Plandemic
Watch this: https://freedomplatform.tv/plandemic-indoctornation-world-premiere/
Know Your Rights – A List Of Human Rights
This is why each day I post a Youth For Human Rights Video. Here is a list of them:
Human Rights Video #1: Born Free and Equal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iv1SOp06geE
Human Rights Video #2: Don’t Discriminate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Jy1nJCYEOo
Human Rights Video #3: The Right To Life
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtMsSvPX658
Human Rights Video #4: Freedom From Slavery
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnfiENKheNo
Human Rights Video #5: Freedom From Torture
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhCQQ0fov0o
Human Rights Video #6: You Have Rights No Matter Where You Go
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-yOlLEV55Q
Human Rights Video #7: We Are Equal Before The Law
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zabio686_54
Human Rights Video #8: Protected By Law
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxT92rNAZeA
Human Rights Video #9: No Unfair Detainment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3UBFER8zJ4
Human Rights Video #10: Right To Fair Trial
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zAdAIAP6mA
Human Rights Video #11: Innocent Until Proven Guilty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D314SE5QtJ0
Human Rights Video #12: Right To Privacy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxwu389BZlE
Human Rights Video #13: Freedom To Move
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdRV4TP_gWI
Human Rights Video #14: Right To Asylum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqwmJoCbP8U
Human Rights Video #15: Right To A Nationality
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Y_3abPMCZA
Human Rights Video #16: Right To Marriage & Family
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRn-Xi0hlnw
Human Rights Video #17: Right to Ownership
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiNtUbaqUHM
Human Rights Video #18: Freedom of Thought
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZ3kLTz3JPU
Human Rights Video #19: Freedom of Expression
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgvQzHdv6AA
Human Rights Video #20: Right to Assembly
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oduSjw7Wd0
Human Rights Video #21: Right to Democracy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38x7h2IVaL4
Human Rights Video #22: Social Security
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmtoFHW4wjo
Human Rights Video #23: Workers Rights
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGZuy3Qn8Ns
Human Rights Video #24: Right to Play
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hbe1PqiJBsg
Human Rights Video #25: Food and Shelter for All
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2c_OFgYX9Y
Human Rights Video #26: Right to Education
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrxoNZh5sqU
Human Rights Video #27: Copyright
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHZG4XxXNBQ
Human Rights Video #28: Fair and Free World
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDPVUIunLQc
Human Rights Video #29: Responsibility
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf2ckZhZDag
Human Rights Video #30: No One Can Take Away Your Human Rights
I Keep Hearing It Takes A Village
A 1984 Interview With Soviet Defector Yuri Bezmenov
Explains the process of subversion of a country.
Single And Looking
I think if I did this I WOULD be single and looking!
Human Rights Video #19: Freedom of Expression
One of my principle concerns with the current scene is the rapidly escalating speed with which human rights are being trampled. The lack of peace in certain regions is proof positive that these principles are actually valid and needed, more than ever.
This trend needs to be reversed. The entrance point is educating people that they do have rights. Hence this post and the request you share these posts so more people are aware of and insist upon their rights so that we can live in a peaceful society.
Watch the video and if you think so too, please share it!
Do you know it is a fundamental right of yours to have your own opinion? You would not think so from the way some people (including the government) try to belittle you for disagreeing with them but it is.
Human Rights Video #18: Freedom of Thought
One of my principle concerns with the current scene is the rapidly escalating speed with which human rights are being trampled. The lack of peace in certain regions is proof positive that these principles are actually valid and needed, more than ever.
This trend needs to be reversed. The entrance point is educating people that they do have rights. Hence this post and the request you share these posts so more people are aware of and insist upon their rights so that we can live in a peaceful society.
Watch the video and if you think so too, please share it!
Do you know it is a fundamental right of yours to have your own opinion? You would not think so from the way some people (including the government) try to belittle you for disagreeing with them but it is.
Magic
“Magic is believing in yourself, if you can do that, you can make anything happen.” Johann Wolfgang von Goethe – Writer (1749 – 1832)
Fact: Morrison opposes legislation to absolutely protect deposits
More shennanigans from that bunch of ne’er do wells in Canberra. If you have money in an Australian bank it would be a good investment of your time to call a politician and demand they protect it from the skullduggery of banks and their cronies.
The Morrison government had an opportunity to settle the growing community concern over the security of bank deposits from a “bail-in”. It has failed. The government’s report of the Senate Economics Legislation Committee’s inquiry into Senator Malcolm Roberts’ Banking Amendment (Deposits) Bill 2020 is full of worthless legal platitudes that cannot disguise the fact that it does not want to give Australians absolute certainty that deposits cannot be bailed in.
If you are concerned about bail-in, do not let your local MP and Senators be fooled by this report. They are the target of the government’s false assurances. Just as the government in 2018 was able to sneak the crisis resolution powers law through the Senate with only eight Senators present and no formal vote, because most MPs and Senators weren’t paying attention, the government has crafted this report to dupe MPs and Senators into thinking Senator Roberts’ bill isn’t necessary.
Call and email your MP and all 12 Senators in your state to tell them this report is a failure, and demand they vote for Senator Robert’s Banking Amendment (Deposits) Bill 2020 when it comes before the Senate.
Always remember, Senator Roberts’ amendment, to ensure the conversion and write-off provisions of the 2018 law can’t apply to bank deposits, should have been considered and debated by the Senate back in 2018. It wasn’t, because after One Nation gave the government notice that it intended to move the amendment, the government offered to get their lawyers to check over the amendment, but while One Nation waited to hear back, the government rushed the bill through the Senate when the One Nation Senators weren’t in the chamber. This dirty act by the government proved its determination to block any moves to explicitly protect deposits from its 2018 law, and it has just demonstrated that determination again in this report.
No hearing
The biggest failing of the Senate inquiry into Senator Roberts’ bill was its lack of a public hearing to test the claims made in the submissions. Not holding a public hearing allowed the committee chair, Senator Slade Brockman, to sign off on a report that accepted the claims of Treasury and APRA without question. A public hearing would have allowed experts to show those claims were badly flawed. Outspoken independent economist and former Liberal Party economics advisor John Adams, a key leader of the campaign to clarify the law, said: “This process was a complete whitewash—it would appear that the committee had already formed an established position irrespective of the evidence.” In his dissenting report, Senator Roberts said: “The committee has failed to get to the truth of the matter.”
The report sticks to the government’s position that amending the law to clarify the protection for deposits is unnecessary because there is already “legislative certainty”. It repeats APRA’s and Treasury’s assertions that deposits are protected by APRA’s mandate, depositor preference, and the $250,000 Financial Claims Scheme (FCS) deposit guarantee. But these assertions have been shown to be false, which a public hearing would have revealed.
One of the most telling lines in the report is its concession that the $250,000 FCS deposit guarantee is not perpetually in force, but must first be activated in relation to a specific bank and the government has discretion not to activate it, which the government has never broadcast. The report states: “While it is a decision of the Treasurer to activate the scheme, it is not clear why the Treasurer would choose not to activate the scheme.” That’s the whole point: such unclarity over what the government touts as the primary protection against deposit bail-in is an important reason to amend the law.
The report asserts interpretations of existing laws and regulations that most MPs would take on faith, but on closer inspection the interpretations are false. An egregious example is this sentence about APRA’s prudential standards supposedly protecting investors in so-called hybrid securities, a.k.a. bail-in bonds, which do have conversion and write-off provisions: “The Prudential Standard ensures ADI [bank] customers do not unknowingly purchase a financial instrument to which the conversion and write-off provisions apply.” This is footnoted to a reference to a Prudential Standard APRA issued in 2015. The problem is, this ignores the fact that in 2017, the outgoing boss of securities regulator ASIC, Greg Medcraft, launched a broadside at APRA precisely for allowing retail investors, mums and dads, to buy these securities without understanding their risks of being bailed in. The UK bans retail investors from buying hybrids because they wouldn’t understand the risks.
Medcraft said in Senate testimony on 26 October 2017: “There are two reasons we believe a lot of the retail investors buy these securities. One is they don’t understand the risks that are in over 100-page prospectuses and, secondly—and this is probably for a lot of investors—they do not believe that the government would allow APRA to exercise the option to wipe them out in the event that APRA did choose to wipe them out.” (Emphasis added.) He added: “Yes, they’ll be bailed in. … I do think this is, frankly, a ticking time bomb.”
For the government’s report to blithely assert APRA’s prudential standard provides protections that in the real world it provably does not, is a demonstration of the committee’s extremely poor and shallow analysis.
Do not accept baseless assurances as guarantees! This report is not the final word on the bail-in amendment; the Senators who will vote on it in November have the final word. Call them and your local MP to demand they support the bill. As Senator Roberts wrote: “If the bill does not have any other adverse outcome and seeks simply to reaffirm the meaning of the legislation currently in place, then there is no reason not to pass the bill.”
Call and email the Committee and Senators!
The bottom line is the Banking Amendment (Deposits) Bill 2020 will put the issue beyond all doubt. If it is passed, there can be no bail-in of deposits! Concerned Australians should flood politicians with phone calls and emails demanding they pass Senator Malcolm Roberts’ bill.
Click here for the contact details of your local MP and state’s Senators.
https://www.aph.gov.au/Senators_and_Members
The bottom line is the Banking Amendment (Deposits) Bill 2020 will put the issue beyond all doubt. If it is passed, there can be no bail-in of deposits! Concerned Australians should flood politicians with phone calls and emails demanding they pass Senator Malcolm Roberts’ bill.
Click here for the contact details of your local MP and state’s Senators.