What Are The True Numbers? The More Likely True Risks Of Jabs

This morning I received a newsletter from Steve Kirsch talking about how yet another analysis (that’s 9 now) computes the VAERS numbers of 20,000 dead post jab are probably underreported by a factor of 20.

I don’t know how these analysts are getting their numbers. I quote from a full article I posted here https://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=31877 on 2nd Feb 2021:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gave Harvard Medical School a $1 million dollar grant to track VAERS reporting at Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare for 3 years and to create an automated reporting system which would revolutionize the VAERS reporting system- transforming it from “passive” to “active.” It found, “Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. […] Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”

ONE PER CENT of vaccine reactions are reported! So if 20,000 deaths are reported that more likely puts the true figure at 100 times that or 2,000,000 deaths post jab.

These are not figures from a wild-eyed conspiracy theorist or wacko nut-job. These are figures from an NIH paid for study conducted by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare. Could not get much more main-stream than that!

So, why are the CDC, the FDA and Congress refusing to acknowledge the risks from the present jab? Maybe Upton Sinclair was spot on the money when he said:

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” Upton Sinclair