by Dr Keith Scott-Mumby
Well, you all know me; I have a HUGE view of human health. Very little falls outside my gaze that impinges on the great joy and vitality that is our lot on earth. So when I read a piece by a doctor demanding that we all learn about “climate change” and that it is our duty to be informed about something that is damaging and already upon us (“Climate change,” she says, “Is here and undeniable”), I get more than a bit pissy!
This is not the territory doctors should be in. Too much politics and flaky science.
The current climate debate is BUNK. There is no global warming. It has been manufactured by NASA tweaking its figures successively, to maintain the apparency of a rise. How can you “adjust” temperature figures?1
But even NASA has been unable to keep up its lies and the temperature rise, if there ever was any, has now been stalled for 10 years. Little wonder Japanese climate scientist Dr. Mototaka Nakamura recently characterized expert’s global warming data as “untrustworthy” and “falsified”.2
The rate of warming has not met with predictions, which is a serious blow to the notion that global warming is already on us. This mega-failure means that all other predictions probably mean very little too.
Yet the ignorance and hype merchants still keep going on, unable to modify their dialogue in the light of mere facts. Squeaky Greta Thunberg has made herself very rich (or rather her father, who pulls the puppet strings) and has become such a celebrity that millions, no billions, of people around the world believe that it’s all beyond question: human activity is messing up our climate.
It is not. Too bad she’s stirring up trouble among the young. Now we have idiots gluing themselves to the roads, in protest… To Hell with ambulances and other emergencies, say these “concerned” individuals.
I have no problem there is climate change. It happens all the time. It’s happened quite a lot in my lifetime of nearly 80 years. But that’s a local phenomenon and doesn’t equate to “global” warming.
There is evidence of massive change on a bigger scale. The Sahara desert, from space, shows clearly that water once flowed freely across what is now hot, dry sand!
Does Science Count?
Many thousands of good scientists around the world disagree with global warming, including Nobel Prize-winning physicist Dr. Ivar Giaever who, on resigning from the American Physical Society (APS) in protest, wrote: “In the APS it is OK to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes over time and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible?”
Badly put, but he meant that no-one is allowed to argue or debate the issue. The loonies who want to keep this going insist that “scientific consensus” maintains that global warming is real and wants everyone who thinks or says otherwise marginalized and got rid of.
It’s just the way they discredited, censored and removed anyone who wanted to take issue with the COVID-19 narrative. Those who support the official view have no trustworthy science to back themselves with but they fight furiously to protect their position against anyone who doesn’t buy their story. Faking the figures to hold the status quo is not unusual behavior for these dudes. Protesting the trickery however is now enrolled as an antisocial crime!
Take the polar bears; surely that means there is climate change? Coupled with sad pictures of starving polar bears lost on the shrinking ice, it seems OBVIOUS to the average individual. But nobody reads the actual science. The polar bear population is stable overall, according to real scientists! The “sad” pictures happen every year, when the ice melts, and the bears have to swim for it. As for the famous picture of a “starving” bear that went viral, even National Geographic had to admit it was a con. The bear was very likely aged and sick.3
Data from conservation groups and the government show that the polar bear population, which is supposed to be the poster child for global warming, is NOT declining in numbers. In fact today it is roughly five times what it was in the 1950s and three or four times what it was in the 1970s when polar bears became protected under international treaty (see chart).
The truth is that Arctic ice is back on the increase: 20% more as long ago as 2013. It’s not about the extent of the ice, which varies, but the total quantity of ice and that’s going UP. That’s not what you hear from the media, is it?
Keep reading: https://alternative-doctor.com/should-doctors-be-climatologists/#link01