Ellen McKenzie

Ellen McKenzie

Four armed men came to take her home while her husband was gone. She gave them one warning, then reached for the rifle.

Montana Territory, October 1889.

The sound of approaching horses made Ellen McKenzie’s hands pause mid-stir over the stew pot. Her husband, James, had left two days earlier, driving their small herd to market. Their nearest neighbor lived four miles away through dense pine forest. And she was alone with their eight-month-old daughter, sleeping peacefully in a wooden cradle beside the stone fireplace.

Through the cabin’s single window, Ellen watched four riders emerge from the tree line.

No territorial badges. No official authority. Just the kind of men who knew exactly when homestead husbands left their claims unguarded.

Land grabbers.

They moved through the territory with ruthless efficiency—filing fraudulent claims while owners were away, counting on isolated wives to flee rather than fight. Most families couldn’t afford lawyers. The nearest marshal was three days’ ride. By the time disputes reached court, the land was usually sold and the men long gone.

They’d made a calculation about Ellen McKenzie.

They were wrong.

She lifted her daughter from the cradle, breathing in the soft scent of her hair, feeling the tiny heartbeat against her chest. Then she carried her down to the root cellar, wrapped her in quilts, and laid her gently on grain sacks among the potatoes and preserves.

“ Mama’s right upstairs, sweetheart,” she whispered. “I won’t let them take what’s ours.”

She bolted the cellar door from above.

Then she reached for her husband’s Winchester rifle and checked the chamber.

Six rounds loaded. A full box of ammunition on the shelf.

Her father had fought at Antietam as a Union sharpshooter. When she was seven, he’d handed her a rifle and said, “The frontier doesn’t ask if you’re ready. It asks if you can shoot straight when it matters.”

She could.

The first knock came—almost polite.

“Ma’am, we’re from the Territorial Land Office. There’s been a filing error on your claim—”

Ellen’s voice carried through the thick log door, steady as iron.

“The only error is you thinking I’ll open this door.”

Low laughter followed. The sound of men who had done this many times and never been challenged.

“Now, Mrs. McKenzie, there’s no need for trouble—”

The Winchester cracked once.

The bullet tore into the doorframe six inches from the speaker’s head, close enough for him to feel the air rush past.

The laughter stopped.

“That was your warning,” Ellen called. “Next man who steps on my property gets the bullet. And I don’t miss when I’m aiming to hit.”

For five hours, Ellen McKenzie held the cabin alone.

Every shadow crossing a window, the rifle tracked it.

Every boot on the porch, she drove them back.

Every attempt to circle behind the house, she was already there, having memorized every sightline around her home.

They tried bargaining. Threats. Waiting her out.

Nothing worked.

When her baby’s cries rose through the floorboards, Ellen knelt and whispered through the cracks in the planks:

“I hear you, my love. I know you’re scared. But we’re McKenzies. We don’t abandon what’s ours.”

The crying softened, as if her daughter understood.

As the Montana sky darkened to purple with approaching dusk, the men began to grasp something that defied everything they believed:

This woman wasn’t stalling for rescue.

She was the fortress.

Then—distant thunder rolled across the valley.

James appeared over the ridge with three neighboring ranchers he’d wired from town, a sudden unease having sent him racing home.

The land grabbers scattered like startled crows.

When James burst through the door, he found Ellen calm and steady, rifle still ready, their daughter on her hip, nursing peacefully as if nothing extraordinary had happened.

Ellen didn’t collapse in relief.

She simply met his eyes and said, “They thought I’d be easy.”

The story spread across Montana Territory faster than telegraph wire.

Within three weeks, two other homestead women successfully defended their claims while their husbands were away—both citing Ellen McKenzie’s stand as proof that being alone didn’t mean being helpless.

Territorial newspapers picked it up. Women’s groups in Helena and Butte referenced it in their organizing. The four would-be claim jumpers were quietly identified and encouraged to leave the territory.

Years later, when their daughter traced her fingers over the bullet scar still visible in the doorframe, James placed his weathered hand over the mark and said:

“Your mother taught grown men something they’d forgotten: kindness isn’t weakness. Mercy isn’t surrender. And a woman protecting her family is the most dangerous force on the frontier.”

Ellen didn’t answer. She simply smiled—the smile of someone who knows exactly who she is and what she’s capable of.

Because the frontier had its own lessons, harsh and unforgiving:

You could wait for someone to save you.

Or you could load the rifle, secure the door, and become your own salvation.

When frontier women faced that choice, they chose the rifle.

And the frontier learned to respect them for it.

(Tom: As a rule, the only thing that has ever stopped an armed, bad intentioned person is an armed, well intentioned person. Don’t ever forget that.)

Pasteurized vs Raw Milk

Pasteurized vs Raw Milk

For decades, the “Food Police” told us that raw milk was dangerous and that skim milk was healthy. In 2026, the script has flipped.

With the new “Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act” signed this month, the war on dairy fat is ending. But the real revolution is happening underground: the deregulation of Raw Milk.

Why does this matter? It’s about Lactase.

When you pasteurize milk (heat it to 161°F), you kill bacteria, yes. But you also destroy the enzyme Lactase, which is naturally present in milk to help you digest lactose. This is why millions of people think they are “lactose intolerant.” They aren’t intolerant to milk; they are intolerant to dead milk.

Raw milk is a bioactive food. It contains:

Bioavailable Calcium: Not the chalky stuff added to almond milk.

Immunoglobulins: Antibodies that support your immune system.

Butterfat: Essential for absorbing Vitamin A and D.

The establishment called it “risky.” Biohackers call it “liquid gold.” The freedom to choose what you put in your body is the ultimate health metric.

Vital Advice: If you can’t access raw milk (check local laws), do the next best thing: Grass-Fed, Vat-Pasteurized, Non-Homogenized milk. If the cream doesn’t rise to the top, it’s not real food.

Source: “Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act” (2026 Policy Update) /McAfee, M. “The Safety of Raw Milk”.

Peter Rost

Peter Rost

The pharmaceutical industry has long been criticized for its approach to chronic disease management. Peter Rost, a former Pfizer executive, revealed that the real focus is not on curing diseases, but on creating lifelong markets for drugs. The truth is that chronic diseases, which require ongoing medication, are far more profitable for drug companies than curing the condition.
Many chronic illnesses, such as diabetes, heart disease, and obesity, are largely preventable with lifestyle changes, yet the healthcare system often focuses on symptom management rather than finding cures. This has led to a pharmaceutical monopoly, where companies profit from keeping patients dependent on their medications.
Understanding this truth about big pharma can help us make better health decisions. Prevention, rather than long-term medication, should be a priority for healthcare. It’s time to take control of our health and make informed choices.

The secret to living to 100? HIGH CHOLESTEROL!

A massive Swedish study tracking over 800,000 people for 35 years just revealed: Every single centenarian had HIGH total cholesterol. The higher your LDL, the longer you live.

Cholesterol is needed for life.
Mitochondria depend on cholesterol.
Sex hormones depend on cholesterol.
Cholesterol helps boost immunity.

https://x.com/thehealthb0t/status/2015611639891103884?s=20

When queried, Grok supplied the following data:

The X post you’re referencing is from @thehealthb0t and discusses a Swedish study on cholesterol levels in relation to longevity, based on a video clip of an interview emphasizing cholesterol’s benefits for mitochondria, sex hormones, and immunity. While I don’t have direct access to raw, unpublished datasets from research studies (those are typically held by institutions like Karolinska Institutet for the AMORIS cohort), I can retrieve and analyze the published source material the post draws from using web tools.

The study in question is titled “Blood biomarker profiles and exceptional longevity: comparison of centenarians and non-centenarians in a 35-year follow-up of the Swedish AMORIS cohort,” published in GeroScience in 2023. It draws from the larger AMORIS (Apolipoprotein-related Mortality Risk) cohort, which originally included over 800,000 Swedish participants who had blood tests between 1985 and 1996. However, this specific analysis focused on a subset of 44,636 individuals (born 1893–1932) who were aged 64–99 at the time of their blood draws, tracking them via national registers until 2020 or death. Of these, 1,224 (mostly women) reached age 100.

Key Findings from the Study

  • Biomarkers Associated with Longevity: Centenarians tended to have lower levels of glucose, creatinine, uric acid, liver enzymes (like aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase, and lactate dehydrogenase), and total iron-binding capacity. They also had higher levels of iron and total cholesterol compared to those who didn’t reach 100.
  • Cholesterol Specifically: The study measured total cholesterol (not LDL or HDL separately). Belonging to the lowest quintile of total cholesterol was linked to a lower chance of becoming a centenarian, suggesting very low cholesterol may reduce longevity odds. However, high cholesterol didn’t directly increase the odds—it’s more that low levels were detrimental. A correction to the paper clarifies this nuance, noting the original phrasing overstated the benefits of higher levels. Differences in favorable biomarker profiles (including cholesterol) were observable from age 65 onward, potentially reflecting genetics or lifestyle factors.
  • Homogeneity Among Centenarians: Centenarians showed relatively consistent biomarker profiles overall, with two subgroups identified via cluster analysis: one with slightly higher nutrition-related markers (like total cholesterol and albumin) and another with lower but still adequate levels.

How This Relates to the X Post

The post’s claims—like “every single centenarian had HIGH total cholesterol” and “the higher your LDL, the longer you live”—aren’t fully supported. The study didn’t find universal high cholesterol among centenarians (just higher on average in some contexts), and it didn’t assess LDL at all. The video in the post aligns with broader discussions on cholesterol’s role in health but extrapolates beyond the data.

Broader Context and Critiques

This topic is debated in health circles, with some viewing high cholesterol as protective in old age (e.g., aiding immunity or as a marker of metabolic stability). Others point out limitations like survivorship bias (the study only includes people who survived to have blood tests in mid-to-late life) or that correlation doesn’t mean causation—higher cholesterol might just reflect people predisposed to longevity rather than causing it. For instance, cross-sectional studies on centenarians sometimes show lower cholesterol overall, and clinical guidelines still warn against high levels due to cardiovascular risks in younger adults. One analysis notes the findings contradict some prior research but could highlight age-specific effects.

If you’re after more details on the full AMORIS dataset or related studies, let me know—I can dig deeper. Always chat with a doc for personal health advice, as this is observational data, not prescriptive.

 

A Deep Dive Into Butyrate — Your Gut’s Powerhouse Molecule

Butyrate Strengthens Gut

  • Butyrate is a short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) produced by gut bacteria that ferment dietary fiber. It serves as essential fuel for colon cells and maintaining overall systemic health
  • Adequate fiber intake — around 30 grams daily — is crucial for butyrate production. Without it, your body burns stored fat and protein, creating disease-causing byproducts
  • Butyrate strengthens your gut barrier, preventing intestinal permeability that allows harmful substances to enter the bloodstream and trigger autoimmune responses
  • Research shows butyrate improves insulin sensitivity, reduces diabetes risk, lowers bad cholesterol, prevents colorectal cancer, and supports brain health
  • Boost butyrate by eating fiber-rich foods, resistant starches, fermented foods and probiotics, while avoiding processed foods, managing stress, and limiting unnecessary antibiotics

Source: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2026/01/19/deep-dive-into-butyrate-guts-powerhouse-molecule.aspx

From An Ad On Facebook

Silver isn’t precious because it’s rare.

Or beautiful.

Or even valuable as currency.

Ancient civilizations from Egypt to China prized silver for one specific reason modern medicine refuses to acknowledge…

It healed wounds nothing else could touch.

For 5,000 years, every major civilization on Earth treated silver like it had supernatural healing powers.

Ancient Egyptians stored water in silver vessels and noticed it stayed fresh for months.

Greek physicians wrapped wounds in silver-lined cloth.

Chinese medicine used silver needles believing they “balanced the body’s energy.”

Medieval royalty ate with silver utensils and drank from silver cups… not for status, but because they genuinely lived longer than everyone else.

Nobody understood WHY silver worked.

They just knew it did.

Fast forward to the 1800s.

Doctors started running experiments.

They published findings in medical journals showing silver prevented infections, accelerated wound healing, and stopped inflammation nothing else could touch.

By the early 1900s, silver solutions were standard in every hospital.

Surgeons used it.

Burn units used it.

Maternity wards used it.

One doctor wrote in 1919:

“Silver has saved more lives in this hospital than any drug we possess. Its ability to prevent infection is unmatched.”

Then suddenly… the research stopped.

Not because silver stopped working.

Because pharmaceutical companies realized they couldn’t patent a 5,000-year-old metal.

Antibiotics could be patented. Pills could be sold for billions.

So silver was systematically removed from medical education.

Erased from textbooks.

Declared “outdated” and “unscientific.”

But here’s what they couldn’t erase…

Silver’s electron-conducting properties.

Modern science has now confirmed what ancient healers instinctively knew.

When silver makes contact with your skin, it conducts electrons directly into damaged tissue.

Those electrons neutralize the free radicals causing inflammation.

They activate cellular repair mechanisms.

They restore the electrical balance your body desperately needs to heal itself.

And here’s the part that’ll frustrate you…

Hospitals STILL use silver when nothing else works.

• Silver-coated catheters to prevent infections.

• Silver burn dressings for wounds that won’t heal.

• Silver-lined bandages for diabetic ulcers.

NASA uses silver to purify water in space.

Water treatment plants worldwide rely on silver filtration.

They know it works.

They just don’t want YOU to know.

Because if you realized you could access silver’s healing properties while you sleep…

You’d stop buying their pills.

Silver is a naturally occurring element. You can’t patent it. You can’t monopolize it.

So the research was buried.

Medical schools stopped teaching it.

And within a generation, silver’s healing properties were completely erased from public knowledge.

But modern life severed our connection to silver in another way too…

We don’t eat with silver utensils anymore.

We don’t store water in silver vessels.

We sleep on synthetic fabrics that insulate us from the Earth’s natural charge.

We’re electrically starving.

And our bodies are falling apart because of it.

So for years, researchers asked one question:

How do you restore that connection in a modern home?

The breakthrough came from combining two things most people don’t think about.

Silver threads woven into bed sheets… and a hidden feature already in your home.

That third hole in your electrical outlet that most people ignore is actually a ground port.

It connects directly to a copper rod buried in the earth outside your home.

Every house has one. It’s required by building code.

Here’s where it gets interesting…

The same conductive silver those 1800s doctors used can be woven directly into fabric.

Connect that fabric to the ground port, and suddenly your bed becomes electrically connected to the Earth.

Sleep on it, and your body grounds all night long… exactly like those hospital patients decades ago.

But with one crucial advantage.

The silver threading conducts electrons FROM the Earth… directly through your skin… into damaged tissue.

Eight hours of electron transfer. Every single night.

I saw this firsthand with a patient I’ll never forget.

Margaret was 82 years old.

She had a wound on her ankle that refused to heal for eight months.

Her doctors tried everything. Antibiotics. Topical treatments. Specialized dressings.

Nothing worked.

They were talking about amputation.

I gave her a silver-threaded grounding sheet and told her to sleep on it every night.

Two weeks later, Margaret came back for a follow-up.

The wound was closing.

Not slowly. Rapidly.

Her doctor was stunned.

Four weeks after that, the wound was completely healed.

No amputation. No surgery. No fancy drugs.

Just eight hours a night of silver-conducted electrons flooding into damaged tissue.

Margaret’s still using that sheet today. She’s 86 now.

And she hasn’t had a single wound issue since.

Grok’s reply to my question about it:
The text you shared appears to be a promotional narrative (likely for silver-threaded grounding sheets) that mixes some historical and scientific facts about silver’s antimicrobial properties with unsubstantiated or exaggerated claims, particularly around a supposed pharmaceutical “suppression” and the healing powers of combining silver fabric with electrical grounding (earthing).

Here’s a balanced breakdown based on reliable sources:

Historical and Medical Uses of Silver

True parts: Silver has been used for thousands of years for its antimicrobial effects. Ancient civilizations (e.g., Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Persians) stored water in silver vessels to keep it fresh and applied silver to wounds. Hippocrates wrote about its healing properties. In the 19th–early 20th century, silver compounds (like silver nitrate and colloidal silver) were widely used in medicine for infections, wound care, eye drops (to prevent newborn blindness), and burns.

By the early 1900s, colloidal silver was common before antibiotics arrived in the 1940s.

Modern use: Silver is still used topically in hospitals—e.g., silver-coated catheters reduce infections, silver dressings (like Acticoat or silver sulfadiazine cream) help with burns and chronic wounds (e.g., diabetic ulcers) by releasing silver ions that kill bacteria. NASA did develop silver ionization for water purification in Apollo missions and beyond.

Not suppressed for patents: Silver declined because penicillin and modern antibiotics were more effective, safer for internal use, and patentable (leading to profits). But silver wasn’t “erased”—it’s still standard in specific topical applications where it works well against resistant bacteria.

Risks of Colloidal Silver (Internal Use)

The FDA has warned since 1999 that oral colloidal silver is not safe or effective for any disease. It can cause permanent argyria (blue-gray skin discoloration), and overuse risks kidney/liver/neurological damage. No evidence supports broad “healing” claims like balancing energy or neutralizing free radicals systemically.

Grounding/Earthing Claims

Earthing (direct contact with the Earth or via conductive sheets/mats plugged into a grounded outlet’s third port) has some preliminary research: Small studies suggest it may reduce inflammation, improve sleep, lower stress/cortisol, and speed wound healing by transferring electrons to neutralize free radicals.

However, evidence is limited—mostly small, sometimes industry-funded studies. Experts (e.g., Cleveland Clinic, WebMD) say it’s safe for most but not proven to cure or dramatically heal chronic conditions. No large-scale RCTs confirm major benefits.

Silver-Threaded Grounding Sheets Specifically

These products weave silver threads for conductivity and connect to the outlet’s ground port (which links to Earth’s charge via building codes).

Claims in the text (e.g., rapid healing of non-healing wounds like Margaret’s story, “electron transfer” fixing inflammation overnight) are anecdotal and not backed by robust evidence. No high-quality studies show these sheets outperform plain grounding mats or provide “supernatural” healing via silver + grounding combo.

Silver in fabric adds conductivity (and some antimicrobial benefit to the sheet itself), but the dramatic wound-healing stories sound like marketing hype. Topical silver dressings work locally on wounds; sleeping on silver threads doesn’t deliver therapeutic silver ions systemically or directly to distant tissues.

In summary, silver has legitimate antimicrobial history and niche modern uses (topical only—avoid ingesting colloidal forms). Grounding shows promise for minor benefits like better sleep or reduced inflammation but isn’t a miracle cure. The product’s pitch overstates both, blending facts with unproven ideas (e.g., Big Pharma conspiracy, electrical “starvation” causing disease).

If you’re curious about trying grounding for sleep/stress, a basic mat (without silver) is cheaper and has similar (limited) evidence. For wound issues, consult a doctor—proven treatments like medical-grade silver dressings exist if needed.

Toxic chemicals in food cost the world $3 trillion a year, new report finds

Fast Food Poison

Four groups of chemicals in the global food system cost the world nearly $3 trillion a year by causing disease, decreasing fertility and polluting water and soil, according to a new report.

The report, authored by the sustainability consultancy and investment firm Systemiq, finds that phthalates, bisphenols, pesticides and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are key threats to human health.

The researchers said the available evidence on human exposure and associated health risks from those four groups of chemicals show risks that include heart issues, cancers, reproductive, developmental and immune system disorders, birth defects and endocrine disruption — creating estimated health care costs between $1.4 and $2.2 trillion each year. They estimated an additional $640 billion is spent each year due to water quality issues and agricultural losses.

Source: https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/food-cooking/toxic-chemicals-in-food-cost-the-world-3-trillion-a-year-new-report-finds/

Veda Austin on Water Memory Freezing Experiment & The DANGERS of Tap Water

Veda Austin On Water

Veda Austin is a visionary water researcher, artist, and speaker who sees water as more than just a resource—it’s the fluid intelligence of the universe, observing itself through all life. For over a decade, she has captured stunning crystallographic images of water in its ‘state of creation,’ revealing how it reflects thought, intention, and the essence of life. Veda’s work brings a profound message of unity and reverence, inspiring a deeper connection to the sacred nature of water, whether through her art, teachings, or public speaking.

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deHXNhDydvs

Exposing The Cholesterol/Statin Myth

Eye-opening interview with Dr. Sarah Myhill exposing the cholesterol myth! “Statins are not rooted in research or science. They are rooted in propaganda.”

Cholesterol is ESSENTIAL—your body needs it for hormones, vitamin D, cell membranes, brain function, and more. It’s not the villain we’ve been sold.

Statins? They block vital pathways (like CoQ10 production), leading to muscle pain, fatigue, accelerated aging, and mitochondrial damage—while the ‘benefits’ are overhyped and not commensurate with cholesterol reduction alone. The trillion-dollar statin empire thrives on fear, not facts.

Time to rethink heart health: focus on real causes like inflammation, poor diet, and mitochondrial dysfunction—not aggressively lowering a natural, life-sustaining substance.

Share this vital information with family & friends who are taking harmful statin drugs. Bookmark for future sharing!

View: https://x.com/ValerieAnne1970/status/2012872601744605440?s=20

Biphasic or Segmented Sleep

Once, men and women did not sleep as we do now. The notion of “eight hours straight” was foreign. In the Middle Ages, the night unfolded in two distinct breaths: the first sleep and the second sleep.

As the sun dipped below the horizon and the sky turned to dark velvet, people would retire early, surrendering to the hush of night. After four or five hours, their eyes would open—not from anxiety or disruption, but from rhythm. This pause in the night was a quiet, secret world.

By candlelight, they prayed, leafed through worn books, or sipped spiced wine. Some crossed the street to knock on a neighbor’s door, while others lingered in the kitchen, telling stories to their children, hands wrapped around warm cups. It was the heart of the night, and yet life moved gently—intimate, unhurried, profound.

When the invisible clock of darkness signaled, they returned to bed. The second sleep carried them to dawn, when the rooster’s crow marked the beginning of the day.

For centuries, this was the rhythm of rest—recorded in diaries, stories, even medical manuals. But the 19th century arrived with street lamps, factories, and the clamor of urban life. The middle hours of the night lost their enchantment, and people began to sleep “all in one go.”

By the 20th century, the memory of segmented sleep had faded. What was once a natural rhythm became misunderstood. Today, we might call it insomnia.

Then… it was simply the most human way to live in harmony with the night.

Grok’s reply to my question to verify the data:

Yeah, that description you’ve shared is a pretty spot-on summary of a well-known historical sleep pattern called segmented sleep (or biphasic sleep). It’s not a myth—there’s solid evidence supporting it, though it’s mainly tied to pre-industrial Western societies rather than being a universal human norm across all times and places.

The key researcher behind this is historian A. Roger Ekirch from Virginia Tech. In his book ‘At Day’s Close: Night in Times Past’ (2005) and earlier papers, he uncovered over 500 references to “first sleep” (or equivalents like ‘premier sommeil’ in French or ‘primo sonno’ in Italian) and “second sleep” in sources spanning from ancient times (e.g., Homer’s ‘Odyssey’, Virgil, Livy) through the Middle Ages and into the early modern era. These show up in diaries, medical texts, literature, court records, and even prayer books.

People would typically:
– Go to bed a couple of hours after dusk (around 9–10 PM).
– Sleep for 3–5 hours (“first sleep”).
– Wake naturally around midnight for 1–2 hours (the “watch” or waking period)—a time for prayer, reading, reflection, conversation, sex, or even visiting neighbours.
– Then drift off for “second sleep” until dawn.

This was described casually, as if everyone knew it was normal—no hint it was seen as insomnia. Activities during the wakeful period were often calm and intimate, just like your text describes.

The shift away from this happened gradually in the 19th century, driven by the Industrial Revolution: artificial lighting (gas, then electric), factory schedules, urban life, and a cultural push for productivity made consolidated 8-hour blocks the new “normal.” By the 20th century, waking in the middle of the night started being viewed as a problem.

That said, it’s not entirely undisputed:
– Some critics argue the evidence shows it was common but not universally practiced—even in Europe, sleep varied by class, season, or individual.
– Studies of non-Western pre-industrial groups (e.g., hunter-gatherers in equatorial regions) often show single-block sleep, suggesting segmented sleep might have been more typical in temperate Europe with longer winter nights.
– Modern experiments (like Thomas Wehr’s in the 1990s) found people in dark conditions can shift to segmented patterns, but it’s not proven “better”—total sleep time and quality matter most.

Today, many with middle-of-night wakefulness find comfort knowing it’s an echo of this old pattern, not necessarily a disorder. If it happens to you and you’re getting enough total rest (7–9 hours), it might just be your body’s rhythm.

Solid historical fact with strong backing, especially for medieval and early modern Europe. Cheers for the interesting question!