Fur Dog

Fur Dog
Good friends of ours have a golden retriever. We looked after him for a fortnight. Ended up calling him “Tumbleweed” due to all the fur that ended up on the kitchen floor. Never thought of taking a picture with Harvey and his fur like this.

Vaccines are Safe, Effective, Do Not Cause Autism, and are Made by Companies Most Interested in Your Health

That headline HAS to be the biggest lie I have ever typed.

NOTHING could be further from the truth.
From observation and reasoning, most of the people I see commenting on the vaccine debate fall into one of several groups.
1. Those who truly believe that vaccines do more good than harm.
2. Those who are defending their decision to vaccinate their children because they can’t be wrong.
3. The paid shills of the drug companies.
4. Those who blindly and unquestioningly believe authority.
5. Those who have done enough homework to realise that the truth about the negative consequences of vaccines is being suppressed so hold grave doubts that all we are being told is true.
6. Those who are closely connected to someone who has been adversely impacted upon or killed by vaccines.
7. Those who have direct personal knowledge of the harm caused by ingredients in vaccines.
8. Those who of the opinion that vaccines do more harm than good.
9. As well, there are those who do not comment, some of whom are interested in acquiring data.
I will address most specifically the members of groups 1 and 9 with this article.
The members of the second, third and fourth groups I will not address as there is no point. Their mind is made up and the facts are not needed. Most pro=vaccine commenters should be in debating teams. They are not there to learn or discuss, they comment to push the vaccine agenda, repeating as solid fact statements proven to be lies, even by their own sources! regardless of the data contradicting their Contrary data would only engender a potential confusion and non-rational defense in groups 2 and 4. The members of group 3 accept money in an effort to advance the cause of that which harms people. They are criminals.
The other groups 4-7 listed above I don’t need to address, they know. They might get some talking points from this article or may wish to share it or link to it at: http://tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog/2017/05/16/vaccines-are-safe-effective-do-not-cause-autism-and-are-made-by-companies-most-interested-in-your-health/
I hope this post will provide enough solid facts to those who have an desire to learn the unbiased truth. Those who are confused by the directly opposing stances, both of which cannot be true.
It will not change one iota of conviction, authoritarian bombast or vested interest bias in those blind to obeservation. From them it will elicit howling condemnation and vitriolic criticism. For so it should. It threatens their cherished lies or vested interest cash cow by providing evidence from “their side of the fence“ that they are attempting to herd us 180 degrees in the wrong direction.
On the comments posted at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3P6wVUH0pc&t=4s I have seen some outrageous untruths promoted forcefully as gospel.
For instance that vaccines are safe, effective and do not cause autism.
This is in direct contradiction of incontrovertible facts.

Bursting the The Peer Review Bubble

The pro-vaccine proponents are often authoritarian, aggressive, rude and invalidative, deriding as “unscientific” any who have reservations about or personal experience contradicting the safety and efficacy of vaccines charade.

Any but official sources are denigrated and dismissed as unreliable.
Anything but a peer reviewed article is similarly scorned. That notwithstanding a UK survey which found fully a third of researchers admitted to skewing results in favour of the organisation funding the research. And major publishers of peer-reviewed articles have had to retract a large number of articles. (Do an on-line search for “journal retracts articles”.)
Direct observation (when a mother observes that her baby died within 24 hours of receiving vaccinations) is scorned as “anecdotal” in favour of “peer-reviewed” and “double-blind” clinical trials by the denizens of scientific and clinical laboratories.
This site http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005738 documents a meta-analysis of researchers and found fully a third admitted to questionable research practices and 72% observed questionable research practices in others. A quote from the site:
“A pooled weighted average of 1.97% (N?=?7, 95%CI: 0.86–4.45) of scientists admitted to have fabricated, falsified or modified data or results at least once –a serious form of misconduct by any standard– and up to 33.7% admitted other questionable research practices. In surveys asking about the behaviour of colleagues, admission rates were 14.12% (N?=?12, 95% CI: 9.91–19.72) for falsification, and up to 72% for other questionable research practices. Meta-regression showed that self reports surveys, surveys using the words “falsification” or “fabrication”, and mailed surveys yielded lower percentages of misconduct. When these factors were controlled for, misconduct was reported more frequently by medical/pharmacological researchers than others.
Considering that these surveys ask sensitive questions and have other limitations, it appears likely that this is a conservative estimate of the true prevalence of scientific misconduct.
So I take “peer-reviewed“ research with more than a grain of salt and value it far less than direct obvservation.
And listen to what two of the top people most closely connected to peer-reviewed lies have to say about “peer-review”.
“Peer review is a flawed process, full of easily identified defects with little evidence that it works.” Richard Smith, past editor of the British Medical Journal and chief executive of the BMJ Publishing Group for 13 years. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” Marcia Angell, former Editor-in-Chief of the NEJM. http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f3830/rr/652673
In truth the overseers of the peer-reviewers have found the emporer has no clothes! When a vaccine advocate looks down their sanctimoneous nose at the mention of studies that are not peer-reviewed, recognise that their arrogance is based on ignorance.

Who Says Vaccines Are Safe? Not These People.

Justices of the US Supreme Court stated in 1988 that vaccines were “unavoidably unsafe”.

“The only safe vaccine is one that is never used.” – Dr. James A. Shannon, MD, former director of the National Institutes of Health (1955-1968)
“Vaccines are highly dangerous, have never been adequately studied or proven to be effective, and have a poor risk/reward ratio….The treatment of cancer and degenerative diseases is a national scandal. The sooner you learn this, the better off you will be.” – Dr. Allen Greenberg, MD
“I found the whole vaccine business was indeed a gigantic hoax. Most doctors are convinced that they are useful, but if you look at the proper statistics and study the instances of these diseases you will realize that this is not so.” – Dr. Archivides Kalokerinos, MD
“In my medical career I’ve treated vaccinated and unvaccinated children and the unvaccinated children are far healthier than the vaccinated ones.” – Dr. Philip Incao, MD. This “anecdotal” observation has recently been validated by a survey of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children.
“With regard to acute and chronic conditions, vaccinated children were significantly less likely than the unvaccinated to have had chickenpox and pertussis but, contrary to expectation, were significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with otitis media, pneumonia, allergic rhinitis, eczema, and NDD. The vaccinated were also more likely to have used antibiotics, allergy and fever medications; to have been fitted with ventilation ear tubes; visited a doctor for a health issue in the previous year, and been hospitalized. The reason for hospitalization and the age of the child at the time were not determined, but the latter finding appears consistent with a study of 38,801 reports to the VAERS of infants who were hospitalized or had died after receiving vaccinations. The study reported a linear relationship between the number of vaccine doses administered at one time and the rate of hospitalization and death; moreover, the younger the infant at the time of vaccination, the higher was the rate of hospitalization and death [55]. The hospitalization rate increased from 11% for 2 vaccine doses to 23.5% for 8 doses (r2 = 0.91), while the case fatality rate increased significantly from 3.6% for those receiving from 1-4 doses to 5.4% for those receiving from 5-8 doses.“ –
Pretty horrific results!
“There is no scientific evidence that vaccinations are of any benefit, but it is clear that they cause a great deal of harm.” – Dr. Gerhard Buchwald, MD
“Only after realizing that routine immunizations were dangerous did I achieve a substantial drop in infant death rates.” – Dr. Archivides Kalokerinos, MD
“I once believed in Jenner; I once believed in Pasteur. I believed in vaccination. I believed in vivisection. But I changed my views as the result of hard thinking.” – Dr. Walter Hadwen, MD, LSA, MRCS, LRCP, MB, BS, BSc
So they are NOT safe!
The National Vaccine Compensation Program in the US has paid out just shy of 2.6 billion dollars as a result of vaccine injuries.
I was not able to access the official site but some out dated statistics are here:
Again, they are NOT safe!
The CDC has admitted that between 1955–1963 over 98 million Americans received one or more doses of a polio shot which was contaminated with a cancer-causing virus called Simian vacuolating virus 40 (SV40). The CDC quickly took down the page but the site was luckily cached and saved to symbolize this grand admission. And to believe that some people do not believe it could happen again!
To further confirm this unbelievable admission, Assistant Professor of Pathology at Loyola University in Chicago Dr. Michele Carbone has been able to independently verify the presence of the SV40 virus in tissue and bone samples from patients who died during that era. He found that 33% of the samples with osteosarcoma bone cancers, 40% of other bone cancers, and 60% of the mesothelioma’s lung cancers all contained this obscure virus. This leaves the postulation that upwards of 10–30 million actually contracted and were adversely affected by this virus, to be deadly accurate.
Their is a cached image of the CDC web page at this site:
They have NOT been safe for a VERY long time!
Dr Wakefield investigated the safety studies of the MMR vaccine and found them woefully inadequate. That and his observation of the regression of children after the vaccine led him to publish his 280 page study which ignited the fuse of the vaccination debate in the UK. Here is an interview with him and links to the 28 other studies from around the world that support Dr. Wakefield’s controversial findings: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/10/wakefield-interview.aspx
So the lie that Wakefield was a fraud and no other studies have replicated his findings can be put to bed as just that, a blatant lie.
The Center for Disease Control covered up for years the fact that their studies revealed autism increased in African American boys by 236% after vaccination. Here’s a link to the whistle blower interview:
and the result of it:
So vaccines DO cause autism to children.
The flu shot during a pregnant woman’s first trimester increases the autism rate in the child by 20%.
Appeared in the JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association.
So they DO cause autism to children, even when administered to their mother!
The flu vaccine has the most adverse reactions attributed to it. Look here for some of the side effects:
Dr High Fudenberg found 10 times the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease in those over 55 years old who received the flu vaccine 5 years in a row. According to Dr. Fudenberg, one of the world’s most prolific immunologists and 13th most quoted biologist of our times (over 600 papers in peer review journals), he had this to say regarding the annual flu vaccine program: “If an individual has had 5 consecutive flu shots between 1970-1980 (the years of the study) his / her chance of developing Alzheimer’s Disease is 10 times greater than if they had one, two or no shots.“ When asked for the reason why this is so, Dr Fudenberg stated that, “It is due to the mercury and aluminium buildup that is in every flu shot. The gradual mercury and aluminium buildup in the brain casues cognitive dysfunction.”
So, the aluminium in vaccines cause Alzheimer’s Disease too.
And for the final word on vaccine safety, pick up a vaccine insert to see what the manufacturer lists as possible side effects. From stomach upset to paralysis and death. That is probably the most truth you will ever get from a drug company!

Vaccines Are Effective

“There is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza. The producers of these vaccines know that they are worthless, but they go on selling them anyway.” – Dr. J. Anthony Morris, formerly Chief Vaccine Control Officer at the FDA

In actual fact, vaccines are the opposite of effective! Vaccinations reduce the ability of the body to fight infection. “seasonal flu vaccination almost doubled the risk of infection with pandemic flu.” http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/flu-vaccine-paradox-adds-to-public-health-debate-1.2912790
“There is insufficient evidence to support routine vaccination of healthy persons of any age.” – Dr. Paul Frame, MD, Journal of Family Practice
“We are taught by the authorities that vaccines protect us against eventual aggressive viruses and microbes, and, therefore, prevent contagious illnesses and epidemics. This lie has been perpetuated for 150 years despite the ineffectiveness of vaccines in protecting against illnesses.” – Dr. Guylaine Lanctot, MD
“I’ll talk about vaccines. Number one, vaccines make people sick. They don’t work. They don’t protect. The use of vaccines is totally wrong! It’s perfect nonsense based on fear. They are dangerous. One child out of five has overwhelming disabilities from vaccines – nuerological problems, seizures. I’ve got a whole list. There are plenty of books on this subject. Doctors don’t even read about this.” Interview with Dr. Guylaine Lanctot, MD
“During those 30 years I have run against so many histories of little children who had never seen a sick day until they were vaccinated and who, in the several years that have followed, have never seen a well day since. I couldn’t put my finger on the disease they have. They just weren’t strong. Their resistance was gone. They were perfectly well before they were vaccinated. They have never been well since.” – Dr. William Howard Hay, MD
“The greatest threat of childhood diseases lies in the dangerous and ineffectual efforts made to prevent them through mass immunization….There is no convincing scientific evidence that mass inoculations can be credited with eliminating any childhood disease.” – Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, MD, Author
Four Sanger middle-school students have chickenpox – and they had been fully vaccinated.
So vaccinations do not confer guaranteed immunity.
“There is a great deal of evidence to prove that immunization of children does more harm than good.”—Dr. J. Anthony Morris, former Chief Vaccine Control Officer and research virologist, US FDA

Who You Gonna Trust? A Lesson In Logic

1. The vast majority of people correctly perceive that most politicians lie. So a lying politicians does not want a population that can tell truth from lies. The politicians erroneously believe they are best served by a blindly obedient, non-questioning, ignorant population. (To see how they brought this about, read “The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America” by Charlotte Iserbyt http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com/)

2. Drug companies make money by selling drugs. There is no profit for them in a healthy, disease free population. Let that sink in for a moment. There is no profit for them in a healthy, disease free population. Therefore, the longer a person is on drugs, the more the drug company makes in profit. They do not make money by curing people. They make money by inventing drugs that merely suppress symptoms but do not cure disease. They make the most money by creating perpetual customers. People who are drugged from the cradle to the grave. That is their ideal scene. A lifelong customer.
3. To accomplish this highly profitable result the drug companies will stoop to anything and stop at nothing. From withholding or altering death rates during drug trials, to the depravity of promoting deadly destructive “solutions” and lying that they help. For instance the Paxil antidepressant that increases the suicide rate by 800%. The courts have convicted the drug companies and fined them billions, yes, billions for all sorts of immoral and illegal activity (bribery, off-label marketing, keeping deadly drugs on the market), all in the name of profit.
So we have established their ethic level is criminal and motivation is money. Above any consideration of ethics. Agreed?
4. The executives who perpetuate these crimes against humanity are never brought to personal justice. The company pays the fine. And as the fine is far less than the profit made, even by doing the wrong thing, the company profits. And as the directors are legally obliged to make as much money as they can for the company, there is no disincentive to the directors in doing the wrong thing. (Watch the documentary The Corporation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y888wVY5hzw&t=314s)
5. But these drug companies (run by the very same, aforementioned, lying, cheating, bribing, research twisting unethical executives) say they have a “solution” to prevent disease – vaccination. The government, composed of lying politicians, buy this unproven solution from proven liars and want to force it on us.
And we believe this?
As Mr Spock would say, “That is highly illogical!”
The Yanks have a saying, “Burn me once, shame on you. Burn me twice, shame on me.”
In the subject of vaccines the public have been burned so many times they are looking individually like Roman candles and collectively like a raging forest fire!
And if you want to take it further, ask Google about the link between the protein in vaccinations called Nagalase and how it suppresses the body’s ability to make/absorb vitamin D and how that increases the cancer risk. Here’s one link:
Here’s to healthier children, not lifelong clients of big pharma.
Tom Grimshaw


“I’ve ordered thousands of vaccines in my career as a physician. Until recently I had never considered vaccine injury as more than folklore. Weeks ago I never would’ve believed a story about vaccine injured triplets….so the past few weeks have been difficult. I have struggled to make sense of all that I have seen and learned. I met a mother of triplets the other weekend, a very attractive white woman with years added onto her face and her smile. She recalled to me the day her triplets were born. She and her then husband were ecstatic that she was able to carry them for 36 weeks.
At the time, mom was so happy that they were inside of her long enough to mature, they were born perfectly healthy. I can totally relate since I am now twelve weeks post-partum. I had very similar worries carrying my little princess. Mom’s eyes dropped though as I gave her a hearty smile of excitement. The same day that her triplets were given their six-month check-up and vaccines, was the same day that all three of her kids checked out. She said it was as if someone replaced her children with new ones. They unlearned all they knew…regressed and screamed for days. I stood there motionless and speechless. She didn’t want my pity, nor my tears, she just wanted me to know.
I’m a new mom, a sister, an aunt, a cousin, a friend, and a family medicine physician. I’m from a small town called Gary, Indiana. As a matter of fact, I practice medicine about two blocks away from the house that I along-with my eight brothers and sisters grew up in. My dad bought the house in the 60s, after he met my mom. They both migrated to the Midwest to escape the blatant racial tension of the deep south, and the rest is history.
In our small town the emergency room is named after my dad for all the great medical care he has provided through the years. During the financial boom he even donated money to build part of it… He’s a pretty special guy; we both can sit and gush about each other for hours at a time. I’ve always been a Daddy’s girl.
I came back home to practice medicine in our small town after spending eight years in Nashville, TN. I did my undergraduate work at Vanderbilt University. After graduation I went to medical school at Meharry Medical College, my Dad’s alma matar, with my two sisters Ruth and Rebekkah.
Our family-run clinic is sometimes my pride and joy, and other times the bane of my existence lol. My brother Nathaniel is the director (he says he’s going to miss me being pregnant because I was much more pleasant). My mom Ruthie is the manager (she expects us to wear our white coats even when the AC is out). My Dad, the smartest and most charming doctor I’ve ever met, is 86 and he still sees patients a few times a week. We also have a wonderful doctor named Shelly Sandifer in our clinic. She came to work with us after my sister Rebekkah passed away trying to have a child of her own. Dr. Sandifer has a lovely Bajan/British accent, a great sense of humor, and the patients love her. We practice community medicine every single day.
We treat families at our clinic. Sometimes I don’t have to ask patients much about their family history. I treat their aunts, uncles, parents, and sometimes even their grandparents…it’s the best feeling in the world. Our patients trust us to take care of them, and that is something that we all take very personally. When we say, “our family, treating your family…” we absolutely mean it.
We all took an oath to first and foremost “Do No Harm.” It’s been difficult. Throughout my tenure as a physician, I have watched while our academy has pushed certain medication that we find years later has been causing more harm than good…that hurts.
I have witnessed the vaccine schedule grow from 16 doses of 4 vaccines from birth to six years old when I was a child, to the current recommendation of 49 doses of 14 vaccines between birth and age six, and 69 doses of 16 vaccines between birth and the age of eighteen….and we’ve been giving them on-time, sometimes five shots a day to help kids ‘catch-up’, and all without question. Medical school and residency taught us all to do so.
I guess I cant help but wonder if there’s a connection between the fact that when we had to give fewer vaccines we had fewer childhood diseases. It is only human to wonder. We had fewer learning disabilities, less asthma, less autism, and less diabetes. Autism in particular was 1 in 500 in the late seventies and it has now skyrocketed to 1 in 50. Why so many? Why so soon?
I am so sorry that I didn’t know that the government has paid out $3 billion to families injured by vaccines through the VICP (Vaccine Injury Compensation Program). As a matter of fact, I assumed that all vaccines were very very safe. They have to be because we give them to everyone’s kids, right?!?? I am so sorry that I didn’t realize that there are tens of thousands of families on a list that have never received compensation because they couldn’t 100% prove that the vaccine created an injury (even though many of them can pinpoint the day and time that their babies’ lights dimmed).
And until recently, I had never heard of a CDC scientist/whistleblower named Dr. William Thompson (note, I can’t link to a story because even the article written in Forbes has been removed online). Dr Thompson was brave enough to come forward because his conscience was killing him. I feel like such an ignorant ASS to say the least.
Dr. Thompson revealed that a study conducted at the CDC showed a 236% increase in the rate of autism in African-American boys who received the MMR vaccine before the age of 36 months. He states that an internal decision was made to change the study results to demonstrate that there was no increased risk…and he feels really bad about all the lives he ruined.
The documentary Vaxxed plays a percentage of the four hours of voice recordings between the whistleblower/Dr. Thompson and another scientist. All of this would be impossible to believe without those recorded phone conversations.
Of course I am Black mom, sister, aunt, cousin, and friend. As a Black physician, with a mostly Black patient base, I am very very concerned and very sorry. But I am also concerned as a person that loves all people and children regardless of race. What does this information about one vaccine on one group of children infer about all vaccines and all groups of children?
As a mom of a new tiny precious being and a doctor of many, I am left with so many questions: Should vaccines be delayed? Are any vaccines safe? If so, which ones? Are there more vaccine-injured victims that we even know about? Should genetic testing be conducted on all children before we assume that they can tolerate all of those vaccines?
And my most important question: Why won’t Congress subpoena Dr. Thompson so that we can really really know the truth about this particular vaccine.
I have to thank Del Bigtree for taking the time to show me the data that I was inadvertently pretending not to see, and I really have to thank Dr. Thompson. Without this information, we would never have known, and it all would’ve just been written off as mishmash of conspiracy theories.
With what I now know, I cannot support mandatory vaccines for children. Some kids respond well to vaccines, but others do not. How can we be sure who will and who will not? Should we really sacrifice one for many? Parents have to have the right to choose! Parents have to make their own informed decisions. Parents deserve access to this information which has been buried so deep that even I, a practicing physician, hadn’t been aware of.
I apologize from the bottom of my heart to any children and parents that I have unknowingly harmed. I had no idea.
Please ask questions and make the time to go see the documentary Vaxxed. Form your own opinions, do your own research, and then talk to your physician. Demand to hear from Dr. Thompson, pass this information along to your loved ones, and start these conversations. We all deserve answers, and this is the only way to get any.
People keep asking me if I’m scared to speak about this. My realest fear is that we will continue to assume that these moms are making this stuff up.”
— Rachael L Ross, MD, PhD
Doctor apologizes for harm she may have caused with vaccines

A Vaccine Related Communication From A Reader of my Newsletter

Tom, You probably remember me from… …I read your weekly emails,some are very informative and certainly good advice for our health regimes. As a grandfather of 2 gorgeous girls I cringe when I read so much anti vaccination propaganda. One of the girls was recently diagnosed with measles,luckily it was an incorrect diagnoses proving to be an allergy related rash. When I researched the vaccination benefits the world has received over the years I must say that the anti vaccination lobby runs a huge risk by bringing a small sample of side effects as a reason not to vaccinate children against so many preventable diseases! Any person or group advising parents not to vaccinate their children runs a dangerous campaign which can have catastrophic affect on our young. Please spend more time researching your facts before risking the health of our next generation! https://ourworldindata.org/roush-and-murphy-2007-data/
I replied (plus a paragraph I added later):
Thanks for writing your kind words and expressing your concerns Malcolm!
I appreciate your civil and reasoned email although I am very surprised that after reading all my posts you still hold the view that vaccines do more good than harm. I thought I have provided more than enough evidence to at least put some doubt in the mind of even their staunchest advocates to justify their doing their own research and coming to the same conclusion I have.
As is the case with many things, if you research only one side of a story you will regard the other side as completely incorrect. For instance the link you provides makes no mention at all of the children killed or maimed as a result of the administration of vaccines so no valid comparison can be drawn as to relative merits. For instance if measles was truly responsible for 440 deaths per annum (from memory about .02% of the population) prior to the vaccine is that really worth consigning 2% (200 times as many) of the population to a life of autism?
I have observed the proponents of vaccines tell a very one sided story and downplay or invalidate the risks and tell blatant lies to promote the vaccines.
For instance vaccine proponents still say vaccines do no harm and do not cause autism despite the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program in the US having paid out 3.6 billion dollars as a result of vaccine injuries and several courts finding that vaccines DO cause autism.
The CDC’s own research showed a whopping increase in autism among African American boys after the vaccine! What&’s worse, they suppressed it for years! It only came out after a whistleblower spilled the beans.
So the vaccine proponents attempt to cover up the truth and blatantly lie. You have been lied to by those in authority so often you have taken it to be truth.
For the sake of your grand daughters (I have three grandchildren myself so I know how you feel) please get a hold of the video series The Truth About Vaccines and get truly informed by doctors, lawyers and parents who have had the integrity to honestly look past the propaganda and see the truth.
I will be very interested to hear your viewpoint after watching it. Please let me know.
If you do not want to watch it, recognise that your opinion is merely prejudice and belief in what you have been told rather than unbiased scientific inquiry.
Remember, every vaccine critic with an injured child was pro-vaccine before vaccines injured their child.
The reason I communicate what I have learned about vaccines is that I don’t want you to see the truth only as a result of a vaccine injury to one you love.
Their are far easier ways to learn the truth than through the pain of death or injury to one you love.
In conclusion let me say that despite my very strong position, I honestly and fervently believe the decision to vaccinate or not MUST be left up to the individual parent couple. Where there is risk there must be choice. And there is a risk in not vaccinating just as there is a risk in vaccinating. My reading and experience bringing up three unvaccinated children leads me to the conclusion that we made the better choice by focusing on using nutrition to build a healthy immune system rather than injecting a chemical toxin laden poisonous cocktail into their delicate young bodies.

Flu vaccine confusion and safety concerns lead to low vaccination rate in Queensland kids

Vaccine Poster Child
Another pro-vaccine disinformation piece!
Continue to spread the truth.
Vaccines are neither safe nor effective.
They do not provide immunity (even more so with the flu than other diseases) and do more harm than good (even more so with the flu vaccine than other vaccines).
Vaccines are a toxic betrayal in the name of help made by criminally greedy big pharma more interested in profiting from perpetual customers than helping you maintain healthy bodies.
The above is not an opinion but documented, incontrovertible truth.
The best chance you have of optimal survival for you and your family is to be aware, informed, vigilant and courageous about defending your rights and freedoms from encroachment.
To be informed, read my past posts on Facebook or look at www.tomgrimshaw.com/tomsblog and search vaccines.
You will find enough information to counter the lies of vaccine proponents and win some converts. This IS the way society is changed for the better. One aware person raising the awareness of another person. One person at a time.