Read this and understand its ramifications before you let them inject into your body an untried, untested vaccine for which the manufacturer is indemnified from any and all harm it causes you or your children.
Moderna Vaccine Data
The Less Educated, The More ProVax
One of my friends, David Mayo, reports after reading ‘Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies’: The book is interesting in that is composed of peer reviewed studies arranged by topic. His words on page 294 “Education level of Non-Vaccinating Parents” The studies in this chapter confirm that parents who don’t vaccinate their children are highly educated,value scientific knowledge and are sophisticated at researching vaccines. Mothers with college degrees are the most likely to refuse vaccines for their children. Mothers who never graduated from high school are the most likely to fully vaccinate their children. The chapter then follows with eight peer reviewed studies with subjects relating to that.
Milkweed, only food source for monarch caterpillars, ubiquitously contaminated
(Tom: This is tragic. Please support any petition or other attempt to curb the use of pesticieds and eschew their use yourself. Investigate companion planting and other means of more sustainable agriculture.)
New evidence identifies 64 pesticide residues in milkweed, the main food for monarch butterflies in the west. Milkweed samples from all of the locations studied in California’s Central Valley were contaminated with pesticides, sometimes at levels harmful to monarchs and other insects.
The study raises alarms for remaining western monarchs, a population already at a precariously small size. Over the last few decades their overwintering numbers have plummeted to less than 1% of the population size than in the 1980s – which is a critically low level.
Monarch toxicity data is only available for four of the 64 pesticides found, and even with this limited data, 32% of the samples contained pesticide levels known to be lethal to monarchs, according to a study released today in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.
https://www.unr.edu/nevada-today/news/2020/butterflies-and-pesticides
Human Rights Video #24: Right to Play
The lack of peace in certain regions is proof positive that these principles are actually valid and needed, more than ever. Please promote the Youth for Human Rights videos so more people are aware of and insist upon their rights so that we can live in a peaceful society.
Watch the video and if you think so too, please share it!
The Immune Defense Summit
Starts today!
These are the experts you definitely DO NOT want to miss on Monday!
- Dr. Richard Cheng, Successful COVID-19 Therapy
- Ty Bollinger, Avoiding Cancer Cell Growth
- Niki Gratrix, Link Between Emotions and Disease
- Dr. David Minkoff, Overcoming Lyme Disease and Co-Infections
- Dr. Thomas Lewis, Testing Your Immune Strength
- Dr. Izabella Wentz, Thyroid Disorders and Immune Health
When you register now, you’ll also unlock these complimentary gifts:
- Slash Your Risk of Chronic Disease and Infections eGuide
- The Coronavirus Story: What the Media Isn’t Telling You eBook
- The Ancient Answer for Liver Ailments eBook
- 2 transcripts from The Immune Defense Summit
- Access to COVID-19 Viral Defense Protocol presentation with Dr. Thomas E. Levy
In The Age of Information Ignorance is a Choice.
A very comprehensive collection from medical doctors and PhD scientists who explain clearly why vaxcines are not safe or effective.
Flu Shots Increase Risk 500% of Acute Respiratory Infection
(Tom: It does not take a PhD in medicine to feel disinclined to get a flu shot when they increase your risk of getting severely ill from COVID-19 by 500%! This from the British Medical Journal.)
Article:
Rapid Response:
Flu shots and the risk of coronavirus infections
John Watkins is right; we need to think beyond containment, but he overlooks the possibility that seasonal flu shots are potential contributors to the current outbreak. (BMJ 2020;398:m810—February 28)….A randomized placebo-controlled trial in children showed that flu shots increased fivefold the risk of acute respiratory infections caused by a group of noninfluenza viruses, including coronaviruses. (Cowling et al, Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:1778) From Table 3, vaccine recipients had 20 noninfluenza virus-positive ARIs and 19 virus-negative ARIs; non-recipients had 3 noninfluenza virus-positive ARIs and 14 virus-negative ARIs. These figures yield an odds ratio of 4.91 (CI 1.04 to8.14).
Such an observation may seem counterintuitive, but it is possible that influenza vaccines alter our immune systems non-specifically to increase susceptibility to other infections; this has been observed with DTP and other vaccines. (Benn et al, Trends in Immunology, May 2013) There are other immune mechanisms that might also explain the observation.
To investigate this possibility, a case-control study is in order as we study and care for the victims of covid-19. Influenza vaccines have become sacred cows in some quarters, but they shouldn’t be.
ALLAN S. CUNNINGHAM 2 March 2020
When big companies fund academic research, the truth often comes last
Internal industry documents obtained through litigation have revealed many examples of industry sponsors influencing the design and conduct of research, as well as the partial publication of research where only findings favourable to the funder were published.
For instance, in 1981 an influential Japanese study showed an association between passive smoking and lung cancer. It concluded wives of heavy smokers had up to twice the risk of developing lung cancer as wives of non-smokers and that the risk was dose related.
Tobacco companies then funded academic researchers to create a study that would refute these findings. The tobacco companies were involved in every step of the funded work, but kept the extent of their involvement hidden for decades. They framed the research questions, designed the study, collected and provided data, and wrote the final publication.
Niall McCrae and David Kurten: EU Numbers Show Correlation Between Flu Vaccine and Coronavirus Deaths
This is an excellent article and drops many blockbusters so is well worth your time reading to the end.
Does This CDC Study Deliver the Knockout Blow in the COVID Lockdown Debate?
For weeks, the nation’s economy has been under lockdown to curb the spread of the Wuhan Coronavirus. It’s contagious. That’s true, but in the span of a few days, the entire COVID narrative has virtually collapsed.
Most people are more likely to wind up six feet under because of almost anything else under the sun other than COVID-19.
The CDC just came out with a report that should be earth-shattering to the narrative of the political class, yet it will go into the thick pile of vital data and information about the virus that is not getting out to the public. For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26%. Officials estimate a 0.4% fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35% rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26% — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged ita month ago.
Until now, we have been ridiculed for thinking the death rate was that low, as opposed to the 3.4% estimate of the World Health Organization, which helped drive the panic and the lockdowns. Now the CDC is agreeing to the lower rate in plain ink.
Plus, ultimately we might find out that the IFR is even lower because numerous studies and hard counts of confined populations have shown a much higher percentage of asymptomatic cases. Simply adjusting for a 50% asymptomatic rate would drop their fatality rate to 0.2% – exactly the rate of fatality Dr. John Ionnidis of Stanford University projected.
Comparing COVID-19 to previous seasonal and pandemic influenzas reveals a similar fatality rate.