How Endocrine Disruptors Destroy Your Body + The Dirty Dozen to Avoid
BPA’s toxic effects are well-publicized. From the lining of canned foods to polycarbonate hard plastics to even the thermal coatings on cash register receipts, this is one of the world’s most proven bad news endocrine disruptors. BPA is linked to everything from hormone-related breast and prostate cancers to polycystic ovarian syndrome and early puberty.
But did you know BPA is just one of at least a thousand chemicals or chemical mixtures that can tinker with our bodies’ delicate hormonal systems, setting us up for disease?
Deciding which healthy oil to use for the cooking task at hand can be a challenge. Here is a list of the healthiest oils along with their smoke points.
A friend received an email which contained some interesting data…
Not so long ago, scientists at UCLA made a surprising discovery.
They wanted to understand how probiotics affect the brain and mood. So, they decided to run a test using brain scans. What they discovered shook the foundations of probiotic science.
It has even led some scientists to suggest that probiotics should be called “psychobiotics”. While the term might sound odd, I promise it has nothing to do with an old Hitchcock movie.
You see, the UCLA researchers discovered probiotics have a effect much bigger than previously known on how your brain works.
The UCLA study began with a simple goal. The researchers set out to see how the brains of people who consumed probiotics worked differently from those who didn’t.
To do this, they used a technology called functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). It’s an MRI for the brain. The test worked this way…
Participants were hooked up and prepped for the fMRI. Then, they looked at pictures designed to stimulate emotional responses. As they did, brain scans were done.
The group who got a placebo without probiotics performed as expected. They showed activity in the sensory and emotion areas of the brain.
But the test group who were given probiotics produced brain scans that were completely unexpected…
Sincerely,
Dr. Janet Zand
This is one of many reason why I use probiotics in my nutrition bars and powders! There is a strong connection between the gut and the brain about which we are only just now learning.
The guy who wrote this post lost his child to a vaccine reaction. He was pro vaccines till they killed his kid. Keep that in mind will you?
I bet your pediatrician can’t answer these! But we all just assume they know best. Ours failed us. Every parent researches their strollers, baby monitors and various other things but very few parents actually research what’s being injected into their children. Do some REAL research. Wake up people! Disgusting what’s going on and my son is gone because of it. I’ll never stop fighting and exposing what took my boy from me. Makes me sick he should still be here. Worst feeling in the world.
How much do you know about vaccines? Here are 40 solid questions. After really digging deep and researching these 40 things you will be woken up and see the real truth. It’s all about money.
Name 5 vaccine ingredients.
What is MRC-5?
What is WI-38?
What is vaccine court?
What is the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program?
What is the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act?
How has the CDC schedule changed since 1986?
How much money has been paid out by vaccine injury court?
How many doses of how many vaccines are in the CDC schedule between birth and age 18?
Do vaccines contain aborted fetal tissue? If so, which vaccines? And how many aborted babies were needed before they found one with the virus necessary to create the vaccine?
Do any vaccines contain dog, monkey, pig, and human DNA?
What is an adjuvant?
What is an antigen?
Which arm of the immune system do vaccines stimulate?
Which arms of the immune system do natural diseases stimulate?
What is transverse myelitis?
What is encephalopathy?
What is the rate of autism in 2017, what was it in 2000? What was it in 1990?
What is glyphosate and is it in vaccines?
If your child is injured, who will take physical, emotional, and financial responsibility?
What was the Supreme Court’s statement on vaccines in 2011?
Can you provide a study showing vaccinated vs. unvaccinated health outcomes?
Can you show me a safety study proving it is safe to inject multiple vaccines at one time?
What is shedding?
Do vaccines shed? Which vaccines can shed for up to 6 weeks?
Which vaccines are live virus vaccines?
What is the VICP?
What is SV40?
What is MTHFR (methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase)?
What is an acceptable amount of aluminum to ingest per day and how much is injected via the hep B vaccine on day one of life?
Can someone who was vaccinated for pertussis still spread pertussis after being exposed to it? If so, for how long?
What is the death rate from measles in the US from 2005-2015? From the MMR vaccine in same time frame?
What does attenuated mean?
Where can I find information about vaccines?
Are there vaccine consent forms?
Could the Vial stopper start an allergic reaction?
Can there be serious reactions to vaccines?
What is NVIC?
Is there any compensation for physicians who have a certain percentage of their patients fully vaccinated?
The local mayor, state MP and federal MP for Mandurah, Western Australia, have attacked the Interests Of The People (IOTP) show “The Economic Massacre of Mandurah” for exposing that their city is the leading edge of Australia’s housing and economic crisis.
The show featured independent economist John Adams and CEC Research Director Robert Barwick briefing host Martin North on their recent visit to Mandurah, where they witnessed streets littered with For Sale signs, and were informed by locals of the area’s serious economic and social problems, including the worst drug problem in the state. Martin North shared his comprehensive survey data of Mandurah’s 30 per cent house price falls, and more than 40 per cent unemployment and underemployment.
In the 17 July Mandurah Coastal Times, Federal Liberal MP for Canning, Andrew Hastie, attacked the show as “over the top”.
By contrast, the show struck a chord among WA locals, with many expressing that they know the show is right. “We’re seeing exactly what they say as fact in this town”, said local sport store owner Hayden Burbidge to Perth’s biggest radio station, 6PR, on 12 July.
The online Daily Mail also covered the show, in an 18 July article headlined “Economists drive through WA town counting endless ‘for sale’ signs on properties revealing the true extent of Australia’s housing crisis”.
The problem for Andrew Hastie, who is known to be personally very concerned about the situation in Mandurah, is that if he publicly acknowledges the crisis, he will be contradicting the claims of his own government. The Morrison Coalition government is both denying the crisis, and hustling the population to scam them into thinking that another housing boom is about to start and so they should rush out and buy houses.
They are preying on young households in particular, to lure them into thinking now is the right time to buy their first home. To do so, Assistant Treasurer and Housing Minister Michael Sukkar is trying to spread fear among young families—fear of missing out!
He is urging them to rush out and buy their first home now, before the government’s 5 per cent deposit scheme starts in January. Prices will skyrocket, Sukkar is implying.
“Housing Minister Michael Sukkar has urged first-home buyers to try to snap up a property now, ahead of the government’s signature loan deposit scheme starting next year, warning that housing prices are likely to increase”, Rosie Lewis reported in The Australian on 18 July.
“If you’ve got an opportunity to get a foot in the market before then you should take it, given I think the market is starting to improve,” Mr Sukkar told The Australian. “People who buy now I don’t think will regret it at all. A re-elected Morrison government has put a lot more confidence into the market. We’re seeing green shoots in Melbourne and Sydney in the last quarter and I think with low interest rates, with APRA reducing service-ability buffers, all those factors combine to confirm that optimism.” (Emphasis added.)
Sukkar might be confused. There are green shoots in the housing market—green shoots of weeds taking over abandoned greenfield developments in Sydney and Melbourne from the more than 25 per cent defaults from people walking away from their deposits, unable or unwilling to pay the balance and start building a home.
More likely, Sukkar is not confused, but along with the rest of the government is desperate to con people into the market, in the hope that a rush of buyers will start pushing up prices again.
The question is, if it doesn’t work to drive up prices, and the thousands of buyers who’ve followed Sukkar’s advice find themselves trapped in negative equity, will the Morrison government pay their debts for them?
WA shows that negative equity is a very real danger from these low-deposit schemes. The state’s Keystart program helps people into the housing market with a 2 per cent deposit, but a higher introductory interest rate. After a few years of building equity, the borrowers would refinance at a lower rate with a commercial bank. It worked for years… while prices were going up. Since prices have been plunging, however, all it is doing is trapping borrowers in negative equity and high interest rates, because commercial banks are unwilling to refinance their loans if they have no equity.
The insanity of the Morrison government’s approach is that it is trying to put off a crash by reinflating an already overstretched bubble. In reality, the bubble will burst, and it must burst, and house prices must fall a very long way so that once again they become truly affordable, without households chaining themselves to huge, unpayable debts. The longer politicians put it off, the worse the eventual crash will be, and they will destroy their constituents.
Solutions
What politicians should be doing is implementing economic solutions before the crash. The CEC has drafted a number of pieces of legislation:
to reform the banks and protect their customers through a Glass-Steagall separation of banking from speculation;
to put a freeze on foreclosures on family homes and family farms while the unpayable mortgage debt is reorganised and written down to affordable levels matching the true value of the property;
to direct the Auditor-General to urgently audit the banks to ascertain their true exposure to this crisis, and what needs to be done to clean up their books; and
a national bank to invest in productive infrastructure and industries, in order to restructure the economy away from its current focus on financial services, housing construction and raw materials exports, and back to being a powerhouse of manufacturing and agricultural production.
To fight for these solutions, join the CEC!
Click here to watch the IOTP response: The Mandurah Establishment Attacks Adams and North https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=et8N33RbOzw&feature=youtu.be
The Adani conglomerate should be best described as a bloated
gangster, promising the earth even as it mines it. Like other
corporate thugs of such disposition, it will do things within,
and if necessary outside, the regulatory framework it
encounters. Where necessary, it will libel detractors and bribe
critics, speak of a fictional number of as yet non-existent
jobs, and claim that it is green in its coaling practices. It
will also hire legal firms claiming
to be trained attack dogs and hector
the national broadcaster to pull unflattering stories from
publication and discussion.
As a marauder of the environment, the Indian mining giant has
left little to chance. It has politicians friendly to its cause
in Australia at both the state and federal level, but it faces
an environmental movement that refuses to dissipate. It also has
a problem with environmental science, particularly in the area
of water management. Conditional approvals have been secured,
albeit hurried in the aftermath of May’s federal election, and
even here, further testing will have to be done.
Given the inconveniences posed by scientists wedded to
methodology and technique, the company did not surprise in freedom of
information findings by the environmental group Lock the
Gate that it had asked the federal environment department for “a
list of each person from CSIRO and Geoscience Australia involved
in the review” of the Groundwater Dependent Ecosystem Management
Plan (GDEMP) and Groundwater Monitoring and Management Plan
(GMMP).
In a bullying
note to the Department of Environment and Energy (DOEE) in
January 25 this year, Hamish Manzi, head of the company’s
environment and sustainability branch officiously gave a five
day limit to the request, claiming that it “simply wants to know
who is involved in the review to provide it with peace of mind
that it is being treated fairly and that the review will not be
hijacked by activists with a political, as opposed to
scientific, agenda.” Manzi had noted “recent press coverage
regarding an anti-coal and/or anti-Adani bias potentially held
by experts reviewing other Adani approvals.” For Manzi, the only
expert worthy of that name would have to be sympathetic to the
mining cause.
The corporate instinct is rarely on all fours with that of the
scientific one. The former seeks the accumulation of assets,
profits and dividends; the latter tests hypotheses using a
falsification system, a process that can only ever have fidelity
to itself. The corporate instinct is happy to forget troubling
scientific outcomes, and, where necessary, corrupt it for its
ends. Where the science does not match, it is obviously the work
of ill-motivated activists or those inconvenienced by
conscience.
The Union of Concerned Scientists in February 2012, through its
Scientific Integrity Program, supplied
readers with a list of fields where science, and
scientists, have been attacked or compromised. More importantly,
it notes how governments become the subject of influence, their
decisions ever vulnerable to wobbling. “Corporations attempt to
exert influence at every step of the scientific and
policy-making processes, often to shape decisions in their
favour or avoid regulation and monitoring of their products and
by-products at the public’s expense. In so doing, they often
attempt to fundamentally alter the decision-making process.”
The methods of corrupting science are not exhaustive, but the
UCS report suggests a view tried ones. Research, for instance,
is either held up by the company in question or terminated.
Scientists are intimidated or coerced through threats to job
security, defunding and litigation. Defective methodologies in
testing and research are embraced. Scientific articles are ghost
written, with corporate sponsorship blurred. Negative results
are slyly underreported; positive results are glowingly
celebrated. And never forget good old fashioned vilification.
The FOI documents
regarding Adani’s conduct show the company as a witchdoctor
wooing the federal government into timed releases of information
and an obsession with preventing a broader public discussion of
findings. A January 9 email from Adani to DOEE demanded that
CSIRO/GA reports not be circulated to third parties or the
public. The next day, the department obligingly informed the
company that it would only share advice with Queensland’s
Department of Environment and Science.
The uncovered documents also show a certain degree of cyber
stalking at play. On January 15, a staff member of Geoscience
Australia wrote to DOEE expressing concern that the company had
viewed LinkedIn profiles of employees. Such concerns did little
to ruffle the growing accord between the department and the
company.
The abdication of government to the corporate sector is one of
the more troubling features of this tawdry chapter in Australian
non-governance. Corporate giants know they must enlist the
support of representatives who they can trust to be of sound
mind. History is replete with successful lobbying efforts in the
name of corrupted science.
In 2007, ReGen Biologics, a New Jersey company, faced a
sceptical Food and Drug Administration (FDA) concerned with
Menaflex, a device intended to replace knee cartilage. With the
FDA’s rejection came a mobilisation effort. Politicians were
sought and cultivated. In December that year, Senators Frank
Lautenberg and Robert Menendez, and Rep. Steve Rothman all wrote
to FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach. The Commissioner’s
ear had been bended sufficiently to lead to a new review headed
by Dr Daniel Schultz, head of the FDA’s medical devices
division. Scepticism vanished; the product was approved. In
2010, a shamefaced FDA had to concede that it had erred and duly
revoked approval.
Instead of defending practices of departments and professionals
engaged in the task of assessing the merits of such ventures,
individuals such as the Australian deputy prime minister suggest
that Adani might have a point in is heavy-handed enthusiasm to
root out contrarians. In Michael McCormack’s view, Adani “were
made to jump through more environmental hoops than perhaps any
previous project in the nation.” They merely
“wanted to determine… that those arguing against their proposals
were not just some quasi anti-development groups or
individuals.” The thug’s narrative has found a home in the
hearts of the anti-scientific representatives that currently
rule the Canberra roost. Scientists have been warned.
More articles by:Binoy
Kampmark
Binoy Kampmark
was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He
lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com