Averaging Last Seconds Versus Bureau Peer-Review
Averaging by its very nature smooths: removing peaks and troughs. Temperature data tends to be cyclical, whether on a one-minute, or thousand-year scale. The Australian Bureau of Meteorology has made a habit of smoothing when it is convenient and using extreme values otherwise. Take their one-minute temperature data from Canberra Airport: super-sensitive electronic equipment now records the highest, lowest, and last second of each minute and reports the highest second as the daily maximum temperature. Back in 2019 I purchased some of this data to test the Bureau’s claim that averaging the data would make no difference. I found that averaging the last one-second of each minute always gave me a lower maximum temperature. This is because the difference between the the highest and the last second could typically be 0.7 degrees Celsius as shown in Figure 17 – that is from a comprehensive report I co-authored in 2020. I have so far been unable to get this report published in a suitable peer-reviewed journal perhaps because it contradicts the Bureau’s much lauded Ayers and Warne (2020) analysis that comes to the opposite conclusion.
https://jennifermarohasy.com/2023/05/averaging-last-seconds-versus-bureau-peer-review/
World Atmospheric CO2, Its 14C Specific Activity, Non-fossil Component, Anthropogenic Fossil Component, and Emissions (1750–2018)
Our results show that the percentage of the total CO2 due to the use of fossil fuels from 1750 to 2018 increased from 0% in 1750 to 12% in 2018, much too low to be the cause of global warming.
Imagine A World Where
Ever evaluated CO2?
This is the greatest fraud in human history, but nobody has the courage to stand up and tell the following TRUTHS ….
1. 97% of all CO2 in the atmosphere is naturally occurring, nothing to do with what mankind does or does not do.
2. We are living in a period of among the LOWEST CO2 levels in the atmosphere in the history of this planet. Millions of years ago CO2 levels in the atmosphere were up around 4,000+ppm. Since then CO2 levels have steadily declined and today CO2 is only around 415 ppm. Extremely low. If it falls to around or below 210 ppm then all plant life, vegetation, trees etc will start to die. When that happens we all will perish. This is how utterly ludicrous this whole thing is.
3. The hydro-graphic survey station at Fort Dennison, which measures the mean height of the largest body of water on the planet, the Pacific Ocean, tells us of countless times the mean height of the ocean was HIGHER before WWII than in recent times. For example, in 1914 the Pacific Ocean recorded a mean height of 1.11 meters which is HIGHER than it was in 2019 at 1.05 meters. There weren’t any coal fired power stations, 747’s or SUV’s around in 1914!
4. Pacific islands are not sinking, very recent photographic comparisons to US aerial shots taken during WWII clearly show a huge number of islands have actually expanded/increased their surface area … they have GROWN!!
5. The Arctic has recorded massive ice and snow gains over the last three to four years despite global warming/climate change alarmists telling us the Arctic will be ice free by 2010.
6. In Australia massive increases in electricity costs which will be terrible for everyone, manufacturing and businesses will struggle to survive, many will probably close, base-load power shortages resulting in wide-spread black-outs, massive job losses and a society on its way to serious decline – all of which is in the name of “global warming/climate change” will NOT reduce the earth’s temperature. Nothing we do here in Australia will have the slightest impact on the earth’s temperature. When pushed on the matter by members of Parliament, even the CSIRO’s Chief Scientist admitted it for goodness sake!
7. We know from this planet’s history that in the few times where CO2 has been at elevated levels, the earth’s temperature did NOT rise. We know this as FACT through ice core samples, and ice core samples don’t lie. You can’t change the earth’s history but my bet is there’s plenty of doomer activists who wish they could.
8. Despite being told by doomer climate alarmists the Great Barrier Reef will be 50% gone by 2020 due to climate change, the reef is actually flourishing with fantastic coral growth of recent times.
9. Last year China INCREASED their emissions by roughly the same amount as Australia emits in an ENTIRE YEAR for goodness sake. This means if the whole of Australia vanished off the face of the earth and didn’t exist tomorrow and therefore did not emit a single gram of emissions, nothing would change.
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WOULD CHANGE.
NOTHING!
10. And let’s not forget there’s not suppose to be any more rainfall and certainly not enough to fill our dams by 2015. Just another LIE.
The truth is every single solitary global warming/climate change prediction has been proved WRONG.
Not one single alarmist claim has been correct and the reason for this is because it is based on complete and utter LIES.
Wake up people and save Australia from this insanity.
EVs Require
Brainwashed Nation
WHAT HOPE DO WE HAVE?
Craig Kelly writes:
The coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef is currently the highest on record – but only 3% of Australians understand that.
Like in most issues, the most misinformed were Greens voters with more 75% of Greens thinking the reef was doing worse than usual.
But given the alarmist propaganda spewed out by the ABC and the rest of the left wing media and the brainwashing in our schools, this result is hardly surprising.
It is this deception of the public, and cowardly politicians in the Liberal Party, that would rather appease the climate lies than fight for the truth – is the reason Liberal and Labor have signed the nation up to the ruinous Net Zero.
Just like Covid, how much self-inflicted damage will Australia do to itself until enough people wake up to the con?
Did Not Accurately Predict A Single Thing!
In fact, the authorities got EVERYTHING 100% wrong! Now, getting 100% does not come easily. It’s a lot of work to get 100%. In a brilliant lecture Dr Lee Merritt said of Fauci, Brix, etc. “Everything they said was wrong. Now, they were wrong about what they were telling us and they were wrong by errors of omission, not telling us things that we knew to be helpful. And I’m talking about knowing in science for 20 years. So I can give you the benefit of doubt if you’re wrong about one or two things, but when you’re wrong 100% of the time consistently, that’s not by accident. I mean even a blind hog gets to eat corn once in a while.”
Should Doctors Be Climatologists?
by Dr Keith Scott-Mumby
Well, you all know me; I have a HUGE view of human health. Very little falls outside my gaze that impinges on the great joy and vitality that is our lot on earth. So when I read a piece by a doctor demanding that we all learn about “climate change” and that it is our duty to be informed about something that is damaging and already upon us (“Climate change,” she says, “Is here and undeniable”), I get more than a bit pissy!
This is not the territory doctors should be in. Too much politics and flaky science.
The current climate debate is BUNK. There is no global warming. It has been manufactured by NASA tweaking its figures successively, to maintain the apparency of a rise. How can you “adjust” temperature figures?1
But even NASA has been unable to keep up its lies and the temperature rise, if there ever was any, has now been stalled for 10 years. Little wonder Japanese climate scientist Dr. Mototaka Nakamura recently characterized expert’s global warming data as “untrustworthy” and “falsified”.2
The rate of warming has not met with predictions, which is a serious blow to the notion that global warming is already on us. This mega-failure means that all other predictions probably mean very little too.
Yet the ignorance and hype merchants still keep going on, unable to modify their dialogue in the light of mere facts. Squeaky Greta Thunberg has made herself very rich (or rather her father, who pulls the puppet strings) and has become such a celebrity that millions, no billions, of people around the world believe that it’s all beyond question: human activity is messing up our climate.
It is not. Too bad she’s stirring up trouble among the young. Now we have idiots gluing themselves to the roads, in protest… To Hell with ambulances and other emergencies, say these “concerned” individuals.
I have no problem there is climate change. It happens all the time. It’s happened quite a lot in my lifetime of nearly 80 years. But that’s a local phenomenon and doesn’t equate to “global” warming.
There is evidence of massive change on a bigger scale. The Sahara desert, from space, shows clearly that water once flowed freely across what is now hot, dry sand!
Does Science Count?
Many thousands of good scientists around the world disagree with global warming, including Nobel Prize-winning physicist Dr. Ivar Giaever who, on resigning from the American Physical Society (APS) in protest, wrote: “In the APS it is OK to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes over time and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible?”
Badly put, but he meant that no-one is allowed to argue or debate the issue. The loonies who want to keep this going insist that “scientific consensus” maintains that global warming is real and wants everyone who thinks or says otherwise marginalized and got rid of.
It’s just the way they discredited, censored and removed anyone who wanted to take issue with the COVID-19 narrative. Those who support the official view have no trustworthy science to back themselves with but they fight furiously to protect their position against anyone who doesn’t buy their story. Faking the figures to hold the status quo is not unusual behavior for these dudes. Protesting the trickery however is now enrolled as an antisocial crime!
Take the polar bears; surely that means there is climate change? Coupled with sad pictures of starving polar bears lost on the shrinking ice, it seems OBVIOUS to the average individual. But nobody reads the actual science. The polar bear population is stable overall, according to real scientists! The “sad” pictures happen every year, when the ice melts, and the bears have to swim for it. As for the famous picture of a “starving” bear that went viral, even National Geographic had to admit it was a con. The bear was very likely aged and sick.3
Data from conservation groups and the government show that the polar bear population, which is supposed to be the poster child for global warming, is NOT declining in numbers. In fact today it is roughly five times what it was in the 1950s and three or four times what it was in the 1970s when polar bears became protected under international treaty (see chart).
The truth is that Arctic ice is back on the increase: 20% more as long ago as 2013. It’s not about the extent of the ice, which varies, but the total quantity of ice and that’s going UP. That’s not what you hear from the media, is it?
Keep reading: https://alternative-doctor.com/should-doctors-be-climatologists/#link01
The Sun Controls Climate Change
What do you think has more of an effect on the temperature of the planet?
A trace gas (CO2) which makes up just 0.04% of the atmosphere (of which 95% comes from natural sources, not human activity), or that colossal ball of heat in the sky, called ‘The Sun’?