In a gripping revelation, Dr. Andrew Wakefield recounts his journey from 1995, when parents of previously healthy children contacted him, reporting a devastating regression after the MMR vaccine. These children, once vibrant with speech and social skills, lost their abilities, their eyes “glazing over” as they descended into autism. As a gastroenterologist, Dr. Wakefield was stunned—not by vaccines, which he dutifully administered, but by the consistent parental accounts of gut issues, pain, and developmental collapse. Despite no prior autism expertise, he listened—an act medicine often forgets. Parents described intractable diarrhea, bloating, and failure to thrive, dismissed by doctors as “just autism.” Dr. Wakefield assembled a world-class team, including leading pediatric gastroenterologist Prof. John Walker-Smith. Their findings? Inflammation in the children’s bowels, treatable with anti-inflammatories and dietary changes like gluten and dairy removal. Astonishingly, not only did gut symptoms improve, but cognitive abilities—lost words, lost connections—began to return. In 1998, Dr. Wakefield’s Lancet study reported these clinical findings, explicitly stating it did not prove a causal link between MMR and autism, urging further research. Yet, the world erupted. Accused of claiming vaccines cause autism—a claim he never made—Dr. Wakefield faced a brutal backlash. The study was misrepresented, and myths of retraction swirled (it wasn’t retracted by him). Powerful interests—pharma, government, WHO—were offended. His career was threatened, his name vilified, not for fraud, but for daring to listen to parents and report what he found. Dr. Wakefield’s story exposes a chilling truth: medicine’s arrogance silenced a doctor who prioritized patients over policy. Autism rates have soared—1 in 2,500 in 1966, 1 in 36 today, 1 in 20 boys. Parents were right about the gut-brain link, right about regression, right about dietary interventions. Yet, the system chose to “cut the head off” the messenger.
The science is in — mRNA vaccine-induced myocarditis is NOT rare, mild, or transient.
Our peer-reviewed study, backed by 341 references, dismantles the official narrative and calls for the immediate market removal of COVID-19 mRNA injections due to alarming cardiotoxicity risks.
Questions To Ask
I heard that recently, Bill Gates visited the Prime Minister of Singapore and that shortly thereafter, Singapore passed legislation that made refusing a vaccine punishable by fines and jail time. This is abhorrent!
And that 173 nations have just ceded personal and national health sovereignty to the WHO. This is doubly abhorrent!
So I pulled up this article from 2021 and am sharing it with you again. In my humble opinion, given the severe health issues, let alone deaths, that many suffered after the Covid shot, it is worth printing out and having available should the anticipated next round come to pass.
A conversation from Chris Potts
Had a call from the NHS again today, asking if I’d like to book an appointment for a thingy. only the second call I’ve had in fairness. different caller this time, so once I again I took them through the same procedure as I did with the previous call. which was…
NHS.. hello Mr Potts I’m calling to see if you would like to make an appointment for a C thing. you can make an appointment with your Dr or local Pharmacy.
ME.. hello, would you like to take through the relevant stages, so I can make an informed choice as to whether I’d like to accept your offer of a thingy, or respectfully decline your offer.
NHS.. short pause, what stages are you referring too Mr Potts?.
ME.. well, firstly are you going to explain to me, that the things in question are experimental technologies, and by agreeing to have one, I’ll be taking part in a phase four clinical trial that runs until January 2023.
NHS.. sorry Mr Potts, I don’t have information like that to give you. as I’m not aware of any clinical trials taking place.
ME.. OK, could you please give me a full list of the ingredients of the particular thing, I’d be taking, so I can check to see if I’m allergic to any of them, and avoid the possibility of a reaction.
NHS.. sorry Mr Potts, I can’t give you that information, as I don’t know which brand of thingy you’d be offered.
ME.. ok, then perhaps you could give me a list of alternative treatments that are available, that don’t involve invasive procedures like thingys, and have a proven record of safety and efficacy?
NHS.. again I’m sorry Mr Potts I don’t have any information of that kind at hand, regarding alternative treatments.
At this point I pointed out to the guy that, the three questions I asked him, make up the core principles of gaining INFORMED CONSENT, before any medical procedure can be carried out. and that those principals are protected under international law. I also pointed out, he was perfectly within his rights to call and ask me if I’d like to make an appointment, but in doing so he should have gone through those three stages with me first, as required by law when asking anyone to under go a medical procedure.
In fairness to him guys, he was reasonable about the whole thing, and obviously logged me as “offered but declined,” in a short conversation we had before the call was ended, he said “i take it you’ve looked into this topic then Mr Potts,” I replied “i have indeed my friend, thoroughly.” the impression I got, was that I’d raised his curiosity level a notch, especially the first part about this thingy roll out being a phase four clinical trial, I truly believe he genuinely had no idea this was the case.
As I pointed out many times before, we do still have legally protected rights to decline the thing. once you know your rights, and the legal procedures health care providers must follow by law to gain your INFORMED CONSENT, no amount of threats or coercion can change the fact, that without providing the answers to the three questions I asked, any consent I gave, would not legally be deemed informed and would therefore be invalid. I can’t stress that enough to you guys, know your rights and use them. you’d be surprised how quickly even the most persistent callers back off, once they realise the person on the other end of the phone is no mug lol.
Great questions to ask before you consider the thingy.
Covid Shots Kill Bifidobacteria
mRNA vaccines kill and continue to kill Bifodbacteria. Loss of Bifodbacteria is associated with Autism, Cancer, Crohns, Lyme disease.
Death Is NOT Mild
Whilest Luther makes a valid point, there is an enzyme called Serrapeptase that I have as part of my Anti-Spike Blend that helps resolve internal scar tissue. If you have had the Covid shot, contracted Covid or been around someone in the first two groups (therefore been exposed to the Spike Protein via transfection) check out my https://www.healthelicious.com.au/NutriBlast-Anti-Spike.html,
Groundbreaking Autism Research Unveils Gut-Brain Connection
Dr. Sabine Hazan, renowned gastroenterologist, shares stunning findings from her latest study on the microbiome’s role in autism.
In a soon-to-be-published paper, Dr. Hazan’s team analyzed 20 autistic children, their 23 neurotypical siblings, and 6 neurotypical children with no family history of autism. The results? A striking pattern emerged: autistic children had significantly lower or absent levels of Bifidobacterium—a critical microbe abundant in newborns but depleted in these kids. Siblings showed higher Bifidobacterium levels, but even they lagged behind the unrelated neurotypical group, pointing to a household-linked gut dysbiosis.
Dr. Hazan’s team went further, studying identical twins—both nonverbal, aggressive, and lacking Bifidobacterium at baseline, with identical elevated harmful microbes.
After targeted treatment to restore their microbiomes, these twins, now 7, are fully verbal and non-aggressive just seven months later.
Dr. Hazan emphasizes: “The microbiome is the key. These microbes travel from the gut to the brain via the vagus nerve, influencing behavior.
Ignoring this is a disservice to nonverbal autistic children who suffer, and their families who live in crisis.”
She calls for urgent research and therapeutics to address this gut-brain axis, particularly for nonverbal autistic children who engage in self-harm or require constant care.
In California, where autism rates are soaring, Dr. Hazan argues it’s unacceptable to focus solely on rehabilitation without tackling the root causes.
Vaccine Schedule 1983 vs 2016
“Under Dr. Fauci’s leadership, the allergic, autoimmune, and chronic illnesses which Congress specifically charged NIAID to investigate and prevent, have mushroomed to afflict 54 percent of children, up from 12.8 percent when he took over NIAID in 1984. One of the primary culprits for this change was Fauci brokering a 1986 deal that incentivizing a flood of unsafe childhood vaccines to enter the market:”
With one in 36 children now diagnosed with autism, we don’t just have an epidemic, it is a catastrophe!
Brilliant article, well worth reading. Especially for those wanting to handle autism, jab injuries and autoimmune diseases.
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-do-vaccines-cause-autism
Formula for Treating Vaccine-Induced Brain Damage | Autism Specialist Maija Hahn
How To Cleanse The Body After Vaccination
Click to view the video: https://x.com/toobaffled/status/1923878924486168979
To aid those tricked/coerced into getting the jab/those suffering post exposure to the jabbed, I did my best to compile a Jab Recovery Protocol from various source: https://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=35644
And if you have any doubts or reservations that EVERYBODY needs to do this detox, read the snippets of articles on the About tab of this page: https://www.healthelicious.com.au/NutriBlast-Anti-Spike.html
Why the Canadian Govt and Big Pharma are Waging War on an Ostrich Farm
Canada’s Ostrich Cull Scandal: Are Big Pharma and Globalist Interests Pulling the Strings?
When I first heard about the ostrich farm in Edgewood, British Columbia, facing a forced cull of 400 ostriches, something immediately felt off. Sure, authorities claim they’re responding to an avian flu outbreak—but the deeper I dig into this, the more it smells of something else entirely. Let’s get right into it, because this isn’t just about bird flu—this is about science, censorship, profits, and powerful global interests that seem determined to control the narrative and crush alternatives.
The Edgewood Ostrich Outrage: How We Got Here
Picture a remote, idyllic farm in British Columbia’s Kootenay region, home to about 400 ostriches on 65 acres. On December 31, 2024, two ostriches tragically die of H5N1 avian flu, reportedly brought by wild migratory birds. This leads to a swift quarantine by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)—but that’s just the beginning.
Incredibly, after the initial outbreak, only about 40 birds (roughly 10% of the flock, mainly younger ostriches) succumb to the virus. Within just days, something remarkable occurs: the flock stabilizes, and the remaining 90% of the birds are thriving. Farm owner Karen Espersen observes that these ostriches seem to develop immunity, something clearly special and scientifically fascinating.
Yet despite the farm’s desperate pleas for additional testing and careful scientific study, the CFIA orders all ostriches culled—every last healthy bird—to supposedly “prevent the spread.” The family fights back, but on May 13, 2025, the Canadian Federal Court sides with the CFIA, leaving no room for appeal. The ostriches, despite clear evidence of recovery and possible immunity, are condemned to death.
Why the rush to destroy animals that might be holding keys to groundbreaking treatments? Why no interest in studying them further?
Ostrich Eggs and Antibodies: A Game-Changing Threat to Big Pharma?
Here’s where it gets interesting. Ostriches aren’t just giant flightless birds—they are potent biological factories. Their eggs contain powerful antibodies that have already demonstrated incredible therapeutic potential. Each ostrich egg can yield as many antibodies as 100 chicken eggs or 800 rabbits. That’s not just impressive, it’s potentially disruptive to the pharmaceutical industry.
Dr. Yasuhiro Tsukamoto (nicknamed “Dr. Ostrich”), a prominent Japanese veterinary immunologist, has been leading pioneering research using ostrich antibodies. His work, in collaboration with the Edgewood farm, produced breakthrough products during the COVID-19 crisis, including masks and nasal sprays coated with ostrich antibodies that neutralize viruses effectively. Hospitals in Japan even ran successful clinical trials using ostrich antibody nasal sprays for virus prevention.
Now, apply this logic to avian flu—a virus global health authorities (including the WHO and World Economic Forum) are increasingly hyping as “the next COVID,” predicting global outbreaks and calling for new mass vaccination programs. If ostrich antibodies could provide effective natural immunity or treatment against bird flu, that could render new vaccines—particularly expensive, patented mRNA vaccines—unnecessary or less profitable.
It’s not a stretch to see why pharmaceutical giants might perceive ostrich antibodies as a direct threat: cheap, natural, effective, and impossible to monopolize like lab-engineered vaccines.
The Pharma Connection: Is Big Money Silencing Alternative Solutions?
As I researched deeper, disturbing questions arose. According to the ostrich farm owners, CFIA officials bizarrely grilled them about their proprietary antibody research during quarantine meetings—unusual questioning, to say the least, for an agency supposedly just concerned with containment. Why was a regulatory agency suddenly so interested in proprietary intellectual property?
From my perspective, this screams of corporate influence—exactly the type of “public-private partnership” favored by groups like the World Economic Forum, where regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical interests often blend seamlessly.
Indeed, ostrich antibodies represent precisely the kind of “inconvenient science” that Big Pharma—and powerful globalist institutions like the WHO and WEF—would rather not let flourish. After all, if a farmer in British Columbia could produce inexpensive antibody-based solutions to avian flu, COVID, or other pandemics, why would governments invest billions in patented mRNA technologies championed by the pharmaceutical establishment?
This dynamic mirrors precisely what we’ve seen throughout COVID: affordable, natural solutions systematically sidelined in favor of profitable, patent-protected vaccines and treatments. And let’s be honest—the upcoming bird flu “crisis” narrative feels suspiciously similar to the lead-up to the COVID pandemic: a hyped-up global threat, new vaccines in the pipeline, and massive profits at stake.
A Pattern of Suppression: “Trust the Science”…or Else?
Critically, the CFIA’s rigid refusal to even consider alternative solutions or studies of these potentially immune birds exposes a deeper pattern of institutional inflexibility—or intentional suppression. Despite the farm’s strict quarantine, remote location, and documented immunity of surviving birds, authorities refused any meaningful investigation or testing, stubbornly adhering to blanket policies that conveniently shut down independent science.
Even respected veterinarians like Dr. Scott Weese from the University of Guelph have pointed out the irrationality: “We’re not eradicating H5N1 by culling these ostriches,” he said plainly. Premier David Eby of British Columbia even questioned why there’s no “case-by-case” flexibility, expressing frustration at the CFIA’s blanket policy.
Yet the authorities wouldn’t budge an inch. The message is clear: “Trust our science, no questions allowed.”
Public Outrage and the Fight for Truth
The outrage from the farm, community, and global observers has been intense. Activists and animal advocates descended on Edgewood, physically trying to block the cull and livestreaming desperate pleas for help. Even Robert F. Kennedy Jr., known for challenging the COVID vaccine narrative, weighed in, calling the planned ostrich cull “horrifying.”
The farm’s supporters—and I count myself among them—see this cull as part of a larger pattern: global health authorities and big-money pharmaceutical interests systematically suppressing any inexpensive, natural, and non-patentable solutions. The ostrich antibodies represent exactly the kind of disruptive innovation that global elites, aligned with pharma profits and pandemic narratives, want silenced.
Coincidence or Conspiracy? The Bigger Picture Emerges
Is it mere coincidence that, just as ostrich antibodies were demonstrating real promise as inexpensive, natural antiviral solutions, Canadian authorities swiftly moved to destroy the birds producing them?
While no court case or official inquiry directly proves Big Pharma influence on CFIA’s decision, context matters greatly. The aggressive stance of global health organizations promoting the avian flu as “the next big threat,” coupled with heavy investment in mRNA vaccine technology, makes ostrich-derived natural immunity research deeply inconvenient. Powerful financial interests would clearly benefit from removing such competition.
Even Canadian MLAs and animal-rights advocates are questioning whether something darker lies behind this incident. It may not be outright conspiracy—though that can’t be ruled out—but rather the structural, systemic alignment between big-money pharmaceutical interests, compliant government agencies, and international globalist institutions promoting centralized pandemic responses.
Looking Ahead: Fighting for Transparency and Real Science
This ostrich farm incident isn’t just another animal culling. It’s a symptom of a broader struggle—science versus profit, freedom versus control, transparency versus censorship.
We have an opportunity to push back, demanding full transparency from government and health authorities. We must insist on fair, unbiased scientific inquiry into promising alternatives, no matter how disruptive they may be to established financial or political interests.
Imagine if Canadian authorities had paused to thoroughly investigate these ostriches’ apparent immunity. Imagine a world where inexpensive, effective ostrich antibodies became a mainstream, natural alternative to costly pharmaceutical vaccines. Unfortunately, this scenario directly threatens too many entrenched interests to be allowed to develop without resistance.
We can’t allow powerful actors to squash independent innovation under the guise of “public health.” The Edgewood ostrich cull should be a wake-up call: it’s about far more than birds—it’s about the future of medical freedom, scientific transparency, and resisting the weaponization of fear-based pandemic narratives for profit and control.
Let’s keep our eyes wide open—and keep digging.