Event 202: What are Smallpox Pandemic Simulations Foreshadowing?

From Event 201 to the controversial decisions of the Obama and Trump Administrations to remove a moratorium placed on funding gain of function research, to the seemingly preemptive declaration of Anthony Fauci in 2017 that the US would soon face a pandemic, it seems like the writing was on the wall all along for the outbreak of COVID-19.

Although hindsight is 20/20, it also imbues us with foresight in the atypical event that we actually learn from our mistakes. As the United States announces its first confirmed domestic cases of monkeypox in 2022, parallels between what led up to the COVID-19 pandemic appear to be eerily similar. That similarity is echoed in Europe, where the actions of public health bureaucracies appear every bit as analogous. To tie a bow around those developments, the emergence of an NGO-backed global narrative has been authored by a panel entrusted by the World Health Organization that may serve as the script for whatever stage has been set.

Just as Event 201 simulated the global response to a coronavirus pandemic just months before its actual onset, Germany has chosen to enact a similar exercise concerning an outbreak of smallpox, hosting health ministers from other G7 nations. This decision follows the release of a report from the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response (“IPPPR”). Despite issuing a report to the WHO last year titled “Making COVID-19 the Last Pandemic, the IPPPR report on the threat of a global monkeypox outbreak projects that the virus could kill as many as 250 million of the 3 billion infections it forecast over an 18 month period.

These smallpox pandemic simulations are far from the first of their kind.

In fact, the Center for Health and Security (“CHS”) already held several of these exercises years even before Event 201. Like the forthcoming pandemic simulation in Germany, CHS’ Operation Dark Winter simulated the ramifications of a smallpox vaccine all the way back in 2001. The case study conducted by Dark Winter coupled with the threat of terrorism manufactured by the US under the Bush Administration to pass the National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive more commonly known as Directive 51.

This directive outlined the continuity of government that would be enacted in the event of a catastrophe, an action which has been made possible due to an on-going state of emergency reauthorized every 90 days since September 14, 2001 in response to 9/11.

Though overshadowed by the bellicose tone targeting terrorism as the country’s greatest existential threat since nuclear war, Dark Winter highlighted the potential that epidemic disease outbreaks could have in providing an emergency situation that could drastically extend the powers of the federal government. The dynamic forged by the passage of Directive 51 was evident in the US pandemic response to COVID-19 which facilitated the unprecedented expansion of government power over even the most minute aspects of the everyday lives of citizens.

Germany’s smallpox pandemic simulation rides that momentum by apparently setting the stage for a successive public health emergency in response to the cases of monkeypox to emerge in Europe.

Notably, the exercise presupposes a zoonotic the origin of a smallpox outbreak through a narrative that echoes Event 201, which designated pigs used as livestock as the origin of a new coronavirus.

These presuppositions were essential to policy makers as they provided the undertones needed to promote the theory that COVID-19 emerged zoonotically from horseshoe bats who naturally developed the disease. The value of simulating a public health response that emphasized that zoonotic origin was essential to obfuscated COVID-19’s apparent origins as the result of gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. With this is in mind, the premise that forthcoming cases of smallpox could be the result of similar experiments is startling, particularly as it conveys the complete absence of accountability politicians were held to following the coronavirus pandemic and the possibility that gain of function research has been deployed on a more widespread basis than previously thought.

Unlike SARS-COV-2, which disproportionately affected people who were older, German Health Minister Karl Lauterbach’s remarks at the first day of the smallpox pandemic simulation paint a different picture of what could come, stating “We will do a very realistic exercise in which a smallpox pandemic results from a leopard bite..The scenario will have the particularity that especially younger people will be hit very hard,” Lauterbach, who was lauded in his capacity for German’s handling of COVID-19 serves as a pivotal figure given the change in the countries leadership following the exit of Angela Merkel from the chancellery. Like Anthony Fauci, Lauterbach conveys the transcendent power of a bureaucracy of medical technocrats who operated outside of the parameters that election officials are subject to. As such, the actions of their ilk are much more indicative of what lies ahead than any vapid political posturing.

Meanwhile in the United States, on the very day that the CDC confirmed a case of monkeypox in Massachusetts, the US Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”) announced it would purchase approximately 13 million doses of the freeze-dried version of the JYNNEOS smallpox vaccine from Bavarian Nordic, a vaccine manufacturer based out of Denmark. The purchase order comes just one month after the company’s RSV vaccine entered a phase 3 clinical trial.

Given the genetic similarities of smallpox and monkeypox, approval of JYNNEOS in the US already extends to the administration of the vaccine to as a prophylaxis against the latter virus. BARDA exercised an option in an existing contract with Bavarian Nordic purchase those doses that was in place before the emergence of monkeypox this year. With more than 20 cases of the disease confirmed in the EU nations of England, Portugal, and Spain, Bavarian Nordic was also able to finalize a contract with an undisclosed European nation to supply the same smallpox vaccine purchased by BARDA, albeit under the trademark Imvanex. While the scope of the contract and purchase are not yet known, its announcement sent Bavarian Nordic’s stock surging by over 62% the day following the disclosure.

Finish reading:

https://coercioncode.com/2022/05/21/event-202-what-are-smallpox-pandemic-simulations-foreshadowing/

41.5K people died within 21 days of ‘Covid’ Fake Vaccination in England & a further 291K died within 6 months

UK Jab Deaths 20220514

Data published by the Office for National Statistics reveals that 41,449 people sadly died within 21 days of receiving a dose of the Covid-19 vaccine in England between 1st January 2021 and 31st January 2022, and a further 290,915 people sadly lost their lives within 21 days to 6 months of being vaccinated.

https://davidicke.com/2022/05/14/41-5k-people-died-within-21-days-of-covid-fake-vaccination-in-england-a-further-291k-died-within-6-months/

Freedom Of Choice

Freedom Of Choice

Only today I was reading an article that equated freedom of choice with life. For, if you have no freedom of choice, do you have a life?

Exclusive Fact Check! No COVID-19 Is NOT Snake Venom! Don’t Believe It, Here’s Why…

Covid-19 Not Snake Venom

An interview on April 11th, with Stew Peters, a former chiropractor Dr. Bryan Ardis made a claim that COVID-19 is not a virus, but snake venom. This theory is flawed and full of misinformation. This video, exposes it all.

Basic Points of the Video Proving COVID-19 in not Snake Venom:

1- There was never any serious consideration, from either side, that snakes were the origin or host for the COVID-19 coronavirus. Genetic and protein sequence comparisons always indicated bat coronaviruses as the most likely backbone for a laboratory created COVID-19 bio-weapon.

2- The basis of his claim is that monoclonal antibodies are identical to anti-venoms used for snake bites. This is just not true. Antivenom is made by injecting a goat or horse with a small amount of venom. The antibodies released by the animal’s immune system to fight the venom are later harvested via bleeding. The blood serum or plasma is then concentrated and purified into pharmaceutical-grade antivenom. (Link- https://www.si.edu/spotlight/antibody-initiative/antivenom )

Monoclonal Antibodies are different. They are lab-produced, or cloned, and designed to boost protection against a specific target like the coronavirus. No monoclonal antibodies have been created yet to target snake venoms. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoclonal_antibody)

The two are not one in the same. If you get a snake bite you get antivenom not monoclonal antibodies.

3- Bing Lue, COVID researcher shot and killed, no one knows what he was working on, pure speculation.

4- Ardis misrepresented an Arizona study, He claimed falsely that the study showed an enzyme from rattlesnakes venom was in the blood of all COVID patients. That is nowhere found in the report he referenced. He just lies.

What the study did find, based off minimal research, is an enzyme healthy humans already have in their bodies — which is similar but not identical to an enzyme in rattlesnake venom — was circulating at elevated levels in patients who died of COVID-19. (See the Arizona Supply paragraph 3-4 https://archive.ph/N3Lg8#selection-673.126-679.266 )

5- Ardis implied that 19 toxins were related to COVID-19, and that the 19 in COVID stood for the toxins. The problem is the 19 on the end of COVID stands for the year it was discovered. He then links a study from Texas on Indian Cobra showing how anti-venom has 19 venom toxins. That’s his only tie, one has nothing to do with the other.

6- Ardis also doesn’t provide an adequate explanation for human-to-human transmission of COVID-19, other than to suggest, without providing any evidence that the snake venom might be passed between humans through the water supply, which is epidemiologically impossible based on the actual data. Snake venom is not contagious.

https://restrictedrepublic.com/programs/exclusive-fact-check-no-covid-19-in-not-snake-venom-dont-believe-it-heres-why-april-28th-2022-bd511b?categoryId=84407

Rheumatologist: 40% of 3,000 Vaccinated Patients Reported Vaccine Injury, 5% Still Injured

Rheumatologist Vaccine Injury

Dr. Robert Jackson has been a physician for 35 years. In his practice, there are more than 5,000 patients, about 3,000 of whom got vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines.

What makes him unusual is that he is not afraid to speak out about what he is seeing in his patients. This is because he’s too valuable to fire.

Jackson said never in his career has he seen anything like what he’s seeing now: 40% of his vaccinated patients reported a vaccine injury, and 5% are still injured.

Nobody can argue his numbers are anecdotes because they were confirmed in the EULAR database and published in the BMJ: 37% had adverse events and 4.4% of patients had a flare-up of their disease after vaccination.

Also, he’s had 12 patients die following the jab. Normally in his patient base, he’ll see one or two deaths a year.

So if there is a question of whether all-cause mortality goes up or down after the jabs rolled out, his numbers make it crystal clear.

This is aggregated data from dozens of doctors in his practice: a .33% excess mortality rate among his patients after the vaccines rolled out (i.e., the vaccines likely killed 1 in 300 people in his patient base).

However, this is likely an undercount because he’s not the primary care physician.

This suggests a kill rate many times higher than the .2% we estimated from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS.

However, these are deaths in rheumatology patients, so this may account for the higher estimate. But we are in the same ballpark as the death estimate from VAERS.

Of course, there COULD be an “unknown” thing that killed all these people. It would have to be massive and injected into all these patients to cause the symptoms observed. Wonder what else fits that description? Nobody will tell us.

Naturally, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) doesn’t want you to know any of this and they would prefer it if you didn’t watch the video.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rheumatologist-vaccinated-patients-vaccine-injury/