Anger vs Love
Image taken from page 74 of “The History of Monroe County, Iowa. Illustrated” published by Western Historical Company, 1878, over a green forested area.
Red Eagle or William Weatherford (1780 or 1781 – March 24, 1824) was a Creek chief. One of many mixed-race descendants of Southeast Indians who intermarried with European traders and later colonial settlers. Red Eagle was of mixed Creek, French and Scots ancestry.
He was raised as a Creek in the matrilineal nation and achieved his power in it, through his mother’s prominent Wind Clan, as well as his father’s trading connections. After showing his skill as a warrior, he was given the war name of Hopnicafutsahia. The Creek War (1813-1814), also known as the Red Stick War and the Creek Civil War, was a regional war between opposing Creek factions, European empires, and the United States, taking place largely in Alabama and along the Gulf Coast.
Red Eagle became increasingly concerned about the influx of European Americans onto Creek land and eventually led a group known as “Red Sticks,” bent on protecting their land, their way of life, and their people from intruders.
Eventually the smaller forces of Red Sticks and the larger opposing forces led by General Andrew Jackson came against each other. The conflict ended in the decisive defeat of the Red Sticks at The Battle of Horseshoe Bend, near modern-day Dadeville, Alabama. Terms were drawn up that provided far less land than the Creek tribe had previously held.
The quote attributed to Chief Red Eagle reads, “Angry people want you to see how powerful they are.
Loving people want you to see how powerful YOU are.”
True Intelligence
The courage to confront and
the ability to observe
what is actually there,
not what we think should be there,
not what would like to be there,
not what we are told is there
but to honestly look and see for yourself what is actually there
is key
to not just competence
but also survival.
Calves Born Blind
Calves were born with birth defects incl blindness starting in 2000. They took down the tower 7 yrs later and calves were born healthy again.
This is how mammals are affected. And they keep telling us the technology is harmless!
Methylene Blue Prevents And Reverses Prion Disease, Amyloid and Rubbery Clot Formation, Binds Hydrogel Polymers, Dissolves Nanotech Building Blocks
(Tom: GREAT NEWS this week. A researcher has identified how to dissolve the rubbery clots that 70% of embalmers are seeing in people who have died post Covid jab!)
In this article, I review multiple studies that discuss Methylene Blue as a disolver of amyloid and prion polymers which are not only created by the body “naturally” but can be externally intorduced for nanotechnological purposes. Prions are highly infectious. Both Amyloid and Prion like peptides have been used to build hydrogel, and nanotechnological devices and biosensors. These are the building blocks for the Brain Computer Interface and WBAN bidirectional telemetry surveillance.
Methylene Blue should be considered as a preventative and therapeutic option in combination with high dose Vitamin C, EDTA and other supportive treatments for the inhibition and disolution of the rubbery clot formation, C19 bioweapon induced prion disease and amyloidosis, as well as a potent disolver of the self assembly nanotechnology assault on humanity.
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/methylene-blue-prevents-and-reverses
If It Looks Like A Rat, Smells Like A Rat and Sounds Like A Rat…
If it looks, sounds and smells like corruption … well, maybe we should trust our senses.
John Skerritt, the man who signed off on the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines in this country, has taken a high-paying job with Medicines Australia, an organisation that advocates on behalf of the nation’s biggest pharmaceutical companies.
As the former head of the TGA, Skerritt was responsible for authorising the experimental mRNA vaccines. He did so based on only a few months of clinical trial data, despite serious unaddressed concerns about their safety and effectiveness.
The products he hastily approved have since been linked to a shockingly high rate of SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS, especially among children. Their rollout coincided with a significant increase in EXCESS MORTALITY which, to this day, nobody in the government has even attempted to explain.
And as we all now know, the vaccines didn’t even stop us from getting infected.
If you believe that John Skerritt’s relationship with Big Pharma should be investigated, click ‘Learn more’ to join the 76,000+ Australians who have signed our petition for a TRULY INDEPENDENT Pandemic Royal Commission. When you’re done, you’ll have the opportunity to tell YOUR story of the pandemic by submitting a response to our national survey.
Truth, justice and accountability is still attainable, but only if we fight like hell for it. Click the link to join the movement today!
Credential Stuffing
Thousands of people across Australia have woken up to the news that they might be victims of ongoing online scams.
Cyber security company, Kasada, has been investigating cyber attacks and found a number of well-known retailers might have been compromised, according to the Sydney Morning Herald.
In their analysis, Kasada alleges some customers of Guzman y Gomez, Dan Murphy’s, Binge, TVSN and Event Cinemas have had their online accounts compromised.
This comes just a week after the news that online retailer, The Iconic had been breached, causing some customers to lose thousands of dollars and have their user details breached.
In these attacks, cyber criminals are using a scam called “credential stuffing” to gain access to an individual’s online account and make fraudulent transactions.
As a small business, if you trade online using an eCommerce store or you purchase online — here’s what you need to know.
What is credential stuffing?
Credential stuffing is a type of cyber attack that targets people who have previously had their usernames, emails or passwords stolen in a data breach. They are then more vulnerable to a second, more dangerous attack where cyber criminals reuse the email and password combinations to get access to more of your accounts, and more of your personal data.
It might help to think of credential stuffing like a cyber criminal game of bingo. Hackers will take your previously stolen passwords and try to crack your other accounts using the same details. This is why people who reuse the same passwords when shopping online are more at-risk of an attack.
What are credential stuffing shopping scams?
When cyber criminals successfully use credential stuffing to guess your password on a online shopping account then they have the ability to place orders, and charge them back to your previously used credit card!
How do I know if my details have been hacked?
Kasada, who has been analysing the attacks, says that 15,000 Australian accounts have been hacked in the past three months, as at January 2023, with that number growing daily.
People who use the same passwords across many accounts are most vulnerable to a credential stuffing cyber attack, especially if they have previously had their usernames stolen in an unrelated data breach.
If you are unsure if you have previously had your data leaked online you can check by visiting the website ‘Have I been pwnd’ which checks your email against known data leaks. If the email you usually shop with is in on this list it means you can be targeted with a credential stuffing attack.
Because credential stuffing cyber attacks impersonate legitimate shoppers using real passwords and real usernames, it makes it very difficult for online businesses to identify the scam.
While many companies are still learning or investigating the attacks, we encourage you to review your bank statements and look out for any suspicious transactions.
If you think you have been hacked, you can make a report to the ACSC.
https://cyberwardens.com.au/blog/what-is-credential-stuffing/
Dr. Mike Yeadon, Former Chief Scientist at Pfizer, Sounds the Alarm: At Least Five Intentional Mechanisms of Toxicity in mRNA COVID Vaccines
“Others with great expertise in intracellular signalling and molecular biology quickly spotted at least two other, clearly designed-in, obviously intentional, mechanisms of toxicity”
Below is an unedited message (highlights are mine!) from Dr Mike Yeadon, former Chief Scientist and Vice-President of the Allergy and Respiratory Research Division of Pfizer, and is the co-founder and former CEO of the biotechnology company Ziarco.
Dear all, I am a card carrying trained mechanistic toxicologist (as well as a biochemist, at least, that’s what my degree certificate says).
More relevantly, I have over 30 years experience leading new drug design teams across the disciplines.
Over the life of the pharmaceutical industry, we have collectively learned a great deal what kind of chemical and biochemical structures confer what kinds of safety and toxicity risks. We still miss things, especially when they’re not understood and all we have is harms leading to abandonment of research projects or even withdrawal of launched products. Sometimes, board level executives still don’t withdraw harmful products if they think there’s some slight or arguable uncertainty & if they think they can get away with it. Thalidomide for example was sold in Spain deep into the 1970s, 15 years after it was unequivocally known to be a teratogen in humans. Merck didn’t withdraw their COX2 inhibitor until it was so obvious that they were more or less going to get caught. Other times, companies behaved well.
Equally, we have learned what kinds of design features confer good or poor absorption, low or high plasma protein binding, fast or slow oxidative or conjugative metabolic clearance of drugs via which pathways (hepatic to stool, renal to urine, etc). Drug disposition is perhaps the best understood to the extent there are AI systems which a century of medicinal chemistry & drug metabolism data has fed.
Toxicology is much less well understood by the industry broadly, but students of the specialist field almost all of the well understood mechanisms of toxicity. Things like aspirin, paracetamol, paraquat, rotenone, masked anilines, certain free radical generators, planar polyaromatic hydrocarbons, etc etc. I’ve forgotten so many.
One classic example was dioxin release at Seveso, Italy, which resulted in widespread harms from halogenated biphenyls, which injure us via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, a nuclear factor controlling expression or repression of numerous genes. The underlying biology is extremely complex and I don’t believe we can claim to understand it. We’re not even sure what the endogenous ligands are.
In one project in industry in which I was lead biologist, I noticed two chemistry colleagues had developed unusual facial rashes. I always pored over chemical structures, and noticed a plausible similarity between part of the new molecules that were being made & tested for this program and those industrial pollutants involved in the Italian accident. Sure enough, they had chloracne and it became a major incident, which we solved, killing the project (obviously) and teaching the industry worldwide to avoid close-in analogues.
So when I looked at the purported vaccines, I detected at least three distinct mechanisms of toxicity. I assure you, not one of those features would have remained in molecules in the research teams armoury after the first project meeting. It wouldn’t need to be me leading it. Any of my senior staff would see the very obvious safety risks. My peers in industry would also know of them. I’ve talked about them in interviews, pieces to camera and affidavits.
No one has tapped me on the shoulder to explain why I’ve got it all wrong. Several very clever people have independently said overlapping things, such as Professor Sucharit Bhakdi.
Others with great expertise in intracellular signalling and molecular biology quickly spotted at least two other, clearly designed-in, obviously intentional, mechanisms of toxicity (to do with nuclear localisation signals).
That makes at least five, independent, starkly obvious, in-the-structure harms. Based on at least some of these, I and doctor in Germany, Wolfgang Wodarg, wrote an open letter to the European Medicines Agency, prior to any such product being granted an Emergency Use Authorization. We listed several concerns for the kinds of harms we expected and feared would follow from mass administration to the population. In response to this letter, the media fell upon us both, we were smeared by our national broadcasters and pushed off numerous online platforms. Within weeks of commencement of mass rollouts, all but one of our concerns were starkly obvious. The last one had to do with reproductive toxicity, which duly rolled in a year later. If you choose to disregard this testimony, I don’t know what to say.
link to open letter to EMA:
-Dr Mike Yeadon
This is Mike’s official telegram channel:
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
Please share.
https://www.aussie17.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-former-chief-scientist
Vaccine Shedding Data from Pierre Kory
Here is some more data on the vaccine shedding from Covid jabs: https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/dr-pierre-kory-explains-covid-19-vaccine-shedding/
If you have been adversely affected or you know someone who has been harmed by the jab or shedding from it, check this out: https://www.healthelicious.com.au/NutriBlast-Anti-Spike.html