Category: Vaccines

And they are concerned that the public has lost trust in the medical fraternity? That’s what happens when you lie to deceive and defraud.

(Tom: GREAT NEWS this week. A researcher has identified how to dissolve the rubbery clots that 70% of embalmers are seeing in people who have died post Covid jab!)

In this article, I review multiple studies that discuss Methylene Blue as a disolver of amyloid and prion polymers which are not only created by the body “naturally” but can be externally intorduced for nanotechnological purposes. Prions are highly infectious. Both Amyloid and Prion like peptides have been used to build hydrogel, and nanotechnological devices and biosensors. These are the building blocks for the Brain Computer Interface and WBAN bidirectional telemetry surveillance.

Methylene Blue should be considered as a preventative and therapeutic option in combination with high dose Vitamin C, EDTA and other supportive treatments for the inhibition and disolution of the rubbery clot formation, C19 bioweapon induced prion disease and amyloidosis, as well as a potent disolver of the self assembly nanotechnology assault on humanity.

https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/methylene-blue-prevents-and-reverses

If it looks, sounds and smells like corruption … well, maybe we should trust our senses.

“Others with great expertise in intracellular signalling and molecular biology quickly spotted at least two other, clearly designed-in, obviously intentional, mechanisms of toxicity”

Below is an unedited message (highlights are mine!) from Dr Mike Yeadon, former Chief Scientist and Vice-President of the Allergy and Respiratory Research Division of Pfizer, and is the co-founder and former CEO of the biotechnology company Ziarco.

Dear all, I am a card carrying trained mechanistic toxicologist (as well as a biochemist, at least, that’s what my degree certificate says).

More relevantly, I have over 30 years experience leading new drug design teams across the disciplines.

Over the life of the pharmaceutical industry, we have collectively learned a great deal what kind of chemical and biochemical structures confer what kinds of safety and toxicity risks. We still miss things, especially when they’re not understood and all we have is harms leading to abandonment of research projects or even withdrawal of launched products. Sometimes, board level executives still don’t withdraw harmful products if they think there’s some slight or arguable uncertainty & if they think they can get away with it. Thalidomide for example was sold in Spain deep into the 1970s, 15 years after it was unequivocally known to be a teratogen in humans. Merck didn’t withdraw their COX2 inhibitor until it was so obvious that they were more or less going to get caught. Other times, companies behaved well. 

Equally, we have learned what kinds of design features confer good or poor absorption, low or high plasma protein binding, fast or slow oxidative or conjugative metabolic clearance of drugs via which pathways (hepatic to stool, renal to urine, etc). Drug disposition is perhaps the best understood to the extent there are AI systems which a century of medicinal chemistry & drug metabolism data has fed. 

Toxicology is much less well understood by the industry broadly, but students of the specialist field almost all of the well understood mechanisms of toxicity. Things like aspirin, paracetamol, paraquat, rotenone, masked anilines, certain free radical generators, planar polyaromatic hydrocarbons, etc etc. I’ve forgotten so many. 

One classic example was dioxin release at Seveso, Italy, which resulted in widespread harms from halogenated biphenyls, which injure us via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, a nuclear factor controlling expression or repression of numerous genes. The underlying biology is extremely complex and I don’t believe we can claim to understand it. We’re not even sure what the endogenous ligands are. 

In one project in industry in which I was lead biologist, I noticed two chemistry colleagues had developed unusual facial rashes. I always pored over chemical structures, and noticed a plausible similarity between part of the new molecules that were being made & tested for this program and those industrial pollutants involved in the Italian accident. Sure enough, they had chloracne and it became a major incident, which we solved, killing the project (obviously) and teaching the industry worldwide to avoid close-in analogues. 

So when I looked at the purported vaccines, I detected at least three distinct mechanisms of toxicity. I assure you, not one of those features would have remained in molecules in the research teams armoury after the first project meeting. It wouldn’t need to be me leading it. Any of my senior staff would see the very obvious safety risks. My peers in industry would also know of them. I’ve talked about them in interviews, pieces to camera and affidavits.

No one has tapped me on the shoulder to explain why I’ve got it all wrong. Several very clever people have independently said overlapping things, such as Professor Sucharit Bhakdi. 

Others with great expertise in intracellular signalling and molecular biology quickly spotted at least two other, clearly designed-in, obviously intentional, mechanisms of toxicity (to do with nuclear localisation signals). 

That makes at least five, independent, starkly obvious, in-the-structure harms. Based on at least some of these, I and doctor in Germany, Wolfgang Wodarg, wrote an open letter to the European Medicines Agency, prior to any such product being granted an Emergency Use Authorization. We listed several concerns for the kinds of harms we expected and feared would follow from mass administration to the population. In response to this letter, the media fell upon us both, we were smeared by our national broadcasters and pushed off numerous online platforms. Within weeks of commencement of mass rollouts, all but one of our concerns were starkly obvious. The last one had to do with reproductive toxicity, which duly rolled in a year later.  If you choose to disregard this testimony, I don’t know what to say.

link to open letter to EMA:

https://doctors4covidethics.org/urgent-open-letter-from-doctors-and-scientists-to-the-european-medicines-agency-regarding-covid-19-vaccine-safety-concerns/

-Dr Mike Yeadon

This is Mike’s official telegram channel:

https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel

Please share.

https://www.aussie17.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-former-chief-scientist

Here is some more data on the vaccine shedding from Covid jabs: https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/dr-pierre-kory-explains-covid-19-vaccine-shedding/

If you have been adversely affected or you know someone who has been harmed by the jab or shedding from it, check this out: https://www.healthelicious.com.au/NutriBlast-Anti-Spike.html

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGeBm8cMw/

If you did not get the Covid jab, well done. Two recent stories from Twitter:

Dr David Cartland share:

STAFF ARE LITERALLY PETRIFIED!!

Sent anonymously shared with permission:

I’m private messaging you from a friends phone! With her permission of course.
I work in a NHS hospital. It’s evident we are seeing patients presenting with turbo cancers, strokes, Guillian Barre ! They are all so young with aggressive stage 4 ovarian/lung/liver metastasis and although Dr’s are passing comment nobody is really raising concern!

We were pushed to take the vaccine and declined! Our jobs threatened and all colleagues turned their back on us!

We were moments from losing our jobs until the mandatory vaccines withdrawn!

They are still moving around the hospital trying to give the vaccine!

Everyone so frightened to discuss it because most have had the jab! Others don’t want to start the conversation and are scared of the consequences!

So frightened for the future

and

RAISED BY WOLVES @dogmomjenn writes:

26 of us from the “covid unit” were fired in ’21 for refusing the experimental shot. 6 charge RNs included. Some of the best nurses I’ve worked with.

We saw what the “pandemic” was (crickets chirping) and what happened after the shot came out (ER exploded with business).

Besides personally knowing a respiratory therapist who got fast growing esophageal cancer out of the blue and died, my friends healthy 20 year old dropped dead and was found by his dorm mate. No conclusions by autopsy. He was an athlete. I’m sure he had an arrhythmia that caused his heart to stop from spike protein damage.

I’ve been an RN 19 years. I’ve worked in acute hospital care my entire career. Much of that has been in the float pool, so I see all the adult specialties: cardiac, neuro, surgery, oncology, orthopedics, general medical.

I keep track of all my patients’ c-19 Vax history and their hospital presentation. Most have had 2-8 shots at this point. The more shots they’ve had, the worse off they are, it seems. Many head toward comfort/hospice.

I could recite countless stories of what I’ve seen over the past three years, but there are hippa laws that prevent me from doing so. It’s all the usual stuff: heart attacks, strokes, new onset seizures, brain tumors, uncontrolled afib, cancers coming out of remission and new cancers, vertigo-falls-broken bones(a lot of this), blood clots, super infections, fungal infections, new onset altered mental status and early onset dementia. The stuff you’ve been hearing about. You probably know someone with one or more of these.

While the pro Vax crowd would call this anecdotal, I know this shot has targeted genetic weakness and accelerated problems that may not have been showing up at all if people’s immune systems hadn’t been suppressed by the spike protein damage.

I have never seen anything like this in 19 years. Thankfully, I was only off 2 months, but I had to relocate to get a job with exemption. I’m a mole in the system warning my patients and coworkers not to get any more boosters. One person at a time.

Aren’t nurses one of the most trusted professions? Jenn

The Australian Senate voted against an inquiry into the causes of the nation’s high excess mortality today. This is the third time the Senate has voted against investigating excess deaths, after rejecting two previous motions last year.

Australia has recorded more deaths than expected in the past several years, with some states experiencing up to 17% excess mortality. This trend is ongoing, with the latest reporting from the ABS estimating 12,377 excess deaths for the first three quarters of 2023, 9.9% above the expected baseline.

Why would the Australian Senate vote AGAINST an investigation into excess deaths in Australia? There’s only one reason I can think of; they don’t want the truth to become public because they will all be implicated for their malfeasance.

https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/just-in-australian-senate-votes-down