The Next ‘Great Pandemic’ Claiming Astronomical Death Counts Is Now Being Marketed To The Public

Killed Birds Hazmats

“Yeah, I think we have to recognize – I’ve always said that I think the Covid pandemic was a wakeup call. I don’t believe it’s the great pandemic. I believe the great pandemic is still in the future, and that’s going to be a bird flu pandemic for man. It’s gonna have significant mortality in the 10-50% range. It’s gonna be trouble.” – Robert Redfield — Former CDC Director, March 30th, 2022 interview with Doug McKelway on “Center Point”

The fact that these evil monsters are saying that this is going to happen, and not that there may be a possibility of new ‘viruses,’ is telling to say the very least. Even the framing of this so-called warning leaves only the indication that this is the definite next ‘threat’ to mankind, even though nothing of the sort has happened. How can they predict the exact future? Because they are perpetrating and purposely creating that future. This is what should be called the plan to commit criminal genocide.

(Tom: So, once again, a society with people in charge who are destructive threatens the survival of each and every one of us. The most constructive things I can conceive of have all been documented here https://www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/?p=36001 and here https://www.bringorder.info/English.html and boil down to you becoming as fit and healthy as you can, laying in stocks of spare foods and essential supplies, increasing your skills and abilities, widening your communication lines to encompass more people of like mind to you and supporting others, especially those doing good.)

https://humansbefree.com/2022/04/the-next-great-pandemic-claiming-astronomical-death-counts-is-now-being-marketed-to-the-public.html

The Subversion Of Democracy

The Subversion Of Democracy

For this treaty to have teeth, the organisation that governs it needs to have the power – either political or legal – to enforce compliance. In its current form, the WHO does not possess such powers. In order to enforce compliance, some commentators have recommended concluding the treaty at the United Nations level. However, we fear that it has been already decided with the INB (mandated by WHASS) that a treaty will be developed under the roof of WHO.

To move on with the treaty, WHO therefore needs to be empowered — financially, and politically. If international pandemic response is enhanced, compliance is enhanced. In case of a declared health emergency, resources need to flow to countries in which the emergency is occurring, triggering response elements such as financing and technical support. These are especially relevant for LMICs, and could be used to encourage and enhance the timely sharing of information by states, reassuring them that they will not be subject to arbitrary trade and travel sanctions for reporting, but instead be provided with the necessary financial and technical resources they require to effectively respond to the outbreak. High-income settings may not be motivated by financial resources in the same way as their low-income counterparts. An adaptable incentive regime is therefore needed, with sanctions such as public reprimands, economic sanctions, or denial of benefits.

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/covid19/2022/03/30/a-new-pandemic-treaty-what-the-world-health-organization-needs-to-do-next/

Science Says… …Whatever the Funders Want It To Say!

Science Saya... ...Whatever the Funders Want It To Say!

1. How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data

A pooled weighted average of 1.97% of scientists admitted to have fabricated, falsified or modified data or results at least once –a serious form of misconduct by any standard– and up to 33.7% admitted other questionable research practices. In surveys asking about the behaviour of colleagues, admission rates were 14.12% for falsification, and up to 72% for other questionable research practices.

Considering that these surveys ask sensitive questions and have other limitations, it appears likely that this is a conservative estimate of the true prevalence of scientific misconduct.

Overall, admission rates are consistent with the highest estimates of misconduct obtained using other sources of data, in particular FDA data audits. However, it is likely that, if on average 2% of scientists admit to have falsified research at least once and up to 34% admit other questionable research practices, the actual frequencies of misconduct could be higher than this.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005738

2. Drug studies skewed toward study sponsors

An analysis of pharmaceutical industry drug trials shows that results often favor the firms sponsoring the study.

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna12275329

Who Needs Flowers?

I found this delightful story online and want to share it. It’s from a woman in California: My husband did not want children, DID NOT WANT. I couldn’t have children. A marriage made in heaven. About three years into the marriage, my brother and his wife were killed, leaving a toddler and an infant. I spent the next four days comforting my parents, making funeral arrangements and planning a funeral. My husband spent those four days dealing with the fact that there were two kids that were looking at foster care. He tried to find a way out of the situation. He didn’t want to be a parent. DID NOT WANT. We never discussed the kids because we were dealing with arrangements. We were driving back to my parents’ house after the funeral and he essentially said “So we are going to be parents.” I was shocked, the fate of the kids had never come up. My response was something like “But you don’t want kids.” His response was “I love you, you would not be happy if the kids went to foster care, I want you to be happy, I will do anything for you to be happy.” To be honest, I was almost as grudging as he was, because we had plans and they didn’t include children. But he was right, I wouldn’t be happy if the kids were raised in foster care. So we became parents. Two years later we adopted both kids. My husband—who didn’t want children—spent the next roughly 18 years as the best and most devoted father I have ever met. When the kids were about seven and nine, one day I asked him why he had been so hands-on and devoted. His response was “It is a gift to you— at least it started out that way. Now I love them for themselves.” It blew my mind that he gave up or delayed his dreams and plans just to make me happy and that he did so without sulking without complaining. He was patient, devoted and kind to the children and he did it as a gift to me. Who the hell needs presents, flowers or candlelit dinners?