Trial By Jury Combats Government Over Reach
I just received via email an interesting update to the NSW MyService Account Terms of Service.
It says, in part:
You are not allowed to use MyServiceNSW Account:
to participate in any illegal or fraudulent activity
to cause disruption to MyServiceNSW Account
in a way that infringes a person’s rights or prevents them from using MyServiceNSW Account
in any way that may harass, cause distress or inconvenience others
to post or send unlawful, defamatory, offensive or scandalous material, or
to post or send material that breaks or encourages breaking the law.
Pretty ironic when the NSW government are engaging in illegal activity by applying coercion to accept an experimental medical procedure in a way that infringes my rights, causes harassment and distress to many and encourages medical professionals to break the law and their oath to do no harm.
The solution of course is to reinstitute trial by jury. A judge cannot find a defendant non-guilty by virtue of an unjust law. Only a jury can do that. Trial by jury is the true safeguard against government over reach and tyranny. A judge can assume more power than common law grants him/her and think he/she can decide a case but that is not the correct application of the law.
Just think, if every person who violated the present unjust, draconian laws came before a trial by jury of 12 of their peers, the whole debacle would fizzle and fade in no time at all.
No matter who wins elections, trial by jury is the control mechanism that keeps them in check 124/7. Not just every 4 years.
I encourage you to get behind and support the restoration of common law trial by jury at every opportunity. It IS the physical universe handling for government insanity.
WHO Is A Front
New Documentary on The PCR Test Deception is Banned on YouTube – Share this Film with Skeptics
Film producer Rai Gbrym reached out to me last week about a new documentary he had just produced that exposes the fraud of the PCR test. He had just posted it on YouTube and it already had thousands of views. I immediately downloaded the video so that I could view it when I had some time. When I went to watch it, it was already banned on YouTube, and no longer available. After viewing it now, I can see why Big Tech doesn’t want you to watch this, and why Google banned it on YouTube. If one can prove that the PCR Test used to detect COVID-19 is a fraud, then the entire “pandemic” is a fraud as well. Rai does a very good job of exposing the fraud behind the PCR test, and he has excellent interviews with people like Dr. Stephan Lanka from Germany, and Dr. Malcolm Kendrick from the U.K. We have featured the work of both these men over the years here at Health Impact News, as both of these men have been exposing the corruption in science and medicine for many years now, unlike the many doctors and scientists that have only recently begun to speak out against crimes in Big Pharma due to the COVID-19 scam. Dr. Lanka made headlines in 2017 when he issued a challenge in Germany where he agreed to pay 100,000 euros to anyone who could prove that the measles “virus” actually existed. Wanting to categorize him as a “quack” for not following the mainstream dogma, he had some people take him up on his challenge, but in the end, the German Federal Supreme Court confirmed that there was not enough evidence to prove the existence of the measles virus. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick is the author of several books, including “The Great Cholesterol Con,” “A Statin Nation: Damaging Millions in a Brave Post-health World,” and “Doctoring Data,” among others. Rai Gbrym has done a wonderful job in this documentary, and he is offering it to the public for free, even though it was self-funded, so important does he consider this information. Please support this work at his website, and share this film with as many people as you can.
Renowned virologist warns of ‘collapse of our health system’ due to complications from COVID vaccines
(LifeSiteNews) — A renowned virologist and former senior officer of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently warned against the dangers of the experimental COVID-19 gene-transfer vaccines, encouraged the un-jabbed to “stay unvaccinated,” and predicted an inevitable “collapse of our health system” due to health complications in the vaccinated.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, who once worked as a senior program manager for the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) and has been considered one of the most talented vaccine creators in the world, issued a video “Message to Austria” on November 20 to coincide with a large rally in Vienna opposing new lockdown measures.
As a first priority, he advised the public, “Never, Ever — allow anything, or anybody, to interfere or suppress your innate immune system,” which is the first line of defense human beings have to fight off all infections.
According to Vanden Bossche, the “vaccine antibodies,” which are induced by the current COVID-19 vaccines, suppress innate immunity and they “cannot substitute for it” since they quickly wane in their effectiveness and cannot prevent infection or transmission of the virus.
Thus, these experimental injections, in contrast to innate immunity, “do not contribute to herd immunity,” he said.
Vaccinating children ‘an absolute no go!’
This reality is most important in the case of children whose “innate immunity can easily be suppressed by vaccinal antibodies” since their “antibodies are so young and so naïve that they can easily be outcompeted by vaccinal antibodies,” he said.
And since children are protected from many diseases by their innate immunity, including COVID-19, its suppression by these vaccines exposes them to many more dangers, and “could even lead to autoimmune diseases,” the expert warned.
Therefore, injecting children with these biological agents “is an absolute no go!” the virologist said. “We cannot vaccinate our children with these vaccines.”
Booster shots for the vaccinated ‘absolutely insane!’
Turning his attention to the adult “vaccinees,” those who have been vaccinated, the specialist in microbiology said the suppression of innate immunity has already shown itself to be a problem in this population. “They are indeed going to have a difficult time to control a number of diseases,” including COVID-19.
Yet, since their innate antibodies have previously been trained through years of adapting and maturing, he said “they are usually more resilient to the vaccinal antibodies” than those of children.
However, this resilience can be further deteriorated by additional shots, and thus Vanden Bossche warns that giving these jabbed individuals boosters “is absolutely insane! What this will do is just further increase the immune pressure of the vaccinal antibodies on their innate immunity.” Thus, booster shots are “absolute nonsense! It is dangerous and should not be done!”
To the un-jabbed: ‘For God’s sake, stay unvaccinated!’
As for the unvaccinated, the Belgian physician described why they would fare much better, first breaking them down into three categories:
- Those who have experienced no symptoms, who are “most likely simply protected by their innate antibodies;”
- Those who have experienced mild symptoms, not having to stay in bed for any time; and
- Those who recovered from the disease and may have even had a severe case of it.
Due to what he called the “high infectious pressure” of the Delta variant, the respective innate immunity systems of these unvaccinated may now have to struggle a bit more, and thus the first category may experience mild symptoms, the second, moderate, and the third may have “some higher susceptibility to some other diseases. For example, influenza or the common cold.”
“But very, very importantly, all are protected,” he said. “They all are still protected against severe disease and the majority of them will be protected against very mild or moderate disease.”
This is the case, especially, the virologist said, since COVID-19 “is not a disease of healthy people. People who are in good health have a healthy innate immune system that can deal with a number of respiratory viruses without any problem. These people are not only protected against the disease, but they can even in many cases prevent infection.”
Vaccinees ‘serving as a kind of breeding ground for the virus’
Therefore, in order to maintain their healthy innate immune system as protection against COVID-19 and many other diseases, Dr. Vanden Bossche offered the following three requirements to the unvaccinated:
- “For God’s sake, stay unvaccinated! They should stay unvaccinated;”
- “Take care of their innate immunity, meaning they should take care of their health … if you do this and you are unvaccinated, you will be spared from severe disease without any vaccine. On the contrary, the vaccine would do the opposite;” and
- Those with comorbidities or underlying diseases “should be careful about contacts.”
For this third category of the more vulnerable, the physician said, “This is not to discriminate against the vaccinees, but [the un-jabbed] should especially avoid contact with vaccinees at this point in time.
“Vaccinees are now the people, and there is no doubt about this, who are really serving as a kind of breeding ground for the virus,” he said. “We need to have an extra protection for those who have underlying diseases. Do not vaccinate them, but in fact prevent them from being exposed to high infectious pressure.”
Health issues in the vaxxed ‘will inevitably lead to a collapse of our health system’
He encouraged his Austrian listeners that the only fight they have is “the fight for your health, [in] not getting vaccinated.” In accomplishing this, all of the other measures will not be sustainable.
Though he expressed great concern for “the vaccinees,” stating “we need to help them as much as we can because they will need extensive treatment in many cases,” he observed that the percentage of this group now being hospitalized “is now steadily increasing. Whereas more and more, with training of the innate immune system, with more exposure to the virus, more and more non-vaccinated people get protected.”
“This will lead inevitably — and I am not a doomsday preacher — but this will inevitably lead to a collapse of our health system. It cannot be otherwise,” he said.
‘Strength is found in serenity’
However, in closing, the virologist had a hopeful message, stating the lockdown measures “are not sustainable” and cannot last “for a long time.” He encouraged them to “stay calm,” sharing a German saying that translates, “Strength is found in serenity.”
COVID-19 Digital Certificate Legal Notice
The REAL Anthony Fauci with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Joining us today to talk about his new bestselling book, The Real Anthony Fauci, is Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. of ChildrensHealthDefense.org.
FDA Misled By Pfizer
Spread of Spanish Flu Was Never Experimentally Confirmed
“Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”
Puzzling Human Studies
The landmark study of Milton J. Rosenau, MD, “Experiments to Determine Mode of Spread of Influenza,” was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1919.
- They isolated microbial mixtures from the throat and noses of carefully selected influenza cases from an outbreak location. The researchers then administered these to 10 young U.S. navy volunteers without prior exposure to influenza. None fell sick.
- They drew blood from influenza patients and transferred it to the navy volunteers. None fell sick.
- They collected influenza patients’ mucous membranes with swabs and filtered them to exclude larger microbes like bacteria. They then injected the filtrate into the navy volunteers. None fell sick.
- They brought the navy volunteers to meet influenza patients. They shook hands and conversed. The patients also exhaled (as hard as possible) onto the volunteers’ face for five times. Then the patients cough directly onto the volunteers. None fell sick.
In case these ten navy volunteers were somehow immune, though unlikely as they had no prior influenza exposure, the study recruited another set of 50 volunteers. They repeat the experiment with influenza patients from another outbreak location, but could not prove human-to-human transmission. And, intriguingly, one physician involved in the study contracted influenza.
“I think we must be very careful not to draw any positive conclusions from the negative results of this kind. Many factors must be considered. Our volunteers may not have been susceptible. They may have been immune,” Dr Rosenau addressed. “We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person,” he concluded. “Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”
Other eight human experiments, documented in “Experiments Upon Volunteers to Determine the Cause and Mode of Spread of Influenza, Boston, November and December, 1918,” also failed to confirm how the Spanish flu spread. “Our failure, however, to reproduce the disease with these discharges suggests that there may be unknown factors involved, either in the discharge of the virus from the body, or in its entrance into the victim, or both,” the document ended.
“Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”
Reviewing these studies, John M. Eyler, PhD in the historical science at the University of Minnesota, said in a 2010 paper: “It seemed that what was acknowledged to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases could not be transferred under experimental conditions.”
Possible Explanations Are Unconvincing
Some argue that participants in those studies were already immune. This is rather unlikely, however, as the volunteers recruited had no prior exposure to influenza. As a 2008 review wrote: “While possible, none of the volunteers reported symptoms in 1918, even a fever.” If the volunteers were indeed immune, an initial infection must happen first to generate adaptive immunity that ‘remembers’ the Spanish flu virus. But, again, the volunteers were never symptomatic.
Another reason could be that the influenza patients had passed the infectious phase. This possibility, too, is dubious as Dr Rosenau ensured that influenza patients examined were in their first three days of illness, the period where virus shedding peaks.
Could the participants never contract the Spanish flu virus? Even though no technology could confirm virus diagnosis at that time, “we doubt U.S. Public Health Service physicians had much trouble making an accurate clinical diagnosis of influenza in 1919,” the 2008 review added. Maybe the sick could not transmit the Spanish flu virus to the healthy? Equally improbable as countless healthy people fell sick with the flu at that time.
We’ll Probably Never Know the Answer
The Spanish flu virus eventually disappeared, only to be resurrected in 2005 for animal experimentations to understand its mechanism of virulence. And, indeed, the Spanish flu is a unique influenza virus. “No other human influenza viruses tested were as exceptionally virulent,” the CDC stated. “In that way, the 1918 virus was special — a uniquely deadly product of nature, evolution and the intermingling of people and animals.”
As human infection experiments are no longer ethical and require extensive enrollment procedure, scientists may never solve why experimental human-to-human transmission of the Spanish flu could not be achieved. At least the human studies showed that human contact alone does not explain the Spanish flu pandemic. Underlying factors are likely at play. Evidence has suggested that a tuberculosis co-infection might be a prerequisite to a severe flu infection during the 1918 pandemic. Or perhaps animals were the main culprit in driving the 1918 flu transmission.
https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/spread-of-spanish-flu-was-never-experimentally-confirmed-9f91b37c4dd8
NSW and Vic Deaths
