Random Thought For The Day on Communication
The mind is an interesting thing. In some respects it is like a radio receiver. You could plot the quality of the reception on a scale. At the one end of the scale it can receive an accurate signal at the correct volume and take in the data. At the one end of the scale there are numerous ways the message can be not received.
The signal can be too weak so the message is not understood.
The message can be too strong so it blows the receiver away.
The signal can arrive at the same time as another, so the two messages conflict and not received.
The incoming message can be filtered out so it is not received.
You may have noticed some of these manifestations when trying to communicate with people.
Some people tend to reject most of what they hear.
Some people will reject anything that is not of a particular flavour.
Some will appear to be listening but take in nothing.
Some have data that conflicts with what you are trying to communicate so your message bounces as invalid.
The important thing is to keep communicating data important to you at one of two frequencies or wavelengths.
Either the one with which you feel the most comfortable or the one that is most likely to be received and ensure a duplication at the receipt point.
Either will work in different circumstances.
The former will resonate most with beings similar to you so you will build a set of comm lines with people most like you. Which has pros and cons.
The latter will be better received and understood by whomever receives it. This will build comm lines with a wider group of people.
Whichever you choose, keep communicating. It shows you are alive. People who do not communicate are dead.
Happy communicating!
If You Were My Wife…
Finding Yourself
Another major red flag about Covid vaccines and death
People appear to die at rates 20 percent or more above normal for weeks after receiving their second Covid vaccine dose, according to data from a huge Swedish study.
The figures are buried in a preprint paper on vaccine effectiveness released last month. The headline finding of the paper was that protection against Covid, including severe cases, plunged after six months.
The researchers did not explicitly examine deaths from all causes – which have risen since the summer in many countries that have highly vaccinated populations.
Read more:
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/another-major-red-flag-about-covid
Positive People
The Angry
Al Tilley The Bum
Drew Cohen wrote: This was the very first Far Side I ever saw. I remember seeing it in the NY Daily News and it took me a moment to fathom what was going on, having never seen the strip before and therefor not expecting its unique sensibility. No humor is better than the clever (but not TOO clever) line that takes you a second to take in, understand, and then fully comprehend. I was hooked on Day 1. You never forget your first. Thank you Mr. Larson!
Gandhi … A lovely little anecdote about one of life’s more interesting characters.
When Mahatma Gandhi was studying law at the University College of London, a professor by the name of Peters disliked him intensely and always displayed animosity towards him. And because Gandhi never lowered his head when addressing him, as he expected, there were always ‘arguments’ and confrontations.
One day Mr Peters was having lunch at the University dining room when Gandhi came along with his tray and sat next to him.
The professor said, “Mr Gandhi, you do not understand. A pig and a bird do not sit together to eat. “Gandhi looked at him as a parent would a rude child and calmly replied, “You do not worry, professor. I’ll fly away”, and he went and sat at another table.
Peters, red with rage, decided to take revenge on the next test paper, but Gandhi responded brilliantly to all questions.
Unhappy and frustrated, Mr Peters asked him the following question: “Mr Gandhi, if you were walking down the street and found a package, and within was a bag of wisdom and another bag with a lot of money, which one would you take?”
Without hesitating, Gandhi responded, “The one with the money, of course.”
Mr Peters, smiling sarcastically, said, “I, in your place, would have taken the wisdom.”
Gandhi shrugged indifferently and responded, “Each one takes what he doesn’t have.”
Mr Peters, by this time, was fit to be tied. So great was his anger that he wrote on Gandhi’s exam sheet the word “idiot” and handed it back to him.
Gandhi took the exam sheet and sat down at his desk, trying hard to remain calm while he contemplated his next move. A few minutes later, Gandhi got up, went to the professor and said to him in a dignified but sarcastically polite tone, “Mr Peters, you autographed the sheet, but you did not give me a grade.”
Old Versus New Me
