Souper broth! An old wives’ tale? No, chicken soup really CAN fight a cold, say scientists

Chicken Soup

Chicken soup is good for the soul, they say. And as a homespun remedy for everything that might ail you during winter, there are few things as deliciously soothing.

But could such a broth be more than just a cold comfort? According to the latest scientific study, the answer is yes.

Research in the American Journal of Therapeutics showed that a compound found in chicken soup – carnosine – helped the body’s immune system to fight the early stages of flu.

But the authors warned this benefit ended as soon as the soup was excreted by the body, so that means you may need to have a fairly constant supply.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2252167/Souper-broth-An-old-wives-tale-No-chicken-soup-really-CAN-fight-cold-say-scientists.html

How To Protect Your Vision From Your Computer!

By: Mark Rosenberg, M.D.

If you’re like most of my patients over 40, you spend a good deal of time at your computer every day. Let’s face it, the workings of our modern world, the flow of information, is dependent on computers and you likely have to spend some part of your day using one. Perhaps your job requires you to spend 8 or more hours a day in front of it, or maybe you only use your computer a shorter amount of time a day checking emails, paying bills, staying connected to friends or family on social media or just looking up information.

However long you use your computer, like my patients, you may have experienced symptoms of computer vision syndrome – an annoying set of symptoms that affects 90% of people who use their computer 3 or more hours per day. Since I frequently hear complaints from patients about the symptoms of computer vision, I’d also like to share with you how you can relieve the temporary symptoms of computer vision and allow more comfortable use of your computer.

What Is Computer Vision?
Computer vision syndrome, or CVS, is a cluster of temporary symptoms experienced by people who use their computers on a daily basis for several hours at a time. These symptoms can be further aggravated by bright lighting that creates glare on the computer screen (like overhead fluorescent lighting in offices) or air rushing past the eyes that might occur from an overhead AC or heat vent or desk top fan. These symptoms can include the following:

Dry eyes
Blurry vision
Headache
Double vision
Difficulty refocusing
Eye muscle twitching

How Can You Relieve Computer Vision?
Dry eyes are probably the #1 complaint of patients who use their computer and is usually the cause of redness of the eyes as well. This dryness is caused by the fact that you blink less while working on a computer. Here’s what helps:

Reminding yourself to blink while working on your computer.
Using eye lubrication drops (like artificial tears) to prevent dryness.
Add Omega-3 fats to your diet, at least 1,000 mg a day, to help lubricate older eyes.

Some suggestions to alleviate other common symptoms of computer vision are:

Blurry/double vision: The second most common complaint I hear from my patients involves blurring or double vision changes. These can be caused by trying to focus on reading in a field that has a constant moving flicker in it. Older cathode ray catheter monitor have a flicker that can easily be seen around the edges of the monitor and contributes to eyestrain. Flat screen liquid crystal monitors are much smoother and easier on the eyes. Here’s what helps:

“20/20/20” rule: Every 20 minutes of computer work, focus your vision on something at least 20 feet away for 20 seconds.
Computer glasses: These are special glasses to be used for computer use only and greatly help people who wear contact lenses and/or bifocal lens glasses. These can be somewhat expensive. However, studies show greater productivity of workers using them. In addition, over-the-counter reading glasses with a correction of between +1.00 and +1.50 can also help clarify print much better and decrease strain.

Adjust View Size: Your computer allows you to enlarge the size of print displayed. This option usually runs across the top of your toolbar. Text reading size should be 3 times larger than the smallest text you can read comfortably from your position. Or, select whatever magnification allows you to read print more clearly without straining.

Adjust Refresh Rate: Eye strain issues are more likely if your monitor refresh rate is 75 Hz or less. Set yours for the highest refresh rate.

Adjust Resolution: Related to the “dot pitch” of the display, be sure resolution is less than 0.28 dot pitch or less.
Choose larger screen size: Larger display screens also help. Try to get at least a 19” screen size at least for home use if you cannot change your work computer screen size.

Adjust brightness: Adjust amount of light in your screen with the brightness dial on your monitor. Too dark as well as too light can cause strain.

Difficulty refocusing: Take frequent screen breaks every 20 minutes and look out either a window or somewhere else in the room. Or simply close your eyes for 30 seconds. This rests the muscles of the eye and can help prevent/relieve eye twitching from constant tension.

Headache: Usually caused by monitor glare from surrounding bright light sources like overhead fluorescents or even bright sunlight from a window. Can be prevented by removing the glaring light source. Move your computer to a darker area, with darker walls (light bounces off light walls) so that surrounding lighting is to the side of your computer, rather than in front or behind it, and does not shine into your eyes.

As I tell my patients, in our modern computer-run world, I’m afraid that computer vision syndrome is here to stay. However, in addition to the above recommendations, observe good eye nutrition and vision protection in general. Be sure your diet also includes 5,000 mg of beta carotene a day, as well as lutein, zeaxanthin, and bilberry to boost clear vision. Also, drink enough water for your body weight and protect your eyes from bright sunlight with sunglasses to further strengthen your eyes and combat computer vision.

Stay well,

Mark Rosenberg, M.D.

Exposure to COVID-19-Jabbed Persons ‘Significantly Associated with the Likelihood of the Onset of Menstrual Irregularities’:

A new study published this weekend in the peer-reviewed journal International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research has revealed a significant association between indirect exposure to COVID-19 vaccinated individuals and the onset of menstrual irregularities among unvaccinated women.

The study reports that indirect exposure to COVID-19 vaccinated persons was significantly associated with the likelihood of the onset of menstrual irregularities.

Among unvaccinated participants who were in close proximity to vaccinated individuals:

  • 71.7% reported symptoms within one week.
  • 50.1% reported symptoms within three days.

Researchers further identified that “the strongest association lies within the comparison of ‘Daily within 6 feet outside the household’ versus ‘Seldom/Sometimes/Daily outside 6 feet,’” with relative risks of 1.34 for heavier menstrual bleeding, 1.28 for early periods, and 1.26 for extended bleeding.

This means that women who were in daily close proximity to vaccinated individuals were 34% more likely to experience heavier menstrual bleeding, 28% more likely to have an early period, and 26% more likely to have extended bleeding compared to those with less frequent or more distant exposure.

The study raises significant concerns about shedding—the excretion and potential environmental spread of vaccine components, such as lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and spike proteins.

The authors explain:

“The lipid nanoparticles (LNP), which are the packaging for the mRNA, have also been shown to have wide biodistribution in rodent studies… LNPs are primarily excreted from the experimental animals through feces and urine but also via saliva, sweat, breastmilk, or exhalation.”

The researchers further describe the possible transmission routes for these components, stating:

“The proposed transmission routes to others include inhalation (aerosol), breast milk, transdermal (through keratinocytes), and transplacental.”

Additionally, they note:

“There is accumulating evidence that there can be vaccine component or antibody transmission following COVID-19 vaccination, including via exhaled breath aerosol.”

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/exposure-to-covid-19-jabbed-persons

(Tom: Another example of why detoxing the body of the Spike Protein is so important. https://www.healthelicious.com.au/NutriBlast-Anti-Spike.html

WHO – State of play regarding the Pandemic Agreement and the implementation of the International Health Regulations (IHR)

Dear Friends of ELIANT,

In spring, we informed you about the upcoming Pandemic Agreement, which was to be adopted by the 194 member states at the WHO World Health Assembly in May 2024. Since the countries could not reach agreement, a further 12 months of negotiations were decided. No interim reports have yet been published since then.

The negotiations on amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), which were first agreed 70 years ago, were, however, concluded and adopted by the member states in June 2024, despite the two worrying points that call into question the basic principles of democracy:

Broadening of the term “pandemic emergency”
A pandemic emergency is now defined in the context of a “public health emergency of international concern” as “a communicable disease that has, or is at high risk of having, wide geographical spread to and within multiple States, exceeds or is at high risk of exceeding the capacity of health systems to respond in those States . . .”
What is worrying about this new definition is that a pandemic emergency can be declared already on the basis of a suspected risk, thus giving the decision-maker a great deal of discretion.

The power of the Director-General
Since 2005, the WHO Director-General has had extensive powers under the IHR, which have become apparent worldwide as a result of the experience gained in dealing with the coronavirus pandemic. He can establish an Emergency Committee in the event of a pandemic, determine the number of its members and select the members of the Review Committee according to predefined criteria, which include balanced geographical, gender and scientific distribution, among other things. This Committee makes recommendations, the Review Committee can reject the recommendations or express concerns. However, the final decision on whether and how to adopt the Committee’s recommendations lies solely with the Director-General.
Giving a single person so much responsibility and power to make far-reaching global decisions calls into question the fundamental democratic rights of the civilian population. This requires increased vigilance from all of us – because:
The IHR have existed for 70 years and are integrated into the legislation of WHO member states. That is why the debate necessary in each country about the nature and extent of the implementation of the amendments adopted in June 2024 tends to be a routine matter if there is no awareness in civil society and politics of the far-reaching consequences.

Our question is: why has the further implementation of the WHO Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion of 1986 not been addressed?
In 1986, the WHO Health Assembly focused on salutogenesis/health research and promotion, something which was reflected in the jointly adopted Ottawa Charter. It says among other things: “This includes a secure foundation in a supportive environment, access to information, life skills and opportunities for making healthy choices.” At the follow-up meeting, it was also agreed that the states should take concrete action to implement the Charter’s goals.
It was all the more surprising, then, that in the case of the coronavirus pandemic, the protection of the population was seen solely in terms of vaccination. Yet the salutogenic principles and measures for strengthening resilience and immunity mentioned in the Ottawa Charter are equally important. Both are needed for “ensuring equal opportunities and resources to enable all people to achieve their fullest health potential” (quote from the Ottawa Charter). Why are these opportunities – which, moreover, include the democratic values of the right to physical integrity and personal responsibility – no longer being discussed in the IHR debates?

We need a civil society that is educated in health issues.
Since the implementation of the IHR is a matter for the individual countries, local initiatives are needed. We would welcome hearing from you in the various countries about the initiatives that are taking place in your country – and would also provide support where possible. In any event, we would be very grateful if it were possible for you to find time amongst the day-to-day pressures to campaign for the preservation of democratic rights, including those relating to health issues.

We will keep you updated.

With best wishes on behalf of the ELIANT team
Michaela Glöckler

https://mailings.eliant.eu/m/15800139/1380806-d8b256b87decadf7be612eb27e0cac3835441b16a1ce5fbcc63dc5ac03f809da5a092e4a18aa5a89b7901fd6b0067d58

Australians Abandon Failed mRNA Covid Shots

Daily Covid 19 Shots

After climbing the world leaderboard during the initial Covid vaccine rollout to achieve over 95% vaccination coverage,1 Australians have turned their back on boosters, with the vast majority now ‘under-vaccinated’.

Just 1.7 million, or 8.5% of Australia’s 20.1 million adults have had Covid booster in the past six months, according to the latest Australian Government update (as at 7 February). In contrast, 18.1 million, or 90% had at least one vaccination previously, but have not kept up-to-date.

https://richardsonpost.com/rebekah-barnett/35010/australians-abandon-failed-mrna-covid-shots/

Probiotics In “Venus Fly Trap” Cure Cancer

Researching Venus Fly Trap

In the relentless pursuit of effective cancer treatment, the Venus Flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) emerges as a promising natural ally.

Recent studies spotlight this unassuming carnivorous plant not only as a treatment but potentially as a cancer cure, revealing its arsenal of bioactive compounds. These compounds, rigorously tested in laboratories, have shown remarkable abilities to thwart cancer cell growth and induce apoptosis. As researchers delve deeper into the therapeutic potential of the Venus Flytrap, it becomes increasingly clear that nature might hold the keys to not just managing but curing various forms of cancer.

https://teslatelegraph.com/2023/12/10/probiotics-found-inside-venus-fly-trap-plants-found-to-be-cancer-cure/