In 2017 The German Federal Supreme Court ruled “Viruses Do Not Cause Diseases and Vaccines are Not Effective.”

Dr Stefan Lanka

Even up to this day, there is still no scientific evidence that vaccines are effective against the so-called “viruses”. The reason why this claim has no solid scientific basis is that there is no proof that these biological agents what they call “viruses” cause diseases in the first place.

In 2001, a German molecular biologist Dr Stefan Lanka and his colleague, Karl Krafeld, wrote a book entitled “Impfen – Völkermord im dritten Jahrtausend?” (Vaccination – Genocide in the third millennium?) in which they claim that this is the case.

Microbiologist and virologist, Dr Stefan Lanka, offered a $100,000 (Euro) reward for anyone who could prove that a measles virus exists.

He was taken to court by those wanting to claim the reward. A lower court ruled against Dr Lanka so he appealed to a higher court, the German Federal Supreme Court.

The higher court appointed five experts to help review the evidence – the scientific studies. These five experts, one named Prof. Dr. Andreas Podbielski, “consistently found that none of the six publications which were introduced to the trial contains scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus.”

This was confirmed independently by two recognized German laboratories, including the world’s largest and leading genetic institute, proving that “the authors of the six publications in the measles virus case were wrong, and as a direct result all measles virologists are still wrong today”.

In 2017 after reviewing the evidence and hearing the testimony of the expert witnesses the German Federal Supreme Court made a final decision agreeing that there wasn’t enough evidence to support that the “measles virus” existed.

During the “measles virus trial”, the head of the National Reference Institute for Measles at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Dr. Annette Mankertz, admitted an important fact that “may explain the increased rate of vaccination-induced disabilities, namely of vaccination against measles, and why and how specifically this kind of vaccination seems to increasingly trigger autism”.

COVID Whistleblowers Expose Narrative As ‘Total Fraud’

COVID Whistleblowers Expose Narrative As 'Total Fraud'

(Tom: I saw this post from Ron Paul on Parler and went to watch the video but it had been removed for violating YouTube’s terms of service. Obviously whistle blowers spilling the beans on the COVID narrative lies are not deemed to be in the best intersts of… …someone. So I found it on BitChute for you.)

Two insiders have recently emerged to give a shocking view behind the scenes of the ongoing Covid narrative. A former chief science officer at pharma giant Pfizer and a former official at the CDC have both come forward with shocking tales of fraud and falsification.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/7NQZK3b4Ezhe/

Befriend Your Sheriff

To my US mates,

Today I received this

Dear Tom —

Did you know that your county sheriff can be your biggest health freedom ally?

Every sheriff takes an oath to uphold the constitution when they’re sworn into office. Yet less than 10 percent of sheriffs nationwide are considered constitutional sheriffs, meaning a sheriff that puts individual liberty — and protecting and serving the people — above the crisis of the day.

How do you know if your county sheriff is a constitutional sheriff, and what’s the best way to forge a relationship with him or her? Stand for Health Freedom recently sat down with Richard Mack, founder of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA), to discuss just that. Please check out our new video with Sheriff Mack on how to talk to your sheriff about health freedom. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPQjzU6uVs4

Engage Your Sheriffs, Peace Officers and Public Servants

On September 30, the CSPOA is holding a special one-day training event in Lynchburg, Virginia. Sheriff Mack, constitutional attorney Michael Peroutka and others will address a wide range of topics, from the powers and duties of sheriffs, to COVID-19 orders. Please help us spread the word about this important and timely event, which is free to attend!

Here’s how you can help:

1) Call your sheriff and encourage them to join their peers at the September 30 constitutional training seminar. Information on the event and how to register is available here. https://cspoa.org/training-seminar-sept-30-in-va/

2) Check our new sheriffs campaign here: https://standforhealthfreedom.com/action/do-you-have-a-constitutional-county-sheriff/, which highlights the importance of being represented by a constitutional sheriff and the role they play in defending health freedom. We also provide a sample email that you can send to invite your sheriff to the special training event.

3) Remember to watch SHF’s video interview on how sheriffs can help you exercise your constitutional rights. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPQjzU6uVs4

As always, we are grateful for your advocacy and everything you do to stand for health freedom.

In solidarity,

Leah and the Stand for Health Freedom Team

Cancel Netflix

Cancel Netflix

If you have a Netflix subscription, before you cancel it, watch the documentary, The Social Dilemma. Got half way through it last night and found it rivetting!

Human Rights Video #7: We Are Equal Before The Law

One of my principle concerns with the current scene is the rapidly escalating speed with which human rights are being trampled. The lack of peace in certain regions is proof positive that these principles are actually valid and needed, more than ever.

This trend needs to be reversed. The entrance point is educating people that they do have rights. Hence this post and the request you share these posts so more people are aware of and insist upon their rights so that we can live in a peaceful society.

Watch the video and if you think so too, please share it!

Do you know it is a fundamental right of yours to have your own opinion? You would not think so from the way some people (including the government) try to belittle you for disagreeing with them but it is.