British PM found to have personally invested $500 million into Moderna through a tax haven in the Caymen Islands.

Sunak

British PM and #WEF2030Agenda devotee #Sunak invested $500 million of his private funds into Moderna through a company called Thelema Partners in a notorious tax haven in the Caymen Islands. Afterwards he stated in parliament that the vaccine was “safe and effective” while then going on to roll out further permissions for Moderna to set up further vaccine producing interests within the UK.

https://twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1685220902005362688

Covid Leak Cover-Up

Covid Leak Cover-Up

Anthony Fauci’s Former Boss & Head of Operation Warp Speed Has Reportedly Disclosed the Origins & Coverup of COVID-19

“Robert Kadlec, who was Assistant Secretary for the US Department of Health during the pandemic – and formerly Anthony Fauci’s boss – has given an interview to The Weekend Australian Magazine.

‘We think vaccine research resulted in the pandemic – that vaccine ­research was the proximate cause.’

In an extraordinary admission, Dr Kadlec said they decided to try to encourage a group of leading international scientists to calm down speculation on the origins of the virus.

Kadlec told The Weekend Australian that he, Dr Fauci and NIH director Francis Collins privately discussed how to ‘turn down the temperature’ on accusations against China in the early days of the pandemic while they were trying to encourage Beijing to co-operate and share a sample of the virus.”

https://archive.is/ya5Wm

Anti-vaxxers, I’d like to hear your side. Why do you believe as you do, and what led you to believe it?

Well James, before I add my own slant on this question, I’m sure your phrasing using a divisive epithet was purely to inspire controversy rather than honest answers …

James Question

…. and, we can also interpret that as you’re a professional “question asker” predominently, rather than answering any at all …

James Profile

… then we can assume the answers you receive you’re not really bothered about understanding.

But that aside, let’s go into it.

“What we believe”. I’ve already got a problem with this. It’s not really a case of differences of belief, like religious stances, or whether there’s a Father Christmas. You see, science is something that is always moving, always being questioned, always challenged and replicated. It’s not the case that one pharmaceutical company launches a product on a dubious research study and then that’s it; no further questions, no dissent, settled science, take it or else! Oh wait …

Researchers and academia can, and should, always question the results of the scientific findings, learn more, improve the outcomes etc.

For me personally, right back in the distant 2019/20 memory of this strange “pandemic”, when all these wonder drugs miraculously came into being by the end of that year, I wasn’t listening to the media, I wasn’t listening to the Government, I was focused only on the research, only on the process and methods, only on the findings, the outcomes. I had questions that needed answers. I didn’t want to hear some armchair journalist with guidance on approved talking points from the Government or biased press with financial interests interpetation of reality, I wanted to know the clinical aspects of the research.

If you want to read about the details of many of the reasons, with citations, I answered them here:

Why will you decline COVID 19 vaccination?
https://choicenotcoercion.quora.com/Why-will-you-decline-COVID-19-vaccination-3

Initially because their real world ARR (absolute risk reduction) was less than 1% and didn’t touch the virus at the population level; neither preventing infection nor transmission . Because there were more deaths in the intervention arm of the initial phase 3 trial than the placebo. The IFR (infection fatality rate) for my demographic was 0.035% Because my own innate and adaptive immune response is far more robust and durable against a respiratory virus than any “vaccine induced” response. The use of mRNA therapy prophylactics intramuscularly injected to somehow prevent a respiratory mucosal infection? Seriously? All the vague nonsense about “training your immune system to recognise the virus” implies the virus can be cleared upon the narrow recognition of a fast mutating spike associated with an extinct variant NOT the nucleocapsid. Every mRNA apologist fails to realise that the mechanism does not leave those transfected cells intact and this trade off is creating at most damaged organs / scarring where the body cannot replace the cells lost (i.e heart tissue, myo-pericarditis), or at worst autoimmune reactions (see next reason) that then drive more problems as your immune response cannot discern virus proteins from human proteins. Because the risk of autoimmunity and Original Antigenic Sin / Immune Imprinting / Pathogenic Priming is too great Because the LNP mRNA delivery system creating a cytotoxic S protein in the human body is not a benign mechanism and carries with it additional health risks (e.g ramping down the interferon response or switching your antibody response to tolerate the virus not clear it) Because “the Science” never measured how long mRNA with N1-methylpseudouridine nucleotides persisted within cells. Claims of these mRNA payloads “disappearing” in hours is plainly false when they have been measured 60 days post injection. Because the biodistribution of the delivery mechanism spreads LNP’s uncontrollably throughout the body and can breach different barriers that weren’t meant to be crossed. Because the more shots you take, the more increased risk and instances of infection are seen Because the shots quickly descend into negative efficacy ranges very quickly Because the manufacturers have NO LIABILITY TO BE PROSECUTED should things go wrong Because governments of the world coerced, nudged and pressured people into taking them when there’s clearly no discernible benefit.
And here:

Does the COVID-19 vaccine ever leave our system?
https://choicenotcoercion.quora.com/Does-the-COVID-19-vaccine-ever-leave-our-system-2

Even now 2 years later, reading some of the answers lacking in references already on this question, there remains a lot of people who still have no idea how the gene based mRNA therapy injection works.

Did you want the noble lie answer, or the inconvenient truth?

Noble lie

The lie would have everyone believe that the mRNA in the jabs is cleared from the body within hours after injection (just like natural mRNA in the body), that the spike protein generated only persists for a few days to a week. In that time your immune system is supposed to learn from the recognition and destruction of the spikes to “create” memory antibodies coded specifically for the SARS-CoV-2 virus so that, for the future, in the event of encountering the virus / variant, your body will leap into action and clear any virus before it can infect you. If that’s what you prefer to believe then don’t read any more.

Inconvenient truth

Now, the truth as we understand it. The lack of appropriate studies measuring the time of persistence of mRNA in the jabs by the pharmaceutical companies is woefully pitiful in the area of your question. Anyone who says otherwise is spreading false information. So we have to look to independent studies to piece it together. Let’s start with the mRNA. Normal mRNA consists of a uridine nucleotide, as well as the coded pairs to create the spike instruction. However, it was found historically that the mRNA with uridine set off the toll like receptors and the body recognised the mRNA as an invader, so synthetic pseudouridine was substituted. (Source on history) The body “normally” breaks down mRNA but this isn’t normal mRNA and the body doesn’t know what to do with it.

How long has it been seen to last?

This study shows the mRNA and spike has been detected in the lymph nodes at many time points, the maximum measured at 60 days but which could be longer; the researchers had to submit to publish and so it cut the study short. This was confirmed by Dr Ryan Cole (Pathologist) who knows the researchers.

Beyond this, we have the latest research that shows perpetual injections are causing a switch in blood based antibody classes, from the viral clearing IgG3 to the lesser helpful tolerating IgG4 that usually suppresses symptoms.

Since the total amount of anti-spike IgG antibodies was only moderately (1.6-fold) elevated after the third compared to the second vaccine dose, we next investigated whether the increased proportion of IgG4 antibodies had functional consequences. To this end, paired sera from a representative subcohort of ten volunteers were analyzed. First, RBD-specific IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies were determined via ELISA. IgG4 levels were significantly increased after the third vaccination, whereas the levels of RBD-binding IgG1 were not different at the two time points (Fig. 3B). The avidity was clearly increased after the third vaccination (Fig. 3C), which is in line with recent reports.

[…] Together, these data show that spike protein-reactive IgG2 and IgG4 exhibit reduced Fc-mediated effector functions.

Impact of breakthrough infections on vaccine-induced antibody responses

The fact that individuals, who experienced a breakthrough infection after being three times vaccinated with mRNA, showed the highest IgG4 levels in cohort 1 (Fig. 1) suggested that infections with SARS-CoV-2 can also activate IgG4-switched memory B cells.

So not only is the body “tolerating” the virus upon reinfection rather than clearing it, we also can see evidence in the research of infection enhancing antibodies.

Enhancing antibodies facilitate SARS-CoV-2 infectivity

The effect of enhancing antibodies on ACE2 binding to the spike protein suggested that the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 would also be increased, similar to the effect of the D614G mutation (Hou et al., 2020; Korber et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Plante et al., 2021).

To investigate this question, we utilized vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)/?G-GFP SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudovirus (SARS-CoV-2 PV) to quantify the effect of representative enhancing antibodies on SARS-CoV-2 infection. As expected, enhancing antibodies increased the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 PV to ACE2-transfected HEK293T cells in an enhancing-antibody-dose-dependent manner (Figures 3A and S1D).

Considering the spike has been seen in many places, none more so than the heart and brain , and no anti-N protein was detected in that referenced case showing it wasn’t from natural infection, then we can assume it was the vaccine that was responsible.

It was surmised in September 2020 that these injections could cause ADE (antibody dependent enhancement) from this published study … … as well as this mouse model study showing how repeated injections caused lower humoral and cellular immunity.

Our findings demonstrate potential risks with the continuous use of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine boosters, providing immediate implications [emphasis added] for the global COVID-19 vaccination enhancement strategies.

We found that the protective effects from the humoral immunity and cellular immunity established by the conventional immunization were both profoundly impaired during the extended vaccination course.

In long covid sufferers (PASC), the spike protein has been seen after 15 months

Our previous results show that during early stages of the disease, PASC group have reduced classical monocyte and increased intermediate monocyte percentages compared with healthy controls (5). We find an increase in non-classical monocytes in PASC group 6-15 months post infection, and higher percentages of intermediate and non-classical monocytes at day 0 in severe cases, suggesting augmented classical-intermediate-non-classical monocyte transition in both groups but with different kinetics.

Summary

Whether the effects of the injections eventually fade, we just don’t know until a proper independent investigation is carried out. The body may produce spike for a long time, with toleration being its primary response, unable to recognise the virus variants beyond the original WH1 strain, because of immune imprinting and suppression / pathogenic priming / OAS / ADE. The perpetual reinfections people are experiencing, despite being jabbed multiple times, is very concerning.

But more jabs is the antithesis to the solution, considering more jabs equal more infection, as per the Cleveland Clinic study and the mouse study example above lowering the response. Willingness to increase your personal risk to further spike protein damage by continuing injections is folly.

Not wanting to limit my search with my own personal bias, I wrote to Pfizer, I called Moderna, I carried out FOIA requests to the MHRA in the UK, I messaged the CDC, I contacted researchers in the UK, ones in the US, I read paper after paper from the years before and during the investigation into their launch on the mechanisms, the delivery methodology, the impact on the individual participants etc.

After all that, none of the information I found could answer my questions, none of the research that was touted as the ones we should “follow” satisfied my own personal benchmark of risk to benefit judgement.

With each passing month since 2021, I read study after study, all pointing in one direction of travel, and that is to avoid them at all costs; irespective of condition. The particular method of action is not one I wanted working inside my body, my cells, distributing to a lot more places than was “originally promised” and still believed by a lot of ill informed people. The UK Government, with less than obvious fan fare, dropped the necessity of recommending these less than effective wonder drugs when their own data on NNV (Number needing to vaccinate) for the prevention of ONE SINGLE CASE of severe hospitalisation came out:

NNV

Appendix 1 NNV values (number of patients needed to be vaccinated in order to prevent 1 single case) https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1131409/appendix-1-of-jcvi-statement-on-2023-covid-19-vaccination-programme-8-november-2022.pdf

But you know, out of all of this, I’ve personally learnt a lot of valuable lessons; from how the psychological manipulation of the public has been implemented and how easily they can be fooled and remain ignorant, being turned on one another so readily, how research can be misleading, how statistics can be fudged to suit the narrative, how public servants can be “bought and influenced” through lobbying and capture, and how the media distorts the evidence to a given narrative.

It’s been a truly eye opening event horizon to cross and now my eyes are open, they won’t ever be closed.

Shocking ONS Report: COVID Vaccinated 18-39 Age Group at 91% Higher Death Risk than Unvaccinated Peers in UK

The above chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for all-cause deaths, per 100,000 person-years among adults aged 18 to 39 in England. The green line is the mortality rate among the unvaccinated, which while fluctuating has remained pretty stable throughout.

The other lines however represent different vaccination statuses, and they are extremely concerning. The orange, yellow, and pink lines represent mortality rates within 21 days of receiving a first, second or third dose. And they reveal that the risk of death increases significantly immediately after vaccination.

This may explain why figures found in ‘table 4’ of the same ONS dataset reveal 41,449 people died within 21 days of vaccination in England between 1st Jan 21 and 31st Jan 22 –

https://expose-news.com/2023/07/26/covid-vaccinated-youth-increased-risk-death/

Was COVID a Racial Bioweapon? RFK Jr. Gets Hammered by Media

In their attempt to paint Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as an anti-Semite, mainstream media grossly took Kennedy’s comments out of context when he spoke during an after-hours campaign dinner. Rather, it’s the truly terrifying 2020 study RFK Jr. referred to that really needs to make front-page news.

According to mainstream media, Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently made claims about COVID-19 being an ethnically targeted bioweapon. That is false.

Kennedy was discussing the threat posed by bioweapons development, and the need to regulate this kind of research and “resuscitate” the 1972 international bioweapons charter that forbids most of it.

Kennedy cited a 2020 scientific paper, which found that ethnic Chinese, Finns, and Ashkenazi Jews were the least susceptible to COVID-19, while people of African descent and Caucasians were the most susceptible, due to ACE2 and TMPRSS2 polymorphism variations.

Because we now have synthetic biology and a wide variety of genetic engineering techniques, there’s a whole new retinue of bioweapons, and among the most heinous are bioweapons that target specific ethnicities.

While evidence from official sources are scant, high-level individuals insist that race-specific bioweapons development is already underway, in one country or another, and/or that ethnic-specific bioweapons may already exist.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/07/25/was-covid-a-bioweapon-that-targets-certain-races.aspx