Rice, Arsenic and Starch. Hold On A Minute…

Soaking Rice

I saw this meme and thought to query the data. This is what ChatGPT returned:
Soaking rice for 30 minutes before cooking can remove some surface starch and a small amount of arsenic, but the two effects are quite different.

1. Arsenic removal

Rice absorbs arsenic from the soil and water in which it grows. Much of this arsenic is inorganic arsenic, the form of greatest concern for human health.
– A 30-minute soak may remove some arsenic, particularly arsenic on or near the surface of the grain.
– However, it is not particularly effective at removing arsenic contained within the grain.
– Rinsing the rice several times before cooking can help, but the reduction is generally modest.

2. Starch removal

Here the answer is more positive.
– Soaking allows some loose surface starch to enter the water.
– Discarding that water and rinsing the rice removes the suspended starch.
– This can reduce the cloudy water and, to some extent, the stickiness of the cooked rice.
– However, most of the starch remains inside the grain.
Research suggests that washing alone does not necessarily make a significant difference to the texture of cooked rice.

3. What is the most effective way to reduce arsenic?

The best-established household method is to cook rice in excess water, much as you would pasta, and drain it afterwards.

Method Arsenic reduction
Ordinary rinsing Generally small
30-minute cold soak Some reduction, variable
Cook in 6–10 parts water to 1 part rice, then drain Approximately 40–60%

The figures for excess-water cooking come from FDA research.

There is also an interesting alternative: USDA research found that soaking white rice for 10 minutes in water at 80°C, using ten parts water to one part rice, removed an average of approximately 38% of inorganic arsenic.

My recommendation

If your objective is to reduce both arsenic and surface starch, I would:
1. Rinse the rice thoroughly.
2. Soak for 30 minutes in plenty of fresh water.
3. Discard the soaking water.
4. Cook in excess fresh water.
5. Drain when cooked.
One qualification: cooking in excess water also removes some water-soluble nutrients, particularly B vitamins and iron from enriched white rice.

Finally, I wouldn’t become overly concerned about rice consumption. Varying your grains rather than relying heavily on rice is a sensible way to reduce long-term exposure to arsenic.

The Great Gold Heist

The Great Gold Heist

In 1933, owning gold in America became a crime. ??
Here’s how Roosevelt quietly robbed every saver in the country:
1 April 1933: Executive Order 6102 forces Americans to turn in their gold at $20.67 an ounce. Refuse, and you’re facing fines or prison.
2 January 1934: Once Washington has the gold, FDR reprices it to $35 with a signature.

Gold jumped 69% overnight. The dollar in your pocket lost 41% of its backing. The government pocketed roughly $2.8 billion, and the people who handed over their gold got nothing extra.

That’s the dirty secret of inflation. Whoever gets the new money first wins. Everyone holding dollars pays for it. In 1934, Washington got it first, and our great-grandparents paid.

Devaluation is taxation without a vote.

And it never stopped. Your dollar has lost more than 95% of its purchasing power since then. Same trick, slower pace.

Share this with someone who thinks their savings are “safe” in dollars.

Are Americans Finally Getting Smarter About Supplements?

Vitamin Capsules

Dr Mercola writes:
Americans are becoming more selective about supplements, shifting away from broad multivitamins and toward individual nutrients that match specific health goals, but choosing targeted products only benefits you when they address a genuine nutritional need.

Vitamin D, zinc and several other individual nutrients showed some of the largest increases in use over the past 25 years, reflecting a growing interest in personalized nutrition instead of one-size-fits-all supplementation.

The study tracked which supplements Americans buy, not whether those products improve health, making it important to base your decisions on high-quality scientific evidence rather than popularity or marketing claims.

Food remains the best source of most nutrients, with sensible sun exposure serving as the ideal source of vitamin D, while targeted supplements help fill important gaps that modern diets often leave behind, such as magnesium.

A simple supplement routine built around your daily meals is easier to maintain over the long term than juggling multiple bottles and complicated schedules, making it more likely you’ll consistently receive the nutrients your body needs.

(Tom: This seems to contradict

Finish reading: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2026/11/03/targeted-supplements-personalized-nutrition.aspx

Cowardice, Confront, Communication and Courage

Cowardice is not so much a label as it is an operating basis. One of not looking and not saying.

There are a thousand levels of cowardice. It’s probably accurate, if unpalatable, to say the vast majority of us lack courage to some degree in some area.

The descent down the scale from courage to cowardice started the first time we decided something was too horrible to be faced.

So we looked away.

We did not fully confront it.

Not being able to face it, we fell out of communication with it.

Do that enough times over enough areas and we fall well and truly out of communication with life generally and, as a result, have more and more problems.

Welcome to the human condition.

Is there a road back from this?

Yes, there is.

The first step is to recognise that there is something that could be improved and that improvement is desirable. To what end?

Well, let’s look at the most desirable condition. That would be where we are willing to look at anything, observe it fully enough to see it accurately for what it is, correctly label it and, if appropriate, to communicate honestly to it or about it, regardless of vested interest, potential gain or loss.

That’s a pretty star high level of confront, courage and personal integrity.

So how do we move from where we are towards that star high level we identified?

The cheaper, potentially easier beginning, is to start noticing the things that we formerly did not confront and start looking at those things more fully. Then do this more and more, to a deeper degree over a wider range of activities.

An easy selector for something to confront is to make a list of areas where you are having trouble. If you are having trouble with an area that is the clearest sign possible that the area is not being confronted and you are, to a greater or lessor degree, out of communication with it.

For that with which you fully confront you perceive accurately.

Perceiving it accurately, you are in communication with it.

Being in communication with it means you can solve problems associated with it.

The other, more complete handling, is to do a course that teaches the theory of communication then do the practical drills that:
-improve your ability to be here, in present time,
-enable you to confront the environment without discomfort,
-enable you to confront the person in front of you,
-enable you to confront anything the person in front of you says to break your confront.

The subsequent practical drills then ratchet up your skill in the various parts of the communication formula.

The end result of the course is a person much better in communication with their environment and the people in it.

My eldest grandson did it in grade school and by the time he was half way through high scool he was the leader of his high school debating team.

If you would like an increase in your confront, courage or communication skill, let me know. Happy to point you in the right direction.

Tom Grimshaw
tom@tomgrimshaw.com

Grace Slick

Grace Slick

She was Grace Barnett Wing — a name that sounds like it belongs on a society page, not a rock concert stage.

In 1961, it did. She grew up the daughter of an investment banker and a former singer, raised in the comfortable suburbs of Northern California in a household she later described, with characteristic bluntness, as straight out of a television sitcom. She attended Finch College in New York — a finishing school — studied art briefly at the University of Miami, married a filmmaker named Jerry Slick, and settled into the life that had been implied by her upbringing: a model in San Francisco, representing designers wearing beautiful clothes for people who could afford them.

It was not interesting to her.

In August 1965, she read an article in the San Francisco Chronicle about a local band called Jefferson Airplane. She went to see them play. Standing in a small club on a weeknight, watching this group of musicians from the same city she lived in, she decided — in the way people only occasionally do — that she could do that.

Not might. Not wanted to. Could.

She formed her own band, The Great Society, with her husband and a small group of musicians. This was 1965 — the year Bob Dylan went electric at Newport, the year the Rolling Stones released Satisfaction, the year American music was being taken apart by people who had decided the old arrangements were not going to hold.

Grace Slick was one of those people. And she had a song.

She wrote “White Rabbit” in approximately one sitting — a psychedelic piece built on a bolero rhythm and the internal logic of Lewis Carroll, in which the events of Alice in Wonderland became a map for a generation that had decided to follow the rabbit wherever it led. The song builds from a whisper to a command. When she sang it, her voice did something that very few voices in rock history have managed — it didn’t just carry the melody, it embodied the menace and the invitation at the same time.

When Jefferson Airplane’s original female vocalist, Signe Anderson, left the band in 1966 to start a family, they invited Grace Slick to join them. She brought two songs with her: “White Rabbit,” which she had written, and “Somebody to Love,” written by her brother-in-law Darby Slick, which she had already been performing.

Both became top-ten hits. Jefferson Airplane’s 1967 album Surrealistic Pillow put the band at the center of the San Francisco psychedelic scene and made Grace Slick one of the most recognizable voices in American music.

This was the Summer of Love. San Francisco’s Haight-Ashbury district had become the center of a generational shift that had no single name but enormous momentum — a renegotiation of how young people understood authority, identity, and what a life was supposed to look like. Grace Slick, who had attended finishing school and modeled designer clothes for wealthy shoppers not three years before, was now its voice.

She performed at Woodstock in August 1969 — not at a sensible hour but in the early hours of a Sunday morning, after rain and chaos had pushed the schedule overnight. Jefferson Airplane took the stage as dawn broke over nearly half a million people, and she sang “White Rabbit” to the largest audience any of them had ever seen.

The song had been written in a single hour, in 1965, by a former department store model.

For three decades, Grace Slick remained one of the most distinctive figures in rock — through Jefferson Airplane, Jefferson Starship, and Starship, across bands that changed their names and sounds as the decades turned but always kept her voice at the center. When she finally retired from music in 1990, she was fifty years old.

She picked up a paintbrush.

Her painting career began in the mid-1990s — portraits of the musicians she had shared stages with: Jerry Garcia, Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix. Scenes from Woodstock. White rabbits. The imagery that had defined her music found a new form on canvas. She has said painting and music come from the same part of the brain. Only painting, she noted, is quieter.

In 1996, she was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame as a member of Jefferson Airplane.

She turned 87 yesterday.

She started as Grace Barnett Wing — a finishing-school girl with a modelling job she found boring. She became Grace Slick, a voice that helped define one of the most turbulent and creative decades in American cultural history. And then, quietly, she became a painter.

She wrote her most famous song in an hour. She spent the rest of her life proving that the rabbit hole goes far deeper than any single song.

Alexey and the Routers

Alexey and the Routers

In 2018, MikroTik, a Latvian maker of networking gear, was dealing with a serious security flaw in its routers. A fix existed, but tens of thousands of devices around the world were still running old software, and criminal botnets were scanning the internet for them.

Once inside, the attackers put the routers to work mining cryptocurrency and joining coordinated attacks, often without the owners having any idea. A security expert who used the name Alexey watched this happen and decided the owners weren’t going to patch the problem fast enough on their own.

So he wrote an automated script that went looking for the same vulnerable routers, logged into them through the same weakness and changed each one’s firewall rules to block the ports the attackers were using. He didn’t look at anyone’s data, harvest passwords or install software of his own. Before leaving each device he left a brief note explaining the change and urging the owner to update.

Alexey said his only goal was to protect ordinary internet users, but what he’d done was still unauthorized access to other people’s equipment. The episode split the security world, with some praising him as a digital vigilante and others arguing that breaking into someone’s device without permission is wrong whatever the motive.