Family Values?

silhouette of a family on a farm crop field where a tractor is spraying pesticides and herbicides

Just when you thought you’d heard the worst about Monsanto, comes this: Monsanto executives and paid shills for the company argued “to beat the shit” out of moms who criticized Roundup weedkiller.

They also declared “organic” to be the “enemy.”

As Monsanto’s new owner, Bayer, gears up to face another round of trials from plaintiffs alleging that exposure to Roundup caused them to get non-Hodgkin lymphoma, more revealing and disturbing internal emails and other documents are surfacing.

They’re ugly. They shed more light on Monsanto’s sinister tactics. And they target you.

As reported in New Food Economy, here’s what Monsanto Bruce Chassy, a University of Illinois biochemist, wrote to Monsanto executive Dan Goldstein, about a letter posted by Zen Honeycutt on the Moms Across America website:

“The funniest part about the letter is how it says my children got better when I fed them organic. There you have it. That’s your enemy. Beat the shit out of them and put them on the defensive and you won’t have this problem.”

Chassy fired back:

“I have been arguing for a week to beat the shit out of them and have clearly lost. We don’t want to be seen as beating up on mothers, nobody will listen to it anyway, it has to be done by third parties, it’s an industry problem not a Monsanto problem … I have heard it all this week.”

There you have it. From the company that brags on its website:

Respect for human dignity and human rights is the ethical foundation of everything we do. We treat people fairly and respectfully, irrespective of their religion, nationality, ethnic origin, culture, gender or sexual orientation. We value and foster diversity.

Well, almost everybody… …but clearly not moms who have an axe to grind with Roundup weedkiller. And not anyone who supports organic food and farming.

This is the evil we’re up against. It’s our job to keep up the pressure on corporations and politicians until one day, our food is poison-free.

https://www.organicconsumers.org/

5G WAS TESTED IN RUSSIA ON HUMANS & ANIMALS WITH DISTURBING RESULTS: WHAT YOU ARE NOT BEING TOLD – DR BARRIE TROWER & MARK STEELE DISCUSS

EMF Warning Sign

This should be a wake up call to us all as it is not conjecture, it is not unsubstantiated opinion. This is hard, solid tests and results. Bad results. Results well worth fighting to avoid.

Chia Seeds

Chia Seeds

9 Health Benefits of Chia Seeds and How to Eat Them

Chia seeds are a great source of many nutrients, which is why I have them in many ofmy formulations,

https://foodrevolution.org/blog/chia-seeds-benefits/

2019 Photo Contest

2019 Photo Contest

Talented photographers from around the world submitted more than 121,000 amazing photos to The Nature Conservancy’s 2019 global photo contest. It was tough, but we narrowed down the photos for our People’s Choice category.

Now we need YOUR HELP to choose the People’s Choice winner. Cast your vote for your favourite photo right now. Voting closes this Sunday 8 September.

VOTE FOR YOUR FAVOURITE PHOTO

This has been our most successful photo contest ever. From extraordinary moments to everyday beauty, we’re inspired by the variety of photographs entered from more than 150 countries. They’re a powerful reminder that nature’s wonder connects us all.

Now it’s your turn to help us showcase the best of the best. Take a moment to check out the finalists and vote for your favourite photos.

Thanks for being part of The Nature Conservancy’s community of supporters. Friends like you have an unmatched ability to see nature’s magnificence in the world around us. We’re grateful to have you with us.

Good luck!

Rachel Bailey
Director of Marketing and Membership

P.S. There are so many incredible photos, it’s worth the look!

https://www.natureaustralia.org.au/get-involved/how-to-help/photo-contest/

Secrets Spies And Trials

Secrets Spies And Trials

Secrets, spies and trials: national security vs the public’s right to know.

“I feel we’re living in very dangerous times here in Australia…one day we’ll wake up and wonder how on earth we got here.” MP

In a Canberra court room one of the most controversial trials ever to be held in Australia will soon get under way. The case is highly sensitive, with key evidence central to the allegations unlikely to ever be heard by the public.

“This could be…one of the most secretive trials in Australian history.” Former judge

A former spy and his lawyer have been charged with conspiring to reveal secret information relating to an Australian intelligence operation aimed at a friendly foreign government.

“There is a legitimate public interest in knowing what is being tried…That’s difficult to do if a trial, at the pointy end, will be held secretly.” Lawyer

The two men involved are a former intelligence operative known only as Witness K and his lawyer, the former ACT Attorney-General Bernard Collaery.

“Traditionally, it’s simply not in the public interest to prosecute this kind of thing.” Lawyer

Witness K and Collaery are accused of disclosing an Australian bugging operation carried out in the government offices of Timor Leste in 2004. It was years after the revelations became public that they were charged.

“There is that I think overall perception that this sort of litigation is a payback, firstly. Secondly, that the secrecy provisions are perceived to be a coverup.” Former judge

On Monday Four Corners investigates the extraordinary steps the Australian government has taken to prosecute these men and to keep them silent.

“I don’t know what I’m going to be allowed to say in court. I’ve only just been allowed to speak to my lawyers after 18 months…but I’m circumscribed even in what I can tell my own lawyers. It’s an amazing experience.” Bernard Collaery

The intelligence community argues that prosecuting those that leak is an essential part of our national security.

“If you have everybody going out and saying, well, I don’t agree with something, and disclosing privileged information, then you don’t have an intelligence service.” Former intelligence analyst

But former judges and senior lawyers who have worked closely with the intelligence agencies say they are deeply worried about the prosecution and the use of the national security laws created in the wake of 9/11.

“I don’t think (these laws) were designed for this sort of case at all.” Former judge

The program examines the tension between those who say national security is paramount and those who fear the steady encroachment of state security on the public’s right to know.

“I think that for far too long, there has been this notion that, very few people will decide what’s good for us to know, and what’s good for us not to know. And I, for one, am not prepared to give them a blank check.” Lawyer

https://www.nexusnewsfeed.com/article/geopolitics/secrets-spies-and-trials/