Category: Health Tips

Turmeric is not easily absorbed by the body.
Phospholipids aid the absorption of turmeric up to 39X.
Eggs contain phospholipids.
Black pepper increases the absorption of other nutrients by up to 2,000%
So I have two eggs for breakfast on the weekends and sprinkle some turmeric and black pepper on them.
http://theheartysoul.com/turmeric-juice-heart-health/?t=FM

Increasing numbers of scientists around the world are producing research data demonstrating the immediate threat posed to human health by saturation coverage of wi-fi, smart meters, and EMF in general. Now those researchers are banning together and getting involved in some vital activism. “The International EMF Scientist Appeal was initially signed by 190 scientists from 39 nations. All of these scientists have published peer-reviewed papers on the biological or health effects of non-ionizing radiation, part of the EMF spectrum that includes Extremely Low Frequency fields (ELF) used for electricity, or Radio Frequency radiation (RFR) used for wireless communications.”1
As of July 25, 2016, the Appeal has 221 signatures from 41 nations. Dr Martin Blank, who has over 30 years of EMF research at Columbia University states wi-fi and EMF in general are damaging our cells and killing us prematurely, pleading with the UN to acknowledge the emerging EMF health crisis: “Our children are at risk…The safety limits are much too high. They are not protective.”
http://globalfreedommovement.org/threat-of-wifi-and-emf-the-subject-of-international-scientist-appeal/

This review below from the Vaccine Information Service when read should be sufficient to bury the lying, misleading and harmful Australian Medical Association which claims vaccines are safe for all, including little babies.
https://cairnsnews.org/2017/03/16/turnbull-government-ignore-vaccination-toxic-ingredients/

Rosemary is a strong herb, uniquely famous in the traditional and alternative medicine for centuries. It helps with memory problems and can cure many diseases. In Greece, when they have an important exam, the students often put rosemary branches in their hair. Also, many studies have shown that rosemary contains carnosic acid, acid that fights toxic components that affect the brain.

Every once in a while, an analysis that explodes confidence in the medical system surfaces.
It might appear as a newspaper article, or a review published in a medical journal.
Its fate is always the same. It sinks like a stone in a dark lake. As if it never happened.
Months or years later, people who read the original article begin to doubt their own memory. “Did I really read that? If I had, surely other articles would have been written. There would have been uproar…”
No. It’s par for the press to bury uncomfortable stories and give them a quick death. It’s another form of censorship.
For example:
The citation is: BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012;344:e3989) “Anticoagulants cause the most serious adverse events, finds US analysis.” Author, Jeanne Lenzer.
Lenzer refers to a report by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices: “It calculated that in 2011 prescription drugs were associated with two to four million people in the US experiencing ‘serious, disabling, or fatal injuries, including 128,000 deaths.’”
The report called this “one of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity.”
And here is the final dagger. The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDA’s own database of “serious adverse [medical-drug] events.”
Therefore, to say the FDA isn’t aware of this finding would be absurd. The FDA knows. The FDA knows and it isn’t saying anything about it, because THE FDA CERTIFIES, AS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE, ALL THE DRUGS THAT ARE ROUTINELY MAIMING AND KILLING AMERICANS.
And here is another “stone that sank in the lake” I just came across. This one is from the June 27th, 2014, issue of the Harvard Safra Center for Ethics newsletter, by Donald Light, “New Prescription Drugs: A Major Health Risk With Few Offsetting Advantages”:
“Few know that systematic reviews of hospital charts found that even properly prescribed drugs (aside from misprescribing, overdosing, or self-prescribing) cause about 1.9 million hospitalizations a year. Another 840,000 hospitalized patients are given drugs that cause serious adverse reactions for a total of 2.74 million serious adverse drug reactions. About 128,000 people die [per year] from drugs prescribed to them. This makes prescription drugs a major health risk, ranking 4th with stroke as a leading cause of death. The European Commission estimates that adverse reactions from prescription drugs cause 200,000 deaths; so together, about 328,000 patients in the U.S. and Europe die from prescription drugs each year. The FDA does not acknowledge these facts and instead gathers a small fraction of the cases.”
Any sane person would expect a massive reaction to these stories. Congressional probes, court cases, arrests and prosecutions of FDA officials and pharmaceutical executives and researchers, mass firings of editors at medical journals who publish studies praising the killer drugs.
But no. It doesn’t happen.
Essentially, these criminals are left alone, and they continue in their work. They’re like war criminals who have let off the hook for their crimes against humanity.
And these days, the elite media outlets who are crowing about “fake news” are not put under the spotlight for their decades of inattention to medical murder.
In their silence, they enable medical murder.
https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/health-healing/another-devastating-revelation-on-killer-medical-drugs-is-buried/

There are criminally greedy men running big Pharma! Homicidal maniacs in fact.

It’s the morning of the trial. The jury will shortly be sworn in.

The crux of the matter in Dolin Vs GSK is whether or not Paxil caused Stewart Dolin to kill himself whilst under Paxil’s influence.

Dolin’s widow, Wendy, intends to show the jury details of GSK’s prior knowledge of the Paxil suicide link. Furthermore, how GSK hid this link with skullduggery; ie; they carried out underhanded and unscrupulous behavior to keep the truth from healthcare professionals, regulators and, more importantly, patients.

In 1989, GSK submitted its “Integrated Summary of Safety Information” to obtain approval of Paxil to treat adult depression. Amongst other adverse event statistics, the Safety Summary reported the number of suicides and suicide attempts experienced by patients who took Paxil, a placebo or a comparator drug during GSK’s initial clinical trials.

In GSK’s presentation they compared the suicide attempts with patients in the Paxil group and those patients in the placebo group; and here’s how they hid the fact that more patients in the Paxil group had a far higher (significant number) of suicides and suicide attempts.

During the run-in period (which is also called wash-out), patients taking part in a clinical trial are taken off of any medications they may be taking and given a placebo (commonly known as a dummy or sugar pill) instead. In this way, a person’s system is “washed out” of other drugs and all patients start the trial on a drug-free basis at “baseline,” i.e. at the actual beginning of the clinical trial.

Because people who are stopping medications during this wash-out period may experience adverse events associated with withdrawing from the medication they were on, adverse events experienced during this period are not properly counted as occurring during the clinical trial. Adverse events that occur during run-in periods cannot be included when calculating adverse event ratios for clinical trials. This is standard practice for clinical trials.

The FDA’s Dr. Martin Brecher had mentioned in testimony that it is “scientifically illegitimate” to count placebo run-in/washout events. Furthermore, Michael Seika, another FDA medical reviewer, explained why run-in adverse events should not be counted. According to a December 8, 1999 GSK memo of a conversation with the FDA:

Specifically, I [Thomas Kline, Assistant Director of Regulatory Affairs at GSK] asked [Michael Seika] if a patient were to die during placebo run-in, i.e. prior to randomization, should that patient be included in the calculation for placebo deaths. He clearly stated that such a patient should not be counted in our analyses, since such a patient would not comprise the “controlled” portion of a trial.

Despite GSK knowing that counting adverse events during placebo run-in was improper they included them in their 1989 “Integrated Summary of Safety Information”.

When the 1989 “Integrated Summary of Safety Information” is properly dissected we see that patients taking Paxil were at an 8.9 times greater risk of experiencing a suicide event than those on placebo.
http://fiddaman.blogspot.com.au/2017/03/paxil-suicide-way-gsk-hid-link.html