Author: TomsWrite

Posted on

The Three Biggest Problems With Modern Medicine

Dr Bryan Ardis says the 3 primary problems in health care are these.

1. Health insurance has destryed our healthcare systems in America. It has stripped the rights of medical practitioners and healthcare professionals in every single sphere from being able to honestly and ethically practice medicine and healthcare with the patients. For any company who can tell a healthcare professional we will not cover this modality or this prescription medication or this therapy I think is evil and needs to be destroyed.

2. The specializing of medicine. When the medical profession decided to isolate their area’s organ systems and only look at one organ as a part of the human body is a massive problem. The entire body is a system and I think the entire body should be looked at by every health care professional as a whole.

3. The use of pharmaceutical drugs to mask symptoms and to be proposed and marketed as a treatment for any symptom or illness is a fraud. There is not a single symptom that a human being has ever had in their whole life, a fever, a cough, a sweat, a rash, a diarrhea, no one has ever had a symptom ever, not a cancer, that was ever caused by a drug deficiency…

…There are actually nutritional deficiencies that are created that lead to all disease outcomes and symptoms. And as long as you feed the body what it needs and take away from the body what is causing poison toxicity or immune suppression you can cure almost any disease but you have to change the enviroment in which your body’s pysiology and cells live in to change your experience of living.

…”To cure something is to return it back to its normal state and that is not what cancer treatment or pharmaceutical drugs are designed to do.”…

…In the book ‘The Only Answer to Cancer’ Dr. Leonard Coldwell writes that of all the patients he has seen in his 30+ years, 85% of every terminally diagnosed cancer patient he has seen have one sigular cause, it is one toxic emotional relationship to one human.

He promises his patients, “If you will cut that individual out of your life forever you can cure yourself of that disease within 12 weeks.” And for those that do, they reverse all their cancers.

For the other 15% of people who are also diagnosed with cancer he says there is an underlying toxic impact, from their diet, from things they are exposed to, from things they are putting on their body in the way of toxicities or toxins in cosmetics, you name it.

From an interview Dr Bryan Ardis gave Nathan Crane.

Posted on

Ray Tomlinson and Email

Ray Tomlinson and Email

In 1971, a 30-year-old engineer named Ray Tomlinson sat at his terminal at Bolt Beranek and Newman (BBN) and changed communication forever.
Working on ARPANET, the precursor to today’s internet, Tomlinson faced a simple challenge: how could messages be sent between different computers on a network? At that time, electronic messages could only be sent to users on the same computer.
His breakthrough came with a simple but ingenious solution—using the @ symbol to separate the user name from the host computer name. This user@host format remains the global standard fifty years later.
Tomlinson’s first test message was sent between two computers sitting side by side in his lab. While he later admitted he couldn’t remember the exact content of that first message, he suggested it was probably something like “QWERTYUIOP” or “testing 123.”
What’s remarkable is that Tomlinson wasn’t assigned to create email. He developed it as a side project while working on other ARPANET protocols. His supervisor only learned about it after the fact.
The modern controversy surrounding email’s invention comes from Shiva Ayyadurai’s claim to have invented email in 1978. However, most computer historians maintain that Tomlinson’s 1971 innovation was the true birth of networked electronic mail.
While email has evolved dramatically since those early days, Tomlinson’s core innovation—enabling messages to travel between separate computers via a network—remains the foundation of electronic communication used by billions daily.
Sources: Internet Hall of Fame, Boston Magazine, Smithsonian Institution
Posted on

Mucus matters – it’s your body’s secret weapon

Woman Blowing Nose

Mucus might seem like an unappealing substance, but it’s essential for keeping us healthy. It works as the body’s “flypaper,” trapping dirt, debris, and pathogens before they can reach our lungs. Every day, we produce about 1.5 quarts of mucus that sweeps into the back of the throat and is swallowed, where stomach enzymes neutralize potential threats. Besides acting as a first line of defense, mucus helps to hydrate and protect various parts of the respiratory system.

Finish reading: https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/home-family-pets/mucus-matters-it-s-your-body-s-secret-weapon/

Posted on

Mitochondrial Imbalance Linked To 90 Percent Of Chronic Diseases

Mitochondria

Mitochondria are often called the power generators of human cells. They convert nutrients such as glucose and fatty acids that we obtain from food into adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the primary energy source in our cells during metabolism.

At the same time, mitochondria are the core of human immunity, too. Healthy mitochondria effectively regulate immune responses, while mitochondrial dysfunction can damage immune cells, resulting in many chronic diseases and impaired cellular differentiation.

Finish reading: https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/mitochondrial-imbalance-linked-90-percent-chronic-diseases

Posted on

Are Shower Filters Worth It?

Winston Kao writes:
I am often asked for recommendations of shower filters.
I don’t have one. Why?
Several reasons:
1. The effectiveness of all water filters drops sharply when exposed to HOT water. Most people shower at temperatures above 120F. But that is the limit of temperatures at which most filters are rated.
2. Shower filters tend to be SMALL. Small means that the water lacks sufficient contact time with the filter media to effectively remove certain stubborn contaminants, especially chloramines and fluoride, which are common in most tap water in the U.S.
3. Shower filters may not contain the correct media to do the job even if we don’t consider the problems with hot water. Especially true of fluoride – I know of NO shower filter which contains materials that would effectively remove fluoride.
4. Shower filters vary widely in quality and I would hesitate to trust some of the cheap, Chinese-made filters.
5. Shower filters need to be changed frequently if they are to be worth anything. This jacks up the cost.
6. The “best” shower filters aren’t cheap. I have seen quotes of $200 to $300 or more to purchase a new unit, with a cartridge replacement cost of $150 or more, and the recommended replacement intervals of every 3 months! Cost for a year of ownership on the order of $800 isn’t a good deal, is it?
Paying so much for a filter which cannot remove chloramines and fluoride, two of the toughest and very harmful chemicals, makes no sense.
My solution is always to suggest one of two things:
1. Ideally, purchase and install an Ideal Earth whole-house water filter system. This way ALL of your water from every tap is clean! You can shower or bathe in very hot water without any problems, because the water is filtered BEFORE it goes to your water heater and then to your shower.
2. A few people have connected a filter in the bathroom COLD water supply line and then fed this already filtered water into one of those “on-demand” water heaters to supply the shower. I have designed custom bathrooom filter systems for this purpose for those who, for some reason, cannot get the whole-house filter system. The cost of this custom system works out to be very reasonable compared to the cost of the premium shower filters and their replacements. The MAIN point, though, is that this system will GET THE JOB DONE PROPERLY, while conventional systems will not.
Yours in health,
Winston Kao
Natural Health Researcher,
Inventor & Educator
Posted on

Katharine Ross and Sam Elliott

Katharine Ross and Sam Elliott

During the filming of “The Legacy” in 1978, Sam Elliott found himself quietly falling for his co-star Katharine Ross. Elliott, with his deep voice and rugged charm, was already a figure of intrigue on set, but it was Ross’s grace and intelligence that captured him entirely. They spent long hours together between takes, learning each other’s rhythms and building a connection that neither had anticipated. Yet, both instinctively understood that their blossoming romance needed protection from the prying eyes of the press.
In a later interview with “Vanity Fair,” Elliott revealed, “We were building something fragile. It was too new and too precious to have other people’s opinions weighing on it.” The vulnerability in his voice reflected how much those early days meant to him. For Ross, who had already experienced the harsh glare of public attention during her earlier marriages and career peaks like “The Graduate,” the need for privacy felt even more vital. She had seen too many romances wilt under the magnifying glass of Hollywood.
Their time on “The Legacy” served as a rare bubble of intimacy. On set, they maintained professionalism, careful not to fuel any gossip. Behind the scenes, quiet dinners and long conversations deepened their bond. Elliott admired Ross’s subtlety, the way she listened more than she spoke, and how she carried herself with effortless dignity. He once said in a “Parade” magazine feature, “She had this elegance about her that could stop you in your tracks. I knew early on that she was unlike anyone I had ever met.”
Ross, in turn, found herself drawn to Elliott’s authenticity. In an interview years later with “Closer Weekly,” she recalled, “Sam never tried to impress anyone. He was who he was, whether cameras were rolling or not. That kind of honesty is rare in our world.” Their connection grew steadily, shielded by a mutual understanding that true intimacy required sacred ground, far removed from flashing cameras and magazine headlines.
Friends close to the couple later shared that there was an unspoken code between Ross and Elliott during those first few months. One crew member from “The Legacy” commented anonymously to “People” magazine, “You could feel something between them, but they were careful. It was like watching two people pass notes in class—silent but obvious if you looked closely enough.”
When Elliott reflected on those early days, he often emphasized the importance of patience. He believed that the slow pace at which their relationship developed made it stronger. In a 2015 interview with “The New York Times,” he said, “There is a beauty in waiting, in letting love grow in the quiet moments instead of blasting it out to the world before it’s ready.” It was a philosophy that guided them both as they navigated a romance that was at once exhilarating and terrifying.
Their bond deepened long after “The Legacy” wrapped, proving that their caution had been well-placed. Elliott once jokingly noted that winning Ross’s heart felt like winning an Oscar he never got to accept on stage. “She was the prize. Nothing else mattered once I had her,” he told “Vanity Fair,” his voice thick with emotion.
In protecting their young love from external pressures, Katharine Ross and Sam Elliott gave themselves the gift of a foundation built on trust and quiet understanding. They were not interested in spectacle; they were invested in building something real, something that could stand the test of time.
Their story remains a reminder that sometimes, the most beautiful romances are the ones shielded from the noise, nurtured in silence, and cherished away from the spotlight.