Month: September 2023

Posted on

CDC Data Reveals COVID Vaccine Could Shave Off 24 Years from Men’s Lives!

The long-term consequences of Covid-19 vaccination are now being realised…

A year ago, doubly vaccinated Australians were 10.72x more likely to catch Omicron than the unvaxxed. Now they are 20x more likely and the triply or more vaxxed are 35x more likely, as the latest NSW Health stats show (see below).

Meanwhile, the latest Cleveland Clinic Data and the latest US data analysed by Josh Stirling, founder of Insurance Collaboration to Save Livess and former #1 ranked Insurance Analyst, shows a really really disturbing trend.

The damage to health caused by each vaccine dose does not lessen over time. It continues indefinitely.

In fact, CDC All-Cause Mortality data show that each vaccine dose increased mortality by 7% in the year 2022 compared to the mortality in year 2021.

So if you have had 5 doses then you were 35% more likely to die in 2022 than you were in 2021. If you have had one dose then you were 7% more likely to die in 2022 than you were in 2021. If you are unvaxxed then you were no more likely to die in 2022 than you were in 2021.

Conclusion
The population of NSW in Australia is 6½ million people. They are a highly vaccinated group. Looking at the Australian Government data for the last 6 weeks of 2022 we see that.

1. Those with 1 or 2 doses are 20x more likely to be admitted to hospital with Covid than those with no doses.
2. Those with 3 or 4 or more doses are 35x more likely to be admitted to hospital with Covid than those with no doses.
3. Being unvaxxed provides 100% protection from having to go to the ICU. Being vaxxed gives you a 6 in 100,000 chance of being hospitalised in the ICU.
4. Vaccines are unsafe and extremely ineffective.
5. COVID-19 vaccination is putting unsustainable pressure on hospitals and ICUs in NSW and by implication all over the world.
6. The NHS in the UK will be destroyed unless vaccinations are banned immediately. It may already be too late.
7. The vaccines prevent herd immunity. Herd immunity will never be reached in the vaxxed. It has already been reached in the unvaxxed
8. The continuation of the pandemic is entirely caused by the anti vaccines.

The last time I looked at the data in NSW, for the last 6 weeks of 2021, the double vaxxed were 2.18x more likely to catch Omicron than the unvaxxed.

Here were are today, 12 months later in the last 6 weeks of 2022, and the double vaxxed are not 2.18x, but actually 20x more likely to catch the latest variant. And the triple jabbed are 35x more likely!

So there is the immune system destruction that I predicted in October2021. There is the progressive vaccine-mediated AIDS. These are farcical Monty Python kinds of numbers. As I understand it the Australian government is now going to stop classifying hospital data by vax status.

Talk about bury your head in the sand. In any event. It is too late. The cat is out of the bag. These figures are an accelerating immunological catastrophe.

https://expose-news.com/2023/09/01/c19-jab-reduces-lives-of-men-by-24-years/

Posted on

Half Medical Research Untrue

Half Medical Research Untrue

One of my friends posted:
 
So, before you all throw away your Swerve…
When I read the article on erythritol for the first time yesterday, a couple of things jumped out.
1. The authors said they discovered this link “by accident”. Right there, we need to stop. This means that they were not controlling for any concomitant factors. That means erythritol may have nothing to do with the clots at all.
2. The article never said whether any of these people were at risk for clots from other conditions. Were they diabetic? Heart disease? Turns out, the answer is yes.
3. The article made no mention of other dietary risk factors that existed in these people. Did they consume a lot of sugar? Well, it appears none of them were on any specific diet.
4. Where did the erythritol in their blood come from?
Then today, I see this.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=582902963507483&id=100044250288155&mibextid=NnVzG8
 
So, a quick Google search turned up a very simple explanation for the results found in this paper.
 
Sugar is metabolized into sugar alcohol in the body. In fact, blood sugar alcohol from sugar metabolism and blood sugar alcohol from erythritol are practically indistinguishable in the blood.
 
During the time of the study (2011-2016), keto wasn’t much of a thing and erythritol wasn’t widely available on the market to begin with. There is no explanation by the authors as to how these people would have been able to consume a product that wasn’t even available on the market during that time.
 
So, now let’s put 2 and 2 together.
1. Sugar alcohol from sugar and erythritol are identical in the blood.
2. Study participants were not on a controlled diet.
3. Study participants had health conditions known to be exacerbated by sugar.
4. Blood clots are caused by sugar. (In a super simple explanation, sugar makes blood sticky; fat makes blood slick. Sugar causes clots; dietary fat does not, although not all fats are created equal).
5. These people likely had no to limited ability to consume erythritol during that time frame.
 
So, did the nonexistent erythritol cause the clots? Or was it sugar?
 
Y’all, it was the sugar.
 
This “study” is very much like me saying “I ate an organic meal, then I got a headache, so organic foods cause headaches.”
 
This very much reminds of the industry funded hatchet job on coconut oil a few years ago. Remember when the FDA told us that a “study” showed that coconut oil caused heart attacks and we should all eat corn oil? Then we found out that the corn industry funded that “study”?
 
I suspect something similar is behind this bogus “study” as well.
 
As for myself, I don’t like erythritol. I am one of the unlucky few who detect an unpleasant cooling sensation from erythritol. For most people it has a neutral taste and causes less bloat and gastric upset than other sugar alcohols. I don’t think there is any reason to ditch your erythritol based on this article.
 
And PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE stop sharing things if you haven’t vetted the accuracy of it. That happened with the coconut oil fiasco too. People started freaking out, sharing the article, saying “OMG, stop eating coconut oil”, only to find out later that the study was bogus. It took me longer to write this post than it did to research the truth of the article. All total, I have spent 20 minutes.
 
Twenty minutes and I can feel confident that I am sharing information that is as accurate as possible based on the data we have.
Posted on

When ‘Drink More Water’ Turns Into a Health Crisis

Tim Noakes MD

Runners can jeopardize their life by drinking too much water during a long-distance event. An estimated 10% to 20% of people have inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone and retain fluid even though they’re overhydrated. As a result, they can lose consciousness and may die unless treated with concentrated salt solutions.

The treatment for overhydration is to give a high-saline IV (3% to 5% sodium). The sodium will absorb and help expel the excess water through urination, typically resulting in rapid recovery.

For non-athletes who are metabolically inflexible and have insulin resistance, a low-carb diet can help you regain your metabolic flexibility.

Dr. Mercola believes that once you’ve regained your metabolic flexibility, scientific evidence suggests a diet higher in carbs (primarily from ripe fruit) and restricting fat to about 30% of calories can optimize energy production and minimize harmful reactive oxygen species (ROS) production.

In this interview, Timothy Noakes, Ph.D., a physician and sports medicine researcher in South Africa, clarifies common confusions about sports hydration and high-carb diets.

https://healthelicious.com.au/articles/DrJosephMercola-DrTimNoakes-HowOverhydrationAndCarbIntakeImpactAthletes.pdf

Posted on

Growing Doubt: a Scientist’s Experience of GMOs

Jonathan Latham

Some of my concerns with GMOs are “just” practical ones. I have read numerous GMO risk assessment applications. These are the documents that governments rely on to ‘prove’ their safety. Though these documents are quite long and quite complex, their length is misleading in that they primarily ask (and answer) trivial questions. Furthermore, the experiments described within them are often very inadequate and sloppily executed. Scientific controls are often missing, procedures and reagents are badly described, and the results are often ambiguous or uninterpretable. I do not believe that this ambiguity and apparent incompetence is accidental. It is common, for example, for multinational corporations, whose labs have the latest equipment, to use outdated methodologies. When the results show what the applicants want, nothing is said. But when the results are inconvenient, and raise red flags, they blame the limitations of the antiquated method. This bulletproof logic, in which applicants claim safety no matter what the data shows, or how badly the experiment was performed, is routine in formal GMO risk assessment.

To any honest observer, reading these applications is bound to raise profound and disturbing questions: about the trustworthiness of the applicants and equally of the regulators. They are impossible to reconcile with a functional regulatory system capable of protecting the public.

https://www.independentsciencenews.org/health/growing-doubt-a-scientists-experience-of-gmos/

Posted on

Ignorance Is The Enemy, Not Carbon!

Ignorance Is The Enemy, Not Carbon!

Tim Miles commented:

Well have you actually noticed that none of the policies enacted in the name of reducing Carbon Emissions are doing that. They are doing the precise opposite. What slight warming we have seen is due to clearing skies since much tighter rules came in on smoke over the past 3 decades.
Here’s one to discuss. As a farmer I see it is getting colder, not warmer, hyping occasional days of hot weather doesn’t change that. A colder world is a drier world, and its one which will support a lot less people. What if Co2 has a minimal warming effect and we are as predicted 50 years ago in fact heading into an ice age.
If that were the case would you really want to tell several billion people living in Northern latitudes that they are going to starve but cannot stampede South because we cannot all suddenly cram into Southern latitudes where the soil simply hasn’t built up yet.
Ice ages both ended and started quite abruptly in contrast to what the media says. I learnt this reading papers for years in the Science Library as a student.