Archie Kalokerinos on Vitamin C

Archie Kalokerinos on Vitamin C

Dr. Kalokerinos is well known worldwide as the doctor who spent much of his time fighting for the wellbeing of the Aboriginal inhabitants of Australia. He is so much appreciated for his work and for his engagements that many, lovingly, call him ‘Archie’ He wrote down his experiences in the masterpiece “Every Second Child”.

Instead of being rewarded for doing so, he was harassed and his methods were disregarded by the authorities, probably because they were too simple, too cheap and too efficacious to fit modem medical standards. And, besides, they were meant to protect a population which, in its own native county, is regarded by some as not worth taking the trouble for anyway. Dr. Kalokerinos thought differently. He pinpointed the increase in vaccination campaigns as the reason why, at a certain point, up to half of the vaccinated Aboriginal infants died.

90 Million Americans On Psychotropics

90 Million Americans On Psychotropics

Mark Farnell writes on MeWe:
Psychoactive drugs are substances that, when taken in or administered into one’s system, affect mental processes, e.g. perception, consciousness, cognition or mood and emotions. These drugs affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior.

Do your research on these drugs. Listen to people who were injured by them and have long term side effects & withdrawals. I witnessed firsthand what these drugs did to my mom, they made her more confused, agitated, and paranoid. She developed tardive dyskinesia thanks to Dr. Bonnie Hafeman’s negligence and arrogance. Makes me wonder how much she was getting paid to prescribe these drugs.

My one adult niece tried to commit suicide because she was on an anti-anxiety med. She told me that she couldn’t even cry, she was emotionless..these drugs mess with your brain!

Fox News Decision to Settle Dominion Lawsuit for More Than Three-Quarters of a Billion Dollars Makes No Sense

Something fishy here.

First, corporate executives don’t give away $787 million of shareholders’ money without a test of the claim in court.

Second, it is not defamation to report the news. Tucker Carlson reported the claims of experts. That is news reporting. Dominion’s defamation lawsuit should have been filed against the experts. It wasn’t, because the experts had the evidence.

Third, Experts supplied evidence that the Dominion voting machines could be programmed to count votes differently from how the votes were cast; experts supplied evidence that the machines could be hacked; experts supplied evidence that the voting machines were connected to the Internet. Fox News could have called these experts as expert witnesses. By agreeing to settle, Fox News refused the evidence its day in court. Why?

A possible explanation is that Fox News, voluntarily or involuntarily, participated in an orchestration that established the precedent that reporting news different from the narrative, or news that is unfavorable to a person, company, or government institution, is defamation. Think about what this means. A prosecutor who charges a person with a crime has defamed the person. Truth becomes unreportable. Investigative reporter Seymour Hersh could be charged for defamation, and for being a Russian agent, for reporting that the US government destroyed the Nord Stream pipeline.

When we see the few truth-tellers who are the stars of their organizations jettisoned–Tucker Carlson from Fox News, Matt Taibbi from Rolling Stone, Glenn Greenwald from The Intercept, James O’Keefe from Project Veritas, President Trump charged under a non-existent law, and Wikileaks’ Julian Assange imprisoned for a decade without due process, we must face the fact that there is an organized conspiracy to suppress truth. We are experiencing the completion of The Matrix in which expressed doubt or even unspoken suspicion of official narratives are criminal offenses.

Truth-tellers receive almost nonexistent support. The inescapable conclusion is that in the Western world truth has no future.

Tyranny is upon us.

Covid Crimes – Australian Body of Evidence

This is a recorded talk and slide presentation conducted in Wollongong NSW Australia, following 2 years of research and monitoring of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) website DAEN (Database of Adverse Event Notifications), specifically the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ i.e.
962 reported deaths as at 15.01.2023 across Australia including
9 children
11 foetal deaths
16 stillbirths
192 miscarriages – termed ‘abortion spontaneous’
319 lost pregnancies including death of 32-year-old pregnant woman – ‘rash pruritic’

Video includes a 1.5 min clip with a young woman called Lara (from Central Queensland) who accepted her GP’s recommendation to get COVID-19 jabbed and lost her first pregnancy (@ 12 weeks boy, Ollie).

Relevant links and documents showing safety concerns were ignored by officials and the COVID-19 jab harm which resulted, are shown in the information section (under the video). “INCRIMINATING DATA” with links, have been emailed to a criminal barrister in Brisbane, QLD, following a recommendation from Dr. Chris Neil (Australian Medical Professionals’ Society, President & Cardiologist). A number of lawyers from other countries are involved in a private criminal prosecution of named persons. The “INCRIMINATING DATA” video and links, will aide in the evidence-gathering.

A friend wrote to me saying after receiving the video link: “… This record is the most important thing we could have done considering Mark Sextons recent post declaring the establishment intentionally ignoring the evidence. We have illustrated and demonstrated the problem. Evidence of Democide in action. The people must unite now. What you have achieved is now an incredibly powerful tool to humanity……”

I hope you will spend the time to watch and share this important video and include the attached one page “Summary of Information” with links, for easy distribution. Thank you.

Kind regards,
Sharon Cousins
Independent Researcher/ Writer,

Is the Earth Flat or a Sphere?

I thought to ask the question of ChatGPT. This is what I asked and this is what it answered.

a) What are the top 10 arguments that flat earthers say prove the earth is not a sphere?
b) On what scientific principle is their logic based? and
c) Is their logic/application of the principle accurate or flawed, and if so, how?

a) Here are the top 10 arguments that flat earthers commonly use to support their belief that the earth is not a sphere:
1. The horizon always appears flat and level, without any curvature.
2. There is no observable or measurable curvature to the surface of the earth.
3. The horizon rises to eye level no matter how high you ascend.
4. Airplanes and ships do not adjust their course for the curve of the earth.
5. There is no proof that the earth is moving or spinning.
6. The earth’s gravity is not strong enough to hold oceans and people on its surface.
7. The pictures of the earth from space are faked or doctored.
8. The sun and moon are much closer and smaller than mainstream science suggests.
9. There are no actual photos of the earth from space.
10. The flat earth model can explain all phenomena without the need for complicated science.

b) The logic of flat earthers is based on the principle of empirical observation, which is the practice of verifying or validating a hypothesis through the use of empirical evidence. They claim that they have not observed any proof of a curved earth, and therefore believe that the earth must be flat. However, their logic is not accurate, as it ignores significant evidence that supports the idea that the earth is a sphere.

c) In reality, flat earthers’ logic and application of the basic principle of empirical observation are deeply flawed.

Firstly, the fact that the horizon appears flat to the naked eye is not evidence that the earth is flat. It is actually due to the limitations of our perception and the relatively small size of the earth compared to the vast expanse of the universe.

Secondly, there is plenty of empirical evidence that confirms the curvature of the earth, including photographs from space and measurements of the earth’s shadow during a lunar eclipse.

Lastly, while the flat earth model may explain some phenomena, it cannot account for other fundamental aspects of the natural world, such as gravity and the movements of the planets and stars.

Therefore, it can be concluded that the flat earth argument is not based on sound scientific principles and is fundamentally flawed.

Getting the Voice Picture?

Kim Beazley

“The United Nations has given the (Australian) Federal Government a mandate of ownership for housing, property, farms and businesses to government control once the Republic has been proclaimed”. And what is preventing Australia becoming a republic? The fact that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders are not currently included in the Constitution and are still deemed to be the original owners of the land. Do you now have some idea why Albanese and Labor want to have Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders written into the Constitution? There is nothing the slightest bit altruistic about it. It is deceptive and nefarious stuff. It is about the stated aim of Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum that “By 2030 you will own nothing and be happy about it”.