Aunt Jemima

Aunt Jemima

“The branding of the syrup was a tribute to this woman’s gifts and talents. Now future generations will not even know this beautiful woman existed. What a shame. The world knew her as “Aunt Jemima”, but her given name was Nancy Green and she was a true American success story. She was born a slave in 1834 Montgomery County, KY. and became a wealthy superstar in the advertising world, as its first living trademark. Green was 56-yrs old when she was selected as spokesperson for a new ready-mixed, self-rising pancake flour and made her debut in 1893 at a fair and exposition in Chicago. She demonstrated the pancake mix and served thousands of pancakes, and became an immediate star. She was a good storyteller, her personality was warm and appealing, and her showmanship was exceptional. Her exhibition booth drew so many people that special security personnel were assigned to keep the crowds moving. Nancy Green was signed to a lifetime contract, traveled on promotional tours all over the country, and was extremely well paid. Her financial freedom and stature as a national spokesperson enabled her to become a leading advocate against poverty and in favor of equal rights for all Americans. She maintained her job until her death in 1923, at age 89. ??This was a remarkable woman, and sadly she has been ERASED by politics. I wanted you to know and remind you in this cancel culture time period.”
(From Kasandra on

Without Ukraine The NWO May Not Survive. Go The Ruskies!

Without Ukraine The NWO May Not Survive

Read this carefully!

According to Nathaniel Rothschild, heir to the Rothschild family fortune…“Without Ukraine, the global order may not survive.”

Did you catch that?

This is a RED ALERT PANIC CALL to fellow globalists saying that if the Ukraine were to fall, then so would the New World Order. [They] are literally BEGGING for military reinforcements from other globalist nation states to aid in “saving” Ukraine for the NWO agenda…This is incredibly telling, especially knowing about the US funded BioLabs there. Preventing next Plandemic, perhaps?

He also said that Xi was a “close second” to being the “worlds most dangerous man” next to Putin. That confirms my belief regarding Xi…George Soros said the same thing. That is NOT coincidental.

There should be NO more questions. It should be ABUNDANTLY CLEAR by now that Putin, and Xi are single handedly DESTROYING the NWO, and [they] are ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED about it!

Blueprints for flourishing in the midst of a decaying civilization

Ancient Entrance

The following is adapted from the author’s remarks at a panel presented by the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

Fran Maier is right that we are now at a hinge in history—the end of an age and the beginning of something new. Anyone who thinks he or she knows exactly what will emerge next is probably wrong. Whatever is coming next, it will be a very different world from the one we’ve inhabited since World War II. I am quite certain that many things will get worse before they get better. Our societal institutions—governmental, educational, communications, media, medical, public health, etc.—have failed us. The degree of rot in these institutions makes reform or repair, in the short term at least, impractical.

I believe our task is analogous to that undertaken by the Czech dissidents of the Soviet era. Many of us are familiar with Vaclav Havel, who became the first president of the Czech Republic after the fall of Communism and wrote the now classic essay, “The Power of the Powerless.” Maier mentions another Vaclav: a close friend and collaborator of Havel, Vaclav Benda is less well-known but no less important. In contrast to Havel, Benda was a faithful Catholic and remained grounded in his Christian convictions as he faced the challenges of his time and place.

Some readers will doubtless wonder whether the historical analogy to a communist totalitarian regime might not be a bit overblown. Things may be bad, but they surely cannot be that bad. But consider, as Eric Voegelin taught us, that the common feature of all totalitarian systems is neither concentration camps, nor secret police, nor mass surveillance—as horrifying as all these are. The common feature of all totalitarian systems is the prohibition of questions: every totalitarian regime first monopolizes what counts as rationality and determines what questions you are allowed to ask.

At the risk of offending my audience I will suggest: if you don’t see that precisely this is happening on an unprecedented scale globally, you have not been paying close attention. If you still remain skeptical, consider Polish philosopher Leszek Kolakowski’s brilliant formulation to describe the totalitarian method of imposing unity on an entire population: perfect integration through perfect fragmentation. Mull over this phrase while you watch T.V. or scroll social media: perfect integration through perfect fragmentation.

In the Czech context of the 1970s and 1980s, as Professor F. Flagg Taylor writes, “[Vaclav] Benda saw that the Communist regime either sought to infiltrate and co-opt independent social structures for its own purposes, or to de-legitimate and destroy them. It sought to maintain a populace of isolated individuals without any habits or desires for association.” In other words, as he put it, the Iron Curtain had not just descended between East and West, but between one individual and another, or even between an individual’s own body and his soul.

Benda recognized that any hopes for the regime’s fundamental reform or even moderation were futile. It was time to ignore the regime’s official structures and build new ones where human community could be rediscovered and human life could be lived decently. Benda proposed building new small-scale institutions of civil society—in education and family, in productivity and market exchange, in media and communications, literature and the arts, entertainment and culture, and so on—what Benda called “The Parallel Polis” (1978).

He described this idea as follows: “I suggest that we join forces in creating, slowly but surely, parallel structures that are capable, to a limited degree at least, of supplementing the generally beneficial and necessary functions that are missing in the existing structures, and where possible, to use those existing structures, to humanize them.” And he clarified that this strategy “need not lead to a direct conflict with the regime, yet it harbors no illusions that ‘cosmetic changes’ can make any difference.” Benda explained:

In concrete terms this means taking over for the use of the parallel polis every space that the state has temporarily abandoned or which it has never occurred to it to occupy in the first place. It means winning over for the support of common aims…everything alive in society and its culture in the broadest sense of the word. It means winning over anything that has managed somehow to survive the disfavor of the times (e.g., the Church) or that was able, despite unfavorable times, to come into being.

The parallel polis is not, Benda emphasized, a ghetto or an underground; it is not a black-market system hiding in the shadows. As the word polis suggests, the purpose of these institutions was to eventually renew the wider society, not to retreat from it entirely. On this point, his proposal can be distinguished from the Benedict Option proposed by Rod Dreher in his book of that title. “The strategic aim of the parallel polis,” Benda wrote, “should be the growth, or the renewal, of civic and political culture—and along with it, an identical structuring of society, creating bonds of responsibility and fellow-feeling.”

Benda acknowledged that every institution of the parallel polis was a David facing the Goliath of a massively powerful totalitarian state. Any one or another of these institutions could be crushed by the state machinery if the state specifically targeted it for liquidation. The task, therefore, was to create so many of these parallel structures and institutions that the corrupt state would finally be limited in its reach: while it could crush any one institution at any time, there would eventually be too many such institutions for the state to target them all simultaneously. Elements of the parallel polis would always survive: as the state crushed one institution, two others would arise elsewhere.

Plan of Action

The parallel polis requires a deliberate strategy: it does not develop automatically. As Benda proposed in his own day, I am convinced it is time to build these new parallel institutions of civil society. We need to be thinking in 50-year increments. This means planting mustard seeds that may not fully germinate in our lifetimes. I suggest that today’s Parallel Polis should be grounded in three principles: Sovereignty, Solidarity, Subsidiarity. I will conclude with five brief points to illustrate the application of these principles in our current moment. (I am simply going to state these points, since time does not allow me to argue for or explain each one.)

First: governments during COVID demanded we become disempowered and isolated. People globally ceded their sovereignty and abandoned social solidarity. By contrast, the new parallel institutions of civil society must return sovereignty to individuals, families, and communities and strengthen social solidarity.

Second: markets, communications, and governing structures have become increasingly centralized at a national and global level, robbing individuals, families, and local communities of legitimate authority, privacy, and freedom. Thus, the new institutions must be grounded in technologies and models of decentralized communications, information sharing, authority, and markets of productivity and exchange.

Third: individuals, families, and local communities especially have been robbed of their legitimate authority and targeted. To rectify this, the new institutions must support the principle of subsidiarity and empower practical efforts at the local level.

Fourth: fear has been weaponized to coerce individuals, families, and communities to cede their sovereignty and even make them forget they once had it. To help individuals, families, and small communities reclaim their sovereignty—their ability to self-govern—we must help people overcome their fear and find their courage.

Fifth, with the rollout of new mechanisms of social surveillance and control—the biosecurity model of governance, biometric digital IDs, Central Bank Digital Currencies, surveillance capitalism, and so on—the temporal window to reclaim solidarity and regain sovereignty is closing fast. Therefore, the time to begin is now.

Nation First looks at new data from the UK regarding ‘vaccine’ deaths by George Christensen

Dear friend,

Future historians will consider the use of mRNA ‘vaccines’ to be among the worst crime committed against humanity.

As astute Nation First readers know, I try to always put the word ‘vaccine’ in air quotes when it comes to the mRNA jab as the reality is it’s not a vaccine at all but rather an experimental gene therapy injection masquerading as a vaccine.

Billions were forced to take this slow poison, from which far more have died by now than they did from the so-called COVID-19 pandemic.

Miscarriages, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases rates have all soared since the forced ‘vaccination’ campaigns began.

A bombshell UK government report reveals that 92% of all COVID-19 deaths in 2022 occurred among those who had received three doses of the ‘vaccine’.

Among non-COVID-19 deaths, mortality rates were highest among triple ‘vaccinated’ individuals, up to 30 times higher than the unvaccinated.

Mortality rates among the ‘vaccinated’ have grown significantly over time, with a 43.71% increase in deaths per 100,000 people between June 2021 and June 2022.

Many health professionals are now coming out to reveal terrifying insights about the ‘vaccine’ and criticise governments for forcing an untested drug on billions of innocent people.

The use of mRNA ‘vaccines’ could be considered one of the worst crimes committed against humanity, as the ‘elites’ execute their 2030 agenda of de-population and mass migration through the weakening and destabilisation of nation-states.

Censored and intimidated into silence during the pandemic, more and more health professionals are now coming out to reveal terrifying insights about the ‘vaccine’ and criticise governments for forcing an untested drug on billions of innocent people.

Take Dr Conni Turni, a senior research fellow at the University of Queensland who leads a national and international reference laboratory for respiratory bacterial pathogens where identification, serotyping, genotyping, sequencing and antimicrobial sensitivity testing are performed and where vaccine efficacy trials are undertaken.

In a peer-reviewed paper titled ‘COVID-19 vaccines – An Australian Review’ published in the Journal of Clinical & Experimental Immunology late last year, Dr Turni lists the following:

Just to name a few short-term side effects: Death, Cardiac disorders such as Myocarditis, Blood and lymphatic system disorders, such as blood clots, thrombocytopenia, low platelet count, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, capillary leakage syndrome, Congenital and genetic disorders, Eye disorders, Immune disorders, Muscular, skeletal and connective tissue disorders, Cancerous tumours, Nervous system disorders, Pregnancy and perinatal conditions, Guillain-Barre syndrome and the list goes on…

The Australian Bureau of statistics has just released the national death rate for March 20, 2021 up until 31 March 2022 (registered by 31 May 2022) as 44,331, which according to their own statement lies 6,609 (17.5%) above the historical average. These extra deaths cannot be explained by COVID alone (Fig 2) which is responsible for less than half of the excess deaths in the first 4 months of 2022 in Australia. Cancer, diabetes and neurodegenerative diseases are all above the baseline in this time frame…

Long-term risks of vaccination as predicted by scientists, many already validated by scientists and doctors: Vaccine-induced autoimmunity, pathogenic priming, multisystem inflammatory disease and autoimmunity, antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), activation of latent viral infections, neurodegeneration and prion disease, increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and other vascular events following vaccination, babies suffering enduring adverse consequences, mRNA reverse transcribing intracellularly into the DNA and death due to autoimmune disease long after vaccination

Never in Vaccine history have 57 leading scientists and policy experts released a report questioning the safety and efficacy of a vaccine. They not only questioned the safety of the current Covid-19 injections but were calling for an immediate end to all vaccination. Many doctors and scientists around the world have voiced similar misgivings and warned of consequences due to long-term side effects. Yet there is no discussion or even mention of studies that do not follow the narrative on safety and efficacy of Covid-19 vaccination.

Dr Turni’s paper is worth reading in full.

Not only were the mRNA ‘vaccines’ increasing your risk of other diseases but also weakened your immune system against COVID-19, the very virus it supposedly was meant to protect against.

Recently, a new bombshell report published by the UK government revealed that 92 of all COVID-19 deaths in 2022 occurred among the triple ‘vaccinated’.

Even among non-COVID-19 deaths, mortality rates were highest among the triple ‘vaccinated’, as much as 30 times higher compared to the ‘unvaccinated’.

And among the triple-jabbed group, mortality rates seem to rapidly pick up after three weeks following their last dose.

This is an indicator of the fact that the ‘vaccine’ works in killing us by proxy by compromising our autoimmune system, resulting in a higher risk of getting autoimmune-related diseases.

The data also shows that mortality rates among the ‘vaccinated’ have grown significantly over time.

For instance, in the June of 2021, there were 30,453 deaths per 100,000 people among the ‘vaccinated’ compared to just 2,385 per 100,000 among the ‘unvaccinated’.

By June of 2022, this already massive difference grew by 43.71%.

Some 34,414 deaths per 100,000 people among the ‘vaccinated’ were recorded compared to just 1,342 per 100,000 among the ‘unvaccinated’.

The data is right before you.

Now tell me that mRNA ‘vaccines’ were safe and effective.

Well, they have been effective, but for something else rather than preventing transmission of COVID-19!

Why would the elites, who basically see us as livestock to brutally exploit, and who never fail to take advantage of an opportunity to further impose oppressive laws, ever think in terms of our welfare?

We are witnessing the execution of their Agenda 2030; the weakening and destabilisation of nation-states through rapid de-population and mass migration.

The ‘elites’ have rubbed it right on our face their plans for a one-world government.

The only question remains: are we going to sit ideally by while they orchestrate the destruction of our society?

Until next time, God bless you, your family and nation.

Take care,

George Christensen, with a Nation First staff writer

The Need To GROW

The Need to GROW tells the story of disruptive new technology that threatens to shift the balance of power AWAY from the global food companies…
And into the hands of the people.
This is an amazing film about how we can heal the world — streaming FREE for a limited time.
Watch the award-winning film, The Need To GROW — before it’s too late.