
Groundbreaking new research found extraordinarily large amounts of aluminium in brains of people who died with autism.
Cells from vaccine injection site were observed carrying a toxic load of aluminium into the brains of people who died from autism.

Tom's Blog on Life and Livingness

Groundbreaking new research found extraordinarily large amounts of aluminium in brains of people who died with autism.
Cells from vaccine injection site were observed carrying a toxic load of aluminium into the brains of people who died from autism.

A 49 minute presentation on vaccination data:
Besides introducing foreign proteins and even live viruses into the bloodstream, each vaccine has its own preservative, neutralizer and carrying agent, none of which are indigenous to the body. For instance, the triple antigen, DPT, which is the Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus vaccine, contains the following poisons: Formaldehyde, Mercury, and aluminum phosphate, and that’s from the Physician’s Desk Reference, 1980. The packet insert accompanying the vaccine, lists the following poisons: aluminum potassium sulfate, a mercury derivative called Thimersol and sodium phosphate. The packet insert for the polio vaccine lists monkey kidney cell culture, lactalbumin hydrozylate, antibiotics and calf serum. The packet insert for the MMR vaccine produced by Merck Sharp and Dhome which is for measles, mumps and rubella lists chick embryo and neomycin, which is a mixture of antibiotics.
Now chick embryo, monkey kidney cells and calf serum are all foreign proteins which are biological substances composed of animal cells which because they enter directly into the bloodstream can become part of our genetic material. They can become part of our genetic material, folks, remember that, it’s going to be important later. These foreign proteins, as well as other carriers and reaction products of a vaccine are potential allergens and can produce anaphylactic shock. Folks, anaphylactic shock is a nice word for brain damage. Reading on…
Another problem with vaccines is that they go directly into the bloodstream without filtering by the liver. Dr. William Albrecht tells us the following, “If you take water into your system as a drink, it goes into your bloodstream directly from the stomach, but if you take in fats, they move in through your lymphatic system. When you take other substances like carbohydrates and proteins, they go into the intestines and from there are passed into the liver as the body’s chemical filter. Before they go out into the blood and circulate in the body. Most of your vaccination serums and proteins are not filtered by the liver, consequently vaccinations can be a terrific shock to the system. Injections of foreign substances like viruses, toxins and foreign proteins into the blood stream via vaccinations, have been associated with diseases and disorders to the blood, brain, nervous system and skin. Rare diseases such as atypical measles and monkey fever as well as such well- known disorders as premature aging, allergies, etc. have been associated with vaccines. Also linked to immunizations are such well-known diseases as cancer, leukemia, paralysis, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, and sudden infant death syndrome.”
Folks, I’m not making this up. This is mostly out of Physician’s Desk Reference, 1980, and Organic Consumer Reports of 1977.
This fowarded post was allegedly written by a friend’s husband. The writer does not name themselves so it is to be treated accordingly. Except that I have heard the very same predictions from eminent medical professionals on The Truth About Vaccines 2020 Round Table video which I suggest you watch part oneand part two as a matter of the highest priority.
https://go2.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/docuseries/roundtable-1/?a_aid=5e500f3d6fc77
This is coming from my husband who is a microbiologist. He has worked at many institutions helping to create vaccines, and better science. But during his time at many, many world renowned institutes he saw very deadly unethical practices- he no longer works in that field because of how corrupt it had become.
HEED HIS WORDS
OUR LIVES DEPEND ON IT
We are moving to step 5. Mandated MRNA vaccines are coming. The fear campaign of Covid has failed. People are not scared any longer of Covid, but that’s not the problem anymore and truthfully Covid never was.
The problem is now that Covid failed and you are seeing this chess game of totalitarian control unfold, let me tell you what is really coming. If this is a mandatory vaccine campaign and it gets rolled out rapidly, you better be aware, educated and terrified.
Globalists in the next 2-3 months will magically find the cure for Covid and roll it out in a mass vaccination campaign. This vaccine is MRNA vaccine. This roll out will come out very fast for two reasons.
1) so that you have no choice but to comply, you’re stuck in your house and you’ll beg for it to get out.
2) so the side effects are not revealed until the vaccine has been widely distributed.
Why is this relevant. Well, MRNA virus carry the instruction to replicate and build its viral protein right away. It doesn’t require anything other than the host cell machinery to operate. In other words, it cuts down the manufacturing process significantly.
Why is that a problem? Well, MRNA has direct coding. It will do what they are programmed it to do.
In this case the RNA cause direct DNA mutation which leads to cancer, they can change your emotion, give you autoimmune diseases, autism, anything that it is programmed to do. Possibly even worse.
There is no coronavirus vaccine and there never will be one. You think that you are getting a vaccine for immunity, when in reality it’s a trojan horse for something different. I tried to make this as reader friendly as possible.
This is real. I never thought in my life this would ever be real. Just because we can manipulate biology in ways doesnt mean we should.
I left research biology for ethical reasons. Bioethics is a major problem. Data is falsified for the sake of rapid profits. I have personally witnessed it.

Dr Tenpenny observes, “We have to be mindful of the fact that while the Corona Virus is dominating the global headlines, Autism is not going away. It’s simply the epidemic that the CDC, PHARMA, the AAP & the Media have decided to be silent on.”

Because vaccinations do not have a certain and predictable outcome (they confer immunity to some but not others, some get sick with the illness they are designed to prevent, some get Guillain-Barre, many suffer autoimmune disease and other side effects and some die as a reaction to the vaccine) they are therefore an experiment and are covered by this code.

It’s official. We received our proof of delivery of the cease and desist documents to the Prime Minister and Aged Care Minister yesterday. Today, the Health Minister will be served the same document.
The Government are officially on notice now and are compelled to respond to our questions and statements in writing within 28 days from the 12th May 2020.
Our group has had huge success with a cease and desist for the 5G tower in Mullumbimby. More exciting news on this to come soon.
We are getting there, guys.
It’s a massive move and one that will finally make the government answer to their stupid claims.
Below are the photos of the notarised documents, meaning they carry the weight of the court and are a legal document which can NOT be ignored.
Effectively it means no one is allowed to force you to vaccinate while this is in play and until we have resolved the issue which could take a month or two.
But our legal team are ready to go all the way now.
When it ends up in court, we’re ready and this will be the end of all forced vaccines in the country.
Biggest move yet!
Share this far and wide and let everyone know they CAN’T be forced to be vaccinated now that they are on notice.
If anyone tries, show them this post and the photos and template of the cease and desist.
Medical Freedom Australia.
My message here is very simple.You must watch this and get everyone you know to watch it.
https://go2.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/docuseries/roundtable-2/
We need to educate ourselves.
I have 40 questions for you…if you can’t answer them, your doctors should, but how many Drs can actually tell you?
ANSWERS:
Copied and shared – please feel free to keep sharing far and wide.
After reading the insert would you still go ahead and have the flu vax?
(Tom: with up to only 50 percent effectiveness and a chance at Guillain-Barre? How could I pass up that chance? EASILY!)
After reading the insert would you still go ahead and have the flu vax?
Me: “May I please have the package insert for the flu vaccine?”
Rite-Aid Pharmacist: “Why?”
Me: “So I can read it.”
P: “Which one?”
Me: “The one advertised with the little banners on every aisle.”
P: “I will print you the information sheet.”
Me: “No, that’s not the same thing.”
P: “What do you want to know? I can tell you.”
Me: “I would just like to read the whole thing before I consider getting one…side effects, contraindications, effectiveness, ingredients like mercury.”
P: “I don’t think I have any. Let me check. (checks) Sorry, I can’t give you one until the box is empty, because it has to stay in the box. And there isn’t any thimerisol in the single dose flu shot any more. I can print you the information sheet.”
Pharmacy co-worker with big smile at me: “Hi, I found one.” (hands insert to me)
Here are some things in the insert not on the store’s sheet:
With love to those who read this far. Please share.
Australian doctor on the FLU vaccine:
“Are GPs wasting their time with the flu vaccination program?
Professor Chris Del Mar — GP, Cochrane reviewer and one of Australia’s best known public health academics — believes Australia’s flu vaccination program, a key component of GP care, is ineffectual and a waste of GPs’ time.
In this edited extract from a speech delivered to the GPDU conference on the Gold Coast last week, he explains his reasoning.
I was actually asked to give a rant, so I’ve been working up some froth in my mouth.
But it’s also an opportunity for me to put up this idea: that public health is overselling the influenza vaccine.
We as GPs are at the front line tasked with promoting the vaccine to our patients. I want to discuss some data that makes me question this approach.
Influenza is a threat, and we should worry about it. A hundred years ago, roughly 50 million people died worldwide from this virus. It was the first modern pandemic.
I am not antivax in general, but the influenza vaccine has got intrinsic disadvantages compared to other vaccines: it is needed every year; it’s not a life-long vaccine as with most other viruses because of the way the virus itself changes, because it changes its protein structure every year – we have to guess what the next seasonal virus will look like to produce each year’s vaccine.
That is obviously going to be hopeless for a pandemic, which by definition is a virus that changed so much we’ve got no immunological defence to it. When we’ll need the vaccine most, it’s going to be least effective.
But more than that, the influenza vaccine simply is not very effective.
Data from a recently updated trio of Cochrane reviews (references provided below) shows the effect of influenza vaccine in randomised trials.
It reduced the risk ratio of getting influenza confirmed by the laboratory quite optimistically, down to 0.4.
That means less than half the number of people vaccinated ended up getting laboratory-confirmed influenza.
But if you look at the difference in absolute rate differences, you see that 23 cases per thousand gets reduced by nine cases per thousand.
That’s around a 1% difference. This is because true influenza is actually quite rare a disease for us individually, roughly once every decade.
Influenza is swamped by “influenza-like” illness.
Beyond that, the vaccine’s efficacy has not been tested well enough for serious effects – like hospitalisations, and pneumonia. There are too few randomised controlled trials with this outcome. People keep relying on observational studies, and increasingly, on surrogate outcomes.
For us as GPs who care for people with influenza-like illness, the flu, there is a very, very small difference in terms of the protection offered from the influenza vaccine.
You then have to think about the real interest in the flu vaccine from a public health perspective.
It is not simply whether or not people get the flu; it’s whether they get really sick from it.
And if you look at the Cochrane data for time off work and school there is no statistical difference in all the trials that have been done.
For hospital admission, there is a tiny difference – and it is not significant.
So it can’t be demonstrated from randomised trials that you keep people out of hospitals by vaccinating. Similarly for other serious consequences such as pneumonia – which is what killed so many people 100 years ago – you don’t see any difference there either.
And death as an outcome? Ditto. You can’t show any difference.
On the other side of the coin, that is the harms from the vaccine; well, it can give you a fever. In children, we’ve estimated informally, with an infectious diseases colleague of mine, Professor Peter Collignon, that about one in 100 children who are vaccinated probably have a febrile convulsion by extrapolating the data, as well as other more mild adverse effects as well.
There have even been the occasional deaths following the influenza vaccine, most particularly in children – one in WA and one in Queensland.
So there is some definite adverse effect from using the vaccine.
But mostly the problem with influenza vaccination is the huge amount of effort involved.
Our practice spends a lot of time sending out reminders, queuing people up, getting the vaccines ready, figuring out who’s eligible and who has to pay.
It’s quite a lot of churn to get people vaccinated.
There’s other issues as well.
Based on purely observational data, the best protection from serious illness, particularly in a pandemic situation, may be having had wild flu before.
That could explain why in the two little pandemics we have had recently – Swine flu and Bird flu – the people who we thought were going to get creamed by this, such as the elderly in nursing homes, were actually fine.
Similarly, it also looks as if the efficacy of the vaccine wears off in just a few months, from other observational data.
Instead, unexpectedly odd groups in society were affected – people who were obese, women who were pregnant, people with asthma.
The next question is, well if we’re not going to promote the flu vaccine, is there anything else we should do instead?
Neuraminidase Inhibitors?
We know it may or may not help individuals with symptoms, but from a public health response, they were hopeless.
So what about hygiene and handwashing?
There’s very good data to show at reducing acute respiratory infections by washing your hands and wearing a mask. Maybe we should be promoting much more of that.
I feel obliged to explain to my patients the controversy around influenza vaccines and let them know that I haven’t had it myself, thus saving myself 20 bucks.
What’s going to change this?
I think it’s people like us GPs who are likely to challenge [the attitudes towards the vaccine]. It’s not the people who do the systematic reviews. If we GPs say, ‘it looks to us that the emperor’s got no clothes on’, then maybe people will take this issue more seriously.”