Category: Vaccines

Names names, quotes destructive intents.

Catherine Austin Fitts calls it “The Great Poisoning”

Data published by the Office for National Statistics reveals that 41,449 people sadly died within 21 days of receiving a dose of the Covid-19 vaccine in England between 1st January 2021 and 31st January 2022, and a further 290,915 people sadly lost their lives within 21 days to 6 months of being vaccinated.

https://davidicke.com/2022/05/14/41-5k-people-died-within-21-days-of-covid-fake-vaccination-in-england-a-further-291k-died-within-6-months/

An interview on April 11th, with Stew Peters, a former chiropractor Dr. Bryan Ardis made a claim that COVID-19 is not a virus, but snake venom. This theory is flawed and full of misinformation. This video, exposes it all.

Basic Points of the Video Proving COVID-19 in not Snake Venom:

1- There was never any serious consideration, from either side, that snakes were the origin or host for the COVID-19 coronavirus. Genetic and protein sequence comparisons always indicated bat coronaviruses as the most likely backbone for a laboratory created COVID-19 bio-weapon.

2- The basis of his claim is that monoclonal antibodies are identical to anti-venoms used for snake bites. This is just not true. Antivenom is made by injecting a goat or horse with a small amount of venom. The antibodies released by the animal’s immune system to fight the venom are later harvested via bleeding. The blood serum or plasma is then concentrated and purified into pharmaceutical-grade antivenom. (Link- https://www.si.edu/spotlight/antibody-initiative/antivenom )

Monoclonal Antibodies are different. They are lab-produced, or cloned, and designed to boost protection against a specific target like the coronavirus. No monoclonal antibodies have been created yet to target snake venoms. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoclonal_antibody)

The two are not one in the same. If you get a snake bite you get antivenom not monoclonal antibodies.

3- Bing Lue, COVID researcher shot and killed, no one knows what he was working on, pure speculation.

4- Ardis misrepresented an Arizona study, He claimed falsely that the study showed an enzyme from rattlesnakes venom was in the blood of all COVID patients. That is nowhere found in the report he referenced. He just lies.

What the study did find, based off minimal research, is an enzyme healthy humans already have in their bodies — which is similar but not identical to an enzyme in rattlesnake venom — was circulating at elevated levels in patients who died of COVID-19. (See the Arizona Supply paragraph 3-4 https://archive.ph/N3Lg8#selection-673.126-679.266 )

5- Ardis implied that 19 toxins were related to COVID-19, and that the 19 in COVID stood for the toxins. The problem is the 19 on the end of COVID stands for the year it was discovered. He then links a study from Texas on Indian Cobra showing how anti-venom has 19 venom toxins. That’s his only tie, one has nothing to do with the other.

6- Ardis also doesn’t provide an adequate explanation for human-to-human transmission of COVID-19, other than to suggest, without providing any evidence that the snake venom might be passed between humans through the water supply, which is epidemiologically impossible based on the actual data. Snake venom is not contagious.

https://restrictedrepublic.com/programs/exclusive-fact-check-no-covid-19-in-not-snake-venom-dont-believe-it-heres-why-april-28th-2022-bd511b?categoryId=84407

Dr. Robert Jackson has been a physician for 35 years. In his practice, there are more than 5,000 patients, about 3,000 of whom got vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines.

What makes him unusual is that he is not afraid to speak out about what he is seeing in his patients. This is because he’s too valuable to fire.

Jackson said never in his career has he seen anything like what he’s seeing now: 40% of his vaccinated patients reported a vaccine injury, and 5% are still injured.

Nobody can argue his numbers are anecdotes because they were confirmed in the EULAR database and published in the BMJ: 37% had adverse events and 4.4% of patients had a flare-up of their disease after vaccination.

Also, he’s had 12 patients die following the jab. Normally in his patient base, he’ll see one or two deaths a year.

So if there is a question of whether all-cause mortality goes up or down after the jabs rolled out, his numbers make it crystal clear.

This is aggregated data from dozens of doctors in his practice: a .33% excess mortality rate among his patients after the vaccines rolled out (i.e., the vaccines likely killed 1 in 300 people in his patient base).

However, this is likely an undercount because he’s not the primary care physician.

This suggests a kill rate many times higher than the .2% we estimated from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS.

However, these are deaths in rheumatology patients, so this may account for the higher estimate. But we are in the same ballpark as the death estimate from VAERS.

Of course, there COULD be an “unknown” thing that killed all these people. It would have to be massive and injected into all these patients to cause the symptoms observed. Wonder what else fits that description? Nobody will tell us.

Naturally, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) doesn’t want you to know any of this and they would prefer it if you didn’t watch the video.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rheumatologist-vaccinated-patients-vaccine-injury/

Germ Versus Terrain Theory Debate

And if you would like them, the debate notes are here: https://yummy.doctor/blog/germ-theory-vs-terrain-debate-notes/

Terrain vs. Germ Theory Debate: Dr. Amandha Vollmer and (MD Student) Dr. Paul Cottrell – Moderated by Jesse Hall

A question posed in an interview of virologists.