Month: October 2024

A new study published this month in MDPI’s peer-reviewed Methods and Protocols confirms Pfizer Inc.’s COVID-19 injection contains in some cases “more than 500 times” the permitted limit of potentially cancer-causing DNA contamination.

Pfizer’s poor testing method caused a “massive under-detection” of DNA impurities.

“Further, it should also be taken into account that DNA impurities in Comirnaty® are apparently integrated into the lipid nanoparticles and are thus transported directly into the cells of a vaccinated person, just like the mRNA active ingredient,” the study states.

The authors warn Pfizer’s COVID shot could integrate foreign DNA into the human genome, increasing the risk of dangerous mutations.

“What this means for the safety risks, particularly the possible integration of this DNA into the human genome, i.e., the risk of insertional mutagenesis, should be a secondary focus of the discussion required, which must go far beyond what could have been considered years before the so unexpected introduction of mRNA pharmaceuticals into the global market,” the conclusion reads.

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/pfizer-covid-jabs-dangerous-dna-impurities

Milk produced by mammals immediately after giving birth “is at least 3 times more effective than vaccination to prevent flu and is very cost-effective,” the study confirms.

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/colostrum-3-times-more-effective

Authors call for “immediate global moratorium on COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy.”

In a recently published preprint study on Preprints.org, a team of independent researchers has raised significant concerns about the safety of COVID-19 shots for pregnant women.

The study, titled “Are COVID-19 Vaccines in Pregnancy as Safe and Effective as the U.S. Government, Medical Organizations, and Pharmaceutical Industry Claim? Part I,” assesses the rates of adverse events (AEs) in pregnancy following COVID injection compared to influenza vaccines and other vaccines.

The authors, including James Thorp, Albert Benavides, Maggie Thorp, Daniel McDyer, Kimberly Biss, Julie Threet, and Peter McCullough, conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study using data from the CDC/FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

The study period covered 412 months for all vaccines except COVID shots, which were only used for 40 months (December 1, 2020, to April 26, 2024).

The authors “report a retrospective, population-based cohort study assessing rates of adverse events (AEs) in pregnancy after COVID-19 vaccines compared to the same AEs after influenza vaccines and after all other vaccines,” the study reads.

The researchers found that the CDC/FDA safety signals were breached for all 37 AEs following COVID injection in pregnancy.

These AEs included miscarriage, fetal chromosomal abnormality, fetal malformation, cervical insufficiency, premature rupture of membranes, premature labor, premature delivery, placental calcification, placental infarction, placental thrombosis, placenta accreta, placental abruption, placental insufficiency, placental disorder, fetal maternal hemorrhage, fetal growth restriction, reduced amniotic fluid volume, preeclampsia, fetal heart rate abnormality, fetal cardiac disorder, fetal vascular malperfusion, fetal arrhythmia, fetal distress, fetal biophysical profile abnormal, hemorrhage in pregnancy, fetal cardiac arrest, fetal death (stillbirth), premature infant death, neonatal asphyxia, neonatal dyspnea, neonatal infection, neonatal hemorrhage, insufficient breast milk, neonatal pneumonia, neonatal respiratory distress, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and neonatal seizure.

The CDC/FDA’s safety signals “were breached for all 37 AEs following COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy,” the authors confirm​​.

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/37-pregnancy-complications-linked

A new study made available online today in preprint analyzes exposure to COVID-19 vaccine components such as lipid nanoparticles or spike protein.

This exposure can be experienced directly, as through vaccination, or indirectly, such as through blood transfusions from vaccinated donors.

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are used in mRNA COVID vaccines, like Pfizer and Moderna, to deliver the mRNA into the host cells.

The mRNA tells the host cell to produce spike proteins, which in turn triggers an immune response in the body.

The study authors argue these vaccine components can be found not only in the body of the vaccinated, but they also can be shed onto those nearby.

“Biodistribution may not be limited to the body of the vaccine recipient, as a growing body of evidence demonstrates the possibility of secondary exposure to vaccine particles,” the authors write.

“These can be via bodily fluids and include the following routes of exposure: blood transfusion, organ transplantation, breastfeeding, and possibly other means.”

For example, the presence of vaccine components in the blood “presents a possible threat to a recipient of a blood donation from a vaccinated donor who suffered from vaccine induced thrombosis or thrombocytopenia (VITT).”

Vaccine-induced thrombosis or thrombocytopenia is a serious condition where blood clots (thrombosis) and low platelet levels (thrombocytopenia) occur after receiving certain vaccines, particularly those against COVID.

Alarmingly, the authors were unable to find evidence that it is safe for the vaccinated to donate blood.

“[W]e did not find evidence to support the safety of COVID-19 vaccine recipients to donate blood,” the study reads. “Questions remain over the safety of associated blood products and secondary exposure to vaccine particles.”

The authors therefore call on the vaccinated to stop donating blood altogether.

“Given these concerns, blood donors should consider refraining from donation until more information is published on the safety of blood from vaccinated donors,” they conclude.

The researchers note vaccine components can be shed from the vaccinated onto those nearby simply by proximity.

“In households where one person was vaccinated, other family members developed spike protein antibodies,” they confirm.

Vaccine components can be transferred simply through “either exhalation or skin-to-skin contact.”

The authors also point to sexual intercourse as a “possible mode of transmission,” as “spike protein RNA has been observed in semen during SARS-CoV-2 infection.”

Breastfeeding also presents a “possible, albeit likely transient, route of secondary exposure for nursing babies” given that “vaccine contents have been observed in breast milk,” the study adds.

The researchers point to cases of breastfed infants who have suffered from severe adverse events “from their mother’s milk that contains not only SARS-CoV-2 antibody proteins, but traces of the injection materials and likely spike proteins as well.”

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/covid-vaccinated-could-shed-lipid

“[M]ore cases of malaise, headaches, chest pain, breathing problems, and sleep problems,” study confirms.

A new study published this month in the peer-reviewed journal Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy confirms higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including spontaneous abortions, oligohydramnios (abnormally low amount of amniotic fluid surrounding the fetus), and abnormal fetal growth, among pregnant women who received at least one dose of the COVID-19 jab compared to those who didn’t take the gene therapy drug.

The study looked at the prevalence and issues of COVID-19 injection adverse events among pregnant women.

The authors call for “clear and trustworthy information” regarding COVID jabs, “particularly among pregnant women who face higher risks of severe illness.”

“Given the increased risk of severe viral pneumonia in pregnant women, it is critical to foster confidence in the vaccine’s safety and understand any potential adverse events (AEs),” they write.

Conducted March to May 2022 in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (SA), the researchers compared women who did not get any doses of the COVID gene therapy drug during pregnancy (Group A) to women who did get at least one dose during pregnancy (Group B).

They analyzed the frequency, types, AEs, and management of AEs of the COVID shot, and explored pregnancy, delivery, and fetus-related complications like miscarriage, birth defects, and preterm labor.

The Pfizer vaccine was most commonly taken among the patients, followed by AstraZeneca and then Moderna.

The cross-sectional study involved 438 women who gave birth or were pregnant within the previous 8 weeks.

Most participants were aged 25 to less than 35 (58.8%), and 287 (61.3%) were university graduates.

Data was collected through face-to-face interviews with skilled nurses in 13 randomly selected primary healthcare facilities, using a validated, well-structured questionnaire that included the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) COVID injection-related AEs, according to the study.

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/covid-jabbed-pregnant-women-have