Disposable and Cloth Diapers Tested for Indications of PFAS “Forever Chemicals”
Story at-a-glance
- Mamavation tested 65 diapers from 40 brands for PFAS “forever chemicals”. 23% of products tested showed indications of PFAS, with organic fluorine levels ranging from 10 to 323 parts per million
- Both disposable and reusable cloth diapers were found to contain PFAS. 17% of disposable diapers and 30% of reusable cloth diapers/accessories tested positive for organic fluorine above 10 ppm
- PFAS chemicals are linked to numerous health issues, including reduced immunity, allergies, developmental problems, and increased cancer risk. Pregnant women and babies are particularly vulnerable to these effects
- The study found issues with OEKO-TEX certification, as some certified products still contained PFAS. The certification’s testing methods may not detect all forms of PFAS, including PTFE (Teflon)
- Mamavation recommends looking for diapers that use total chlorine-free (TCF) processing, avoid fragrances and lotions, and for cloth diapers, use natural materials like organic cotton or hemp instead of synthetic waterproofing
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2024/08/22/diaper-pfas.aspx
Calley & Casey Means: The Truth About Ozempic, the Pill, and How Big Pharma Keeps You Sick
Casey Means was a Stanford-educated surgeon. Her brother Calley was a lobbyist for pharma and the food industry. Both quit their jobs in horror when they realized how many people were being killed by the systems they participated in. This is an amazing story.
Watch here: https://rumble.com/v5b73od-calley-and-casey-means-the-truth-about-ozempic-the-pill-and-how-big-pharma-.html
Nutritional Bullets
This is a great article by Keith Scott-Mumby.
Today’s piece is based on a presentation I did in front of the Prime Minister of Malaysia, in Kuala Lumpur.
Bullet #1:
Losing focus by concentrating on isolated technical information and spurious quantitative measurements does not lead to a workable science of nutrition.
The present science of nutrition is a fraud and needs ousting in place of something with more wisdom and workability.
Bullet #2:
The creation, repair and maintenance of healthy body tissues cannot be reduced to itemized lists of figures, like a shopping list.
Bullet #3:
This kind of “nutrient accountancy”, as I call it, shows deplorable lack of understanding of the way Nature works and the meaning of holistic integration of health.
Bullets #4 and #5:
It’s no good studying ancestral foods when few people eat ancestral foods today! Besides, food contents mean nothing as farming methods change.
In other words, you can’t have meaningful accountancy when the balance side is bankrupt!
Bullet #6:
Every individual is different and varies in nutritional requirements from time to time and different individuals have highly disparate nutritional requirements at any one time. In other words, people differ in their needs but also, the SAME individual differs in his or her needs from time to time!
The Bigger Picture
Stepping back and looking at the “bigger picture” I feel is the way to teach people better nutrition and a fuller grasp of the concepts of holism and natural living. For this purpose I have devized the idea of 10 simple basic rules for nutrition:
Rule #1: No-one will cure anything to last, no matter how brilliant you are, or what healing paradigm, if the patient is in a negative nutritional balance.
Rule #2: Nothing in the body is fixed. It ALL changes over, every few months. Therefore nutrition is a vital construction factor.
Rule #3: What you are eating that you shouldn’t is of far more importance than what you not eating that you should.
This last is my unique contribution to nutrition and medicine. It fits with what I call my “180-degree rule”… Everything is backwards to conventional wisdom, a half clockwise turn around.
Rule #4. Natural foods in their natural state manifest energetic properties that bear no relation to their biochemical composition. The whole is more than the sum of the parts!
Rule #5: What is swallowed does not equate to nutrition. Malabsorption and dysbiosis are rampant. Digestive unwellness is the norm.
Rule #6: RDAs and the like take no account of different rates of absorption, individual biological variation, stress demands, or that the minimum requirement to avoid fatal avitaminosis is a totally different concept than the amount required for optimum health.
Rule #7: No nutrients act alone, they are all interdependent. All studies which purport to examine the effects of vitamins and minerals in isolation are likely to be misleading.
Rule #8: Nutrition supplementation for detoxification is a life-saving factor in the modern world. We cannot have functioning enzymes to keep our bodies healthy and poison-free if certain essential nutrients are lacking.
Rule #9. Foodstuffs, notably plants, contain an abundance of pharmacologically active substances. The effect of these drugs can rightly be seen as a sub-function of nutrition (complex, vast subject!)
Rule #10: What goes in doesn’t necessarily come out! (nutritional implosion?) I have had cases where years of colonic residues have emerged. One lady recognized coloured food grains she had eaten 40 years before (and never since)!
Set these facts (my experience) against the fact that more and more diseases have chronic infections and inflammation as their seat:
• Heart disease
• Arthritis
• Diabetes
• Cancer is inflammatory
There was somewhat more to the presentation than this but let me finish with these bullets:
• Choose a diet rich in a variety of plant-based foods.
• Eat plenty of vegetables and fruits.
• Maintain a healthy weight and be physically active.
• Drink alcohol only in moderation, if at all.
• Select foods low in fat and salt.
• Prepare and store food safely.
• Consume only nutritious books, jokes, movies etc…
And the last slide was about Vitamin L (love)!
• Love as a factor in health and longevity
• love of self and others
• love of life
• love is the healer of all ills
Well, I hope you found it interesting to have facts slung at you in this style. These are truly the basics and you need to keep them in mind at all times!
Vitamin L to you all!
Prof. Keith Scott-Mumby
The Official Alternative Doctor
No references: I am the source of this!
From: https://alternative-doctor.com/getting-down-to-nutritional-bullets/
Vitamin D, p53 and the Spike Protein
Once again, we gain further understanding as to why Vitamin D is so critical in the battle against the Spike Protein.
Finish reading: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/friday-hope-vitamin-d-p53-and-the
The Causes Of Autism
With Nyema Hermiston; RN ND Adv Dip Hom BScHons
A seminar presented by the NSW Branch of the Australian Homeopathic Association
While investigating autism treatments for a major project to complete her science degree, Nyema Hermiston uncovered a surprising number of respected scientific and medical papers that help to explain the rapid increase world-wide in the number of recorded diagnoses of child autism.
In this seminar, Nyema succinctly presents her findings that are based on her many years of dedicated research. At the same time, Nyema proposes a variety of evidence-based strategies that can assist in promoting vital, healthy neuro-development in children.
This seminar is especially suitable for homeopaths and other health professionals who treat autistic children – as well as providing expectant parents and others who are genuinely interested in benefiting from this newly uncovered knowledge on how to reduce the risks of autism.
Video Links
(expire August 20 2025)
Part 1: What Affects Neurodevelopment? (1 hour) AUD $9.95
https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/9127216887867931479
Part 2: Autism Risk Factors (1 hour) AUD $9.95
https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/3284970649773921375
Part 3: Do Parents Wait & See If Their Child Develops Autism? (1 hour) AUD $9.95
https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/7273284152787218519
The dimming of the Northern Lights: Norway’s drug-free psychiatric units shut

In part one of this series, we featured the medication-free ward at the Asgard Psychiatric Hospital in Norway, where the staff have been implementing a way of treating people with severe emotional health problems without coercing them to take medication. In part two, we visited the medication-free ward at Blakstad Psychiatric Hospital which pioneered Basal Exposure Therapy, a trauma-informed approach to treating the root causes of emotional disorder.
Despite the striking successes achieved by these programs, the Norwegian government is in the process of closing down all the country’s non-medication wards.
A drug-free paradigm for recovery
It has been a brief, yet important experiment in building a new mental health paradigm. In 2015, the Norwegian Health Minister ordered the country’s health authorities to create non-drug options for those incarcerated, willingly or not, in psychiatric hospitals. Another of the institutions that responded to the call was the Hurdalsjoen Recovery Center.
Hurdalsjoen was more ambitious than most other psychiatric hospitals. Instead of setting aside one small ward and maintaining the rest of the hospital on a “treatment as usual” protocol, it decided to transform the entire institution.
Hurdalsjoen’s founder, Ole Andreas Underland, had been inspired by a presentation at a conference that suggested a completely new approach. One particular graph told him a story that has been long known in certain circles but which psychiatry is not eager to promote. The graph (seen below) is from a study published in 2007 and yet six years passed before Underland heard of it.

The study, published in the Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, demonstrated clearly that not only could “schizophrenics” recover, but that they were far more likely to do so if they stopped taking their “anti-psychotic” medication. In fact, they were eight times more likely to recover once off drugs.
Patients want healthy food, nature, exercise — and no drugs
Underland was taken aback by the findings.
The treatment we have used since the 1950s has been medication, and it has been proven wrong. We spend more and more money on medication, and yet there is the continued growth of mental disorders. Relying on medication obviously doesn’t work.
The program he created at Hurdalsjoen was modeled on what he knew patients wanted. How did he know? He asked them — he sought out opinions from user groups, people in psychiatric wards or taking psychiatric medication, and took their requests seriously. By the time the Health Minister issued his directive on drug-free options in 2015, Hurdalsjoen was already implementing what the minister had in mind, and more.
It turned out that people didn’t want drugs, nor did they want to be shut up in sterile institutions. They wanted healthy food, the opportunity to be in nature, exercise options, and time and facilities for creative projects. Underland made sure his institution provided it all. The hospital was situated on the banks of Lake Hurdal, and patients were free to wander around its grounds and even go on shopping trips in the nearby town.
They also had an unusual relationship with staff — which was one of Underland’s main aims when he selected staff with “lived experience” of being patients in a psychiatric institution. A full 50 percent of staff were former psychiatric inmates, and they ate together with the current patients, at the long wooden tables in the dining room that overlooked the lake.
Withdrawal — but not from life
There were 60 beds at Hurdalsjoen, and most of the time, all were occupied. Almost all the patients who came were defined as chronically “ill,” having suffered through years in psychiatric hospitals where they were drugged, often forcibly.
When Robert Whitaker, founder of the Mad In America website, visited Hurdalsjoen in 2019, he met some of the current and former patients, including Tonje Finsas, the first person to have been treated there. When Finsas arrived in Hurdalsjoen she was taking a total of 31 different drugs, including 3 antipsychotics. She was just 31 years old and had been in and out of psychiatric hospitals for 20 years — with a total of 220 separate hospitalizations.
Finsas had left Hurdalsjoen by 2019 and was living independently in a nearby village and working part-time for the hospital, running the activities room. There were plans for her to begin working full-time as what Underland called a “recovery pilot” — someone who helps to guide new patients. She was down to just 2 drugs from the original 31.
Finsas credits Hurdalsjoen for saving her life.
My story shows it is possible to get better. It is possible to get back out there. Yes, I am high and low still, but I control it, I know what triggers it, and I know what to do … Without [this place], I wouldn’t be alive today.
‘The revolution will have to happen’
Finsas is one of around 650 who passed through Hurdaljoen over the years. Between 2013 and 2021, treatment was fully funded by the government, even though it was a private hospital. Underland, when interviewed by Whitaker a few years ago, was optimistic that his model of care could become the standard for mental health treatment in Norway, and even beyond.
This is going to be the most important psychiatric hospital that is making this revolution happen. We will show it can be done, and then the revolution will have to happen.
He had good reason to feel confident in the future. After all, a survey of former patients had shown that 80 percent were either “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with the treatment.
Eighty percent of these patients meet their personal goals of reducing or phasing out pharmaceuticals altogether. But phasing out drugs is very demanding for many, and it has to be customized because some patients will respond with quite heavy side effects even if the dosage is taken down very little. We see that especially on antidepressants that they are very, very tough to reduce for some patients, but some other patients can reduce without having any problems at all.
The end of the dream
But Underland’s dream was not to be. In 2022, when the Labor Party came to power, public funding of private hospitals stopped. The Hurdalsjoen Recovery Center closed in early 2023.
Then, in June of 2023, the authorities announced that the Basal Exposure Therapy ward at Blakstad Psychiatric Hospital would be closing. In October, the University of North Norway Hospital, which runs Asgard Psychiatric Hospital, announced that its six-bed medication-free ward would be closing too.
The announcement that Blakstad’s BET ward would soon be no longer was a shock to all those who had invested so much in it. After all, it had gained international repute in a WHO document that singled it out for praise as one of the three programs that best embodied a human-rights approach to mental health care.
The only other psychiatric hospital in Norway that offers medication-free services to mental health patients, including those who are psychotic, is at Nedre Romerike. It too is scheduled to close its drug-free ward.
They can’t justify psychiatric harms if there are alternatives
After so many years of extraordinary effort, giving renewed life and hope to hundreds of patients, these developments are “a tragic outcome,” according to Mette Ellingsdalen, a leader at We Shall Overcome, an organization of “users and survivors of psychiatry,” as it defines itself.
In the last year we have seen the Norwegian Psychiatric Association ramp up their public defense for biomedical psychiatry. While the opposition against the medication-free wards from many psychiatrists has been there all the time, it has now become a more public stance from the psychiatric association. We also have a government that has stated it’s “time to listen to the mental health professionals.”
Ellingsdalen was blunt when describing what she feels are the reasons why all the programs have been consigned to the psychiatric dustbin — the fears of “traditional” psychiatrists that their modes of treatment are being undermined by a successful competitor:
One of the main justifications for a treatment regimen that harms so many of its patients is that there are no viable alternatives. As a result, any place that demonstrates that it is possible to help people without infringing on their human rights is perceived as a fundamental threat to the system, rather than a place to learn from.
Professor Larsen of the department of psychiatry at Norway’s Stavanger University has been scathing in his criticism of drug-free programs, warning that they could cost lives. He has not provided any evidence to back up his assertion. Meanwhile, lives are ruined and lost due to the adverse effects of the psychiatric drugs he and almost all other psychiatrists dispense.
Robert Whitaker concluded his farewell tour of Norway’s “light in the north” with a poignant description of the Hurdalsjoen Recovery Center:
I paid a final visit to Hurdalsjoen which formed a lasting memory of the place. In a living room area, a small group of patients were gathered around a fireplace, and they were laughing about how earlier that day, several had climbed down a ladder into a hole cut in the thick ice of Lake Hurdal, and — surmounting their fears — had taken a quick dip in the ice-cold water.
Now Hurdalsjoen is shuttered, and patients no longer walk its grounds dreaming of a better future.
The information contained in this article is for educational and information purposes only and is not intended as health, medical, financial or legal advice. Always consult a physician, lawyer or other qualified professional regarding any questions you may have about a medical condition, health objectives or legal or financial issues. If you are struggling with suicidal thoughts, you can call a qualified free mental health helpline or seek help from a qualified therapist.
Why Price Controls Should Stay in the History Books
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- As inflation rises, some have called on the government to impose price controls. But such controls have significant costs that increase with their duration and breadth.
- Prices allocate scarce resources. Price controls distort those signals, leading to the inefficient allocation of goods and services.
- Appropriate fiscal and monetary policies can reduce inflation without the costs imposed by price controls.
The burst of inflation that followed the COVID-19 crisis and the expansionary policy of international central banks, including the Federal Reserve, has returned the topic of price controls to the news. For example, recent articles have advocated forms of price controls to reduce U.S. inflation and achieve other goals.1
This article reexamines price controls, discussing their history, operation and disadvantages, and economists’ views on the policy. It explains why most economists believe broad price controls to be costly and ineffective in most situations.
U.S. PCE Inflation Is at Its Highest since 1982
SOURCE: FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data).
Price controls are government regulations on wages or prices or their rates of change. Governments can impose such regulations on a broad range of goods and services or, more commonly, on a market for a single good. Governments can either control the rise of prices with price ceilings, such as rent controls, or put a floor under prices with policies such as the minimum wage. The following table shows some examples of common price controls.
Ceilings | Rent control |
---|---|
Price controls on necessities: food/gasoline | |
Price controls on food, water or building materials after a disaster | |
Drug price controls | |
Floors | Minimum wage |
The History of Price Controls
Price controls have a long history: The Code of Hammurabi prescribed prices for goods 4,000 years ago, and the Massachusetts and Virginia colonies did likewise 400 years ago.2 Governments have commonly restricted prices during wartime, with all major belligerents instituting broad limits on prices during World War II. Western countries commonly employed broad price controls into the 1970s. The U.S. government last used broad controls in a series of schemes from 1971-74 following the withdrawal of the dollar from the gold standard. Many developing countries control the prices of staples, sometimes combining price controls with subsidies.
The Impact of Price Controls
Let’s consider the impact of price ceilings. High prices have two economic functions:
- They allocate scarce goods and services to buyers who are most willing and able to pay for them.
- They signal that a good is valued and that producers can profit by increasing the quantity supplied.
That is, prices allocate scarce resources on both the consumption and production sides. Price controls distort those signals.
The next figure shows a stylized supply-demand graph for a competitive market in which the equilibrium price-quantity pair would be defined by the point at which the supply and demand curves cross, at {PE, QE}. In the presence of the price ceiling, however, consumers want QD units, while the suppliers are willing to offer only QS units. QD is much greater than QS and the difference is a shortage of the product (Q) at the price ceiling.
The next figure similarly shows how a price floor, such as a minimum wage, changes the equilibrium {price, quantity} combination in a competitive market. In this figure, the price floor produces a glut of supply—for example, unemployment in the case of a minimum wage.
Supply and Demand with a Price Floor
SOURCE: The author.
Costs of Price Controls
Price controls have costs whose severity depends on the broadness of the control and the degree to which it changes the price from the free-market price. The costs include the following:
- A government bureaucracy and law enforcement must be funded to enforce the controls.
- Goods and services are allocated inefficiently, both in consumption and production.
- Competition shifts from production to political markets as firms attempt to influence price-setting decisions.
- Widespread evasion of price controls promotes disrespect for the law.
- Suppressed inflation appears when temporary controls are relaxed.
Most of these costs are straightforward, but allocative inefficiency requires some explanation: Because QD is greater than QS in the second figure, there is a shortage of the product, and sellers must figure out how to allocate a limited supply. Perhaps they sell only to longtime customers or customers who also buy other products, or they just limit the quantity that each customer can buy.3 Rent control forces landlords to keep renting to existing tenants at artificially low prices. Such “non-price rationing” is inefficient because some buyers who don’t get the good would be willing to pay more for them. Producers would be willing to increase production and sell to consumers who want to buy at a higher price, but price controls make that illegal.
How Do People and Firms Evade Wage and Price Controls?
When a price ceiling prohibits a desired transaction, the buyer and seller will often evade the price ceiling by transacting in a closely related but unregulated product or by trading illegally in black markets. Similarly, sellers might change a good slightly to prevent it from being subject to the same price limit. The economist Hugh Rockoff notes that the price of clothing has been particularly difficult to control because an article of clothing can be upgraded easily to a higher-priced category by adding inexpensive decoration or reduced in quality by substituting cheaper materials.
The historian Jennifer Klein has documented that the current dependence of the U.S. health care system on employer-provided insurance is a relic of the evasion of wage controls during World War II. During that conflict, defense industries wanted to hire more workers but could not legally raise wages. To make their jobs more attractive, some employers began offering health insurance as a legal fringe benefit.
Price controls prompt greater behavioral changes in the long run. Consider how firms might respond to a higher minimum wage that increases the cost of entry-level labor. In the short run, employers might raise prices and economize on labor. Firms will tend to raise prices, even in a competitive market, because producers must pay higher wages to their employees. People will consume less of the higher-priced products that use entry-level labor intensively. In the longer run, employers will install more capable machines, such as dishwashers or automated cooking machines, to reduce the quantity of entry-level labor they use.
What Do Economists Think about Price Controls?
Economists generally oppose most price controls, believing that they produce costly shortages and gluts. The Chicago Booth School regularly surveys prominent economists on questions of interest, including price controls. Most economists do not believe that 1970s-style price controls could successfully limit U.S. inflation over a 12-month horizon, and many of those economists cite high costs of controls.
Economists do know, however, that price controls can be theoretically beneficial when imposed appropriately on a monopolist or monopsonist, and they do tend to work better in imperfectly competitive markets.4 The economist Hugh Rockoff cautiously suggests a limited role for price controls during some inflation episodes in his book Drastic Measures: A History of Wage and Price Controls in the United States. Rockhoff reported that even the late Milton Friedman, a noted free-market advocate, accepted a limited role for temporary price controls in breaking inflation expectations during a disinflation.
Conclusion
Price controls have had a very long but not very successful history. Although economists accept that there are certain limited circumstances in which price controls can improve outcomes, economic theory and analysis of history show that broad price controls would be costly and of limited effectiveness. Appropriate fiscal and monetary policies can reduce inflation without the costs imposed by price controls.
References
- Klein, Jennifer. For All These Rights: Business, Labor, and the Shaping of America’s Public-Private Welfare State. Princeton University Press, 2010.
- Rockoff, Hugh. “The Response of the Giant Corporations to Wage and Price Controls in World War II.” The Journal of Economic History, March 1981, Vol. 41, pp.123-128.
- Rockoff, Hugh. Drastic Measures: A History of Wage and Price Controls in the United States. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
- Schuettinger, Robert; and Butler, Eamonn. Forty Centuries of Wage and Price Controls: How Not to Fight Inflation. The Heritage Foundation, 1979.
Endnotes
- See Isabella Weber’s Dec. 29 opinion piece in the Guardian and Eric Levitz’s Jan. 2 article in New York Magazine.
- The book Forty Centuries of Wage and Price Controls: How Not to Fight Inflation, written by the economists Robert Schuettinger and Eamonn Butler, discusses the historical examples in this article and is highly critical of price controls.
- In command economies, such as the former Soviet Union, consumers must commonly spend hours standing in line to buy scarce goods and services.
- A monopolist is the sole seller of some product, while a monopsonist is the sole buyer of some product. Monopolists will generally sell less output than would be sold by many competitive firms and for a greater price. If the government caps the price at which a monopolist may sell, it will sell a greater quantity at the lower price. Similarly, if a monopsonist is forced to buy for a higher price, it will do so and buy a greater quantity. Some economists argue for a minimum wage on the basis that the employment market is imperfectly competitive so the minimum wage can potentially increase both wages and employment. Other policies, such as subsidies and taxes, can also be used to make imperfectly competitive markets behave more like competitive markets.
This article is an education all by itself!
If you are a tea or coffee drinker, make yourself a cuppa and set aside a few minutes for this one.
“I am constantly amazed at how recent headlines validate the core ideas and observations about psychological warfare that Jill and I have chronicled over the last two years.” – Dr Robert Malone
Read article: https://www.malone.news/p/investors-beware-mpox-disaster-cronyism
Natural Light Is an Essential Nutrient
- Sunlight’s hidden benefits — Sunlight is crucial for our health, dramatically cutting the risk of dying or getting cancer, yet we’re always told to avoid it
- Beyond vitamin D — While we recognize the importance of vitamin D, many other critical functions of light in plants, animals, and humans remain largely unknown and will be explored in this article
- Modern light exposure — Our constant exposure to artificial light is mistakenly seen as harmless, but forgotten research shows it’s a root cause of many modern physical and behavioral issues
- Light and blood — Blood plays a key role in conducting light throughout our bodies. Disruptions in this process (e.g., from wearing glasses that block certain parts of the light spectrum) can lead to serious health problems
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2024/08/09/natural-light-health-benefits.aspx