cells to proliferate and be exposed through cancer screening, as by then most people would probably not even associate a diagnosis of cancer with a previous vaccine. Therefore, even though previous analyses on COVID-19 vaccine injuries have shown that the unreported factor is about 41x, it could be significantly higher for cases of cancer. To find trends of increased cancer rates following COVID-19 vaccines, we need to compare these rates with previous FDA approved vaccines in VAERS. Searching for various forms of cancer in VAERS, I found 739 cases resulting in 84 deaths following COVID-19 vaccinations for the past 16 months. Using the exact same search for all FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 30 years before the COVID-19 shots were issued emergency use authorizations, I found 220 cases resulting in 16 deaths over 360 months. That’s an average of .6 cases per month for the previous 30 years compared to an average of 46 cases of cancer per month following COVID-19 vaccines, an increase of 7,567%. The CDC and FDA have not issued any warnings regarding increased cancer rates following COVID-19 vaccines.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/7500-increase-in-recorded-cases-of-cancer-following-covid-19-vaccines/

If a medical degree can explain the theatrics we’re seeing, then it’s not a degree worth trusting. Ordinary people are beginning to see that.

https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/21/the-spell-is-broken-how-the-white-houses-mask-play-finally-exposed-covids-true-culprits/

For this treaty to have teeth, the organisation that governs it needs to have the power – either political or legal – to enforce compliance. In its current form, the WHO does not possess such powers. In order to enforce compliance, some commentators have recommended concluding the treaty at the United Nations level. However, we fear that it has been already decided with the INB (mandated by WHASS) that a treaty will be developed under the roof of WHO.

To move on with the treaty, WHO therefore needs to be empowered — financially, and politically. If international pandemic response is enhanced, compliance is enhanced. In case of a declared health emergency, resources need to flow to countries in which the emergency is occurring, triggering response elements such as financing and technical support. These are especially relevant for LMICs, and could be used to encourage and enhance the timely sharing of information by states, reassuring them that they will not be subject to arbitrary trade and travel sanctions for reporting, but instead be provided with the necessary financial and technical resources they require to effectively respond to the outbreak. High-income settings may not be motivated by financial resources in the same way as their low-income counterparts. An adaptable incentive regime is therefore needed, with sanctions such as public reprimands, economic sanctions, or denial of benefits.

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/covid19/2022/03/30/a-new-pandemic-treaty-what-the-world-health-organization-needs-to-do-next/

And here’s something you won’t hear on the main stream news outlets…

“On April 9, 2022 American Airlines Captain Robert Snow experienced a severe post-vaccination cardiac arrest inside the cockpit of Airbus 321 carrying nearly two hundred souls,” Horowitz tweeted.

The event took place at the gate six minutes after landing. This near miss is a direct result of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) overlooking their own safety regulations for brazenly political purposes relating to the dangerous COVID-19 vaccine mandate policies.

A group of lawyers and doctors familiar with health care protocols in civilian and military aviation in December sent a letter to the FAA and CEOs of all major airlines with a dire warning about vaccinated pilots.

According to the team of legal and medical professionals, pilots are prohibited from flying after taking a non-FDA-approved treatment or one that was approved under 12 months ago.

https://welovetrump.com/2022/04/19/vaccinated-american-airlines-pilot-went-into-cardiac-arrest-six-minutes-after-landing-commercial-flight-with-nearly-200-passengers-watch/

Spells it out in simple steps.

https://dissidentsignposts.org/covid__free_downloads