Category: Wealth Tips

http://www.ontargetresearch.com/2014/09/25/focus/
and don’t miss this video:
http://www.risingabovethenoise.com/revival-of-the-fittest-how-to-brand-video/

By Julie Steed, Technical Services Manager
An issue that arises in blended families is in relation to stepchildren. Stepchildren are included in the definition of a child, however the step-parent/child relationship is severed upon the dissolution of the natural parent’s relationship with the step-parent. This often happens as a result of divorce or death.
The severed relationship between step-parent and children has long been a principal in family law and was recently confirmed as the case for superannuation death benefits in ATO ID 2011/77. The Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT) has also used this principal in deciding cases.1
This means that the step-parent is unable to leave their superannuation benefits to their stepchildren since they no longer will meet the definition of a child. The children may however still qualify under financial dependency or interdependency.
An alternative is for the step-parent to formally adopt the stepchildren. If this occurs, the stepchild becomes a legally adopted child, who then has all of the legal rights and entitlements of a natural child. However, in practice this formality is rarely undertaken. It is particularly difficult in the event of a second marriage where the natural parent will generally object to their child being adopted by another person. It is more likely where one of the natural parents has died and the surviving parent remarries, although it is still uncommon.
Where there are blended families, the interaction between superannuation death benefits and careful estate planning becomes all the more important in order to ensure that the family’s wishes are able to be fulfilled.
Case study
Andy and Jill married many years ago and each have two children from previous marriages, Mandy and Candy and Bill and Phil. Andy and his first wife had an acrimonious divorce. Jill’s first husband died shortly before the birth of Phil.
estate affairs
Andy and Jill have made life long commitments to each other and to each other’s children. It is Andy and Jill’s wish that if one of them dies, the other inherits everything but on the death of the second of them, all assets are divided equally between their four children.
Andy and Jill visit their financial planner who runs through the different scenarios, before calling in an estate planning specialist.
Andy and Jill have the following assets:
Ownership Asset Value
Joint Family home $600,000
Joint Shares $150,000
Joint Cash $50,000
Andy Superannuation $200,000
Jill Superannuation $30,000
Jill Death benefit pension from Jack $600,000
Total $1,630,000
What would happen if they both passed away now?
Assume Andy and Jill were both involved in a serious car accident. Jill died at the scene and Andy died in hospital six weeks later. If they both died without a Will and without superannuation death benefit nominations, the following is the best outcome that could be obtained.2
As Jill died first, her share of the jointly held assets will generally pass to Andy due to the right of survivorship. Upon Andy’s death, all of the jointly held assets will pass to his children. Andy’s superannuation could pass 50 per cent to each of his children ($100,000 each) but none could pass to Bill and Phil as the death of Jill has severed the step-parent/child relationship.
The only way Bill and Phil could receive any of the superannuation benefit is if they were financially dependent or in an interdependency relationship with Andy. The same applies to Andy’s children in respect of Jill’s superannuation and this means her superannuation will be shared equally between her children. Assuming that the children were not living at home and not dependent, the distribution would be as follows:
Child Amount received 3 Calculation
Mandy $500,000 ($600,000 + $150,000 + $50,000 + $200,000) divided by 2
Candy $500,000 ($600,000 + $150,000 + $50,000 + $200,000) divided by 2
Bill $315,000 ($600,000 + $30,000) divided by 2
Phil $315,000 ($600,000 + $30,000) divided by 2
Total $1,630,000
What if some of the children were financially independent?
The situation is further complicated if one of the stepchildren was financially dependent and the other was not.
Consider the scenario where Candy was the only child living with Andy and Jill. Candy would qualify as being in an interdependency relationship with Jill and although the step-parent/child relationship is severed, Candy is eligible to receive one third of Jill’s superannuation.
Child Amount received3 Calculation
Mandy $500,000 ($600,000 + $150,000 + $50,000 + $200,000) divided by 2
Candy $710,000 ($600,000 + $150,000 + $50,000 + $200,000) divided by 2 and
($600,000 + $30,000) divided by 3
Bill $210,000 ($600,000 + $30,000) divided by 3
Phil $210,000 ($600,000 + $30,000) divided by 3
Total $1,630,000
Even if Andy and Jill had death benefit nominations in place to request 25 per cent to each of the four children, the superannuation fund trustees would be unable to make payments to the stepchildren of Andy and Jill since that relationship is severed upon their death. The stepchildren could only qualify if they were financially dependent or in an interdependency relationship.
Andy and Jill’s adviser calls in an estate planning specialist who structures their affairs to ensure that their wishes are met in the most efficient and tax-effective method which will also provide protection for any children whilst they are minors.Testamentary and superannuation proceeds trusts are established via the Will and binding death benefit nominations put in place.
Conclusion
The examples above highlight how the severing of the step-parent/child relationship can result in outcomes that may differ from your client’s expectations. It is essential to update client’s estate plans, including superannuation, as family circumstances change and to utilise the services of experts who can assist with designing the desired outcomes.
1 SCT determination D04-05/186 and SCT determination D99-2000/082.
2 The intestacy laws vary in each state.
3 Before the effect of any superannuation tax has been accounted for.

A decision by US company, APR Energy, not to register four gas turbines leased to Forge Group on the Personal Properties Security Register (PPSR) could potentially cost them $50 million.
Mining services firm Forge Group was placed into receivership in February 2014. At that time they were leasing four gas turbines from APR Energy. Under the laws governing external administrations, all assets not registered under the Personal Properties Security Act (PPSA) can vest with the lessee – in this case, Forge Group.
As reported by The Age, the receivers of Forge Group are taking this matter to the Supreme Court of New South Wales in an attempt to gain control of the turbines from APR Energy. If successful, $50 million worth of assets could be made available to the creditors of Forge Group, in what will be the largest case under the PPSA since its inception in 2012.
Given the relatively insignificant cost of only $16 to register assets under the PPSA (excluding any legal fees if required in the transaction), this oversight could be a major and costly error for APR Energy, and this matter again highlights the importance of correctly registering assets on the PPSR.
If you provide finance, supply, lease, hire or loan assets to third parties, we strongly recommend you obtain appropriate advice and register your ‘security’ interest in the assets to protect your position. Failing to properly register may result in the loss of your assets in the event of insolvency.

There’s a new form of crime on the block. “Sliders” who, from the far side of your vehicle, crouch down and open the opposite door and steal your purse from your car while you are refuelling. Ladies, keep it on you or locked up!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRSkmIY8H1E