
And as if the universe were listening to my rant, not 5 minutes after me posting this http://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=30994, a supporting post from the great Dr Simone Gold hit my in-box.

Tom's Blog on Life and Livingness

And as if the universe were listening to my rant, not 5 minutes after me posting this http://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=30994, a supporting post from the great Dr Simone Gold hit my in-box.

Reminds me of a meme along the same lines. “Your opinion of me is none of my business!” There is a large element of truth in these. Very often a person’s opinion of you is more a reflection of them than it is you. Of course none of us are perfect, we all carry emotional blemishes and physical scars from our past. But the person who dwells on them is not looking at the rightness of a being. And because you get that on which you put your attention, it behooves us to learn our lesson from them then ignore our losses, remember our wins and want and expect the best from our fellow man.

There is an old propaganda line, Repeat a lie often enough and it will be believed.
Well, they are ramping up the lie factory to warp speed as more people are becoming more aware on the subject!
Let’s talk about trust for a moment. Trust requires honesty, transparency and integrity. Three ingredients sorely missing from Pfizer’s character and deeds.
How can you possibly trust a vaccine maker who is a convicted felon that has paid over $3 BILLION in fines in the last 20 years for illegal activities, lying about the efficacy of their products, off-label marketing and bribing doctors? You can’t!
How can you trust a vaccine maker who won’t tell you what is in their vaccine? You can’t!
How can you trust a vaccine that has been rushed to market and skipped animal trials? You can’t!
How can you trust a safety study where they only take really healthy people into the study, do not test the effect of the vaccine on sick or immunocompromised people? You can’t!
How can you trust a vaccine safety study where only the results from a selected 8,000 of the 40,000 participants were taken into account? You can’t!
How can you trust a vaccine safety study where any adverse reaction in less than 2% (800 people) of the 40,000 participants went unreported? You can’t!
How can you trust a vaccine maker that says they are studying the results of the safety study now and will release the results in TWO YEARS TIME? You can’t!
DO NOT BUY THEIR PROPAGANDA! THEY ARE BANKING (LITERALLY) ON YOU BEING UNINFORMED AND COMPLIANT.

A friend asked: “Can anyone answer this intelligently because I’m all ears.”
I replied…
Some people hold the view Craig that there is no actual pandemic, only a false one because the remedies (like HCQ and Ivermectin) that would prevent COVID deaths have been suppressed and the COVID deaths have been falsified and inflated and the media fear porn have blinded those who feel rather than look and think so do not observe the statistics that the total deaths in the US and OZ are actually down on last year. Influenza and pneumonia deaths are down, replaced with COVID deaths.
So why the lockdowns and other “pandemic” response measures that the statistics reveal are at best useless and more likely completely counter-productive and harmful?
The old adage, follow the money.
Who loses from the lockdowns?
Small businesses and the people they employ.
Who wins?
Big businesses.
Owners of Amazon and the other mega giants have seen their net worth grow by billions over the last 8 months whereas a great many small business will never reopen. This reduces mum and pop competition to the giants and we have seen and enormous transfer of wealth from the middle class to the wealthy elite due to this manipulation.
For the last ten+ years Bill Gates (through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) have contributed tens and hundreds of millions of dollars to the WHO and many other health institutions. Do these organisation bite the hand that feeds them? 10 points if you thought, “No.”
Bill Gates and others sponsored a Pandemic 201 conference late 2019 to get everyone (the WHO, governments and health departments) on the same page with regards to societal response to a pandemic.
Since then, the IMF have funded those governments that toed the line and imposed the restrictions on their people. (The president of a former Soviet republic exposed this.)
Hope this explanation of the sting helps make sense of what would otherwise look pretty insane.

The CDC silently updated their numbers late August to show that only 6% of all coronavirus deaths were completely due to the coronavirus alone. The rest of the deaths pinned to the China coronavirus are attributed to individuals who had other serious issues going on.
The data from Europe shows that the number of cases has little correlation to the number of deaths. This is why the narrative is reporting cases and ignoring deaths.
Let’s face it – at this moment in time anyone who is pushing for more lockdowns and other abuses on our personal rights is either evil or terribly misinformed.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm


This delicious blueberry ice-cream recipe comes just in time for the Australian summer! Thanks for the recipe Panaceas pantry.
INGREDIENTS:
2 cups fresh Australian blueberries
1/2 cup pure maple syrup
2 tsp fresh lemon juice
1 cup raw cashews, soaked for 3 hours
2 x 400mL cans full-fat coconut cream
1 tbsp (15mL) Master blend Pure vanilla extract
1 tbsp vodka (optional)
1/4 tsp salt
METHOD:
1. The night before, prepare your ice-cream maker by placing in the freezer, and add the canned coconut cream to the fridge. Soak cashews in water, and put these into the fridge too.
2. The next day, drain cashews, and rinse well. Add cashews to a blender along with all the remaining ingredients, and blend until smooth and uniform. Transfer the mixture to a large bowl, and set in the freezer for 30 minutes.
3. Pour chilled ice-cream mixture into your ice-cream maker, and churn for 45 minutes (or follow the manufacturer instructions). At this stage, you will have what looks like soft serve ice-cream (and you can definitely serve it at this point).
4. Add unicorn confetti, and allow to churn for a further few minutes, until incorporated, then transfer the ice-cream to a 2L capacity metal ice-cream tin (or loaf tin). Cover the top of the ice cream firmly with baking paper or a repurposed, food-safe plastic bag, taking care to seal the ice-cream well to avoid ice crystals from forming. Freeze for 3 hours, then serve up in waffle cones or a bowl.

One of my Healthelicious clients sent me this regarding the new COVID vaccines that alter our DNA. I thought it well worth sharing with you…
Hi Tom, thanks for forwarding your newsletters, I hope you take a break from it every now and then.
We’ve met a couple of times at your market stall during various expos over the years and talked about issues relating to general practice of medical procedures on healthy people.
Here we are, 2020, with a little more transparency than usual but still along way from where we need to be for safety of said medical procedures on healthy people.
I have a background in design engineering of systems for a large financial institution. Over a 20 year period I gained a substantial understanding of IT systems and management of risk implementing those systems with Change Management infrastructure.
A Change as it is labelled usually has several departments to approve before implementation. If it does not have a roll back procedure (used if something breaks to restore back to original state) it is considered high risk and in practice is avoided if possible due to potential high impact.
In other words, if going forward with a Change that does not have a roll back procedure, be 100% sure as far as is practible by testing on a replica system. Testing is to establish that a Change does what is intended and will not break anything in the process.
The latest medical procedures still in experimental phase involve a Change to the human cell system that operate much like a factory with DNA the programming language.
I consider these latest medical procedures to be high risk and potentially high impact as I have yet to see to see any equivalent roll back procedure.
I suppose we could imagine a DNA software simulation run for each individual that might solve the problem of testing prior to administering one of these procedures. This doesn’t exist to my knowledge and I suppose there would need to be robust checking mechanisms to be able to trust such an AI system.
So without an individual testing regime, we’re back to engineering basics, consent provided only with a safe roll back procedure.
Best regards,
David

This study suggests that dietary carotenoids from spinach and tomato aid in the dietary management of steatosis by reversing steatosis biomarkers.
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/9/11/1041