Sugar Alcohols vs Sugar

A post from a friend of mine Dean Blehert on Facebook:

A few days ago, I received an email from some “Healthy solutions“ provider about a long and complex study done by some researchers in Brazil. The article on this study claimed that the study involved more than 15,000 subjects over many months and proved that sugar alcohols (not sugar, but sugar alcohols, often used as sweeteners because many of them do NOT have the bad effects on health that sugar itself has), taken over a period of months, lead to some terrible physical situations. The authors of the study claimed that erythritol was particularly dangerous and that probably Xylitol was similarly dangerous, and that it might be healthier to put sugar back into a healthy diet. The article gave the chemical explanations in language beyond my current grasp (very impressive!).

It was unclear from the article who funded the experiments, but hinted at government help.

Since the person I’ve found most reliable on matters of diet (Dr. Eric Berg) has claimed that both these sugar alcohols were safe, I had some questions about that study. I did not (and do not) have time to get an MD or a PhD in biochemistry to challenge the “science“ of the article. I found a simpler approach. I asked a single question (actually, just a subject, not really a question) on Google, and that resolved the matter for me.

What did I ask? Before you read my answer, work out what YOU would ask in this situation.

Here’s what I entered into Google’s AI:

THE SUGAR INDUSTRY IN BRAZIL?

Instant answer (all data I didn’t have before–I thought most sugar on this planet came from the American south (e.g., Louisiana) and West Indies sugar cane plantations and the beet sugar from Hawaii. Not so):

The sugar industry is the LARGEST industry in Brazil, and sugar is the largest EXPORT from Brazil, and Brazil is the largest producer of sugar in the world (more than a quarter of the world’s sugar). It’s income from sugar has been rising year by year. Anything that challenges the growth of that industry is the enemy, and part of that enemy is erythritol and other products that have begun to replace sugar in many products. Some of the sugar substitutes (the chemical substitutes) have gotten enough valid bad press that they are avoided by many. Stevia and monk fruit are among the safer sugar substitutes, though not everyone can tolerate them. The sugar alcohols, and ESPECIALLY erythritol, are emerging as among the safest and best tolerated sugar substitutes, so, of course, any study (especially an expensive and long one) done in Brazil will easily find funding.

Why is it so crucial to ask who funds a study? Because OTHER studies have been done (many) that found that, even when a study is claimed to be unbiased, “double blind,” etc., nearly always (like 90% of the time) a study financed by some entity (such as a pharmaceutical company) gets the results that entity WANTS TO SEE. In other words, if the Cureitall company wants to prove a product will be effective, they pay someone to test it, and the testers almost always find that it’s effective.

And when independent testers try to replicate the original result . . . THEY CAN’T. For some reason, those without a special financial interest in showing that the drug is effective do NOT get the same results (nowhere near, in most cases) as the people paid by the drug company. (Books have been written about this!)

When a BIG company is promoting the product, and it’s allies in government are behind it, those later studies, often, don’t get published–or their publication is stalled for years. (Though I hear some recent reforms of that system are slowly taking effect.)

Follow the money trail. If the study doesn’t seem to make sense, find out who paid for it.

[By the way, the exact amount of erythritol this “study” found dangerous in regular use happened to be the exact amount of erythritol in a pint of my favorite sugar-free ice cream (Rebel).]

[One other (and last) “By the way”: The people who run these experiments that get the desired results probably vary in their degree of corruption. Some intentionally alter results, play complex tricks with statistics, etc. Others are simply influenced by the pressure to get a certain result, and see things the way they are “supposed” to see them, not necessarily realizing that they’re missing things (like bad effects of a drug), etc.]

Ancient Egyptian Pregnancy Test

Ancient Egyptian Pregnancy Test

Sometime between 1500 and 1300 BCE, an Egyptian physician wrote instructions on papyrus that would outlast every dynasty, every empire, and every civilization that rose and fell along the Nile.

The instructions were this:

Take two bags. Fill one with barley. Fill one with emmer wheat. Have the woman urinate on both daily. Watch what grows.

If both bags remain dormant — she is not pregnant. If the barley sprouts — a girl is coming. If the wheat — a boy.

It sounds, at first, like the ancient world being ancient: mystical, superstitious, built more on symbolism than science. In Egyptian culture, barley carried feminine associations and wheat masculine ones. The assignment of sex to sprouting grain probably had more to do with mythology than medicine.

But here is the part that modern researchers could not dismiss.

In a study published in 1963, researchers re-created the Egyptian experiment under controlled conditions. They collected urine from pregnant women, non-pregnant women, and men, and applied each to seeds in the same way the papyrus instructed. They found that wheat and barley watered with urine from pregnant women caused germination in about 70 percent of cases — while urine from non-pregnant women and men kept the grains from sprouting. Smithsonian Magazine

Seventy percent. In a bridal-shop window, that would be extraordinary. In ancient medicine, working from observation alone, with no concept of hormones or biochemistry, it borders on astonishing.

The most likely explanation is that elevated estrogen in a pregnant woman’s urine promotes plant growth — though the precise mechanism remains genuinely debated. One researcher found that even boiling the urine didn’t change the results, which complicates the simple estrogen theory. What the Egyptians almost certainly didn’t know was why it worked. Any idea of hormonal influences was completely non-existent to them CNN — the accuracy was almost certainly discovered through generations of careful, patient observation. Someone noticed. Someone tried again. Someone kept records.

The sex prediction, it should be said, did not hold up. The grain that sprouted first had no relationship to whether the child was male or female. That part was mythology, not medicine.

But the pregnancy detection itself endured for a staggering length of time. The barley and wheat test appears in a book of German folklore as late as 1699, and was reportedly still practiced in parts of Asia Minor in the 1960s. Smithsonian Magazine Three thousand years of use across dozens of cultures, carried through Greek medicine, through Arab scholars, through medieval European herbalists — because it worked often enough that no one stopped using it.

The knowledge was preserved in the Berlin Papyrus and the Carlsberg Papyrus — two of fewer than a dozen well-preserved ancient Egyptian medical texts that survive. Most of what Egyptian physicians knew has been lost to time, dissolved in Nile floods and desert sand. What remains shows a civilization that was doing something genuinely empirical: watching patterns, recording results, building practical tools from observation.

The modern pregnancy test detects hCG — human chorionic gonadotropin, a hormone that appears in urine after conception. It is read with antibodies and chemical reactions on a strip of treated paper. It takes two minutes. It is accurate to 99%.

And at its heart, it shares the same basic logic as two bags of grain set in the sun beside the Nile: that a pregnant woman’s urine is chemically different from anyone else’s — and that difference, whatever it is, can be read.

The Egyptian physician who first wrote those instructions almost certainly never knew why they worked. They only knew they did.

Three thousand years later, in a laboratory, scientists confirmed it.

And the mechanism — the precise biological reason — is still not entirely settled.

Which means the ancient world may still be teaching us something we haven’t fully learned.

Growing Containers

Growing  Containers

The same tomato plant in four different containers produces completely different yields. The container is not a secondary detail.
The fabric grow bag performs best for a specific reason: when roots reach the permeable wall, the air at the surface desiccates the root tip and the plant responds by producing dense lateral branching further back — a process called air pruning. In a solid plastic pot the root circles continuously until it becomes pot-bound, compressing its own vascular system. In a fabric bag the root system fans outward in branched layers, maximising the volume of compost it can access.
Fabric bags also run significantly cooler than dark plastic containers. A black plastic pot in full summer sun can reach soil temperatures that slow root activity and reduce fruit set. A fabric bag in the same position will typically stay 6 to 10°C cooler.
What happens in each container:
Dark plastic pot — traps heat. Root temperatures above 28°C in summer conditions are possible. Roots circle and become constrained. Inexpensive to buy, costly in yield.
Fabric grow bag — roots branch rather than circle. Better oxygen at the root zone, better water distribution, better production. The best choice for tomatoes on a balcony or terrace.
Terracotta pot — transpires moisture through the walls, which cools the root zone naturally and prevents waterlogging. Excellent for herbs and drought-tolerant crops. For tomatoes it increases watering frequency, and in hot dry summers it can stress the plant. Works well with consistent attention.
20-litre bucket — conducts temperature change rapidly. Roots experience cold nights and warm days as sharp fluctuations rather than buffered changes. Works for tomatoes if the bucket is partially buried or insulated.

Soil Temperature Peas vs Tomatoes

Soil Temperature Peas vs Tomatoes

Your peas are climbing two feet in a week. Your tomato transplant hasn’t moved since you planted it ten days ago. Same bed. Same soil. Same water.

The tomato isn’t sick. It’s cold.

Push a soil thermometer four inches deep. If it reads below sixty degrees, that number explains everything.

Pea roots activate in the low forties. At fifty-two degrees they’re running at full capacity — which is why the pea is sprinting while the tomato sits still. Tomato roots don’t come online until the soil hits sixty. Below that, they’re alive but functionally parked. Root tips aren’t extending. Nutrients aren’t moving. The plant can’t take up phosphorus or transport calcium properly in cold soil.

That purple tint on early-season tomato leaves isn’t a deficiency you need to fix with fertilizer. It’s cold soil locking phosphorus into forms the roots can’t absorb yet. The fix is warmth, not a bag.

The practical version:

– If soil is below sixty — leave tomatoes, peppers, and eggplant in their pots on the porch. They’re not gaining anything in cold ground

– A tomato planted two weeks later into sixty-degree soil will match and overtake one planted into fifty-two-degree soil within days

– The early plant doesn’t get a head start. It gets a cold start

– The peas, lettuce, spinach, and radish are fine right now — their roots were built for this temperature

The thermometer tells you what the plant already knows.

 

Vin Diesel and Michael Caine

Vin Diesel and Michael Caine

Being present when it matters. And doesn’t it always?

One quiet gesture on a red carpet stopped the world for a moment — and reminded millions of people what real friendship looks like.

On December 4, 2025, the Red Sea International Film Festival opened its fifth edition in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Among the stars who walked the carpet that night — Uma Thurman, Ana de Armas, Queen Latifah, Kirsten Dunst — the moment that cut through all the noise was the simplest one of the evening.

Vin Diesel, in an all-black suit and sunglasses, quietly pushed a wheelchair along the red carpet. In it sat 92-year-old Sir Michael Caine — two-time Oscar winner, one of the greatest actors the English-speaking world has ever produced — dressed in a black jacket, blue striped tie, and the unmistakable dignity of a man who has nothing left to prove.

They stopped for photographs. They posed together. Then Diesel pushed his friend inside to receive an Honoree Award celebrating a career that has spanned more than six decades.

No drama. No performance. Just one man showing up for another.

Inside the venue, Diesel took the stage to present the award and spoke about Caine with the kind of warmth that does not come from a publicist’s script. “Tonight is more special for me personally,” he said, “because I’ve been asked to recognise someone who you all know as one of the best actors who’s ever lived.” He added that Caine carries “more charisma in his finger than most people in Hollywood.” The two had worked together a decade earlier on The Last Witch Hunter in 2015 — a film Diesel clearly valued for reasons beyond the box office.

Then Caine came to the microphone, supported on stage by three of his grandchildren.

What followed was pure Michael Caine. Completely himself. No false modesty, no rehearsed sentimentality, no Hollywood speech.

“Thank you for the welcome,” he began. “My name is Michael Caine.” He paused for the laughter and applause that followed. “It’s not my real name, but it’s a realistic name. It’s the one that made all the money.” He told the audience he was born a cockney in London — poor working class — and grew up to become exactly who he is. He spoke about his family with open, unguarded love.

And then, with the straightforwardness that has always defined him, he said: “I kept going until I was 90, which is two years ago. I’m not going to do anything else. I’ve had all the luck I can get.”

He retired in 2023 at the age of 90, after a career that gave the world Alfie, The Italian Job, Sleuth, The Man Who Would Be King, Hannah and Her Sisters — for which he won his first Oscar — The Cider House Rules, and his second Oscar — and a generation-defining run of films with Christopher Nolan, including The Dark Knight trilogy and Inception. More than 160 film and television credits across seven decades. A career so long and so varied that no single summary can hold it.

And he ended his speech by looking around the room in Jeddah and saying simply: “I’m just so happy to be here. I’ve seen it on television but never won anything here, so I’m happy.”

In a business built on performance, it was the most genuine moment in the room.

What made the evening memorable was not just the award, or the career it honoured, or even the warm words Diesel delivered on stage. It was the image that had already travelled around the world before the ceremony ended — one man, large and famous and strong, quietly pushing a wheelchair along a red carpet so that another man, older and slower but no less himself, could be there for something important.

Diesel called Caine a “fellow family man.” That phrase said more than any speech.

There were no grand statements that night. No declarations. Just presence — the kind that shows up without being asked, that does not need acknowledgment, that understands instinctively what it means to simply be there when it matters.

In an industry where everything can become a performance, that was the one thing that wasn’t.

And the world noticed.

Peat Moss or Coco Coir? Which is better for your needs?

The key advantage (this is where coco coir shines)

Coco coir has a unique fibre structure that:

Holds moisture evenly
Maintains airflow at the same time
Prevents compaction over time

That means:
No waterlogging
No dry patches
Stronger root systems

Peat moss is harvested from decomposed plant material in peat bogs. It’s been widely used because it:
Retains moisture well
Is lightweight
Has a slightly acidic pH

But there’s a catch…

Coco Coir Vs Peat Moss (Side-By-Side)
Feature Coco Coir Peat Moss

Water retention Excellent High
(balanced) (can become waterlogged)

Aeration High Low over time

Sustainability Renewable Non-renewable

pH level Neutral Acidic

Reusability Reusable Breaks down quickly

Aussie climate
suitability Excellent Less ideal

Water Retention: Why Coco Coir Performs Better
Here’s where most gardeners go wrong.

They think, “More water retention is better.”
But that’s not true. The real goal is balance.

Peat moss:
Holds water tightly
Can suffocate roots if overwatered

Coco coir:
Holds water and air at the same time
Releases moisture evenly

This is why plants grown in coco coir are:
Less prone to root rot
More resilient in heat
Easier to manage

Sustainability: The Big Difference
This is one area where peat moss struggles.
Peat bogs take thousands of years to form.
Once harvested, they don’t recover quickly.

Coco coir, on the other hand:
Is a renewable byproduct
Uses waste material from coconuts
Supports sustainable gardening practices

If you care about growing responsibly, the choice becomes pretty clear.

Why Coco Coir Is Better For Australian Gardens
Australian conditions are tough:
Hot summers
Dry soil
Water restrictions
This is exactly where coco coir shines.

It helps you:
Retain moisture longer (less watering)
Prevent soil drying out
Improve poor or sandy soils
Peat moss simply wasn’t designed for these conditions.

Use Coco Coir If You Want:
Better water control
Healthier root systems
A sustainable option
A medium that works in Aussie climates

Use Peat Moss If:
You specifically need acidic soil
You’re working with certain specialty plants
For most home gardeners, coco coir is the smarter choice.

As with diets, there is no ‘One size fits all’ in gardening.

Just added something to my gardening encyclopedia I thought you might be able to apply:
Key Principle: As with diets, there is no ‘One size fits all’ in gardening.
That is why for a given approach, like watering or fertilising your soil, there are often many alternatives offered in this book. Pick the one that best suits you, your circumstances, budget and environment.
In any scenario, the worst workable technique, carefully applied is better than any better technique not applied at all.

Veggie Protection

Veggie Protection

Stop sharing your hard-earned vegetables with neighborhood pests and start growing a massive harvest in great looking protection.

Standard garden beds are wide open to hungry deer and birds that can eat an entire crop of tomatoes in a single night. Bending over for hours to pull weeds or pick vegetables leads to a very sore back and tired knees. Loose soil on the ground often contains rocks or clay that make it hard for roots to grow deep and strong.

This screened enclosure creates a safe fortress where your plants can grow without being nibbled by your competition. The tall raised beds bring the dirt up to your waist so you can tend to your garden comfortably while standing. A U-shaped design allows you to reach every single plant from one spot without ever stepping on the soil and packing it down. The beautiful sage green color turns a simple vegetable patch into a stunning focal point for your backyard.

Start by building a U-shaped base using two by twelve cedar or hardwood boards stacked three high for a deep planting area. Use four by four hardwood posts at every corner and extend them six feet into the air to create the roof frame. Connect the tops with two by four rafters to give the structure a classic peak shape.

Use stainless steel screws for the whole build because they will not rust or cause the green paint to peel over time.

Paint all the wood with a high quality exterior sage green paint to prevent rot and keep it looking fresh. Stretch half inch galvanized hardware cloth and/or insect proof mesh over the entire frame and roof then secure it with heavy duty metal staples. Build a simple walk-in door with a wooden frame and cover it with the same mesh.

Plant tall varieties like tomatoes and kale furthest from the sun where they have room to climb.

Wipe down the wire mesh with a damp cloth every spring to remove dust so your plants get the most sunlight possible.