Arterial Deposits

Arterial Deposits

It’s a common misconception that once calcium starts to build up in your arteries, there’s nothing you can really do about it.

Many people think it’s just a one-way street.

But what if you could support your body in a way that actually helps with this issue?

There are several natural compounds that have some really interesting research behind them.

Take allicin, for example, the phytonutrient found in garlic. Studies have shown its potential association with supporting healthy arteries.

Then there’s butyrate, a short-chain fatty acid made by your gut microbes when you feed them fiber from vegetables. It’s also been linked to supporting normal arterial function.

Lycopene, from tomatoes and other vegetables, has also shown promise in supporting the normal thickness and flexibility of artery walls. Just be sure to pair it with a healthy fat like olive oil for better absorption!

And we can’t forget omega-3s, which can help support a healthy inflammatory response in the arteries.

Vitamin K2 plays a crucial role too. It activates proteins that support where calcium goes in the body, helping to prevent its accumulation in unwanted places.

But here’s the thing… While all these natural compounds offer incredible support, there’s one underlying factor that significantly impacts all of them: insulin sensitivity.

There’s a direct relationship between normal insulin levels and healthy arteries.

Combining a low-carb eating plan, like keto, with intermittent fasting can help stabilize blood sugar levels and improve cellular insulin sensitivity.

It makes you think, doesn’t it? Our bodies are complex systems, and sometimes the biggest breakthroughs come from understanding the root causes.

If you’re dealing with fatigue, cravings, poor sleep, brain fog, or constant stress…you’re not broken. You may just be focusing on the wrong thing.

That’s why I created this 2-minute quiz. It’s designed to help you pinpoint your #1 health lever so you can fix the right thing FIRST, so everything else falls into place.

Take it now and discover which lever YOU need to fix: https://drbrg.co/3PIb9Zr

And for more on the protocol for calcified plaque in your arteries, check out this video: https://drbrg.co/4o5rFPD

Dr. Eric Berg, DC, not MD; information only.

Kennedy Starts a Push to Help Americans Quit Antidepressants

Antidepressants

Federal health agencies announced a new national effort to reduce psychiatric overprescribing, increase informed consent, and expand access to non-drug mental health approaches like psychotherapy, nutrition, and physical activity.

Investigators who reanalyzed one of the most influential antidepressant trials reported that the original success claims were heavily inflated, with corrected remission rates falling far below the widely promoted public narrative.

Long-term recovery data from the STAR*D trial painted a much bleaker picture than most patients were told, with only a small percentage of participants both improving and staying well through the full follow-up period.

Exercise improves many of the same biological systems tied to depression, including mitochondrial energy production, stress hormone regulation, blood sugar stability, and sleep quality, without many of the metabolic drawbacks linked to psychiatric medications.

Daily habits like morning sunlight exposure, strength training, stable carbohydrate intake, better sleep timing, and reducing processed foods and seed oils help restore the cellular energy production your brain requires for emotional resilience and mental clarity.

Keep reading:  https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2026/06/07/reducing-psychiatric-overprescribing.aspx

 

Natures Perfect Plan

Natures Perfect Plan

Babies are born with LOW vitamin K on purpose — it’s not a flaw. It’s God’s perfect design.

Cord blood is packed with stem cells specifically meant to repair the physical stress and micro-trauma of birth.

Low vitamin K keeps the blood naturally thin so those stem cells can flow freely and travel exactly where they’re needed — to heal tissues, support organ repair, and jumpstart the newborn’s developing systems without premature clotting getting in the way.

God made it this way so the baby’s own cord blood stem cells can circulate optimally in those critical first moments and hours.

Thin blood = maximum mobility for healing. High clotting factors right at birth would slow or trap those precious stem cells, interfering with their God-given job.

Benefits of lower vitamin K at birth (by design):
• Stem cells & cord blood: Allows unrestricted travel of hematopoietic stem cells throughout the body to repair birth trauma, reduce inflammation, and support tissue regeneration.
• Immune system: Cord blood stem cells help establish and strengthen the newborn’s naive immune system. Low vitamin K ensures they reach the bone marrow, thymus, and other sites without clotting interference.
• Neurological & organ protection: Stem cells can migrate to the brain and vital organs to protect against the oxidative stress of labor and delivery.
• Natural timing: Colostrum (that first “liquid gold”) is rich in natural vitamin K — delivered orally, slowly, and gently through breastfeeding exactly when the baby needs it. God’s perfect dose at the perfect moment.

Instead, we cut the cord early (stealing up to 30-40% of the baby’s blood volume and those vital stem cells), then inject synthetic vitamin K loaded with polysorbate 80, propylene glycol, benzyl alcohol, and sometimes aluminum — straight into an immune system that’s barely online.

Why are we “fixing” what God already designed perfectly?

Think about it before you consent.
Nature doesn’t make mistakes. God doesn’t either.
Delay cord clamping. Keep the cord blood. Trust colostrum. Respect the design.

Your baby’s body was fearfully and wonderfully made.

Finish reading: https://x.com/ValerieAnne1970/status/2063440810708959418?s=20

Healthy Soil, Healthy Brain: What a New Global Study Found

by Eric W. Dolan, PsyPost – Psychology News:

“A recent study published in Scientific Reports suggests a notable geographical link between global soil fertility and the average intelligence quotient of nations. The findings provide evidence that the nutritional quality of local soils might play an indirect role in shaping human cognitive development on a worldwide scale.

Human brain development relies heavily on adequate nutrition, particularly the intake of essential minerals and vitamins. Plants and animals absorb these nutrients from the earth, meaning human diets are deeply connected to the health of the ground beneath their feet. When soil lacks vital elements like iron, zinc, or iodine, the food grown in it tends to be nutritionally deficient. Deficiencies in these specific nutrients are known to negatively affect cognitive growth, especially in young children.

Zinc and iron are necessary for the central nervous system to build physical structures and produce the chemicals that allow brain cells to communicate. Severe or long-lasting dietary shortages can lead to persistent cognitive impairments and learning difficulties.”

The results should be interpreted as evidence that soil fertility is one potentially important environmental correlate of human intelligence rather than a dominant or exclusive determinant. Read more about this fascinating study.

Finish reading: https://organicconsumers.org/scientists-have-found-a-geospatial-link-between-soil-fertility-and-national-intelligence-scores/

Talking To Yourself

Lev Vygotsky

A Russian psychologist spent 10 years proving that the act of talking to yourself out loud is one of the most powerful cognitive tools the human brain has, and almost nobody outside his field has read the work.

His name was Lev Vygotsky.

He worked in Moscow in the 1920s and died of tuberculosis in 1934 at the age of 37. He had no laboratory, no funding, almost no English readers, and a body of work that the Soviet government suppressed for two decades after he died.

He produced the foundational theory of how human cognition actually develops, and the central piece of that theory was a behavior almost every adult is faintly embarrassed about.

Vygotsky noticed that young children talk to themselves constantly. They narrate their own actions, they argue with imaginary opponents, they instruct themselves through tasks out loud.

The dominant theory at the time, from the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget, said this was a sign of cognitive immaturity that children would eventually grow out of as they learned to think properly.

Vygotsky said the exact opposite.

He argued that this self-directed speech was the most important cognitive event in the entire developmental window, because it was the moment a child first started to use language as a tool to control their own mind. The child was not failing to think. The child was learning how to think by externalizing the process and listening to themselves do it.

He predicted that as children matured, this out-loud self-talk would not disappear. It would go underground. It would become silent inner speech, which is the running monologue every adult has inside their own head for the rest of their life.

The voice you hear when you read this sentence is the direct descendant of a four-year-old narrating their own block tower.

For 50 years almost nobody outside Russia had access to his work, and the few researchers who did pick it up could not get funding to test it. Then in the early 2000s the experiments finally started to pile up, and what they found was that Vygotsky had been right about something even more important than he knew.

The first major study came from Gary Lupyan at the University of Wisconsin and Daniel Swingley at the University of Pennsylvania in 2012. They ran a simple visual search experiment. Participants were shown 20 images at once and asked to find a specific object, like a banana or a chair. In one condition they searched silently. In the other condition they were told to say the name of the object out loud to themselves while looking for it.

The participants who spoke the target name out loud found the object significantly faster, with higher accuracy, than the participants who searched in silence. The effect was strongest when the spoken word matched a familiar object the brain already had a strong category for.

Saying the word out loud literally tuned the visual system to detect that thing better. The researchers called it the label feedback effect, and the implication was that the act of vocalizing a goal physically changes how the brain processes the world while pursuing it.

The second major study came out of the University of Michigan and Michigan State in 2017. The lead researchers were Ethan Kross and Jason Moser, and they used both EEG and fMRI to record what happens inside the brain when people talk to themselves while emotionally upset.

They asked participants to recall painful autobiographical memories and reflect on them in two different ways. Some used the first person, saying things like “why am I feeling this way.” Others used the third person, referring to themselves by their own name, saying things like “why is John feeling this way.”

The brain scans showed that the simple act of switching from first person to third person, even silently, decreased activity in the medial prefrontal cortex, the region responsible for rumination and self-referential pain. Within a single second of using their own name instead of the word I, participants showed measurably lower emotional reactivity. The shift required no extra cognitive effort. It cost the brain nothing. And it worked.

Kross described the mechanism in his interviews. Talking to yourself by name creates a small amount of psychological distance from your own experience. Your brain processes the situation more like a problem belonging to someone else, which means it can analyze it instead of drowning in it.

What Vygotsky had intuited in 1934 turned out to be even more powerful than the developmental theory he built it into. The voice you use to talk to yourself is not background noise. It is one of the most precise cognitive tools the brain has, and you can change how it works just by changing the pronoun you use.

People who talk through problems out loud are not anxious or unstable. They are running an externalized version of a process the rest of us are running silently and worse. The kindergartener narrating their block tower, the surgeon muttering through a procedure, the engineer pacing a hallway describing a bug to nobody, the athlete repeating a cue to themselves before a free throw, they are all using the same ancient mechanism that builds and steers human thought.

You can run the experiment yourself the next time you are stuck on something hard. Stop trying to solve it silently in your head. Say it out loud. Describe what you are seeing. Walk yourself through the steps as if you were explaining it to a colleague who is not in the room.

And when something genuinely upsets you, switch to your own name. Ask why this person is feeling this way, instead of why I am feeling this way.

The voice you have been told to keep quiet your entire life is one of the oldest pieces of cognitive technology you own.

Most people are still embarrassed to use it.

Finish reading: https://x.com/ihtesham2005/status/2063266105733615647?s=20

Senate Testimony on Vaccine Caused Cancer

Senate Testimony

People cleared of Cancer started relapsing – they all had been given Boosters”

“It’s simple – Boosters repress the T-Cell response.”

“Cancers went up with each Vaccine.”

Wow – The UK’s No.1 News Channel just covered testimony given in US Congress – as to why the Covid Boosters caused Cancer.

Listen to World renowned Oncologist Angus Dalgleish explain.

Click to view the video: https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/2062801301512102190?s=20

Christine Cotton

Christine Cotton

French biostatistician sounds alarm in suicide note that Covid jab given to public was vastly different from one tested in clinical trials.

‘You were administered a product for which there were absolutely no results, neither of efficacy nor of tolerance.’A French biostatistician who analyzed Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine trial data died by suicide Tuesday, leaving a message reiterating that the vaccine given to the public was not the same as the formulation submitted for testing in clinical trials.

On Tuesday, researcher Christine Cotton published a post on X relaying she would be dead by the time her message was read and imploring people to review her work exposing serious discrepancies in Pfizer’s Covid jab trial data and the version of the jab administered to the public. “It is June 2, 2026. By the time you read these lines, I will have left this world,” Cotton wrote.

“For those who do not know me, my name is Christine Cotton. I am what is known as a whistleblower.”

Cotton’s post went on to explain that she’d made disturbing findings since investigating the jab starting in 2020, leading her to believe the entire vaccine scheme was based on sham science and studies.

“My conclusions are catastrophic, beyond the invalidity of the results due to errors or even manifest frauds,” Cotton wrote. “The Pfizer vaccine that the population received, that you may have received, is not the one from the clinical trial with the 95% efficacy announced by all the politicians, journalists, and TV doctors. You were administered a product for which there were absolutely no results, neither of efficacy nor of tolerance.“ “This message is not intended to create sensationalism on social networks but to inform you of one of the biggest manipulations that humanity has ever known.”

Cotton noted she became severely afflicted with a debilitating illness “at the very moment I filed a complaint against the health authorities,” and that she had attempted various therapies and remedies to no avail.

“For over a year, I have been suffering from excruciating pain starting from the lower back down to my legs, burning sensations in the skin, mainly in the legs and back,” she wrote, adding, “I am at the end of what I can bear.”

Cotton’s conclusion (Chapter 16, page 315) in her latest report established the fundamental flaws in Pfizer’s clinical data, including overestimating efficacy and underestimating the vaccine’s harmful effects, limited to no proof of claims that it actually protected individuals, underreporting of deaths and adverse events, and a failure to establish a risk-benefit analysis for low-risk groups, prompting her to recommend the jabs be withdrawn from the market.

“In light of all these factors, as a biostatistician, former director of a contract research organization specializing in clinical trial data management since 1995, and former quality assurance officer of my company, I not only confirm my conclusions from January 2022 but also call for the withdrawal of all COVID-19 vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech,” she wrote, adding that “Continuing to use the vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech, including the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine COMIRNATY… and other bivalent vaccines in real-world settings presents a significant risk to people’s lives.“

Finish reading: https://x.com/toobaffled/status/2062836111635107962?s=20