In 2017 The German Federal Supreme Court ruled “Viruses Do Not Cause Diseases and Vaccines are Not Effective.”

Dr Stefan Lanka

Even up to this day, there is still no scientific evidence that vaccines are effective against the so-called “viruses”. The reason why this claim has no solid scientific basis is that there is no proof that these biological agents what they call “viruses” cause diseases in the first place.

In 2001, a German molecular biologist Dr Stefan Lanka and his colleague, Karl Krafeld, wrote a book entitled “Impfen – Völkermord im dritten Jahrtausend?” (Vaccination – Genocide in the third millennium?) in which they claim that this is the case.

Microbiologist and virologist, Dr Stefan Lanka, offered a $100,000 (Euro) reward for anyone who could prove that a measles virus exists.

He was taken to court by those wanting to claim the reward. A lower court ruled against Dr Lanka so he appealed to a higher court, the German Federal Supreme Court.

The higher court appointed five experts to help review the evidence – the scientific studies. These five experts, one named Prof. Dr. Andreas Podbielski, “consistently found that none of the six publications which were introduced to the trial contains scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus.”

This was confirmed independently by two recognized German laboratories, including the world’s largest and leading genetic institute, proving that “the authors of the six publications in the measles virus case were wrong, and as a direct result all measles virologists are still wrong today”.

In 2017 after reviewing the evidence and hearing the testimony of the expert witnesses the German Federal Supreme Court made a final decision agreeing that there wasn’t enough evidence to support that the “measles virus” existed.

During the “measles virus trial”, the head of the National Reference Institute for Measles at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Dr. Annette Mankertz, admitted an important fact that “may explain the increased rate of vaccination-induced disabilities, namely of vaccination against measles, and why and how specifically this kind of vaccination seems to increasingly trigger autism”.

A Note From Robert F Kennedy Jr To You

Robert F Kennedy Jr

To all who have vaccinated their babies, and to all who haven’t yet…..

Read this.

Then read it again.

“I’m currently litigating against the four companies that make all 72 vaccines currently mandated for American children via CDC recommendations.

All four of these companies are convicted felons who have paid $35 billion since 2009 for lying to and defrauding regulators and doctors in order to promote their pharmaceutical products.

Our trial team coalition includes the country’s largest plaintiffs firms – all of them veterans of the Monsanto litigation. These firms have won the largest pharmaceutical cases in history. It’s not surprising that we have uncovered proof that the four Vaccine makers’ fraudulent and reckless conduct with their other pharmaceutical products pales in comparison to their crimes in testing, manufacturing, and marketing vaccines, since, in this arena alone, they are immune from liability.

We can now show with scientific certainty that certain vaccines- DTap, DTP, Hep B- are killing and injuring far more children than were ever harmed by the diseases they are marketed to prevent. This information will soon be public.

It would be good for you to see it before you mandate these shots for children.

I’m happy to share it in person with you and your staff and whatever experts you choose to include.”


Robert F Kennedy Jr.”

While the latest research suggests that antibodies against Covid-19 could be lost in just three months, a new hope has appeared on the horizon: the enigmatic T cell.

Biology Researchers

Tommy Wells writes:

This article should’ve been entitled: “we screwed up immunology for the past 7 decades by focusing solely on antibodies, (so we could sell billions of dollars worth of vaccines) but now we’ve been forced to spill the beans about what constitutes real immunity.”

Then there was this little tidbit:
“ When researchers tested blood samples taken years before the pandemic started, they found T cells which were specifically tailored to detect proteins on the surface of Covid-19.”

Errrr…how could that be for a brand new “novel” virus that was supposedly created in some bats recently?? Yet another little factoid that doesn’t fit in with their little made-up story.

Sunshine, selenium and vitamin C are the answers. Plus some good food choices and exercise. This is what activates and invigorates the T cells and your system as a whole. Give them enough time and science eventually gets caught up with what the “alternative” crowd has been saying for the past several decades.

(Tom: This piece of the jigsaw puzzle explains why so many are completely unaffected by COVID-19 and why it hits the older folks harder.

I have read elsewhere that antibodies are not necessary for the body to mount an effective defense against a pathogen, that people had been observed who did not succumb to other illnesses yet had no antibodies to that pathogen.

Considering the whole thrust of a vaccination is to force the body to create antibodies to the pathogen causing the illness against which they seek to protect, this discovery effectively pulls the rug out from underneath that strategy.

It also adds credence to the viewpoint that it is not the pathogen that is the problem, it is the environment of the body – whether or not the body is in a sufficiently high state of operation that it can easily defeat pathogens.)

The article:

Flu Shot Data

The ingredients in vaccines compromise your body’s immune system. Do your homework before you accept any vaccine for you or your loved ones. Here is a starting point:

Truth to Power – Could COVID-19 Have Escaped from a Lab?

Alina Chan

(Tom: This is a great read about a scientist-turned-detective with a level of ethics that matches her competence in biology. Well worth the read! Executive summary: The seafood-market theory, which Chinese health officials and the World Health Organization espoused in the early days of the pandemic, was wrong. The virus was lab engineered.)

“There’s long been a sense that if the public and politicians really knew about the dangerous pathogen research being conducted in many laboratories, they’d be outraged. Denying the possibility of a catastrophic incident like this, then, could be seen as a form of career preservation [for scientists]. ‘For the substantial subset of virologists who perform gain-of-function research,’ Richard Ebright, a Rutgers microbiologist and another founding member of the Cambridge Working Group, told me, ‘avoiding restrictions on research funding, avoiding implementation of appropriate biosafety standards, and avoiding implementation of appropriate research oversight are powerful motivators. Antonio Regalado, biomedicine editor of MIT Technology Review, put it more bluntly. If it turned out COVID-19 came from a lab, he tweeted, ‘it would shatter the scientific edifice top to bottom.’”

Finish reading:

Flu Shot = Fatal Infection

Flu Shot = Fatal Infection

In 1972, Dr. John Anthony Morris reported his research findings on the influenza vaccine to his superiors at the FDA. A distinguished doctor and government researcher, Dr. Morris had been comissioned 13 years earlier to scientifically justify the FDA’s plans to widely expand the flu vaccination program.

To his expectant audience, however, his results were thoroughly disappointing. Dr. Morris reported that the flu shot provided no measurable net benefit, in part because the injected product failed to stimulate antibody production in the lungs, thus allowing for viral replication in this sensitive area.

It was later realized that the lack of benefit also derives from the flu shot’s ability to increase vulnerability to viruses not covered in the shot, including unmatched strains of flu and different respiratory viruses dangerous in their own right.

Dr. Morris’ finding of no net benefit of the influenza vaccine has been repeatedly verified with contemporary data, including a study by Simonsen et al. (2005) that found that the large increase in flu vaccination of the elderly between 1980 and 2001 failed to decrease flu season mortality, and a study in Britain which found that the vast increase in flu shot uptake by those who had just turned 65 (vs. those who were just a bit younger) provided no decline in hospitalizations or deaths.

Important data on flu-shot coverages & C0VID mortality: