Trial By Jury Combats Government Over Reach

I just received via email an interesting update to the NSW MyService Account Terms of Service.

It says, in part:

You are not allowed to use MyServiceNSW Account:

to participate in any illegal or fraudulent activity
to cause disruption to MyServiceNSW Account
in a way that infringes a person’s rights or prevents them from using MyServiceNSW Account
in any way that may harass, cause distress or inconvenience others
to post or send unlawful, defamatory, offensive or scandalous material, or
to post or send material that breaks or encourages breaking the law.

Pretty ironic when the NSW government are engaging in illegal activity by applying coercion to accept an experimental medical procedure in a way that infringes my rights, causes harassment and distress to many and encourages medical professionals to break the law and their oath to do no harm.

The solution of course is to reinstitute trial by jury. A judge cannot find a defendant non-guilty by virtue of an unjust law. Only a jury can do that. Trial by jury is the true safeguard against government over reach and tyranny. A judge can assume more power than common law grants him/her and think he/she can decide a case but that is not the correct application of the law.

Just think, if every person who violated the present unjust, draconian laws came before a trial by jury of 12 of their peers, the whole debacle would fizzle and fade in no time at all.

No matter who wins elections, trial by jury is the control mechanism that keeps them in check 124/7. Not just every 4 years.

I encourage you to get behind and support the restoration of common law trial by jury at every opportunity. It IS the physical universe handling for government insanity.

New Documentary on The PCR Test Deception is Banned on YouTube – Share this Film with Skeptics

Harm Documentary

Film producer Rai Gbrym reached out to me last week about a new documentary he had just produced that exposes the fraud of the PCR test. He had just posted it on YouTube and it already had thousands of views. I immediately downloaded the video so that I could view it when I had some time. When I went to watch it, it was already banned on YouTube, and no longer available. After viewing it now, I can see why Big Tech doesn’t want you to watch this, and why Google banned it on YouTube. If one can prove that the PCR Test used to detect COVID-19 is a fraud, then the entire “pandemic” is a fraud as well. Rai does a very good job of exposing the fraud behind the PCR test, and he has excellent interviews with people like Dr. Stephan Lanka from Germany, and Dr. Malcolm Kendrick from the U.K. We have featured the work of both these men over the years here at Health Impact News, as both of these men have been exposing the corruption in science and medicine for many years now, unlike the many doctors and scientists that have only recently begun to speak out against crimes in Big Pharma due to the COVID-19 scam. Dr. Lanka made headlines in 2017 when he issued a challenge in Germany where he agreed to pay 100,000 euros to anyone who could prove that the measles “virus” actually existed. Wanting to categorize him as a “quack” for not following the mainstream dogma, he had some people take him up on his challenge, but in the end, the German Federal Supreme Court confirmed that there was not enough evidence to prove the existence of the measles virus. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick is the author of several books, including “The Great Cholesterol Con,” “A Statin Nation: Damaging Millions in a Brave Post-health World,” and “Doctoring Data,” among others. Rai Gbrym has done a wonderful job in this documentary, and he is offering it to the public for free, even though it was self-funded, so important does he consider this information. Please support this work at his website, and share this film with as many people as you can.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/new-documentary-on-the-pcr-test-deception-is-banned-on-youtube-share-this-film-with-skeptics/

Renowned virologist warns of ‘collapse of our health system’ due to complications from COVID vaccines

Dr Geert Vanden Bossche Only Fight

Spread of Spanish Flu Was Never Experimentally Confirmed

“Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”

Puzzling Human Studies

The landmark study of Milton J. Rosenau, MD, “Experiments to Determine Mode of Spread of Influenza,” was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1919.

  • They isolated microbial mixtures from the throat and noses of carefully selected influenza cases from an outbreak location. The researchers then administered these to 10 young U.S. navy volunteers without prior exposure to influenza. None fell sick.
  • They drew blood from influenza patients and transferred it to the navy volunteers. None fell sick.
  • They collected influenza patients’ mucous membranes with swabs and filtered them to exclude larger microbes like bacteria. They then injected the filtrate into the navy volunteers. None fell sick.
  • They brought the navy volunteers to meet influenza patients. They shook hands and conversed. The patients also exhaled (as hard as possible) onto the volunteers’ face for five times. Then the patients cough directly onto the volunteers. None fell sick.

In case these ten navy volunteers were somehow immune, though unlikely as they had no prior influenza exposure, the study recruited another set of 50 volunteers. They repeat the experiment with influenza patients from another outbreak location, but could not prove human-to-human transmission. And, intriguingly, one physician involved in the study contracted influenza.

“I think we must be very careful not to draw any positive conclusions from the negative results of this kind. Many factors must be considered. Our volunteers may not have been susceptible. They may have been immune,” Dr Rosenau addressed. “We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person,” he concluded. “Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”

Other eight human experiments, documented in “Experiments Upon Volunteers to Determine the Cause and Mode of Spread of Influenza, Boston, November and December, 1918,” also failed to confirm how the Spanish flu spread. “Our failure, however, to reproduce the disease with these discharges suggests that there may be unknown factors involved, either in the discharge of the virus from the body, or in its entrance into the victim, or both,” the document ended.

“Perhaps, if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”

Reviewing these studies, John M. Eyler, PhD in the historical science at the University of Minnesota, said in a 2010 paper: “It seemed that what was acknowledged to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases could not be transferred under experimental conditions.”

Possible Explanations Are Unconvincing

Some argue that participants in those studies were already immune. This is rather unlikely, however, as the volunteers recruited had no prior exposure to influenza. As a 2008 review wrote: “While possible, none of the volunteers reported symptoms in 1918, even a fever.” If the volunteers were indeed immune, an initial infection must happen first to generate adaptive immunity that ‘remembers’ the Spanish flu virus. But, again, the volunteers were never symptomatic.

Another reason could be that the influenza patients had passed the infectious phase. This possibility, too, is dubious as Dr Rosenau ensured that influenza patients examined were in their first three days of illness, the period where virus shedding peaks.

Could the participants never contract the Spanish flu virus? Even though no technology could confirm virus diagnosis at that time, “we doubt U.S. Public Health Service physicians had much trouble making an accurate clinical diagnosis of influenza in 1919,” the 2008 review added. Maybe the sick could not transmit the Spanish flu virus to the healthy? Equally improbable as countless healthy people fell sick with the flu at that time.

We’ll Probably Never Know the Answer

The Spanish flu virus eventually disappeared, only to be resurrected in 2005 for animal experimentations to understand its mechanism of virulence. And, indeed, the Spanish flu is a unique influenza virus. “No other human influenza viruses tested were as exceptionally virulent,” the CDC stated. “In that way, the 1918 virus was special — a uniquely deadly product of nature, evolution and the intermingling of people and animals.”

As human infection experiments are no longer ethical and require extensive enrollment procedure, scientists may never solve why experimental human-to-human transmission of the Spanish flu could not be achieved. At least the human studies showed that human contact alone does not explain the Spanish flu pandemic. Underlying factors are likely at play. Evidence has suggested that a tuberculosis co-infection might be a prerequisite to a severe flu infection during the 1918 pandemic. Or perhaps animals were the main culprit in driving the 1918 flu transmission.
https://medium.com/microbial-instincts/spread-of-spanish-flu-was-never-experimentally-confirmed-9f91b37c4dd8

NSW and Vic Deaths

NSW and Vic Deaths
Where’s the action on the more important priorities? Altered priorities like this point up a hidden agenda that has nothing to do with health and welfare but everything to do with ushering in a tyrannical police state that is a far greater threat to us all than the cold or flu or Covid.
I strongly encourage you to spend 13 minutes to listen to the inventor of the mRNA vaccine, Dr Robert Malone, give an inspiring talk on how to overcome the mass psychosis, get through to people and rescue our freedom!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INHpQL9fgto&t=13s