HUNDREDS of studies now indicate COVID-19 “vaccines” are one of the LARGEST carcinogenic exposures in modern history.
They:
1. Increase your risk of 7 major cancers
2. Disrupt THOUSANDS of critical genes
3. Integrate into human genomes
4. Drive genome instability
5. Enable tumor immune escape
6. Suppress DNA repair mechanisms
7. Drive chronic inflammation
8. Cause immune dysregulation (?T-cells, type I IFN)
9. Disrupt microRNA networks controlling growth/apoptosis
10. Activate oncogenic signaling (MAPK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR)
11. Remodel the tumor microenvironment
12. Reactivate dormant cancers
13. Block innate immune sensing (TLR inhibition)
14. Produce aberrant proteins (frameshift errors)
15. Induce immune exhaustion
16. Promote IgG4 class switching
17. Contain plasmid DNA including SV40
18. Disrupt RAS signaling – oxidative stress + proliferation
19. Damage the microbiome(loss of immune balance)
20. Increase treatment resistance
To view the video: https://substack.com/@stopthoseshots/note/c-206844481
Quote of the Day
“Just don’t give up trying to do what you really want to do. Where there is love and inspiration, I don’t think you can go wrong.” – Ella Fitzgerald, Singer (1917 – 1996)
Quote of the Day
“Having once decided to achieve a certain task, achieve it at all costs of tedium and distaste. The gain in self confidence of having accomplished a tiresome labor is immense.” – Arthur Helps, Historian (1813 – 1875)
Dr Jared Cooney Horvath on Learning
Some highly relevant data on the necessity to keep computers out of classrooms to boost IQ and cognitive ability.
Watch video: https://www.facebook.com/reel/2439219126535973
Lion’s Mane Mushroom
(Tom: I just received this advertisement for one of the hundreds of ingredients in my Greens Plus formula. I also include Lion’s Mane Mushroom in my Anti-Cancer, Anti-Spike, Diabetes, DNA/Heart/Mitochiondria, Immune and Memory Blends. View the range here: https://www.greenspowders.com.au )
Feel like you’re not as sharp, quick, or energetic as you used to be?
There’s something simple and delicious that you can eat daily to protect and even improve your brain’s health and function as you get older:
Australian scientists have discovered a “brain growth compound” in a delicious food that can help you grow, repair, and rewire your brain.
This “brain-growth compound” boosts neuroplasticity…
Supporting your brain’s ability to grow, repair, and rewire itself well into old age!
It’s found in a superfood that is going viral online right now.
Here are just a few of the amazing discoveries about this “brain-growth compound”:
A 2020 study showed that those in the early stages of cognitive decline taking this brain-growth compound daily saw an increase in brain function within just 4 months.
A 2019 study found that adults taking this brain-growth compound saw significant improvements in cognitive functions like memory and learning and protection from brain cell deterioration.
Research from 2012 showed that taking this brain-growth compound could actually regenerate damaged brain cells.
Multiple studies have shown an improvement in Alzheimer’s Disease symptoms following supplementation with this brain-growth compound.
A 2019 study showed that taking this brain-growth compound daily decreased depression and anxiety, increased sleep quality, and boosted levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) – a protein responsible for producing and protecting neurons.
Research from 2023 found that this brain-growth compound contains nutrients that can improve neuron growth and boost neurotrophic activity in the brain, resulting in enhanced memory formation.
Research also indicates that this brain-growth compound increases “neurite outgrowth,” which refers to the formation of the more complex areas of a brain cell. This means stronger, more resilient, and longer-lasting brain cells.
Pretty amazing, right?
There’s just one problem:
Although this “brain-growth compound” is so effective for a sharp memory and a fast-acting brain…
Most people (especially seniors) don’t get it in their diet.
Why?
Most people DO NOT eat the superfood that contains the largest amounts of this active brain compound.
Fortunately, it’s shockingly easy to get this long-forgotten brain-growth compound into your diet…
It… …works quickly to improve your ability to…
Remember recent events, names, and appointments
Multitask, pivot mentally and react quickly to things on the fly
Maintain focus on tasks, especially complex ones
Plan, organize, problem-solve, and make decisions better
Find the right words during conversations
Appear bright, perceptive, and intuitive to the people around you
Plus much more
It has ZERO SUGAR…
If you’re like most people, you probably eat and drink a lot of things that damage your brain over time…
This is something you can eat to protect and even improve your brain function as you get older.
RHR (Resting Heart Rate)
Just measured my RHR and found it was lower than it had been so I queried it. This was Grok’s response:
A resting heart rate (RHR) is the number of beats per minute your heart makes when you’re completely at rest (e.g., first thing in the morning, sitting quietly after waking). Your recent measurement of 50 bpm at age 73 is exceptionally low — well below the typical adult range of 60–100 bpm — and it’s a strong positive marker given your training background.
Here’s a clear breakdown of the benefits of a low RHR (especially in the 40–60 bpm range for fit older adults), based on major studies, meta-analyses, and guidelines from sources like the American Heart Association, Harvard Health, and long-term cohort research.
Key Benefits of a Low Resting Heart Rate
Stronger Cardiovascular Efficiency & Fitness
A lower RHR means your heart pumps more blood per beat (higher stroke volume), so it doesn’t have to work as hard at rest. This is a direct sign of excellent cardiorespiratory fitness — the heart muscle is stronger and more efficient, just like in endurance athletes.
At 50 bpm, your heart is functioning at an elite level for your age (top percentile for 70+), reflecting the impact of your consistent HIIT (Wingates/Norwegian), weighted sessions, and overall activity.
Lower Risk of Cardiovascular Events & Mortality
Numerous large studies show an inverse relationship: higher RHR is linked to increased risk of heart disease, heart failure, sudden cardiac death, and all-cause mortality.
Every 10 bpm increase above ~60–70 bpm often raises all-cause mortality risk by ~8–13% and cardiovascular mortality by ~8–17% (meta-analyses across tens of thousands of people).
In mid-life and older adults, RHR >75–80 bpm doubles or triples early death risk in some cohorts.
Conversely, lower RHR (especially under 60–70 bpm in fit individuals) is protective — associated with reduced risk of heart failure, stroke, and premature death.
Your 50 bpm puts you in the lowest-risk category for these outcomes.
Marker of Longevity & Healthspan
Across mammals (including humans), species with naturally lower RHR tend to live longer. In humans:
Lower RHR correlates with better overall lifespan and reduced age-related decline.
In very old cohorts (85–95+), lower RHR is tied to greater survival odds and preserved function (independence, cognitive health).
While extreme bradycardia (under 40–45 bpm) can sometimes signal issues (e.g., conduction problems), 50 bpm in a fit, asymptomatic person like you is a positive longevity signal, not a red flag.
Reduced “Wear and Tear” on the Heart
Fewer beats per minute over a lifetime means less mechanical stress on the heart muscle and arteries. This contributes to slower progression of atherosclerosis, lower inflammation, and better autonomic balance (higher parasympathetic tone = better recovery/stress resilience).
Other Indirect Perks
Better metabolic health (lower risk of insulin resistance, diabetes).
Improved autonomic nervous system function (more parasympathetic dominance = calmer baseline state).
Reflection of high aerobic capacity (VO2max), which is one of the strongest predictors of longevity and reduced frailty in older adults.
Important Caveats for Age 70+
Normal RHR for most older adults is 60–80–100 bpm; yours at 50 bpm is athlete-level, not “average elderly.”
Very low RHR is usually beneficial only if asymptomatic (no dizziness, fatigue, fainting, shortness of breath, or chest pain). If any symptoms appear, get checked (e.g., for conduction issues or medication effects).
In the very elderly (85–95+), the protective association with very low RHR sometimes flattens or disappears in some studies — but you’re not there yet, and your fitness context makes 50 bpm a win.
Bottom Line for You
Your 50 bpm RHR is a fantastic biomarker — it’s evidence that your training (HIIT + weighted strength + daily activity) is delivering profound cardiovascular and longevity benefits. It means your heart is efficient, resilient, and working far less hard than average at rest. Keep tracking it (morning, same conditions); sustained low RHR like this is one of the clearest signs your protocol is supporting both strength preservation and healthspan extension.
If it ever drops below ~45 bpm or you feel off, mention it to your doctor — but right now, this is a massive green flag.
Keep owning those sessions, mate. You’re building elite-level cardio resilience at 73.
— Coach Grok
(Tom: Seems like it is a very good marker to keep track of and aim to improve.)
The Story of Super Soaker from Lonnie Johnson
In 1982, a NASA engineer’s malfunctioning heat pump shot water across his bathroom and into history. Instead of cursing the mess, he saw an opportunity that would change the world of play forever.
Lonnie Johnson was a brilliant aerospace engineer working for the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. He spent his days solving complex problems for spacecraft, but his off-hours were spent in his home workshop.
He was experimenting with an environmentally friendly heat pump that used water instead of hazardous chemicals. It was a serious scientific pursuit aimed at modernizing home cooling systems.
But during a test, a high-pressure nozzle burst and sent a powerful stream of water arching across the room. The force was unlike anything available on the toy market at the time.
He watched the water hit the wall with incredible pressure. He saw the potential. He saw a way to bring high-tech physics to his own backyard.
Lonnie didn’t just see a leak. He saw the future of fun. He saw a chance to create something legendary.
However, the path from a bathroom leak to a toy store shelf was not an easy one. Lonnie took his prototype to several toy companies, only to be met with constant rejection.
For seven long years, he heard the word “no.“ Major manufacturers didn’t think parents would pay for a high-powered water gun, or they simply didn’t understand his vision.
He faced skeptics. He faced financial hurdles. He faced a market that wasn’t ready for a 2-liter soda bottle attached to PVC piping.
But he refused to give up on his invention. In 1989, he finally found a partner in a small company called Larami Corp.
The legendary meeting that sealed the deal with Larami Corp. is a piece of toy history. Lonnie Johnson didn’t just walk in with a sales pitch; he walked in with a suitcase.
When he opened that suitcase, he pulled out his homemade prototype. It was a crude-looking device made of PVC pipe, Plexiglas, and a recycled soda bottle.
He didn’t need a PowerPoint presentation. He simply pumped the handle and fired a high-powered stream of water across the boardroom.
The executives were stunned. They had never seen that kind of range or power in a handheld toy.
The toy was first released in 1990 as the “Power Drencher,“ but sales were modest. It wasn’t until a rebranding in 1991 that the world finally took notice.
Once it was renamed the Super Soaker, the gadget became a cultural phenomenon, generating $200 million in sales in just one year.
The boy who used to take apart his toys to see how they worked had now created the most successful water gun in history. His persistence turned a lab mistake into a billion-dollar legacy.
Today, Lonnie holds over 100 patents and remains a titan of American innovation. His story reminds us that sometimes, life’s biggest leaks lead to its greatest rewards.
One accidental splash changed the face of summer fun for generations.
Later in life, Lonnie successfully sued for $73 million in unpaid royalties from Hasbro, ensuring his financial legacy matched his creative one. He continues to use his wealth to fund research into green energy technology.
His workshop is still a place where accidents are treated as discoveries.
Sources: National Inventors Hall of Fame / Smithsonian Magazine
Robin Williams as Sy Parrish
In 2002, Robin Williams accepted the role of Sy Parrish in the psychological thriller “One Hour Photo“ released in 2002, choosing a character defined by control, repression, and moral disquiet rather than humor or sentimentality.
At that point, Williams was commercially associated with warmth, verbal speed, and emotional release. Films like “Mrs. Doubtfire“ from 1993 and “Patch Adams“ from 1998 had reinforced an expectation that his presence signaled comfort or comic relief. Audiences trusted his energy as a stabilizing force. That trust became the raw material “One Hour Photo“ quietly dismantled.
Sy Parrish operates within routines, systems, and boundaries. He works inside a corporate photo lab, follows procedural rules, and measures his value through consistency. Williams approached the role by stripping away expressive habits. His vocal choices stayed flat and controlled. Physical movement remained minimal and purposeful. Emotional information arrived through pauses, eye focus, and restraint rather than dialogue emphasis. The effect unsettled viewers who expected expressive reassurance.
Critics responded by reframing how Williams could be discussed as a performer. Reviews in publications like “The New York Times“ and “Variety“ focused on psychological accuracy rather than transformation gimmicks. The performance was not praised for shock value. It was praised for discipline. Williams demonstrated that menace could exist without volatility and that threat could be communicated through order and fixation rather than chaos.
Audience reaction followed a different path. Many viewers reported discomfort rooted in familiarity. Sy Parrish felt recognizable as a type rather than an exaggeration. That recognition challenged the audience relationship with Williams himself. His public image had trained viewers to relax when he appeared on screen. “One Hour Photo“ inverted that conditioning. The same actor now required vigilance rather than trust.
Williams spoke in interviews around the film’s release about intentional role selection. He acknowledged an interest in characters who revealed interior damage without theatrical signaling. This approach aligned with earlier dramatic work in “Dead Poets Society“ from 1989 and “Good Will Hunting“ from 1997, yet “One Hour Photo“ removed inspirational framing. There was no redemptive arc offered to reassure the viewer.
The film also altered industry assumptions about casting reliability. Studios often rely on type consistency to protect audience expectations. Williams proved that subversion could succeed without alienation. Box office performance remained modest but stable. Critical discussion extended beyond opening weekend, sustaining attention through debate rather than spectacle. The role became a reference point in casting conversations about controlled antagonists.
Importantly, the film avoided positioning Sy Parrish as monstrous through excess. The writing and direction allowed the character to exist within recognizable social systems like retail labor, corporate rules, and suburban family imagery. Williams anchored that realism by refusing emotional escalation. This choice invited viewers to confront discomfort without narrative cushioning.
Over time, “One Hour Photo“ entered discussions about actor credibility rather than reinvention. Williams did not abandon comedy. He expanded the contract he held with audiences. Viewers learned that his presence did not guarantee safety or humor. It could also signal introspection and unease.
The immediate relevance of this performance remains tied to audience literacy. Modern viewers accustomed to tonal shifts across genres often cite Sy Parrish when discussing early examples of expectation reversal executed with restraint. The role continues to function as a benchmark for psychological realism achieved through subtraction rather than intensity.
Williams did not announce this shift through publicity or controversy. He allowed the work to recalibrate perception. That recalibration changed how audiences watched him afterward, carrying a quiet alertness into every subsequent role.
Robin Williams reshaped trust between performer and audience by proving that familiar charisma could conceal credible threat, altering how viewers assess tone, intent, and safety when an actor known for warmth appears.
A Special Kind Of Freak
