One of the world’s top scientists has branded lockdowns a “huge mistake” and called Australia a “standout loser” for “massively” damaging its economy and society without obtaining immunity to COVID-19.
In an extraordinary 30-minute interview Michael Levitt, who won the Nobel prize for chemistry in 2013, also slammed Baby Boomers for “really screwing up” the world. “If I was a young person now I would say, you guys are going to pay for this,” said Professor Levitt, 72.
Professor of structural biology at Stanford University, he said “panic” stemming from “incorrect numbers” had prompted lockdowns whose damage “will exceed any saving of lives by a huge factor – there is no doubt in my mind”.
Uploaded to UK website Unheard overnight, the professor said Germany and Sweden, with deaths so far per million from COVID-19 of 81 and 264, respectively, were “standout winners” in their response.
The future may be unpredictable, but global pandemics aren’t. There isn’t a single government on the planet that hasn’t been warned, repeatedly, that at some point a viral pandemic will sweep the globe, causing untold death and economic disruption.
And yet most failed to prepare for the novel coronavirus.
“Every academic, every researcher who’s looked at this knew this was coming,” says famed whistleblower Edward Snowden in an exclusive interview with VICE co-founder Shane Smith. “Yet when we needed it, the system has now failed us, and it has failed us comprehensively.”
Snowden is the first guest in the new “Shelter in Place” series airing on VICE TV on Thursday at 10 p.m. EST, which looks at the global response to COVID-19 and its lasting impact around the world. Smith discussed these themes, as well as how to survive quarantine, with a host of thinkers from science, entertainment, economics, and journalism.
In the premiere episode, Smith talks to Snowden, who blew the lid off of the National Security Agency’s surveillance of the American people in 2012. In the interview conducted from Smith’s home in Santa Monica over video chat, the two tackle topics including the lack of preparedness in the face of a global pandemic, how long this will be a threat to humanity, and whether the power we’re handing to global leaders will come back and bite us in the ass.
Just to set the stage, here is a quote from the first half of last century. Note how everything changes but the system stays the same. “In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.”
Apple says the AirPod satisfies FCC requirements for close-range radiation levels. But a UC Berkeley scientist is now warning that AirPods might result in irreversible brain damage, including an erosion of the blood-brain barrier.
As wireless headphone sales start to surge, serious concerns over close-range radiation effects and possible brain damage are surfacing. Those concerns are now hitting overdrive as Apple prepares the release of the AirPod, which promise a torrent of non-stop wireless communications just millimeters from the brain.
‘You are putting a microwave-emitting device next to your brain.’
Those AirPods, which complement a wireless-only iPhone 7, could shift users from traditional earbud-based voice communications and listening towards Bluetooth-powered communication and audio. That could pose serious, long-term dangers, with the AirPod stuffing high-tech radiation right into your ear.
Doctor speaks out and quotes study showing no reduction in hospitalisation and mortality from flu vaccine, further reports that people who get the flu vaccine suffer more colds and flu and people who do not vaccinate their children have healthier children.
See these quotes from Robert F Kennedy Jr said on April 8 2020 with regard to Bill Gates:
Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vac ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control over global health policy – the spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism.
Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems fueled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of “lesser humans.”
Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India’s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496, 000 children between 2000 and 2017.
In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines.
In 2014, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23, 000 young girls in remote Indian provinces.
Approximately 1, 200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.
In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1, 048 of the 5, 049 children.
During Gates’ 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates’ operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50 and 500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.” Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless and immoral.”
In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later, Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines.
A 2017 study (Morgensen et.Al.2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP vaccine is killing more African children than the diseases it pretends to prevent. Vaccinated girls suffer 10x the death rate of unvaccinated children. Gates and WHO have refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually.
Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of hijacking WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition, and economic development. They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish-that good health only comes in a syringe.
In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical-industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance. In his recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunity to force his third-world vaccine programs on American children.”
This is a short summary of the key facts associated with the virus and the pandemic. It is a summary of a MUCH LARGER detailed report on what happened, which can be accessed at the end of this summary.
It is not skewed by political partisan ship or charges and counter-charges. Just FACTS.
You have permission to forward this summary and you have permission to forward the much larger report, which, as noted, can be accessed and download via the link at the end of this summary.
Nothing like this has ever happened before. Is important that we understand exactly what did occur so we can prevent a reoccurrence.
Lately there have been discussions as to whether the virus escaped from the lab in Wuhan. So far there is no evidence to prove this. Another study pointed out that at this point the Type A version of the virus which appears to have been the first version came from the Guandong province and not the Wuhan province. There is a lab there too. The bottom line is no one knows if this was caused by a lab accident or not. Whether it came from a lab or not is of less importance than how it was handled. Viruses occur in nature, escape by accident or can be deliberately spread by terrorists. That this can happen is simply a fact of life. What is more important is how this gets handled once it occurs.
To bring some clarity into the confusions and accusations in regards to the COVID-19 debacle it is time to focus on the facts. There are politically motivated accusations and countries accuse each other. None of that is going anywhere. However there are facts of what occurred and that is what we should be focusing on. The facts given below are documented in detail in the timeline that follows.
Fact:
COVID-19 is a very contagious virus that can have bad effects on certain people mostly with preexisting conditions and morbidity.
Fact:
The Wuhan and Hubei government publicly admitted that they were dishonest (lied) about the virus handling and that they badly mishandled it. They even withheld the degree of the contagiousness from two projects (teams)sent from Beijing. And they did this because of financial and economic motivations.
Fact:
By 19 to 20 January the National government of China became fully aware of the extent and danger of this virus. They did take strong measures in an attempt to contain the virus in the Hubei area and all over China as it had spread to almost all provinces. Taking these actions was correct by the national Chinese government.
Fact:
The National Chinese government however did not also shut down all international travel in and out of China at that time (20 January). That was a big mistake and facilitated the spread across the planet.
Fact:
The World Health Organization knew already on 31 December that there was human-to-human transmission but they did not tell anyone. Subsequently the WHO was aware of various reports originated in China that the virus was contagious and was spread by human-to-human transmission. The WHO still kept reporting that there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission. Even a WHO scientist reported that there was human-to-human transmission but later that day withdrew that statement. The WHO continued to report no human-to-human transmission up to 23 January knowing it to be different all along.
Fact:
The WHO while being fully aware of human-to-human transmission did not announce an International Health Emergency on 23 January while acknowledging at that point that there was human-to-human transmission. The WHO waited until a week later to do so. However during that week millions of people left China after the Chinese New Year celebrations. After that the WHO continued to advise against travel restrictions and when the US implemented travel restriction on 30 January the WHO criticized the US. The WHOs actions facilitated the spread of the virus.
Fact:
Despite the fact that virus had arrived on US soil the mayor and health commissioner of New York advised their citizens to disregard safety measures and go out as usual.
Fact:
New York became the epicenter with the worst fall out of the virus requiring heroic efforts to contain it.
Fact:
Mayors and counties in the Bay area acted responsibly and so did the governors of California and Washington and implemented safety measures. Both states fared much better and saved much more lives than what occurred in New York. And while the officials involved in those states were Democrats they acted responsibly and disregarded the irresponsible behavior of Democrat Speaker Pelosi that was earlier advocating for people to got to Chinatown in San Francisco and have a good time which was done for political reasons.
Fact:
The Federal government acted responsibly when it implemented travel restrictions from China on 30 January and later other countries. This helped contain the spread of the virus. This is something the national government of China should have done on 20 January, i.e. before millions of people left China after the Lunar holiday on 23 January. The Chinese government instead protested the travel restrictions implemented by the US.
The moral of the story is that people that care about other people also take responsibility for other people. And the larger the sphere of that responsibility is the more constructive their decisions are. Conversely the more people focus on their own financial or political interests with a disregard for others the more destructive their decisions are. This has nothing to do with whether these people are Republicans or Democrats or Americans or Chinese.
In that regard there is another important point. No government or the citizens in any country benefited from this. Not the US and not China and for China they will feel the economic and public relations pain for a good while to come which unfortunately will also negatively affect the Chinese population. And there were many Chinese citizens that took heroic actions in an attempt to avert this disaster. If the Chinese government were smart they would minimally criminally prosecute those officials in Wuhan and from the Hubei provincial government and do it as a jury trial with the citizens of Wuhan sitting on the jury, many of whom have good friends in the US, Europe and elsewhere.
That raises the question “Did anyone benefit from this”.
By sheer necessity billions of dollars had to be invested into the pharmaceutical industry for research, therapeutics, vaccines and other medical equipment. Nothing wrong with that.
However, there is something that should not happen and that is the following:
Many pharmaceutical companies contribute millions of dollars to the World Health Organization. https://www.globalpolicy.org/home/270-general/52830-who-do-financial-contributions-from-pharma-violate-who-guidelines.html The WHO has been dishonest (deliberately lied) and in fact facilitated the spread of the virus. And in no way should it be able to financially benefit from this and the taxpayer dollars that were given to the pharmaceutical industry to solve the disaster the WHO created. For this reason pharmaceutical companies at least in the US should be prohibited to contribute any funds to the WHO for a number of years – essentially a form of sanction.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a non-profit. This non-profit has invested millions of dollars in pharmaceutical stock and it is making a windfall in increased stock value. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1021577629748680000 They have also provided vast amounts to the WHO. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/who-funds-world-health-organization-un-coronavirus-pandemic-covid-trump/ The WHO should not be able to benefit from this and this non-profit should not be allowed to profit from the suffering of millions of citizens and in no way should any of this money make its way to the WHO. For this reason this non-profit should minimally be prohibited from contributing to the WHO for a number of years or it should divest itself of all pharmaceutical stock at the price it had before this pandemic hit the world. In fact this stock should be sold at that price to the US government so the profits benefit the taxpayers.
Don Chisholm formulated the probiotic mix I include in my bars and nutrition powders . He forwarded me this to share with you.
There is now no better time than right now to watch No Reason For Disease! Knowledge is power and this presentation says it as it is and better still, it is now available to watch in the comfort of your own home. I have even managed to get you a discount.
Use code HEALTHELICIOUS036 to redeem your exclusive 10% discount offer.
Given the current health crisis—that has become our new normal—it is now more important than ever to look for ways to improve our health and build up our immune system. Don truly believes focusing on your health at this point in time is imperative because without it we are more likely to become victims to disease. You may be unsure where to start on your health journey, or have verged off course, or you might be enjoying good health and seeking more knowledge, I am sure this film will provide inspiration for what you are looking for.
Settle in for your own private screening of No Reason For disease with this exclusive offer to rent at 10% off!
USE CODE: HEALTHELICIOUS036
*DISCOUNT CODE TO BE APPLIED AT CHECKOUT, OFFER ONLY APPLIES TO RENT OPTION.
RENT FILM HERE: https://vimeo.com/ondemand/noreasonfordisease
Don has turned 20 years of research, speaking tours and his own health journey into an informative documentary film with an extensive collection of health topics all in a single sitting. There is even a free offer from Don at the end of the film!
Don’t forget to enter the discount code at the checkout to redeem the offer, happy viewing and enjoy!
