The ingredients in vaccines compromise your body’s immune system. Do your homework before you accept any vaccine for you or your loved ones. Here is a starting point: https://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=3835
An Op-Ed in The Guardian by Actor and Activist Alec Baldwin and Paul Paz y Miño of Amazon Watch
At a time when so many are protesting systemic racism, we’d like to highlight a different story of marginalized people speaking truth to power on behalf of their most basic human rights.
It’s the story of how “big oil” is using Harvey Weinstein-like destroy-the-accuser tactics to try to crush environmental defenders. It is also the story of how we can all help those defenders peacefully fight back.
In 2001, Chevron acquired Texaco, including all of its assets and a giant liability known as the “Amazon Chernobyl,” a 1,700-square-mile environmental disaster in Ecuador. Texaco admitted that it deliberately discharged billions of liters of toxic waste into the environment, which ended up in the local water supply, causing cancers and other chronic health problems. According to multiple Indigenous witnesses, the company actually claimed that the oil wastes were medicinal and “full of vitamins.”
Originally, the company attempted to walk away with impunity, but somehow David beat Goliath. After 18 years of court battles, a coalition of Indigenous peoples and local communities won $9.5 billion in damages.
But Goliath won’t pay up. In the words of one Chevron official: “We will fight this until hell freezes over, and then fight it out on the ice.” In 2011, the company filed a retaliatory civil RICO case in New York against the group’s US lawyer and all 47 Ecuadorian villagers who signed the lawsuit, claiming the case was a “racketeering conspiracy.”
(Tom: One very smart girl with her head on straight and her heart in the right place. Kudos to her!)
Hello fellow patriots!! I just love you all!!
My name is Lindsey and my story may be a little different. I was at Virginia Tech during the massacre that killed 32, locked in a classroom for six hours. I saw people running for their lives and experienced things I’ll never forget…
I was never political, but after the shooting (mostly due to pressure from family & society) I thought I was for gun reform. I wanted to be a part of the party that stood for “love”… but it’s all an illusion on the other side. Eventually I started to see right through the propaganda.
After tons of research, I now blame big pharma for much of our country’s mental illness and many of these shootings (prescriptions and anti depressants that can change behavior, as well as other pharma products that affect the gut and brain).
I now realize how important it is own a firearm and be properly trained in how to use one… The only reason the government would want to take our guns away is if they’re planning to do something we would shoot them for… so, I now stand for FREEDOM and the right to protect ourselves and our families. And I’ll keep my guns, thanks.
One of my principle concerns with the current scene is the rapidly escalating speed with which human rights are being trampled. The lack of peace in certain regions is proof positive that these principles are actually valid and needed, more than ever.
This trend needs to be reversed. The entrance point is educating people that they do have rights. Hence this post and the request you share these posts so more people are aware of and insist upon their rights so that we can live in a peaceful society.
Watch the video and if you think so too, please share it!
Do you know it is a fundamental right of yours to have your own opinion? You would not think so from the way some people (including the government) try to belittle you for disagreeing with them but it is.
Preamble There is considerable scientific evidence that these diseases do not just have non-infectious co-factors, but that they are environmental in nature, not infectious.
In fact, with viruses, it is possible to question their very existence.
The book “The Infectious Myth” will investigate provide the scientific evidence that the normally accepted infectious cause is not, in fact, valid and, in will identify more plausible environmental causes.
The COVID-19 scare that emanated from Wuhan, China in December of 2019 is an epidemic of testing, as the graph below with test statistics from Austria shows.
There is no proof that a virus is being detected by the test and, while there should be, there is absolutely no concern about whether there are a significant number of false positives on the test. What is being published in medical journals is not science, every paper has the goal of enhancing the panic by interpreting the data only in ways that benefit the viral theory, even when the data is confusing or contradictory.
In other words, the medical papers are propaganda.
Scientists are detecting novel RNA in multiple patients with influenza or pneumonia-like conditions, and are assuming that the detection of RNA (which is believed to be wrapped in proteins to form an RNA virus, as coronaviruses are believed to be) is equivalent to isolation of the virus. It is not, and one of the groups of scientists was honest enough to admit this:
“we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood”
But, despite this admission, earlier in the paper they repeatedly referred to the 41 cases (out of 59 similar cases) that tested positive for this RNA as, “41 patients… confirmed to be infected with 2019-nCoV.”
Another paper quietly admitted that:
“our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates”
Koch’s postulates, first stated by the great German bacteriologist Robert Koch in the late 1800s, are simple logic, and can be stated as:
• Purify the pathogen (e.g. virus) from many cases with a particular illness.
• Expose susceptible animals (obviously not humans) to the pathogen.
• Verify that the same illness is produced.
• Some add that you should also re-purify the pathogen, just to be sure that it really is creating the illness.
Famous virologist Thomas Rivers stated in a 1936 speech, “It is obvious that Koch’s postulates have not been satisfied in viral diseases”.
That was a long time ago, but the problem continues. And Rivers’ guidance was considered important enough to be cited by papers claiming (falsely) that Koch’s Postulates had been met during the SARS era (2003). None of the papers referenced in this article have even attempted to purify the virus. And the word ‘isolation’ has been so debased by virologists it
means nothing (e.g. adding impure materials to a cell culture and seeing cell death is ‘isolation’).
There is lots of evidence that the virus is not as transmissible as is being implied. You can read the examples and more at: