Category: Vaccines

“The statement that he said, ‘That we are just going to try it in children to see if it’s safe.’ will go down as the most reprehensible, reckless statement in all of human medicine.” Dr Peter McCullough

https://www.instagram.com/p/CXXCg2NBPYy/

(Tom: Dr Peter is being professionally discrete. Knowing the vaccine adverse effect data they have access to at present I would call him a genocidal psychopath.)

Here is the link to verify it: https://townhall.com/tipsheet/scottmorefield/2021/10/26/fda-panel-member-were-never-gonna-learn-about-how-safe-the-vaccine-is-until-we-start-giving-it-n2598090

In defending his reversal on the effectiveness of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19, he discussed his “difficult situation” and said, “I’ve got this role where I’m supposed to produce this paper and we’re in a very difficult, delicate balance.”

The incident is recounted in Robert Kennedy Jr’s New York Times Bestseller, The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the global war on Democracy and Public Health.

Andrew Hill, PhD, is a senior visiting Research Fellow in Pharmacology at Liverpool University. He is also an advisor for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Clinton Foundation. As a researcher for the WHO evaluating ivermectin, Hill wielded enormous influence over international guidance for the drug’s use.

Hill had previously authored a analysis of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 that found the drug overwhelmingly effective.

On Jan. 6 of 2021, Hill testified enthusiastically before the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidlelines Panel in support of ivermectin’s use. Within a month, however, Hill found himself in what he describes as a “tricky situation.” Under pressure from his funding sponsors, Hill then published an unfavorable study. Ironically, he used the same sources as in the original study. Only the conclusions had changed.

https://www.worldtribune.com/researcher-andrew-hills-conflict-a-40-million-gates-foundation-grant-vs-a-half-million-human-lives/

“The statement that he said, ‘That we are just going to try it in children to see if it’s safe.’ will go down as the most reprehensible, reckless statement in all of human medicine.” Dr Peter McCullough

https://www.instagram.com/p/CXXCg2NBPYy/

(Tom: Dr Peter is being professionally discrete. Knowing the vaccine adverse effect data they have access to at present I would call Dr Rubin a genocidal psychopath.)

Here is the link to verify it:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/scottmorefield/2021/10/26/fda-panel-member-were-never-gonna-learn-about-how-safe-the-vaccine-is-until-we-start-giving-it-n2598090

There is no ethical, scientific or logical reason to mandate something that does not prevent infection or transmission or reduce deaths for an illness that has a similar mortality rate to the normal seasonal flu.

That is not the point. The purpose is of all the media hype and illogical government measures is to increase your fear level so you are more easily controlled, to make money via the enforced vaccine mandates and increase compliance to control measures in order to usher in a great reset to a new world order. When you have the correct ‘why’ all the otherwise insanity makes logical sense.

(Tom: In a time frame when 3.5 is the norm, 86 is over 24 times the norm or 2,400% up. Makes a complete mockery of the lie that vaccines are carefully monitored for safety, doesn’t it?

You would think a 2,400% rise is stillbirths in vaccinated mothers would shatter the myth that the vaccines are safe and effective but it seems the evil can keep a straight face and lie in the face of any and all evidence that vaccines are not safe and effective.)

MPP Rick Nichols of Ontario recently addressed Parliament about the rising rates of stillborn children in the Province, and asked the Minister of Health, Christine Elliot, the following question: “In the Waterloo area 86 stillbirths have occurred from January to July, and normally it is roughly 1 stillbirth every two months. But here’s the kicker. Mothers of stillbirth babies were fully vaccinated. And you have clearly said on numerous occasions that the vaccines are safe. So minister, what do you say to the doctors who told expecting women it was OK to get fully vaccinated, and what should they tell the mothers who deliver a stillborn baby?” Christine Elliot did not answer the question, dealing with the facts concerning so many stillborn children occurring, but instead gave the standard vaccine cult religious answer which is an appeal to authority (the vaccines are safe because we say so). “It is safe. It has been tested. We are recommending that women who are pregnant do receive the vaccine for the protection of themselves, protection of the baby as well. And that has been proven, it has been accepted by the Health Canada, by the World Health Organization, by the FDA.” She never addressed the high rate of stillborn babies. Here in the U.S., the latest update to the U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) happened today, and there are now 2,893 fetal deaths in VAERS following COVID-19 shots for the past year, which is more fetal deaths following ALL vaccines for the past 31 years. So why do women continue to believe the health “authorities” that these shots are safe when all these unborn babies are dying in record numbers? This is a religion, the vaccine cult. There is no “science” or “truth” here. Just liars and psychopaths.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/ontario-mpp-rick-nicholls-asks-parliament-why-86-stillbirths-of-fully-vaccinated-mothers-have-occurred-2893-fetal-deaths-now-in-vaers-following-covid-shots/