Alumnium – Ingestion Versus Injection

Alumnium - Ingestion Versus Injection

== Aluminum Deception by the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) ==

Please read the text on the graphic before continuing.

Back? Good. Let me explain how the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia is purposefully lying to people.

The main point they are making is that we ingest (eat, breath, drink) more aluminum than is in vaccines thus we shouldn’t worry about the amount in vaccines. They point out how abundant aluminum is in the Earth’s crust to further their point.

Sounds reasonable, but it’s not. Here’s why.

When aluminum ingestion studies are conducted the researchers multiply the aluminum by 0.3% because that’s how much gets through the gut into the bloodstream. The gut lining is designed to prevent foreign substances like aluminum to pass through. Instead, the substances are often excreted harmlessly in urine and feces. (Ingested aluminum does get excreted but it’s not done harmlessly. The aluminum cation damages the gut lining by opening the tight junctions, thereby causing intestinal permeability.)

However, vaccines are injected precisely so that this protective barrier (the gut lining) is bypassed.

The ATSDR sheet below cites 0.01% to 5% (see link) but a common value used in aluminum ingestion studies is 0.3%. That’s not 3%—it’s zero point 3 percent. The gut lining, unfortunately, has to deal with all of the aluminum—but that’s another topic.

When someone tells you that we ingest more aluminum than we get from vaccines, they never multiply by 0.003 thus their argument is entirely false. Most pro-vax people have not studied aluminum so in a way this error is somewhat forgivable when they repeat it. Correct them nicely and move on.

But it is not forgivable by CHOP. This is academic deception on their part because this is the very basics of aluminum science. There is no excuse for them to omit this reduction factor.

Furthermore, they are comparing an aluminum salt, which is a compound, with the Al cation that we ingest. Another part of the deception.

This is just the latest in a string of lies by CHOP. The prior one (now taken down from their site but screenshots are widely available) was this howler:

“[Aluminum] is found in all tissues and is also believed to play an important role in the development of a healthy fetus.”

No, aluminum is a toxicant and only a toxicant. There is no known beneficial biochemical reaction that uses aluminum as part of its function. (There is one known Al-specific plant reaction that appears to protect the plant from aluminum but that’s it.)

ToxGuide(tm) for Aluminum, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxguides/toxguide-22.pdf

For more detail on how CHOP lies, please see:
http://vaccinepapers.org/dr-paul-offits-aluminum-deceptions-academic-misconduct/

Jack does an excellent job for even more detail:
Reconsideration of the immunotherapeutic pediatric safe dose levels of aluminum, 2018

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17300950

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *